RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,438
And1: 27,243
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#21 » by dhsilv2 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:42 am

Dr Positivity wrote:
euroleague wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what pushed Baylor (who was your 1st vote last thread, and is still on the table) out of the top 3 for you?

Baylor's dominance is above these three, still, in my rankings. I valued his narrative very highly, previously - however, I feel like there is a lot of support for the narrative of Curry (which I had previously ruled out as homerism) as a GOAT level player who had a great impact on coaching and other team's play, an impact beyond just putting up a ridiculous regular season in 2016. Cousey is obviously huge as the first elite passer.

I would normally have Baylor far higher than this, but I only have two votes. The HMs don't count in the voting, so I'm primarily doing those to preface my future voting and point to players who I think deserve heavy consideration.

Editing in - I included Isiah Thomas, as I think he certainly deserves more consideration at this stage. Can't believe I'm seeing Steve Nash before Isiah Thomas. I also forgot to include Havlicek :o , I'm used to him being off the board by now.


You aren't even considering Pettit? And why not?


I second this, and to be honest. I'd think a good post if anyone can comparing the two is needed. I tried to point them out a bit in my post, but I don't feel I have enough to go on to do a proper comparison.
User avatar
wojoaderge
Analyst
Posts: 3,100
And1: 1,682
Joined: Jul 27, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#22 » by wojoaderge » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:45 am

dhsilv2 wrote:So I have to ask those voting Ewing to explain how a guy who was never a serious MVP candidate, made 1 first team all-nba, and was never a top 5 guy in the analytics be called a top 25 all-time player?

He'll probably win this round
"Coach, why don't you just relax? We're not good enough to beat the Lakers. We've had a great year, why don't you just relax and cool down?"
euroleague
General Manager
Posts: 8,448
And1: 1,871
Joined: Mar 26, 2014
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#23 » by euroleague » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:51 am

Dr Positivity wrote:
euroleague wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what pushed Baylor (who was your 1st vote last thread, and is still on the table) out of the top 3 for you?

Baylor's dominance is above these three, still, in my rankings. I valued his narrative very highly, previously - however, I feel like there is a lot of support for the narrative of Curry (which I had previously ruled out as homerism) as a GOAT level player who had a great impact on coaching and other team's play, an impact beyond just putting up a ridiculous regular season in 2016. Cousey is obviously huge as the first elite passer.

I would normally have Baylor far higher than this, but I only have two votes. The HMs don't count in the voting, so I'm primarily doing those to preface my future voting and point to players who I think deserve heavy consideration.

Editing in - I included Isiah Thomas, as I think he certainly deserves more consideration at this stage. Can't believe I'm seeing Steve Nash before Isiah Thomas. I also forgot to include Havlicek :o , I'm used to him being off the board by now.


You aren't even considering Pettit? And why not?


Pettit I have below all the players I have listed. he was great for the non-fully segregated NBA, and beat a rookie Russell/Heinsohn combo led by cousey, but his main strong points were grit/physicality. his team was great, but above Baylor? Can't see it.

Baylor in 1961: 35ppg 20rpg
Pettit in 1961: 28/20

Baylor, his first year in the league as a rookie, led a previously last place Lakers team past Pettit. With baylor in the Western conference, the Hawks were on the way out as soon as he had a 2nd option - even with a Hagan/Pettit combo they barely made it past Baylor's Lakers in 7 in 1960.

Pettit is a solid PF, but these players I listed are higher.
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,257
And1: 17,961
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#24 » by scrabbarista » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:53 am

24. Bob Pettit

25. John Havlicek


I have these two at 20th and 21st, so these contemporary players are starting to get slightly annoying. Just slightly, though. I'm not taking this too seriously. Anyway, some highlights from my formula:

I. In my "Stats" category, which adds up the number of times a player was Top 5 in 18 or 19 differently weighted categories, Pettit is 2nd among remaining players. The player ahead of him - Gilmore - clearly doesn't have his pedigree as a dominant player. See:

II. Pettit is 1st among remaining players in my MVP Voting metric, whereas Gilmore is a blip with 1/8 the score of Pettit.

