ImageImageImageImageImage

Otto Porter Part 2

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,377
And1: 6,753
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1801 » by TGW » Wed Jul 19, 2017 1:02 pm

Dat2U wrote:
Don't forget, It's all Brooks' fault and Wall is a lazy bum. Oh and we'll be fine if we played Sato, Mac & McCullough more.


I honestly don't get why y'all bother even entertaining the troll.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,772
And1: 9,179
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1802 » by payitforward » Wed Jul 19, 2017 1:12 pm

Kanyewest wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
Nope. I like Oubre, probably more than most, but he hasnt earned the right to start over Morris at this point. I think that lineup is a great tool to use, but it depends on the matchup at the PF spot and if Oubre is playing well


Not pretending to know the answer to this, but did Draymond prove himself over all star David Lee? We wanna get our core guys out there as much as possible. Keef can still play a big Patrick Patterson type of rotational player role. He's a good player.

In the 2014-15 season. Of course,it took a David Lee injury to start the season to put Draymond in the starting lineup and Green had started a few postseason games IIRC after Jermaine O'Neal and Andrew Bogut left the series with injuries.

Draymond played almost 1800 minutes his second year, 2013-14. Lee played only about 500 more minutes than Green. Draymond was already the better player overall that year.

In 2014-15, Lee played in only 49 games & averaged under 19 minutes/game. Draymond played in 79 games & averaged over 30 minutes a game.

Not sure what this has to do w/ Oubre-Porter over Porter-Morris, however. Of course I'd use Nat's starting 5 over the default last year! Markieff Morris is not a good player. He's a bad player. He didn't have a good year last year. He had a bad year.

Morris scores more or less at the rate of an average NBA PF (1 point more per 40 minutes) & more or less at the efficiency of an average NBA big (TS% 1/2 percent lower than average). I don't mean an average starter -- I mean the average of all the guys who play PF in the league.

If you look at his blocks, steals, fouls, turnovers & assists, once again overall he's just about average (a little below overall) among all NBA bigs: again, not starters -- just the general run of guys at the 4.

Then there's rebounding: Markieff gets about 80% the number of rebounds of an average NBA big. Once again, not 80% of what an average starting 4 gets. If you compare him to the average guy playing any minutes at all at the 4 in the NBA, while that guy gets 5 rebounds, Markieff Morris gets 4. Moreover, he's worse on offensive boards than defensive boards.

Factor that bad rebounding in to his productivity, and Markieff is one of the really bad players at his position (at any position) in the league. IOW, it seems altogether likely that we'd be better off with Porter starting at the 4 & Oubre at the 3.

Now, keep in mind that Oubre already played 1600+ minutes last year, so we couldn't simply phase out all Morris's minutes. But if we got him down to 1000 minutes, it seems pretty likely we'd be a better team.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,772
And1: 9,179
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1803 » by payitforward » Wed Jul 19, 2017 1:15 pm

TGW wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Don't forget, It's all Brooks' fault and Wall is a lazy bum. Oh and we'll be fine if we played Sato, Mac & McCullough more.

I honestly don't get why y'all bother even entertaining the troll.

There's a difference between being wrong a lot of the time & being a troll. Nat's an enthusiastic fan who is wrong a lot of the time. But, he's not a troll.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,821
And1: 7,946
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1804 » by montestewart » Wed Jul 19, 2017 1:55 pm

payitforward wrote:
TGW wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Don't forget, It's all Brooks' fault and Wall is a lazy bum. Oh and we'll be fine if we played Sato, Mac & McCullough more.

I honestly don't get why y'all bother even entertaining the troll.

There's a difference between being wrong a lot of the time & being a troll. Nat's an enthusiastic fan who is wrong a lot of the time. But, he's not a troll.

Yeah, he's talked enough trash about EGgo to distinguish himself from millie. What appears agenda driven to some may just be highly opinionated.

I try to avoid the Brooks=dumb/Wall=lazy vortex, but he's got a little Ace Degenerate in him. This will be a long offseason. We can use some entertainment around here.
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,377
And1: 6,753
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1805 » by TGW » Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:42 pm

payitforward wrote:
TGW wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Don't forget, It's all Brooks' fault and Wall is a lazy bum. Oh and we'll be fine if we played Sato, Mac & McCullough more.

I honestly don't get why y'all bother even entertaining the troll.

There's a difference between being wrong a lot of the time & being a troll. Nat's an enthusiastic fan who is wrong a lot of the time. But, he's not a troll.


When you're in a John Wall appreciation thread, bashing the guy who almost single-handedly got you somewhere, all the while praising the bench scrubs...you sir, are a troll. Just calling it the way I see it.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Illmatic12
RealGM
Posts: 10,161
And1: 8,459
Joined: Dec 20, 2013
 

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1806 » by Illmatic12 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:20 pm

TGW wrote:
payitforward wrote:
TGW wrote:I honestly don't get why y'all bother even entertaining the troll.

There's a difference between being wrong a lot of the time & being a troll. Nat's an enthusiastic fan who is wrong a lot of the time. But, he's not a troll.


