ImageImageImage

Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,137
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#101 » by bwgood77 » Sat Jul 29, 2017 4:41 am

gino_giode wrote:
phraoh wrote:Phoenix and Cavs are best trade partners in my opinion...even without Jackson, but Phoenix will have to give up one of their young PF's...and 1 or 2 picks. A Bledsoe, Dudley, Chriss, and a protected 1st for Kyrie and Shumpert would seem to work.


Depends to me if James Jones feels like Kyrie could lead the team as well. He's been a teammate to both Kyrie and Bron, but has been a Bron follower for the past 7 years. As one of the older guys, he also sees more eye to eye with Bron and they probably confide in each other how frustrating Kyrie is sometimes. If James Jones doesn't actually believe Kyrie is a leader and he trades anyways, James won't bother to build around him and Kyrie is out the door in 2 years.

And remember they're in the West, so Jones will need a couple other pieces to make this team a contender for the 8th seed. Will Jones mortgage out the rebuilding phase and move young pieces to build around Kyrie to win now?

Kyrie is pulling a LeBron power move where he put out a list and teams know that. Maybe those teams try harder for Kyrie now since they know he's likely to stay. But if they don't, they just have to make cap room in 2 years and enter the Kyrie sweepstakes.

If Jones does trade for Kyrie, I think it would be career suicide. Too much uncertainty IMO.


Agreed.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#102 » by thamadkant » Sat Jul 29, 2017 9:31 am

James Jones is Assistant Vice President of Basketball Operations right?

It means he still sits next to McD and only offers advice here and there, McD makes the call.
User avatar
8on
RealGM
Posts: 10,547
And1: 3,197
Joined: Nov 07, 2015
Location: Palookaville, ND
   

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#103 » by 8on » Sat Jul 29, 2017 4:42 pm

1UPZ wrote:James Jones is Assistant Vice President of Basketball Operations right?

It means he still sits next to McD and only offers advice here and there, McD makes the call.


Vice President of Basketball Operations, technically.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,137
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#104 » by bwgood77 » Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:24 pm

1UPZ wrote:James Jones is Assistant Vice President of Basketball Operations right?

It means he still sits next to McD and only offers advice here and there, McD makes the call.

Oh yeah, it's all McD working the deals and stuff..though Sarver seems to like to be involved. James may have some sort of voice and opinions on the matter which should be considered, but it should be up to McD.
User avatar
darealjuice
Suns Forum Future All Star
Posts: 6,694
And1: 8,900
Joined: Apr 22, 2016
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#105 » by darealjuice » Sat Jul 29, 2017 9:56 pm

I think some of the team scoring stat knocks on Kyrie are a bit misleading. It shouldn't surprise anyone that replacing the best player in the world with Richard Jefferson is going to lead to a big drop off, especially when half those minutes were without Kevin Love as well. There's no question that the eye test shows he's a great scorer and one of the best isolation players in the league, and dude was still an All Star before LeBron came back to Cleveland.

For me it really depends what we're giving up and what contracts we're taking. If we can bring him in while keeping Booker, JJ, Quese, Bender, and next year's pick, then I think we should do it. That team could give Kyrie a serious reason to stay in 2 years if things go right. I'd give some thought to Chriss or Bender, but not both. I'd put both Miami picks on the table. TJ pretty much has to be on the table as much as I like him; I just don't see any way they only take Bledsoe and picks unless the picks are ours. I don't think Ulis would get moved, I don't think Reed or DJJ would be of enough value to the Cavs, and I doubt that they think of any of our veterans highly as trade pieces. I think the Bledsoe + Warren + Miami Picks we've seen floated around here is a decent offer that I'd be okay with, but I don't know how highly teams think of TJ. I'm not crazy about offering too much more than that though.