III. Havlicek has 1.5 "Best on Champs," putting him in elite company among remaining players, as only four others match this total. Among those players (Mikan, Isiah Thomas, Dave Cowens, Steph Curry), Havlicek's career totals in both the regular season and the playoffs are first by a huge margin.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,438
And1: 27,243
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#25 » by dhsilv2 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:56 am

wojoaderge wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:So I have to ask those voting Ewing to explain how a guy who was never a serious MVP candidate, made 1 first team all-nba, and was never a top 5 guy in the analytics be called a top 25 all-time player?

He'll probably win this round


This is I think the first person who to me is coming out of left field. Ewing in the mid 30's would seem right to me. Maybe I move him up to the early 30's, but 24th all time? I'm just struggling with that, and the arguments are that he anchored a top level defense, which is true, but doesn't make me think top 25.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,438
And1: 27,243
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#26 » by dhsilv2 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:58 am

euroleague wrote:
Dr Positivity wrote:
euroleague wrote:Baylor's dominance is above these three, still, in my rankings. I valued his narrative very highly, previously - however, I feel like there is a lot of support for the narrative of Curry (which I had previously ruled out as homerism) as a GOAT level player who had a great impact on coaching and other team's play, an impact beyond just putting up a ridiculous regular season in 2016. Cousey is obviously huge as the first elite passer.

I would normally have Baylor far higher than this, but I only have two votes. The HMs don't count in the voting, so I'm primarily doing those to preface my future voting and point to players who I think deserve heavy consideration.

Editing in - I included Isiah Thomas, as I think he certainly deserves more consideration at this stage. Can't believe I'm seeing Steve Nash before Isiah Thomas. I also forgot to include Havlicek :o , I'm used to him being off the board by now.


You aren't even considering Pettit? And why not?


Pettit I have below all the players I have listed. he was great for the non-fully segregated NBA, and beat a rookie Russell/Heinsohn combo led by cousey, but his main strong points were grit/physicality. his team was great, but above Baylor? Can't see it.

Baylor in 1961: 35ppg 20rpg
Pettit in 1961: 28/20

Baylor, his first year in the league as a rookie, led a previously last place Lakers team past Pettit. With baylor in the Western conference, the Hawks were on the way out as soon as he had a 2nd option - even with a Hagan/Pettit combo they barely made it past Baylor's Lakers in 7 in 1960.

Pettit is a solid PF, but these players I listed are higher.


He lost to Russell as a rookie and then beat him the next year. Not a huge issue, but it's an important distinction. Keep in mind he also twice took the celtics to game 7's in the finals in the russell era.
euroleague
General Manager
Posts: 8,448
And1: 1,871
Joined: Mar 26, 2014
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#27 » by euroleague » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:06 am

dhsilv2 wrote:
euroleague wrote:
Dr Positivity wrote:
You aren't even considering Pettit? And why not?


Pettit I have below all the players I have listed. he was great for the non-fully segregated NBA, and beat a rookie Russell/Heinsohn combo led by cousey, but his main strong points were grit/physicality. his team was great, but above Baylor? Can't see it.

Baylor in 1961: 35ppg 20rpg
Pettit in 1961: 28/20

Baylor, his first year in the league as a rookie, led a previously last place Lakers team past Pettit. With baylor in the Western conference, the Hawks were on the way out as soon as he had a 2nd option - even with a Hagan/Pettit combo they barely made it past Baylor's Lakers in 7 in 1960.

Pettit is a solid PF, but these players I listed are higher.


He lost to Russell as a rookie and then beat him the next year. Not a huge issue, but it's an important distinction. Keep in mind he also twice took the celtics to game 7's in the finals in the russell era.


"he took the celtics" - don't you mean the hawks to the celtics? Hagan had a PER of 27.5 to Pettit's 22 PER when they won in 1958. Hagan averaged more ppg on far better efficiency, more apg, and only a few rpg less, and isn't even mentioned here.

the Hawks also had Lenny Wilkins later - one of the top passers of that era.

