Image ImageImage Image

Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional?

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

kodo
RealGM
Posts: 20,941
And1: 15,356
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#41 » by kodo » Sat Jul 29, 2017 5:10 pm

Shooting specialist SGs, which is what Lavine is, generally do not have a high PER especially in their developmental years. Klay didn't break league average until his 4th season, and even now as arguably the best SG in the entire league in his mold, has a 17 PER.

Lavine is not a dynamic on-ball creator doing everything like Harden. He's an off-ball jump shooter, like Klay, with some depth to his game where he can cut backdoor or attack close outs.

Code: Select all

PLAYER   AGE PER   ORTG
LAVINE    21 14.6  112
KLAY T    21 14.9  102
MCCOLLUM  -- ---- ----
BEAL      21 14.0  102


Code: Select all

PLAYER   AGE PER   ORTG
LAVINE    22 ????  ????
KLAY T    22 12.7  102
MCCOLLUM  22  9.0  95
BEAL      22 15.5  103


Code: Select all

PLAYER   AGE PER   ORTG
LAVINE    23 ????  ????
KLAY T    23 14.3  108
MCCOLLUM  23 13.1  103
BEAL      23 20.1  117


Other notable PERs for off-ball SGs,
- Boston championship Ray Allen: 16.4
- Miami championship Ray Allen: 14.7
- 60 win Atlanta Korver: 14.8
- Spurs championship Danny Green: 13.9
- Detroit championship Rip Hamilton: 16.8

PER is essentially a single value that weighs boxscore in different ways, and it probably weighs rebounds far too heavily for the modern game. The 2nd highest PER on the Warriors is, of course, Jevale McGee. Makes total sense, he has the highest rebounding % on the team.

If we wanted Zach to increase his PER, he could easily do that by securing easy rebounds on misses like Rondo or Wade, instead of running out on fast breaks and filling the corner 3, like Klay Thompson.

And we would be a worse team for it.
User avatar
Leslie Forman
RealGM
Posts: 10,119
And1: 6,304
Joined: Apr 21, 2006
Location: 1700 Center Dr, Ames, IA 50011

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#42 » by Leslie Forman » Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:02 pm

LaVine projects, hell he arguably already is, a top-tier shooter. I liken him to Klay offensively, but the likelihood of him improving his defense like Klay has is unlikely. What Klay did on that end is incredibly rare, arguably even more rare than what Jimmy did on offense.

Anyways the problem is that this would be fine if LaVine projected as your second or third-best offensive guy and third or fourth-best overall guy, like Klay on GSW or Ray Allen in Boston. If he is the best guy on your team you're screwed.
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#43 » by TheStig » Sat Jul 29, 2017 7:00 pm

Rerisen wrote:The Gordon comparison itself is surprisingly not that far off on a stats profile. The link is using BG career, if we did a peak season Zach would come off worse (Ben peaked at 18.2 PER), but wouldn't be so fair to Zach's age.

Image

While this is not apparent on the surface since Zach is a lanky dunk champion, and Ben a little sharpshooter, in terms of what they actually do on the floor - mostly score, play bad defense, shoot a lot threes - its not so far off.

Ben was a bit higher volume in his prime, a better 3pt shooter (though volume is quite close) while Zach shoots a better percentage at 2 pointers, and takes a noticeable higher % of his shots at the rim (27% to 16% roughly).

However surprisingly Ben Gordon drew more fouls than Zach LaVine has.

On things like Rebounds, Assists, Steals, and Blocks, they are similarly mundane or anemic across the board.

The optimistic view would be Zach's size and physical talent offers him hope of much higher upside, but 3 years in, he hasn't leveraged these traits much at all.

I think BG is a great comparison. Though the hope for optimism is that Zach was a 3rd option in MN. He'll be a 1st option here. I think you'll see his raw scoring numbers and assists will go up but his efficiency will likely decrease a bit.