Irving and Booker would be a terror for defenses right away. Both of them can score in any way from all 3 levels, both need constant attention with their shooting ability, and both have good vision with the ball. He's younger than Bledsoe and is already as good as or better than Bledsoe at everything he does well on offense, and Bledsoe wasn't the defender his reputation suggests last year despite being a better defender than Kyrie. JJ and Bender should bring enough high IQ/secondary playmaking to make up for not having a pure PG, Chriss at the worst will be a good transition rim runner and pick and roll/pop guy for Booker and Kyrie to run with, and Ulis is exactly the kind of PG we want running the second unit. Defense would suffer a bit, but I think we'd eventually make up for it with JJ and Bender getting more playing time as they develop. I think it's a good chance to get a young blue chip piece, especially when the price of stars appears to be at a low point.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,137
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#106 » by bwgood77 » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:08 am

darealjuice wrote:I think some of the team scoring stat knocks on Kyrie are a bit misleading. It shouldn't surprise anyone that replacing the best player in the world with Richard Jefferson is going to lead to a big drop off, especially when half those minutes were without Kevin Love as well. There's no question that the eye test shows he's a great scorer and one of the best isolation players in the league, and dude was still an All Star before LeBron came back to Cleveland.

For me it really depends what we're giving up and what contracts we're taking. If we can bring him in while keeping Booker, JJ, Quese, Bender, and next year's pick, then I think we should do it. That team could give Kyrie a serious reason to stay in 2 years if things go right. I'd give some thought to Chriss or Bender, but not both. I'd put both Miami picks on the table. TJ pretty much has to be on the table as much as I like him; I just don't see any way they only take Bledsoe and picks unless the picks are ours. I don't think Ulis would get moved, I don't think Reed or DJJ would be of enough value to the Cavs, and I doubt that they think of any of our veterans highly as trade pieces. I think the Bledsoe + Warren + Miami Picks we've seen floated around here is a decent offer that I'd be okay with, but I don't know how highly teams think of TJ. I'm not crazy about offering too much more than that though.

Irving and Booker would be a terror for defenses right away. Both of them can score in any way from all 3 levels, both need constant attention with their shooting ability, and both have good vision with the ball. He's younger than Bledsoe and is already as good as or better than Bledsoe at everything he does well on offense, and Bledsoe wasn't the defender his reputation suggests last year despite being a better defender than Kyrie. JJ and Bender should bring enough high IQ/secondary playmaking to make up for not having a pure PG, Chriss at the worst will be a good transition rim runner and pick and roll/pop guy for Booker and Kyrie to run with, and Ulis is exactly the kind of PG we want running the second unit. Defense would suffer a bit, but I think we'd eventually make up for it with JJ and Bender getting more playing time as they develop. I think it's a good chance to get a young blue chip piece, especially when the price of stars appears to be at a low point.


I agree with all that except I wouldn't want to trade the 21 Heat pick,unless we added protection. I don't mind picks that much if the have at least top 7 protection or so. I'd probably prefer trading picks over any of our players that were lotto picks because we are already rebuilding them. I don't really want to keep hitting reset. I could deal with protected picks because if he left and we sucked we keep them and if we were getting better we wouldn't need them as much. It would be nice to be two deep with young guys at each position and we could be.
User avatar
darealjuice
Suns Forum Future All Star
Posts: 6,694
And1: 8,900
Joined: Apr 22, 2016
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#107 » by darealjuice » Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:20 am

bwgood77 wrote:I agree with all that except I wouldn't want to trade the 21 Heat pick,unless we added protection. I don't mind picks that much if the have at least top 7 protection or so. I'd probably prefer trading picks over any of our players that were lotto picks because we are already rebuilding them. I don't really want to keep hitting reset. I could deal with protected picks because if he left and we sucked we keep them and if we were getting better we wouldn't need them as much. It would be nice to be two deep with young guys at each position and we could be.


I definitely understand wanting to hold the 21 pick since we have no idea what it's real value is yet and only James Johnson, Kelly Olynyk, Dion Waiters, and Bam Adebayo are (likely to be) under contract for the 2021 season. I just don't think I'd let it or the protections on it be the deal breaker when it comes to bringing in Kyrie, even though I probably wouldn't offer it up right away. I'm pretty sure Bledsoe, TJ, and the 2018 Miami Pick alone is better than anything our competition could/would reasonably offer anyways.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,137
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#108 » by bwgood77 » Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:58 am

darealjuice wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:I agree with all that except I wouldn't want to trade the 21 Heat pick,unless we added protection. I don't mind picks that much if the have at least top 7 protection or so. I'd probably prefer trading picks over any of our players that were lotto picks because we are already rebuilding them. I don't really want to keep hitting reset. I could deal with protected picks because if he left and we sucked we keep them and if we were getting better we wouldn't need them as much. It would be nice to be two deep with young guys at each position and we could be.