I'm really, definitively not big on Bill Russell - so I did have his rookie year wrong. Seems he gets a lot of credit for the duo of him/heinsohn joining in the same year, making a starting line-up that is quite strong and led by the greatest passer of the era and a recent MVP.
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,849
And1: 16,407
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#28 » by Dr Positivity » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:08 am

euroleague wrote:
Dr Positivity wrote:
euroleague wrote:Baylor's dominance is above these three, still, in my rankings. I valued his narrative very highly, previously - however, I feel like there is a lot of support for the narrative of Curry (which I had previously ruled out as homerism) as a GOAT level player who had a great impact on coaching and other team's play, an impact beyond just putting up a ridiculous regular season in 2016. Cousey is obviously huge as the first elite passer.

I would normally have Baylor far higher than this, but I only have two votes. The HMs don't count in the voting, so I'm primarily doing those to preface my future voting and point to players who I think deserve heavy consideration.

Editing in - I included Isiah Thomas, as I think he certainly deserves more consideration at this stage. Can't believe I'm seeing Steve Nash before Isiah Thomas. I also forgot to include Havlicek :o , I'm used to him being off the board by now.


You aren't even considering Pettit? And why not?


Pettit I have below all the players I have listed. he was great for the non-fully segregated NBA, and beat a rookie Russell/Heinsohn combo led by cousey, but his main strong points were grit/physicality. his team was great, but above Baylor? Can't see it.

Baylor in 1961: 35ppg 20rpg
Pettit in 1961: 28/20

Baylor, his first year in the league as a rookie, led a previously last place Lakers team past Pettit. With baylor in the Western conference, the Hawks were on the way out as soon as he had a 2nd option - even with a Hagan/Pettit combo they barely made it past Baylor's Lakers in 7 in 1960.

Pettit is a solid PF, but these players I listed are higher.


Well first off in the year you listed Pettit still finished ahead in WS and MVP voting so it's not like it's a clearcut better Baylor season. But even if Baylor did peak higher, after his knee injury he has many seasons that are not as strong statistically as the rest of Pettit's prime.

Late 50s competition may not have been the best, but Pettit was still great into early 60s which is also when Baylor's best years are. He was still a 28/15 player until 63 or 64.
Liberate The Zoomers
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,648
And1: 8,294
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#29 » by trex_8063 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:14 am

dhsilv2 wrote:.


Especially within a large block of text, it helps me if you very clearly state who your 1st and 2nd picks are like so (bolded):

1st pick: xxxx
2nd pick: yyyy


Just so I'm clear, your 1st pick is Bob Pettit, and your 2nd is Steve Nash, is that right? I wasn't 100% clear as toward the end you state "my vote will....go to Steve Nash".
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,438
And1: 27,243
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#30 » by dhsilv2 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:15 am

euroleague wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
euroleague wrote:
Pettit I have below all the players I have listed. he was great for the non-fully segregated NBA, and beat a rookie Russell/Heinsohn combo led by cousey, but his main strong points were grit/physicality. his team was great, but above Baylor? Can't see it.

Baylor in 1961: 35ppg 20rpg
Pettit in 1961: 28/20

Baylor, his first year in the league as a rookie, led a previously last place Lakers team past Pettit. With baylor in the Western conference, the Hawks were on the way out as soon as he had a 2nd option - even with a Hagan/Pettit combo they barely made it past Baylor's Lakers in 7 in 1960.

Pettit is a solid PF, but these players I listed are higher.


He lost to Russell as a rookie and then beat him the next year. Not a huge issue, but it's an important distinction. Keep in mind he also twice took the celtics to game 7's in the finals in the russell era.


"he took the celtics" - don't you mean the hawks to the celtics? Hagan had a PER of 27.5 to Pettit's 22 PER when they won in 1958. Hagan averaged more ppg on far better efficiency, more apg, and only a few rpg less, and isn't even mentioned here.

the Hawks also had Lenny Wilkins later - one of the top passers of that era.

