Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Will Kyrie be traded by the beginning of the season?

Yes
304
60%
No
144
29%
Not suer
56
11%
 
Total votes: 504

mplsfonz23
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,944
And1: 1,310
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1641 » by mplsfonz23 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 1:47 pm

Hello Brooklyn wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Lakerfan17 wrote:I can't believe he hasn't been moved yet.


Based on the rumored offers, I'm no longer certain he'll be moved before the season starts.


It would be so toxic for the locker room if Kyrie stays on the squad. Unless he comes out and says he doesn't want to be traded.

Still I would demand a big haul if I'm the Cavs. They will get better offers after December 15th and trade deadline.

I was going to and 1 this before I saw this. He won't say that now. his fate lies with the Cavs now. LBJ will not allow mutiny, and I am sure when he asks about the trade demand he will allow Irving to say, "I was just kidding."
He's out. Period. IMO.
User avatar
John Murdoch
RealGM
Posts: 10,253
And1: 7,720
Joined: Sep 16, 2013
         

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1642 » by John Murdoch » Mon Aug 7, 2017 1:57 pm

CLE Get: E.Payton + A.Gordon + J.Randle + J.Clarkson + T.Ross+ ORL 2020 1st (Top 5 pro) + LA 2022 1st (Top 10 pro)

ORL Get: K.Irving + R.Jefferson

LAL Get: C.Frye
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
Seabass11
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,680
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 11, 2017
     

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1643 » by Seabass11 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 1:58 pm

Who are people thinking DET would throw back to us? Can they include Bradley in a deal?

I'd take Bradley and Drummond or RJ
Birdie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,179
And1: 2,516
Joined: Feb 09, 2015
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1644 » by Birdie » Mon Aug 7, 2017 2:06 pm

Seabass11 wrote:Who are people thinking DET would throw back to us? Can they include Bradley in a deal?

I'd take Bradley and Drummond or RJ


I would assume CLE would def. be interested in Bradley but he can't be traded until 9/7 I believe, so, if he's a target, it's gonna be a minute until the deal gets done. I think it's one of the considerations on CLE's part as why a deal hasn't been done yet and rightfully so. And I'm sure CLE is looking to dump Shump as well on the Kyrie deal, I'm sure that makes it more complicated as well. And it's rumored that CLE might be attaching Cedi into deals and he can't be traded until 8/16.

So, I think at the very least, we might not see Kyrie get moved until mid to late Sept unless PHO ponies up Bledsoe/Jackson/a better 1st in the meantime would be my best guess...
Come at the king, you best not miss...
BasketballFan7
Analyst
Posts: 3,668
And1: 2,344
Joined: Mar 11, 2015
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1645 » by BasketballFan7 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 2:15 pm

Seabass11 wrote:Who are people thinking DET would throw back to us? Can they include Bradley in a deal?

I'd take Bradley and Drummond or RJ


That's going to be tough on the wallet in a year, when Bradley's contract expires.
FGA Restricted All-Time Draft

In My Hood, The Bullies Get Bullied
PG: 2013 Mike Conley, 1998 Greg Anthony
SG: 2005 Manu Ginobili, 2015 Khris Middleton
SF: 1991 Scottie Pippen
PF: 1986 Larry Bird, 1996 Dennis Rodman
C: 1999 Alonzo Mourning
JHFVF07
Rookie
Posts: 1,245
And1: 1,012
Joined: Apr 24, 2017
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1646 » by JHFVF07 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 2:15 pm

John Murdoch wrote:CLE Get: E.Payton + A.Gordon + J.Randle + J.Clarkson + T.Ross+ ORL 2020 1st (Top 5 pro) + LA 2022 1st (Top 10 pro)

ORL Get: K.Irving + R.Jefferson

LAL Get: C.Frye


I dont think Lakers wanna get rid of Clarkson so hard that they will include a 1st and Randle, to get Frye.
And our players on this deal doesnt add much value for Cleveland(bad fit).
User avatar
John Murdoch
RealGM
Posts: 10,253
And1: 7,720
Joined: Sep 16, 2013
         