I definitely understand wanting to hold the 21 pick since we have no idea what it's real value is yet and only James Johnson, Kelly Olynyk, Dion Waiters, and Bam Adebayo are (likely to be) under contract for the 2021 season. I just don't think I'd let it or the protections on it be the deal breaker when it comes to bringing in Kyrie, even though I probably wouldn't offer it up right away. I'm pretty sure Bledsoe, TJ, and the 2018 Miami Pick alone is better than anything our competition could/would reasonably offer anyways.


Depends on which teams are involved and might make offers. Boston has a lot of assets they could offer including a ton of players. Hard to know if Denver and Minnesota are interested. Minnesota might really think about putting a good offer in since they are on the list and know he'd likely re-sign.

The 21 Miami pick scares me, particularly since we already traded away a pick that became unprotected and might end up being Bagley, Doncic, Porter or Ayton.

If we were hovering around the 8 seed already or if the west wasn't as tough or if GS wasn't dominating everyone I might feel differently.

But if it's just the package you mention without the 21 pick, obviously you can't really pass it up. I just have a hard time thinking they would feel a non lotto pick, TJ (who they'd have to pay next year) and Bledsoe is worth it. From their point of view, it just doesn't seem like much to me. They could lose Bledsoe in a couple of years themselves as well.

I think if Wiggins or Murray are on the table, they'd choose that route along with picks, if they are looking long term. Their first rounders are probably better than Miami's also.

How much damage do you think we could realistically do with this squad in the next two years? Do you think if we don't make the playoffs either year what do you think the odds are he would want to stay, especially if teams like NY, SA, MIN, MIA and more are after him?
User avatar
darealjuice
Suns Forum Future All Star
Posts: 6,694
And1: 8,900
Joined: Apr 22, 2016
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#109 » by darealjuice » Sun Jul 30, 2017 3:57 am

bwgood77 wrote:Depends on which teams are involved and might make offers. Boston has a lot of assets they could offer including a ton of players. Hard to know if Denver and Minnesota are interested. Minnesota might really think about putting a good offer in since they are on the list and know he'd likely re-sign.

The 21 Miami pick scares me, particularly since we already traded away a pick that became unprotected and might end up being Bagley, Doncic, Porter or Ayton.

If we were hovering around the 8 seed already or if the west wasn't as tough or if GS wasn't dominating everyone I might feel differently.

But if it's just the package you mention without the 21 pick, obviously you can't really pass it up. I just have a hard time thinking they would feel a non lotto pick, TJ (who they'd have to pay next year) and Bledsoe is worth it. From their point of view, it just doesn't seem like much to me. They could lose Bledsoe in a couple of years themselves as well.

I think if Wiggins or Murray are on the table, they'd choose that route along with picks, if they are looking long term. Their first rounders are probably better than Miami's also.

How much damage do you think we could realistically do with this squad in the next two years? Do you think if we don't make the playoffs either year what do you think the odds are he would want to stay, especially if teams like NY, SA, MIN, MIA and more are after him?


According to Woj, official trade offers were made by Suns, Timberwolves, Spurs, Clippers, Knick, and Heat, and I doubt Celtics are looking at Kyrie when they still have IT on a cheap contract. Knicks said KP is off the table, reports of Dragic and Winslow as the Heat offer were denied, Wolves look like they're going to give the max to Wiggins, Clippers supposedly were turned down on their offer of Pat Beverley and DeAndre Jordan, we have Booker and JJ off the table and Bledsoe on the table, and I can't imagine the Spurs being able to beat our offer unless the Cavs really value Aldridge or something.

Eventually this team needs to start winning, you know? There's always going to be other good teams. If all of our young players take steps forward, then we'll see a lot of improvement in the team as a whole. Unless there's we take a major unexpected step forward, it's safe to assume we'll be adding another high lottery pick this year, so that's just more opportunity to add talent. If this team isn't looking like it'll be a playoff contending team in 2 years then we might need to start looking at making a major move, Kyrie here or not.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,137
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#110 » by bwgood77 » Sun Jul 30, 2017 4:12 am

darealjuice wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:Depends on which teams are involved and might make offers. Boston has a lot of assets they could offer including a ton of players. Hard to know if Denver and Minnesota are interested. Minnesota might really think about putting a good offer in since they are on the list and know he'd likely re-sign.