I just don't see Zach becoming a great creator or above average defender. He is pretty one dimensional.
User avatar
Flopper
Veteran
Posts: 2,541
And1: 2,505
Joined: Jun 05, 2010
 

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#44 » by Flopper » Sat Jul 29, 2017 7:16 pm

Not sure I'd use the same supporting evidence to make the case, but I agree with the sentiment that he is more of a supporting than a core piece. The worrisome part about the Butler trade is that all of the guys they got in return project out as just rotation players. How many drafts will it take to find a guy worth building around again?
User avatar
BeKuK
RealGM
Posts: 12,920
And1: 835
Joined: Oct 06, 2009
Location: South Germany
     

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#45 » by BeKuK » Sat Jul 29, 2017 7:22 pm

What if his production level would be much higher and this damn injury never happend? Do you guys believe he would be a Bull now? How tall is he 6'5 / 6'6 ? with this athleticism and a high production level......well, he might run a kind of a franchise that way.

I think Rerisen might some pretty good points here and I agree with him.

Use Zach Lavine the right way and allow him to do what he can do the best way....and enjoyyyyy.
Chi
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,137
And1: 2,378
Joined: Jul 03, 2007
Contact:
       

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#46 » by Chi » Sat Jul 29, 2017 8:20 pm

TheSuzerain wrote:
Chi wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:Giving Lavine a big money extension would be very stupid.


Not giving it to him would be even stupider...

The play is to trade him. There are no other good options.


In your world...
Chi
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,137
And1: 2,378
Joined: Jul 03, 2007
Contact:
       

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#47 » by Chi » Sat Jul 29, 2017 8:23 pm

tong po wrote:LaVine projects, hell he arguably already is, a top-tier shooter. I liken him to Klay offensively, but the likelihood of him improving his defense like Klay has is unlikely. What Klay did on that end is incredibly rare, arguably even more rare than what Jimmy did on offense.

Anyways the problem is that this would be fine if LaVine projected as your second or third-best offensive guy and third or fourth-best overall guy, like Klay on GSW or Ray Allen in Boston. If he is the best guy on your team you're screwed.


Didn't work out so bad for Reggie Miller...

Ray Allen either...
waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,339
And1: 1,759
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#48 » by waffle » Sat Jul 29, 2017 8:27 pm

kind of an important dimension....
User avatar
Sinistar6
Starter
Posts: 2,354
And1: 133
Joined: Nov 18, 2003
Location: Chicago
       

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#49 » by Sinistar6 » Sat Jul 29, 2017 8:33 pm

I look at ZL through rose colored glasses but I really do not care about fake stats. When you watch him you see a phenom on the offensive side of the ball. Drives, dunks, handles, trey ball, create own shot, create shot for others. He is atheletically gifted on a generation type level and has the ball skills also. Sure there are going to be slumps and hard times as he recovers and learns his way but his upside is phenom.
Next time the cult's spaceship lands we'll all be wearing black Starburys.

-mcwelk
User avatar
Leslie Forman
RealGM
Posts: 10,119
And1: 6,304
Joined: Apr 21, 2006
Location: 1700 Center Dr, Ames, IA 50011

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#50 » by Leslie Forman » Sat Jul 29, 2017 8:46 pm

Chi wrote:
tong po wrote:LaVine projects, hell he arguably already is, a top-tier shooter. I liken him to Klay offensively, but the likelihood of him improving his defense like Klay has is unlikely. What Klay did on that end is incredibly rare, arguably even more rare than what Jimmy did on offense.

Anyways the problem is that this would be fine if LaVine projected as your second or third-best offensive guy and third or fourth-best overall guy, like Klay on GSW or Ray Allen in Boston. If he is the best guy on your team you're screwed.


Didn't work out so bad for Reggie Miller...

Ray Allen either...

I'm not sure what your point is because even though those guys were actually quite a bit better than what LaVine even projects to be, they never won a title as the #1 guy. And that was during the offensively inept '90s-early '00s, a time that is pretty irrelevant now where every good team moves and shoots at a high level.