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1647 » by John Murdoch » Mon Aug 7, 2017 2:18 pm

Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
axeman23
Analyst
Posts: 3,732
And1: 3,647
Joined: Jul 31, 2009

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1648 » by axeman23 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 2:21 pm

JHFVF07 wrote:
John Murdoch wrote:CLE Get: E.Payton + A.Gordon + J.Randle + J.Clarkson + T.Ross+ ORL 2020 1st (Top 5 pro) + LA 2022 1st (Top 10 pro)

ORL Get: K.Irving + R.Jefferson

LAL Get: C.Frye


I dont think Lakers wanna get rid of Clarkson so hard that they will include a 1st and Randle, to get Frye.
And our players on this deal doesnt add much value for Cleveland(bad fit).


As a Cavs fan, I was wondering about that. From a Cavs point of view I was a bit "meh" on the deal. But I thought almost straight away Lakers (in my mind, at least) get hosed. Then when it was a Lakers fan suggesting it, I got doubly confused! :lol:
axeman23
Analyst
Posts: 3,732
And1: 3,647
Joined: Jul 31, 2009

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1649 » by axeman23 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 2:24 pm

John Murdoch wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=yb48czll


Apparently Wolves have taken Wiggins off the trading table, and from seeing others opinion about him, and his impending (desired) max, I don't think either side goes for it...
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,241
And1: 36,273
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1650 » by jbk1234 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 3:36 pm

Seabass11 wrote:Who are people thinking DET would throw back to us? Can they include Bradley in a deal?

I'd take Bradley and Drummond or RJ


IMO there's no point in talking to the Pistons if they won't trade Bradley. Bradley, Johnson & pick compensation is actually my preference. Given the fact that S. Johnson got sent to the D League last year, and the Pistons obtained Bradley for Marcus friggin Morris, they should be willing to move those pieces without much fuss. The hickup would be finding a third team to take R. Jackson (Knicks)?
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,772
And1: 22,826
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1651 » by MotownMadness » Mon Aug 7, 2017 4:04 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Seabass11 wrote:Who are people thinking DET would throw back to us? Can they include Bradley in a deal?

I'd take Bradley and Drummond or RJ


IMO there's no point in talking to the Pistons if they won't trade Bradley. Bradley, Johnson & pick compensation is actually my preference. Given the fact that S. Johnson got sent to the D League last year, and the Pistons obtained Bradley for Marcus friggin Morris, they should be willing to move those pieces without much fuss. The hickup would be finding a third team to take R. Jackson (Knicks)?

My only thing is I feel like we can overpay Bradley to stay but Kyrie will be a #1 target for every team as a UFA.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,241
And1: 36,273
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1652 » by jbk1234 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 4:16 pm

MotownMadness wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Seabass11 wrote:Who are people thinking DET would throw back to us? Can they include Bradley in a deal?

I'd take Bradley and Drummond or RJ


IMO there's no point in talking to the Pistons if they won't trade Bradley. Bradley, Johnson & pick compensation is actually my preference. Given the fact that S. Johnson got sent to the D League last year, and the Pistons obtained Bradley for Marcus friggin Morris, they should be willing to move those pieces without much fuss. The hickup would be finding a third team to take R. Jackson (Knicks)?

My only thing is I feel like we can overpay Bradley to stay but Kyrie will be a #1 target for every team as a UFA.


Perhaps. But would you even want to? You'd be cementing in a treadmill roster & getting awfully close to the luxury tax. You've got $106 million in salary on the books next summer without Bradley's contract.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,772
And1: 22,826
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1653 » by MotownMadness » Mon Aug 7, 2017 4:27 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
IMO there's no point in talking to the Pistons if they won't trade Bradley. Bradley, Johnson & pick compensation is actually my preference. Given the fact that S. Johnson got sent to the D League last year, and the Pistons obtained Bradley for Marcus friggin Morris, they should be willing to move those pieces without much fuss. The hickup would be finding a third team to take R. Jackson (Knicks)?