I'm really, definitively not big on Bill Russell - so I did have his rookie year wrong. Seems he gets a lot of credit for the duo of him/heinsohn joining in the same year, making a starting line-up that is quite strong and led by the greatest passer of the era and a recent MVP.


I mean his team took the legendary celtics to a game 7.

As for 58, I didn't see the games. I did youtube search before posting in the last thread and saw a few clips. But the reason Hagan's stats look better is because of the first round, a fairly easy 5 game series for them. Pettit looks to have been a pretty clear best player for his team against the celtics though. But I can't find game film to look at any of this so it's hard for me to judge why Pettit took so few shots in the first round, unless they just had a nice matchup advantage.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,438
And1: 27,243
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#31 » by dhsilv2 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:17 am

trex_8063 wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:.


Especially within a large block of text, it helps me if you very clearly state who your 1st and 2nd picks are like so (bolded):

1st pick: xxxx
2nd pick: yyyy


Just so I'm clear, your 1st pick is Bob Pettit, and your 2nd is Steve Nash, is that right? I wasn't 100% clear as toward the end you state "my vote will....go to Steve Nash".


Sorry yes, you got it right and I was actually just realizing I should go back and bold them. Thanks for asking.
Pablo Novi
Senior
Posts: 683
And1: 233
Joined: Dec 11, 2015
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:
   

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#32 » by Pablo Novi » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:25 am

It's pretty weird for me. Of all the players remaining, Cousy is both my highest ranked AND the one I care the least about. imo, he was the #3 PG of all time (after Magic & "O" - and treating Jerry West as a SG). He's tied for THE highest ranking remaining player in terms of ALL-NBA 1st-Team (with 10, along with Elgin Baylor & Bob Pettit) (and if we include 2nd-Team selections - he's the #1 remaining player) and even though I penalize him significantly for most of his greatness playing out in the 1950's - he still comes in 4th of the remaining players (after Baylor, Pettit & Rick Barry - all of whom I liked a good deal more than Cousy).

I've said before in these threads that I attended a number of Celtics' games in the mid-1960s at the Gaaaden - and the racist nastiness of the fans towards even the great Bill Russell - just killed my love for that team. So, fighting for Cousy over everybody else is not easy for me - still, I DO think he's the best remaining player, vis-à-vis his own position, PG - and we've only picked two so far - so this is overdue." [N.B. We've recently taken Stockton who I have just below Cousy on my GOAT PG list]
-----
Vote: Pettit
Alt: Elgin Baylor (Elgin's finally getting some traction; and I feel he'll go before Cousy - thus my switched vote).
H.M. Bob Cousy (who I feel strongly should go next; but is getting close to zero traction)
H.M. George Mikan
N.B. At least one of these four really should be in our GOAT Top 25.

My #1 criteria is the number of "Great Years" each player accumulated in their careers; "Great Years" defined as: getting selected ALL-League 1st-Team or 2nd-Team. Accumulating several of these says that you dominated YOUR position in YOUR era.

These are the only three guys with 10 ALL-League 1st-Team selections not yet chosen for our GOAT list.
A "decade's" worth of domination of the players at their position is a tremendous achievement (only achieved by a total of 10 players in the 80 years of 1938 season to 2017 season!) Of those ten, only three (K.Malone, Kobe & LeBron) have 11 1st-Team selections. In other words, these three could hardly have done more.

Besides, each of them revolutionized their respective positions. We've been (collectively) putting players on our GOAT list with FAR LESS positional-era-dominance. I don't much see what more they could have done to "satisfy" this board?

Imo, all three of these guys should go next.

Permit me to add: the selectors are IDEALLY suited - it was/is their job to report on the sport; and COLLECTIVELY, there are enough of them to override pretty much any and all personal, "homerist" biases. Imo, their selection process TRUMPS all stats or combinations of them. I'd also note, that over the last 58 years of NBA-NBL-ABA "rabidity", I've never once had a MAJOR objection to their selections.