Much like how Ray needed Pierce, Reggie needed Jalen Rose, and Allen Houston needed Latrell Sprewell, I think you actually need another wing that's more dynamic and all-around skilled to pair with him.

Like Jimmy Butler, one could say.
Hangtime84
RealGM
Posts: 20,988
And1: 4,724
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Rogers Park
     

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#51 » by Hangtime84 » Sat Jul 29, 2017 9:22 pm

tong po wrote:
Chi wrote:
tong po wrote:LaVine projects, hell he arguably already is, a top-tier shooter. I liken him to Klay offensively, but the likelihood of him improving his defense like Klay has is unlikely. What Klay did on that end is incredibly rare, arguably even more rare than what Jimmy did on offense.

Anyways the problem is that this would be fine if LaVine projected as your second or third-best offensive guy and third or fourth-best overall guy, like Klay on GSW or Ray Allen in Boston. If he is the best guy on your team you're screwed.


Didn't work out so bad for Reggie Miller...

Ray Allen either...

I'm not sure what your point is because even though those guys were actually quite a bit better than what LaVine even projects to be, they never won a title as the #1 guy. And that was during the offensively inept '90s-early '00s, a time that is pretty irrelevant now where every good team moves and shoots at a high level.

Much like how Ray needed Pierce, Reggie needed Jalen Rose, and Allen Houston needed Latrell Sprewell, I think you actually need another wing that's more dynamic and all-around skilled to pair with him.

Like Jimmy Butler, one could say.


You need multiple good players at the same time.

Let's hope he can still improve
Jcool0 wrote:
aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?


If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.


NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
User avatar
Dominator83
RealGM
Posts: 21,111
And1: 32,371
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: NBA Hell

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#52 » by Dominator83 » Sat Jul 29, 2017 9:40 pm

Question: does anybody know if there's anywhere that I can physically buy a Lavine Jersey yet? I would rather get it at a store than online. Especially now with Nike since they're sizes are normally stingier than Adidas
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..

For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
Chi
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,137
And1: 2,378
Joined: Jul 03, 2007
Contact:
       

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#53 » by Chi » Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:11 pm

tong po wrote:
Chi wrote:
tong po wrote:LaVine projects, hell he arguably already is, a top-tier shooter. I liken him to Klay offensively, but the likelihood of him improving his defense like Klay has is unlikely. What Klay did on that end is incredibly rare, arguably even more rare than what Jimmy did on offense.

Anyways the problem is that this would be fine if LaVine projected as your second or third-best offensive guy and third or fourth-best overall guy, like Klay on GSW or Ray Allen in Boston. If he is the best guy on your team you're screwed.


Didn't work out so bad for Reggie Miller...

Ray Allen either...

I'm not sure what your point is because even though those guys were actually quite a bit better than what LaVine even projects to be, they never won a title as the #1 guy. And that was during the offensively inept '90s-early '00s, a time that is pretty irrelevant now where every good team moves and shoots at a high level.

Much like how Ray needed Pierce, Reggie needed Jalen Rose, and Allen Houston needed Latrell Sprewell, I think you actually need another wing that's more dynamic and all-around skilled to pair with him.

Like Jimmy Butler, one could say.


Jordan Needed Pippen... Kobe needed Shaq... etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

We're not screwed is the point...
User avatar
RedBulls23
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,338
And1: 21,318
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#54 » by RedBulls23 » Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:15 pm

Dominater wrote:Question: does anybody know if there's anywhere that I can physically buy a Lavine Jersey yet? I would rather get it at a store than online. Especially now with Nike since they're sizes are normally stingier than Adidas

Go to a store, try a size of any jersey on, and then order one online from the bulls website.