When you're in a John Wall appreciation thread, bashing the guy who almost single-handedly got you somewhere, all the while praising the bench scrubs...you sir, are a troll. Just calling it the way I see it.

Nat P? He is a borderline troll. Reason why he got banned on BF iirc

And many of his non-basketball related opinions belong on r/the_donald..
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,328
And1: 7,430
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1807 » by FAH1223 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:53 pm

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter
Image
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,821
And1: 7,946
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1808 » by montestewart » Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:11 pm

NatP4 wrote:Illmatic back spreading lies, tell us more about how we should trade Otto and Oubre for Rudy Gay, monte back being the worst mod in the history of fan boards, TGW back contributing absolutely nothing to anything per usual.

I'm embarrassed for you guys, stop ruining the Otto Porter thread. Go blow each other in the politics thread

Wow, it really IS Ace Degenerate!
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,837
And1: 3,566
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1809 » by Rafael122 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:33 pm

David Falk looks like Jeffrey Tambor.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1810 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 5:03 pm

If the wizards start Otto at power forward this year, he will be an all star.

Read on Twitter


Ted laying out the plan, Otto is the PF of the future. Easy baby step for Scott Brooks: play the 18th ranked player in RPM more minutes
Illmatic12
RealGM
Posts: 10,161
And1: 8,459
Joined: Dec 20, 2013
 

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1811 » by Illmatic12 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 5:33 pm

Rafael122 wrote:David Falk looks like Jeffrey Tambor.

Nah.. looks like his twin brother Oscar
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,048
And1: 20,526
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1812 » by dckingsfan » Wed Jul 19, 2017 5:55 pm

Ted + Plan = Oxymoron :)
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,157
And1: 5,006
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1813 » by DCZards » Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:50 pm

NatP4 wrote:Illmatic back spreading lies, tell us more about how we should trade Otto and Oubre for Rudy Gay, monte back being the worst mod in the history of fan boards, TGW back contributing absolutely nothing to anything per usual.

I'm embarrassed for you guys, stop ruining the Otto Porter thread. Go blow each other in the politics thread


Damn, Nat, guy labels you a troll (rightfully or wrongfully) and you essentially confirm it with a simple-minded post like this one.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1814 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:01 pm

DCZards wrote:
NatP4 wrote:Illmatic back spreading lies, tell us more about how we should trade Otto and Oubre for Rudy Gay, monte back being the worst mod in the history of fan boards, TGW back contributing absolutely nothing to anything per usual.

I'm embarrassed for you guys, stop ruining the Otto Porter thread. Go blow each other in the politics thread


Damn, Nat, guy labels you a troll (rightfully or wrongfully) and you essentially confirm it with a simple-minded post like this one.


its like the 5th time he's called me a troll based on the bulletsforever thing(even though he has no clue why I got banned)

Honestly never seen TGW post anything relevant to the wizards. Like honestly, I can't recall one instance.

Just look at this thread, I was simply posting about the team and my opinion, Dat jumps in insulting me, TGW/Monte/Illmatic jump in per usual. It gets old, and frustrating.
deneem4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 1,263
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1815 » by deneem4 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:20 pm

NatP4 wrote:If the wizards start Otto at power forward this year, he will be an all star.

Read on Twitter


Ted laying out the plan, Otto is the PF of the future. Easy baby step for Scott Brooks: play the 18th ranked player in RPM more minutes


Start oubre at sf
And Morris at center...

Let gortat rebound all the bench misses...
Pay your beals....or its lights out!!!
Bron, Bosh, Wade is like Mike, Hakeem, barkley...3 top 5 picks from same draft
mike, hakeem and Barkley on the same team!!!!
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,451
And1: 2,770
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1816 » by Kanyewest » Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:23 pm

payitforward wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
Not pretending to know the answer to this, but did Draymond prove himself over all star David Lee? We wanna get our core guys out there as much as possible. Keef can still play a big Patrick Patterson type of rotational player role. He's a good player.

In the 2014-15 season. Of course,it took a David Lee injury to start the season to put Draymond in the starting lineup and Green had started a few postseason games IIRC after Jermaine O'Neal and Andrew Bogut left the series with injuries.

Draymond played almost 1800 minutes his second year, 2013-14. Lee played only about 500 more minutes than Green. Draymond was already the better player overall that year.

In 2014-15, Lee played in only 49 games & averaged under 19 minutes/game. Draymond played in 79 games & averaged over 30 minutes a game.

Not sure what this has to do w/ Oubre-Porter over Porter-Morris, however. Of course I'd use Nat's starting 5 over the default last year! Markieff Morris is not a good player. He's a bad player. He didn't have a good year last year. He had a bad year.

Morris scores more or less at the rate of an average NBA PF (1 point more per 40 minutes) & more or less at the efficiency of an average NBA big (TS% 1/2 percent lower than average). I don't mean an average starter -- I mean the average of all the guys who play PF in the league.

If you look at his blocks, steals, fouls, turnovers & assists, once again overall he's just about average (a little below overall) among all NBA bigs: again, not starters -- just the general run of guys at the 4.