Further, there are only 22 players in total who even accumulated at least 6 1st-Team ALL-League selections - showing just how difficult getting TEN is.

btw, I consider Elgin Baylor to have been a superior player to both Pettit & Cousy (and, along with Jerry West, he's my co- All-Time favorite player - because of their bi-racial harmony and artistry (and pretty equal in skills). I have been voting Pettit & Cousy OVER Elgin because I consider it more important that there be more POSITIONAL balance in a GOAT list. I accomplish that balance by selecting one player per position per descending set of 5 GOAT spots. (Example, my GOAT Top 5: KAJ, Magic, MJ, LBJ & TD).

Surely, bigs, especially Centers have historically (especially until about the turn of the century) a bigger influence on Defense. But, generally speaking, the smaller the position / player the more they: run around, cut, stop-and-go, dribble, pass, etc. For me, this almost equals the bigs' defensive advantage. Combining the two factors, while I have, as I said, one player form each position in each descending set of 5 GOAT spots; I always have the Center as the highest ranked.
Pablo Novi
Senior
Posts: 683
And1: 233
Joined: Dec 11, 2015
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Contact:
   

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#33 » by Pablo Novi » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:31 am

euroleague wrote:
#24: Cousey

euroleague

You're spelling Bob's last name wrong, there's no "e" in Cousy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Cousy
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,438
And1: 27,243
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#34 » by dhsilv2 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:38 am

Pablo Novi wrote:Permit me to add: the selectors are IDEALLY suited - it was/is their job to report on the sport; and COLLECTIVELY, there are enough of them to override pretty much any and all personal, "homerist" biases. Imo, their selection process TRUMPS all stats or combinations of them. I'd also note, that over the last 58 years of NBA-NBL-ABA "rabidity", I've never once had a MAJOR objection to their selections.

Further, there are only 22 players in total who even accumulated at least 6 1st-Team ALL-League selections - showing just how difficult getting TEN is.




Can you discuss your thoughts on the number of teams and plays in the league over time and how that impacts the perception of all nba and more importantly the first team? It seems after all easier to be first team in a league of 8 teams vs a league of 20 or 30. I'm just interested in how you look at that. I certainly weigh all nba's here, a lot, but I'm concerned I might over weight it for early eras where there just weren't as many players.
mischievous
General Manager
Posts: 7,675
And1: 3,485
Joined: Apr 18, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#35 » by mischievous » Sat Aug 5, 2017 5:07 am

oldschooled wrote:Damn. Chris Paul is your 23rd greatest player of all time gents. Cant believe he leapfrogged multiple MVP winners (Mikan, Pettit, Nash and Curry) and multiple champions. Just wow.

Paul is like one of the golden boys around here. He keeps failing and getting injured and yet somehow keeps moving up the list. I feel like he's one of those guys who people take over other players because they just like him more.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,409
And1: 9,936
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#36 » by penbeast0 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 5:33 am

Although he played in the weakest NBA era, George Mikan is 2 levels above anyone else left in terms of dominance. He put up Jordan level scoring numbers (relative to his peers), great rebounding, and from all reports, was the dominant defender of the early 50s as well. He dominated physically with his strength and athleticism (he wasn't appreciably taller than his peer, but he was built strong . . . like Shaq v. Shawn Bradley wasn't about height). He won consistently, almost every year during his prime. He is the only truly dominant player left with more than a 3 year or so resume.

Bob Pettit was the dominant player in the 50s between Mikan and Russell and remained a top 5 player even as the game drastically changed from the set shot/hook shot era of the 50s into the more modern game of the 60s. Although not as spectacular as Elgin Baylor, he was more efficient, a better rebounder, and stronger defensively though Baylor's playmaking is superior.

Kevin Durant has a decade as a top 5 player in the league even if he's never been #1. Stephen Curry had one of the GOAT seasons in 2016 and two others where he was in consideration of best player our of his short 7 year (has it been that long?) career. He also deserves a mention but I am not sure he deserves to be ahead of Durant yet though he's well on the way. I am also seriously considering Pettit or Curry here. For that matter Patrick Ewing as well although I value playoff success highly.

