DirtyDez wrote:That's a lot of cheese.
Well, IMO, Warren definitely shouldn't be either. Wiggins isn't even their best player. KAT, then Butler, THEN Wiggins. Warren is our 3rd best player as we sit today. MAYBE Jackson supplants him, but point is, and no, I'm not going down the Warren-is-better-than-Wiggins rabbit hole, but if their 3rd best player is not available for trade, AND is getting the Max, then Warren, shouldn't be available for trade, and should get at least an 80% of Max salary; He's at LEAST 80% the player Wiggins is, he just wasn't drafted 1st overall, and isn't only 22.
Of 93 SGs and 71 SFs, depending how you view Wiggins, for O/D/RPM, Wiggins finished with 1.56 ORPM (13th/13th-SF), -3.16 DRPM and (91st/69th), and -1.60 RPM (52nd/45th) last year, I'm sorry, I'm not seeing a 'Max' player. That's not even close,and if most of you do not believe Warren is better, yet his advanced stats blow Wiggins' out of the water. Maybe he'll figure it out by year 2 or 3 of the contract, but I sure as heck wouldn't pay max money for those numbers...I don't care how he looks; I want production.