Then there's rebounding: Markieff gets about 80% the number of rebounds of an average NBA big. Once again, not 80% of what an average starting 4 gets. If you compare him to the average guy playing any minutes at all at the 4 in the NBA, while that guy gets 5 rebounds, Markieff Morris gets 4. Moreover, he's worse on offensive boards than defensive boards.

Factor that bad rebounding in to his productivity, and Markieff is one of the really bad players at his position (at any position) in the league. IOW, it seems altogether likely that we'd be better off with Porter starting at the 4 & Oubre at the 3.

Now, keep in mind that Oubre already played 1600+ minutes last year, so we couldn't simply phase out all Morris's minutes. But if we got him down to 1000 minutes, it seems pretty likely we'd be a better team.


Yeah, I also believe Green was better than David Lee in 2013-14 although the Warriors only played Green 21 mpg and Lee 32 mpg. I would still say it wasn't apparent to the coaching staff given that Lee started over Green in their postseason matchup against the Clipper and Green only started because of season ending injuries to the other centers on the rosters. Also, Steve Kerr admits that Lee was going to be a starter going into the 2014-15 until Lee got injured and the Warriors went on an incredible run to start the season.

But yeah, Green was the better player especially since Lee's defense was beyond awful and Green was a solid defensive player. The big reason that Lee played over Green probably had to do with the fact that Golden State's front office had handed Lee a giant contract.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1817 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:37 pm

deneem4 wrote:
NatP4 wrote:If the wizards start Otto at power forward this year, he will be an all star.

Read on Twitter


Ted laying out the plan, Otto is the PF of the future. Easy baby step for Scott Brooks: play the 18th ranked player in RPM more minutes


Start oubre at sf
And Morris at center...

Let gortat rebound all the bench misses...


No way, Gortat is a huge key to our offense, setting good screens and rolling opens up our entire offense, protecting the rim and rebounding better than Morris ever could. The best case scenario for our offseason would've been just to sign or draft another wing player that's a good leader imo. Maybe that's why they went after Batum last offseason

Wall Sato
Beal Mac
Oubre (need this player)
Porter Keef
Gortat Mahinmi
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1818 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:45 pm

Like I said the day we drafted Oubre, the day the wizards unleash Porter as the fulltime 4, is the day they make the big jump like the non Durant warriors. Otto can be as good as Draymond even though they have slightly different strengths.

Benefits wall on his switches with literally everyone on defense, having Kelly and Otto to defend guards, gives him more spacing to drive and kick.

Benefits Beal, for the exact same reason

Benefits Oubre obviously giving him starters minutes (with the starters, doesn't have to create his shot)

Benefits Porter, playing his natural position and where he is best, allows him to get more shots because he can screen and get open. Allows him to cut more freely and still have a spaced out offense. Hides his lateral quickness weakness moreso, allows his defense to be a huge strength.

Gortat, spaces the floor for his pick and roll, gives him a frontcourt partner with a brain, much better help defender. Less stupid ass ISOs for Morris that piss him off.

Would improve our 3pt defense obviously, our rebounding, our floor spacing, our switchability, our athletic ability in transition.

Someone tell me what we lose?
deneem4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 1,263
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1819 » by deneem4 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 9:19 pm

NatP4 wrote:
deneem4 wrote:
NatP4 wrote:If the wizards start Otto at power forward this year, he will be an all star.

Read on Twitter


Ted laying out the plan, Otto is the PF of the future. Easy baby step for Scott Brooks: play the 18th ranked player in RPM more minutes


Start oubre at sf
And Morris at center...

Let gortat rebound all the bench misses...


No way, Gortat is a huge key to our offense, setting good screens and rolling opens up our entire offense, protecting the rim and rebounding better than Morris ever could. The best case scenario for our offseason would've been just to sign or draft another wing player that's a good leader imo. Maybe that's why they went after Batum last offseason

Wall Sato
Beal Mac
Oubre (need this player)
Porter Keef
Gortat Mahinmi


What rim does gortat protect???
He set good screens and rolls well but he's not a good finisher if it isn't an open lane...
He rebounds because he can't guard no thing outside the paint so he stays there

If we're going to be like golden state then we need more off ball screens from wings and a big that can pass from the high key...
Pay your beals....or its lights out!!!
Bron, Bosh, Wade is like Mike, Hakeem, barkley...3 top 5 picks from same draft
mike, hakeem and Barkley on the same team!!!!
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,772
And1: 9,179
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1820 » by payitforward » Wed Jul 19, 2017 9:29 pm

montestewart wrote:
NatP4 wrote:Illmatic back spreading lies, tell us more about how we should trade Otto and Oubre for Rudy Gay, monte back being the worst mod in the history of fan boards, TGW back contributing absolutely nothing to anything per usual.

I'm embarrassed for you guys, stop ruining the Otto Porter thread. Go blow each other in the politics thread

Wow, it really IS Ace Degenerate!

Hey, Nat -- get some common sense, would you? When someone defends you (as I did), don't come right in & write crap like that.

Return to Washington Wizards