Vote: George Mikan
Alternate: Kevin Durant
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Lou Fan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 790
And1: 711
Joined: Jul 21, 2017
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#37 » by Lou Fan » Sat Aug 5, 2017 5:57 am

Chef Curry is the choice for me here because his 3 year peak 2015-now has been unbelievable. He started a dynasty won multiple MVPs and his impact stats are ridiculous. Top 5 peak all time with 5 seasons of prime that have all been very good. His 2016 season was off the charts amazing and he should have won the ring without the bogus draymond suspension and all the injuries they had including the one to Curry's knee. His last 3 seasons have gone ring, 73 wins, ring. His gravity on the court is ATG. I value peak over longevity (though both matter to me) thats why I have supported Wade and Curry the last few threads. My reasoning is would you rather have a guy who was the capability to be an MVP/top5 player in the league and be the best player on champ for 5 years (ie Curry) or someone who can lead you to the playoffs every year and probably can't lead a team to the finals for 15 years (ie someone like Clyde Drexler or John Stockton). Curry already has two best on champ years and 3 years where he was a top 2 player in the league. By far the best peak left on the board and the most transcendent memorable player left. You can't tell the history of the NBA without talking about Steph and the way he changed the game.

Couple side notes.

CP3 going this high is pretty shocking I'm not sure what the excuse is for him not having any playoff success given that he has had some strong supporting casts. He seems to perform very well but never wins in the playoffs. I think the analogy Winsome Gerbil used was well said. However it's hard to ignore his amazing stats and advanced stats. I think a middle ground of 28-30 range would be more acceptable. I had him at 25 but I'm thinking that may be a bit high.

Also Mikan should NOT go here or anywhere in the 20s. Era usually isn't a huge deal for me but the weakness of Mikan's era really shouldn't be overlooked. I just don't think he was a good basketball player. I don't think he could play D-1 basketball today. I think I'm probably a better player than he was and my best scholarship offer was from Chicago State (I didn't go there I go to Duke University go Blue Devils). I don't think that about Russell or even Petit and I just don't feel like pioneer points put him over the likes of Ewing, Curry, Nash and others being discussed here. The game outgrew him by the time he was 30. He attempted a comeback at age 31 wasn't very good and then retired again. He deserves respect for what he accomplished but for me to consider him he would have to put up Wilt like numbers. If he put up 50/30/5 with 5 blocks then it's a different story. But his best season was like 28/14/3 on 40 percent shooting. You put someone like Chris Webber in his era I have no doubt his stats are way better and he probably will go in the 80s. Pioneer points and his success put him in the 50s for me.

1st Vote: Curry
2nd Vote: Nash

I'm very flexible on my second vote.
smartyz456 wrote:Duncan would be a better defending jahlil okafor in todays nba
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,133
And1: 25,418
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#38 » by 70sFan » Sat Aug 5, 2017 7:11 am

twolves97 wrote:Chef Curry is the choice for me here because his 3 year peak 2015-now has been unbelievable. He started a dynasty won multiple MVPs and his impact stats are ridiculous. Top 5 peak all time with 5 seasons of prime that have all been very good. His 2016 season was off the charts amazing and he should have won the ring without the bogus draymond suspension and all the injuries they had including the one to Curry's knee. His last 3 seasons have gone ring, 73 wins, ring. His gravity on the court is ATG. I value peak over longevity (though both matter to me) thats why I have supported Wade and Curry the last few threads. My reasoning is would you rather have a guy who was the capability to be an MVP/top5 player in the league and be the best player on champ for 5 years (ie Curry) or someone who can lead you to the playoffs every year and probably can't lead a team to the finals for 15 years (ie someone like Clyde Drexler or John Stockton). Curry already has two best on champ years and 3 years where he was a top 2 player in the league. By far the best peak left on the board and the most transcendent memorable player left. You can't tell the history of the NBA without talking about Steph and the way he changed the game.