The 21 Miami pick scares me, particularly since we already traded away a pick that became unprotected and might end up being Bagley, Doncic, Porter or Ayton.

If we were hovering around the 8 seed already or if the west wasn't as tough or if GS wasn't dominating everyone I might feel differently.

But if it's just the package you mention without the 21 pick, obviously you can't really pass it up. I just have a hard time thinking they would feel a non lotto pick, TJ (who they'd have to pay next year) and Bledsoe is worth it. From their point of view, it just doesn't seem like much to me. They could lose Bledsoe in a couple of years themselves as well.

I think if Wiggins or Murray are on the table, they'd choose that route along with picks, if they are looking long term. Their first rounders are probably better than Miami's also.

How much damage do you think we could realistically do with this squad in the next two years? Do you think if we don't make the playoffs either year what do you think the odds are he would want to stay, especially if teams like NY, SA, MIN, MIA and more are after him?


According to Woj, official trade offers were made by Suns, Timberwolves, Spurs, Clippers, Knick, and Heat, and I doubt Celtics are looking at Kyrie when they still have IT on a cheap contract. Knicks said KP is off the table, reports of Dragic and Winslow as the Heat offer were denied, Wolves look like they're going to give the max to Wiggins, Clippers supposedly were turned down on their offer of Pat Beverley and DeAndre Jordan, we have Booker and JJ off the table and Bledsoe on the table, and I can't imagine the Spurs being able to beat our offer unless the Cavs really value Aldridge or something.

Eventually this team needs to start winning, you know? There's always going to be other good teams. If all of our young players take steps forward, then we'll see a lot of improvement in the team as a whole. Unless there's we take a major unexpected step forward, it's safe to assume we'll be adding another high lottery pick this year, so that's just more opportunity to add talent. If this team isn't looking like it'll be a playoff contending team in 2 years then we might need to start looking at making a major move, Kyrie here or not.


WOJ or Lowe also said up to 20 teams are monitoring the situation and one of them said Boston and Phoenix are the teams most people think are most capable with their assets to pull off a trade if they want to include some of their good pieces.

I know we have to start winning, but I think because of the age and how raw our PFs are, that we likely won't be that good this year with or without Kyrie. If we trade Bledsoe and Warren, for example, we improve at PG, but still lose 2 of our best 3 players. I do think JJ could possibly play better than TJ this year, though I figured it still might take a year or so to adjust to the league, etc, for him to take the biggest step. I do expect him to adapt quickly, but I just don't see us doing much.

I'm fine taking on Kyrie at the cheap price many think it will take, though I still don't think it makes us THAT much better. Many here expected us to be near 500 anyway...or at least at 35 wins or so. Again, my biggest fear is losing him.

But perhaps that is why Gambo says there is zero chance...because James Jones has told McD he doesn't feel Kyrie will re-sign here. I mean it's pretty clear since he has a list what his preferences are. I guess he could love the Watson atmosphere and family/love approach and think that trumps other things, but that might be wishful thinking on my part.

I guess time will tell. It's pretty rare that a player has clearly made a list where he wants to go and another team trades for him. I mean there was the talk George was going to LA that scared everyone off and OKC didn't take a risk considering they mostly dumped a pretty bad contract and decent rookie for a superstar to join another one...so that was little risk.

If it's Bledsoe, this year's Miami pick and that's it, it's a no brainer with no risk. If you add Warren, it's still pretty close because we may have a limit on what we will pay him and he could get a big offer (though I think the market will be soft outside of superstars next summer).

Sounds like the FO would trade Chriss and/or Bender too considering they haven't made any promises to them that we know about though. Who knows?
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#111 » by thamadkant » Mon Jul 31, 2017 5:56 am

If Chriss is going out, then I propose a pick swap instead with Cavs rather than give them a pick. As some said, unless Irving agrees to an extension.. can he?
User avatar
enigmatics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,459
And1: 3,568
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
     

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#112 » by enigmatics » Mon Jul 31, 2017 11:25 pm

Just remember - that Cavs team wasn't built for Kyrie it was built for LBJ.

