TheBrooklynKidd wrote:Paradise wrote:Mkdaman1818 wrote:
IMO the difference is that we're still building a team and not gonna let our team get held hostage by a prima donna. Billy king was weak and let deron dictate everything. The Spurs still attract talent and look to make moves for stars, as long as kyrie or any other star adopts our culture we're fine. If not, trade him out.
You think Kyrie can't pull the same stuff Deron did at the end of his deal? He's going to be a FA in 2019. He's guaranteed to be on a losing squad here based off some of these trade packages being offered on this board. We're basically gutting our team for any package that lands him. That means he will definitely have us on the edge of our seats.
Stay with his hometown team and get paid or sign somewhere else and be an instant contender.
That is the same nonsense that spearheaded 90% of King's dumb decisions.
No thanks. I'll pass on that.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
I agree with some of your points, however there really isn't much of a team here to gut honestly. If we keep LeVert like in my scenario, the team is still better than last years + we add Kyrie Irving. I also don't think it would be a losing squad. Honestly if we put out a lineup of Kyrie/Crabbe/LeVert/RHJ/Mozgov I think we would be a playoff team in the (L)east and easily double our win total from last season.
But I would only do the trade if he's willing to sign an extension otherwise like you said, there's too much risk.
I believe the max extension allowed would be three years, including the present contract, so you'd only be delaying the inevitable by one year if Kyrie were intending to hold the Nets hostage, and that's if Kyrie were willing to agree to the extra year to begin with.




