Couple side notes.

CP3 going this high is pretty shocking I'm not sure what the excuse is for him not having any playoff success given that he has had some strong supporting casts. He seems to perform very well but never wins in the playoffs. I think the analogy Winsome Gerbil used was well said. However it's hard to ignore his amazing stats and advanced stats. I think a middle ground of 28-30 range would be more acceptable. I had him at 25 but I'm thinking that may be a bit high.

Also Mikan should NOT go here or anywhere in the 20s. Era usually isn't a huge deal for me but the weakness of Mikan's era really shouldn't be overlooked. I just don't think he was a good basketball player. I don't think he could play D-1 basketball today. I think I'm probably a better player than he was and my best scholarship offer was from Chicago State (I didn't go there I go to Duke University go Blue Devils). I don't think that about Russell or even Petit and I just don't feel like pioneer points put him over the likes of Ewing, Curry, Nash and others being discussed here. The game outgrew him by the time he was 30. He attempted a comeback at age 31 wasn't very good and then retired again. He deserves respect for what he accomplished but for me to consider him he would have to put up Wilt like numbers. If he put up 50/30/5 with 5 blocks then it's a different story. But his best season was like 28/14/3 on 40 percent shooting. You put someone like Chris Webber in his era I have no doubt his stats are way better and he probably will go in the 80s. Pioneer points and his success put him in the 50s for me.

1st Vote: Curry
2nd Vote: Nash

I'm very flexible on my second vote.


Well, you must be really damn good then. Mikan was 6'10 barefeet and ~270 lbs. He was HUGE and he moved really well. He had nice post game, quite advanced for hiz time. He was also very strong and physical. I don't believe you have more physical or basketball talent than him. Otherwise you would probably play in NBA.

Also, without shotclock even Shaq wouldn't average 50 ppg. You need to understand how the league worked at that time. Here is nice scouting tool about George:



He would probably make NBA based on his physical gifts alone.
User avatar
rebirthoftheM
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,787
And1: 1,858
Joined: Feb 27, 2017
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#39 » by rebirthoftheM » Sat Aug 5, 2017 7:33 am

oldschooled wrote:Damn. Chris Paul is your 23rd greatest player of all time gents. Cant believe he leapfrogged multiple MVP winners (Mikan, Pettit, Nash and Curry) and multiple champions. Just wow.


Not sure why you are surprised. We live in the 'spreadsheet' and 'advanced stats' internet era. 10 years ago, it was different. And in all likelihood, in ten further years, it will morph into something different.

CP3 going this high is just reflective of the era we live in atm IMO. I'm at least happy Dwyane Wade made it ahead of him. That truly would have been unfortunate if he passed Wade.
SpreeS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,767
And1: 4,135
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #24 

Post#40 » by SpreeS » Sat Aug 5, 2017 8:03 am

rebirthoftheM wrote:
oldschooled wrote:Damn. Chris Paul is your 23rd greatest player of all time gents. Cant believe he leapfrogged multiple MVP winners (Mikan, Pettit, Nash and Curry) and multiple champions. Just wow.


Not sure why you are surprised. We live in the 'spreadsheet' and 'advanced stats' internet era. 10 years ago, it was different. And in all likelihood, in ten further years, it will morph into something different.

CP3 going this high is just reflective of the era we live in atm IMO. I'm at least happy Dwyane Wade made it ahead of him. That truly would have been unfortunate if he passed Wade.


I dont care about all these advanced stats. Yes, he is realy good, has a lot of AllStars and AllNba/Def teams selections, but he won only 4 PO series per 12 years!!!! Never has played in conf finals and he had won 6 time over 50 wins in RS. His teams were really good. How this guy can be over Nash, Thomas, Curry, Pettit, KD, Mikan, Barry, Hondo. someone here sad he is unlucky with all these injuries, but luck is a big part of success. One more time, how can he be better than KD. Man its not comparable...

Return to Player Comparisons