Hard to fully judge his efficiency and scoring +/- given that fact.
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 5,558
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#113 » by AtheJ415 » Tue Aug 1, 2017 8:48 am

enigmatics wrote:Just remember - that Cavs team wasn't built for Kyrie it was built for LBJ.

Hard to fully judge his efficiency and scoring +/- given that fact.


Disagree. Lebron is a guy who excels at setting up teammates. Thus, building around him is similar to building around a typical PG. I think Kyrie can be much better than he has been at setting up others, but I don't think that has anything to do with how the Cavs are set up.
User avatar
enigmatics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,459
And1: 3,568
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
     

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#114 » by enigmatics » Tue Aug 1, 2017 4:33 pm

AtheJ415 wrote:
enigmatics wrote:Just remember - that Cavs team wasn't built for Kyrie it was built for LBJ.

Hard to fully judge his efficiency and scoring +/- given that fact.


Disagree. Lebron is a guy who excels at setting up teammates. Thus, building around him is similar to building around a typical PG. I think Kyrie can be much better than he has been at setting up others, but I don't think that has anything to do with how the Cavs are set up.


Wait .....

LBJ is their franchise cornerstone player (twice now). You really convinced yourself that the team wasn't built around and for him?
User avatar
TOO
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,259
And1: 1,311
Joined: Jul 02, 2013

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#115 » by TOO » Tue Aug 1, 2017 6:39 pm

LeBron himself built that team.
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 5,558
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#116 » by AtheJ415 » Tue Aug 1, 2017 7:04 pm

enigmatics wrote:
AtheJ415 wrote:
enigmatics wrote:Just remember - that Cavs team wasn't built for Kyrie it was built for LBJ.

Hard to fully judge his efficiency and scoring +/- given that fact.


Disagree. Lebron is a guy who excels at setting up teammates. Thus, building around him is similar to building around a typical PG. I think Kyrie can be much better than he has been at setting up others, but I don't think that has anything to do with how the Cavs are set up.


Wait .....

LBJ is their franchise cornerstone player (twice now). You really convinced yourself that the team wasn't built around and for him?


Read what I wrote. I'm not disagreeing that the team wasn't built for LBJ. I'm disagreeing with that being an excuse for Kyrie's lack of assists/lack of setting up others. Building the team around LBJ is the same as building it around damn near every PG. Kyrie's situation is such that he is surrounded by elite role players and shooters. His lack of passing is a legitimate concern, and your absurd attempt to paint it as a teambuilding issue doesn't hold in the slightest.

Also, Shaq and Antawn Jamison aren't on this team. No player from his first tenure is, so what does that have to do with anything?
Biff
Veteran
Posts: 2,739
And1: 1,533
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Contact:
 

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#117 » by Biff » Tue Aug 1, 2017 8:27 pm

darealjuice wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:I agree with all that except I wouldn't want to trade the 21 Heat pick,unless we added protection. I don't mind picks that much if the have at least top 7 protection or so. I'd probably prefer trading picks over any of our players that were lotto picks because we are already rebuilding them. I don't really want to keep hitting reset. I could deal with protected picks because if he left and we sucked we keep them and if we were getting better we wouldn't need them as much. It would be nice to be two deep with young guys at each position and we could be.


I definitely understand wanting to hold the 21 pick since we have no idea what it's real value is yet and only James Johnson, Kelly Olynyk, Dion Waiters, and Bam Adebayo are (likely to be) under contract for the 2021 season. I just don't think I'd let it or the protections on it be the deal breaker when it comes to bringing in Kyrie, even though I probably wouldn't offer it up right away. I'm pretty sure Bledsoe, TJ, and the 2018 Miami Pick alone is better than anything our competition could/would reasonably offer anyways.