My only thing is I feel like we can overpay Bradley to stay but Kyrie will be a #1 target for every team as a UFA.


Perhaps. But would you even want to? You'd be cementing in a treadmill roster & getting awfully close to the luxury tax. You've got $106 million in salary on the books next summer without Bradley's contract.

The FO is hell bent on the playoffs and we can't get FAs. So yeah he's only 26 and plays the right way so screw it.
User avatar
Dante80
Pro Prospect
Posts: 766
And1: 842
Joined: Apr 18, 2017
Location: Athens :: Greece
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1654 » by Dante80 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 5:21 pm

My take on this.

There is an objective difference between the value someone has as a basketball player, and the value he represents as an (trade) asset to the team he is contracted with.

The second Kyrie leaked/made known that he wants to be traded/no longer wants to play for the Cavs, his objective market value plummeted. It also forced the new Cavs FO to start searching for trade avenues, at a time in the off-season when major FA and trade transactions/moves were already concluded.

Keeping the guy on the team won't do them much good. The more he stays, the more his trade value drops. Moreover, keeping a player on your team that does not want to be there any more has consequences, both for him and for the team as a whole. Especially if you add in the whole Lebron James aspect.

As is natural, Cleveland - being put in a bad situation - wants to extract the best it can out of this. At the same time, teams that view Kyrie as a possible/notable/worthy addition, will want to extract Kyrie for the lowest price possible. That is the norm for any and every trade negotiation in the NBA.

As expected, the trade value that Kyrie has right now is objectively much, much less than his value as a player, due to the circumstances at hand. So, I don't really think that the Cavs can reach a good deal here, given the specifics. And I don't think that the circumstances will change for the better if they decide to wait. There are a lot of unknown unknowns in that situation (injury, team chemistry, trade value sabotage by the disgruntled player, market changes etc etc).

Knowing the above, I think that the only realistic option the Cavs FO has is to try and negotiate the best available deal they can get, before the season (or even training camp) starts. And to not try to keep the player against his wishes, under no circumstances (it is impossible to get more than cents on the dollar from trading him).
Image
Dry_Fish
RealGM
Posts: 44,073
And1: 8,398
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
Location: San Tan, AZ
Contact:

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1655 » by Dry_Fish » Mon Aug 7, 2017 5:57 pm

mplsfonz23 wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Based on the rumored offers, I'm no longer certain he'll be moved before the season starts.


It would be so toxic for the locker room if Kyrie stays on the squad. Unless he comes out and says he doesn't want to be traded.

Still I would demand a big haul if I'm the Cavs. They will get better offers after December 15th and trade deadline.

I was going to and 1 this before I saw this. He won't say that now. his fate lies with the Cavs now. LBJ will not allow mutiny, and I am sure when he asks about the trade demand he will allow Irving to say, "I was just kidding."
He's out. Period. IMO.


What is lebron going to do really? He can't do anything to Kyrie beside talk to him...maybe give a mean stare.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,241
And1: 36,273
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1656 » by jbk1234 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 6:11 pm

Dante80 wrote:My take on this.

There is an objective difference between the value someone has as a basketball player, and the value he represents as an (trade) asset to the team he is contracted with.

The second Kyrie leaked/made known that he wants to be traded/no longer wants to play for the Cavs, his objective market value plummeted. It also forced the new Cavs FO to start searching for trade avenues, at a time in the off-season when major FA and trade transactions/moves were already concluded.

Keeping the guy on the team won't do them much good. The more he stays, the more his trade value drops. Moreover, keeping a player on your team that does not want to be there any more has consequences, both for him and for the team as a whole. Especially if you add in the whole Lebron James aspect.

As is natural, Cleveland - being put in a bad situation - wants to extract the best it can out of this. At the same time, teams that view Kyrie as a possible/notable/worthy addition, will want to extract Kyrie for the lowest price possible. That is the norm for any and every trade negotiation in the NBA.

