TheBrooklynKidd wrote:
I strongly disagree I think Carroll is garbage and Anderson is one of the best stretch bigs in the league. Carroll doesn't contribute to the offense outside of 3s, rebound or defend well anymore either. And Carroll doesn't even shoot anywhere near 40% from 3. There really is no basis for current Demarre Carroll being better than current Ryan Anderson. I also strongly disagree that Carroll is a better fit.
Current Ryan Anderson is arguably the worst defensive player in the NBA. He is bargani level bad on defense. Carroll shot 39% from three 2 of the last three years and 34% in his worst season coming off injury. He is also a better rebounder then anderson, better defender, better passer, better off the dribble, better in transition. there is literally nothing anderson does better other then shoot threes, where he is marginally better.
the whole point of a stretch big is that they can shoot and give you things a big can do.. anderson doesnt do that with his horrid defense and no rebounding
I understand the worries about Andersons contract, however if we give up Carroll and Nicholson like in the deal I suggested then his contract will only be 12 mill more in total, which a Houston 1st totally makes up for especially if Hartenstein is added as well.
But we can agree to disagree.
i dont think its even remotely close. anderson is one of the 5 worst contracts in the league. carroll is barely bad, and becomes an expiring after 1 season. nicholson is bad but low salary at 6 million.
andersons is 20 million and 3 years. some late first and a low pick prospect doesnt close that gap.
if the knicks pick top 3 protected isnt invovled its not close






