He was an All-Star before Lebron arrived because he puts up empty numbers and voters like flashy scorers. The year before Lebron arrived the Cavs were -4.3 with Kyrie playing. They were a slightly worse offensive team (-1) but a massively better defensive team (+5.3) when he was sitting.
"Now everybody wanna play for the heat and the Lakers? Let's go back to being competitive and going at these peoples!" - Kevin Durant
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,137
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#118 » by bwgood77 » Tue Aug 1, 2017 9:21 pm

Biff wrote:
darealjuice wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:I agree with all that except I wouldn't want to trade the 21 Heat pick,unless we added protection. I don't mind picks that much if the have at least top 7 protection or so. I'd probably prefer trading picks over any of our players that were lotto picks because we are already rebuilding them. I don't really want to keep hitting reset. I could deal with protected picks because if he left and we sucked we keep them and if we were getting better we wouldn't need them as much. It would be nice to be two deep with young guys at each position and we could be.


I definitely understand wanting to hold the 21 pick since we have no idea what it's real value is yet and only James Johnson, Kelly Olynyk, Dion Waiters, and Bam Adebayo are (likely to be) under contract for the 2021 season. I just don't think I'd let it or the protections on it be the deal breaker when it comes to bringing in Kyrie, even though I probably wouldn't offer it up right away. I'm pretty sure Bledsoe, TJ, and the 2018 Miami Pick alone is better than anything our competition could/would reasonably offer anyways.


He was an All-Star before Lebron arrived because he puts up empty numbers and voters like flashy scorers. The year before Lebron arrived the Cavs were -4.3 with Kyrie playing. They were a slightly worse offensive team (-1) but a massively better defensive team (+5.3) when he was sitting.


Wow, that's crazy. Not totally surprising though.
Biff
Veteran
Posts: 2,739
And1: 1,533
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Contact:
 

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#119 » by Biff » Tue Aug 1, 2017 9:26 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Biff wrote:
darealjuice wrote:
I definitely understand wanting to hold the 21 pick since we have no idea what it's real value is yet and only James Johnson, Kelly Olynyk, Dion Waiters, and Bam Adebayo are (likely to be) under contract for the 2021 season. I just don't think I'd let it or the protections on it be the deal breaker when it comes to bringing in Kyrie, even though I probably wouldn't offer it up right away. I'm pretty sure Bledsoe, TJ, and the 2018 Miami Pick alone is better than anything our competition could/would reasonably offer anyways.


He was an All-Star before Lebron arrived because he puts up empty numbers and voters like flashy scorers. The year before Lebron arrived the Cavs were -4.3 with Kyrie playing. They were a slightly worse offensive team (-1) but a massively better defensive team (+5.3) when he was sitting.


Wow, that's crazy. Not totally surprising though.


It's not too surprising, I agree. Demar Derozan is another guy that I don't like for similar reasons. The Raptors are a slightly better offensive team when he plays but they're much better defensively when he doesn't. It's why I REALLY hope that Booker at least becomes a neutral defensive player. If we're basically the same defensively when he's playing or when he sits, then I think his offensive prowess can provide an enormous impact. If he ends up being another Derozan that makes his team a little better offensively but is an enormous defensive liability, I'm going to be disappointed. That being said, Booker already has better on/off numbers than either Derozan or Kyrie.
"Now everybody wanna play for the heat and the Lakers? Let's go back to being competitive and going at these peoples!" - Kevin Durant
Years90Suns
Senior
Posts: 707
And1: 280
Joined: Nov 29, 2011

Re: Why trading for Kyrie could cost McD his job 

Post#120 » by Years90Suns » Tue Aug 1, 2017 10:14 pm

I believe that Irving would not make us a better team. If we did an offer, we should not have done it.

Irving is a much better version of knight... but, nonetheless, he is a SG in a PG body. And a small body.

I believe we would not be adding any chemistry, passing abilities or any other thing that makes a group better for playing basketball.

The plan should be completed. We have young players that we should develope. Of course we should jump to any option that could be interesting, but I do not think Irving is that option. I can hardly imagine Booker playing alongside Kyrie in a balanced back court. Who is going to set the tempo, pass the ball, do the dirty duties.

You can hang me, but I believe Bledsoe is much better fitted for that. He plays defense, does not need the ball in his hands for soooo long, does not need to shoot that much...

it is a pity that irving is not, for example, John Wall. I would jump at Wall any moment. Wall is physical, taller, can pass the ball, does not need all the flash lights on him... It is a pity that strange situations arouse continously and we are caught in the middle of them.

Return to Phoenix Suns