enigmatics wrote:
It's really not that funny to quote fake news sources.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Dupp wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Dupp wrote:Chris Paul would have been great too. All the moves that could have been made aren't ready done. Such a terrible time for all this
Sometimes having an owners with a dickish streak comes in handy. I strongly suspect this might be one of those times. Kyrie isn't going anywhere this season unless there's an issue in N.O. or OKC.
The incompetence of letting the griffin thing go on to the trade deadline and then letting him go while he was in the middle of many trade talks is off the charts. Completely moronic to not have it sorted one way or the other by then.
We could have had a great team. We had good deals for Kyrie and now we won't get anything worthwhile everyone's been traded already.
jpengland wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:WaveTheWheat80 wrote:
Favors/Rubio for Irving would be insane for the Jazz. Would the Cavs think Favors and Rubio is enough?
I doubt it. Favors would be a FA next year. I think Utah would have to throw in a pick at least.
Favors is an ideal fit at 5 for the Cavs, IMO. He protects the rim, runs the PnR, rebounds and can space out to 18 feet. He can play 4 and 5.
Thompson, Favors, Love and LeBron at the 4/5 is fantastic.
Hood would have to be included to give them a scoring threat on the wing IMO.
WaveTheWheat80 wrote:DowJones wrote:Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:A package from Pheonix would work best for the Cavs, in terms of appeasing LeBron somewhat (with Bledsoe) and at the same time, preparing for what seems like his inevitable departure (with other assets coming with Bledsoe).
Kyrie for Bledsoe and Josh Jackson makes sense. Cavs could flip Jackson or just keep him to start a re-build once LeBron leaves.
Bledsoe and smaller parts would never work for Cleveland.
I'd keep Jackson tbh. Bledsoe/Jackson/James/Love/Thompson is a better roster than before imo. 3pt% would be an issue, but a huge upgrade defensively.

DusterBuster wrote:WTF, how is Minnesota a hotspot now for players?
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
Rafael122 wrote:DusterBuster wrote:WTF, how is Minnesota a hotspot now for players?
They're probably a 50 win team. They've got the defense covered, they just need more scoring but like I said, without Rubio it'd be difficult for them to make a move and they just signed Teague.

Birdie wrote:WaveTheWheat80 wrote:DowJones wrote:
Kyrie for Bledsoe and Josh Jackson makes sense. Cavs could flip Jackson or just keep him to start a re-build once LeBron leaves.
Bledsoe and smaller parts would never work for Cleveland.
I'd keep Jackson tbh. Bledsoe/Jackson/James/Love/Thompson is a better roster than before imo. 3pt% would be an issue, but a huge upgrade defensively.
Only package I want from PHO if we're moving Kyrie, Jackson/Chriss/2018 MIA 1st/2018 PHO 1st (Top 8 protected) gets it done for me.
I don't want Bledsoe and another Klutch player, if LBJ is out, better we start selling off pieces and acquiring a cache of picks and youth for the future.

Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
GooniesNeverDie wrote:Rafael122 wrote:
that's a strange list.. there isn't really any theme I can see