Just an idea.
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,128
And1: 11,813
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#55 » by WindyCityBorn » Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:29 pm

What I don't understand is why the discussion is revolving around Zack being our best player? He is our best player right now while we are tanking. With the high picks we are about to start collecting we will hopefully draft someone that projects as a true franchise player. I personally think he can be top 3 player on a championship team and put up 24ppg or better. Regardless I don't understand worry in the discussion on his merits as our best player as if we have no way to improve the roster significantly going forward. We are going to be collecting top 5 picks for a few years at least.
bearadonisdna
RealGM
Posts: 19,757
And1: 5,394
Joined: Jul 07, 2012

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#56 » by bearadonisdna » Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:43 pm

Yeah i think of kevin martin.
But i think if he wouldnt have injured his acl.
Hypothetically if he wasnt injured his progression has been ideal.
I think most of us wouldnt have complaints. A 22 yr old player with dunk championships and averaging about 19 ppg.
His career arc was heading towards????? Superstardom? Max player?
User avatar
BR0D1E86
RealGM
Posts: 17,759
And1: 2,292
Joined: Jul 18, 2002
       

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#57 » by BR0D1E86 » Sat Jul 29, 2017 11:13 pm

bearadonisdna wrote:Yeah i think of kevin martin.
But i think if he wouldnt have injured his acl.
Hypothetically if he wasnt injured his progression has been ideal.
I think most of us wouldnt have complaints. A 22 yr old player with dunk championships and averaging about 19 ppg.
His career arc was heading towards????? Superstardom? Max player?

Superstardom is extreme. His upside is probably the #2 scorer on a contending team. More likely is probably a real high end third option. He's got a real high ceiling as a scorer. He very much needs to round out the rest of his game. I hope he does, he's got skills and athleticism.
User avatar
Dominator83
RealGM
Posts: 21,111
And1: 32,371
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: NBA Hell

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#58 » by Dominator83 » Sat Jul 29, 2017 11:13 pm

RedBulls23 wrote:
Dominater wrote:Question: does anybody know if there's anywhere that I can physically buy a Lavine Jersey yet? I would rather get it at a store than online. Especially now with Nike since they're sizes are normally stingier than Adidas

Go to a store, try a size of any jersey on, and then order one online from the bulls website.

Just an idea.

Not really. Because it would have to be a new Nike Jersey Im trying on. And I'm guessing that if they're out ( or when they come out), Lavine will be the main Bulls Jersey being sold locally
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..

For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
User avatar
RedBulls23
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,338
And1: 21,318
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#59 » by RedBulls23 » Sat Jul 29, 2017 11:17 pm

Dominater wrote:
RedBulls23 wrote:
Dominater wrote:Question: does anybody know if there's anywhere that I can physically buy a Lavine Jersey yet? I would rather get it at a store than online. Especially now with Nike since they're sizes are normally stingier than Adidas

Go to a store, try a size of any jersey on, and then order one online from the bulls website.

Just an idea.

Not really. Because it would have to be a new Nike Jersey Im trying on. And I'm guessing that if they're out ( or when they come out), Lavine will be the main Bulls Jersey being sold locally

Well that's what I meant. Try any nba nike jersey on. I wasn't aware they aren't in stores yet.
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,128
And1: 11,813
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Is Zach Lavine too one dimensional? 

Post#60 » by WindyCityBorn » Sat Jul 29, 2017 11:39 pm

BR0D1E86 wrote:
bearadonisdna wrote:Yeah i think of kevin martin.
But i think if he wouldnt have injured his acl.
Hypothetically if he wasnt injured his progression has been ideal.
I think most of us wouldnt have complaints. A 22 yr old player with dunk championships and averaging about 19 ppg.
His career arc was heading towards????? Superstardom? Max player?

Superstardom is extreme. His upside is probably the #2 scorer on a contending team. More likely is probably a real high end third option. He's got a real high ceiling as a scorer. He very much needs to round out the rest of his game. I hope he does, he's got skills and athleticism.


I think he will be an all-star. I also think he could round out his stats more as well. His assists should go up as he get the ball more than he did in Minnesota. Not sure about the rebounding and defense. His frame is still very slight. I think he needs to add about 10lbs or so to get more physical.

Return to Chicago Bulls