As expected, the trade value that Kyrie has right now is objectively much, much less than his value as a player, due to the circumstances at hand. So, I don't really think that the Cavs can reach a good deal here, given the specifics. And I don't think that the circumstances will change for the better if they decide to wait. There are a lot of unknown unknowns in that situation (injury, team chemistry, trade value sabotage by the disgruntled player, market changes etc etc).

Knowing the above, I think that the only realistic option the Cavs FO has is to try and negotiate the best available deal they can get, before the season (or even training camp) starts. And to not try to keep the player against his wishes, under no circumstances (it is impossible to get more than cents on the dollar from trading him).


The Cavs will get a good offer for Kyrie or they'll trade him for the best pick they can get ahead of next year's draft after the season. These guys are grown men and they're under contract.

I also disagree that there's no way offers will improve as the season goes on. Right now everybody is optimistic about their rosters/teams. Teams always project improvement on to young players. *This is the year player X is going to make a big jump.* Spoiler: Not all of those guys are going to make a big jump. All these *untouchable* rookies will begin to look rather mortal once they start playing in the NBA. Players get injured and it impacts what direction teams go in. But most importantly, there are teams that really want Kyrie & once they realize he won't be traded at a discount, at least one of those teams will offer fair value.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,015
And1: 31,126
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1657 » by mademan » Mon Aug 7, 2017 6:13 pm

Dry_Fish wrote:
mplsfonz23 wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
It would be so toxic for the locker room if Kyrie stays on the squad. Unless he comes out and says he doesn't want to be traded.

Still I would demand a big haul if I'm the Cavs. They will get better offers after December 15th and trade deadline.

I was going to and 1 this before I saw this. He won't say that now. his fate lies with the Cavs now. LBJ will not allow mutiny, and I am sure when he asks about the trade demand he will allow Irving to say, "I was just kidding."
He's out. Period. IMO.


What is lebron going to do really? He can't do anything to Kyrie beside talk to him...maybe give a mean stare.


He's not gonna do anything. It's still in kyries beat interest to play the good soldier.
mplsfonz23
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,944
And1: 1,310
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1658 » by mplsfonz23 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 6:35 pm

mademan wrote:
Dry_Fish wrote:
mplsfonz23 wrote:I was going to and 1 this before I saw this. He won't say that now. his fate lies with the Cavs now. LBJ will not allow mutiny, and I am sure when he asks about the trade demand he will allow Irving to say, "I was just kidding."
He's out. Period. IMO.


What is lebron going to do really? He can't do anything to Kyrie beside talk to him...maybe give a mean stare.


He's not gonna do anything. It's still in kyries beat interest to play the good soldier.

Yup pretty much.
LBJ will be having private talks with the FO on how best to move KI and for whom. There is not enough water that can run under that bridge, IMHO.
Usually when a star wants out he gets out. I just wonder how other stars are viewing Lebron now. Funny how he's having trouble trying to get people on his team now. Derrick Rose, Jose Calderon...What a joke.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,241
And1: 36,273
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1659 » by jbk1234 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 6:37 pm

mplsfonz23 wrote:
mademan wrote:
Dry_Fish wrote:
What is lebron going to do really? He can't do anything to Kyrie beside talk to him...maybe give a mean stare.


He's not gonna do anything. It's still in kyries beat interest to play the good soldier.

Yup pretty much.
LBJ will be having private talks with the FO on how best to move KI and for whom. There is not enough water that can run under that bridge, IMHO.
Usually when a star wants out he gets out. I just wonder how other stars are viewing Lebron now. Funny how he's having trouble trying to get people on his team now. Derrick Rose, Jose Calderon...What a joke.


Yeah why aren't the other stars who are still under contract joining the Cavs on a league minimum contract?
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,241
And1: 36,273
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1660 » by jbk1234 » Mon Aug 7, 2017 6:44 pm

Cavs just released a brand new promo. Kyrie's still in it.

Read on Twitter
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.

Return to The General Board