Max Green wrote:DanoMac wrote:jakecronus8 wrote:GOTSpoiler:
Agree with all of this. I started listening to a GOT podcast last week on a long drive to Nashville and had to turn it off after 15 mins because of the overanalyzing.
I enjoyed this episode immensely, was on the edge of my seat.
I think I can appreciate GOT more comparing it to **** booking/storylines like WWE.
We've had 6 seasons worth of slow build. The fuse has been burning long enough, it's time for **** to explode. I'm enjoying the pacing immensely. There's no filler, every scene and conversation means something now.
2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
-
tydett
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,626
- And1: 8,038
- Joined: Feb 15, 2012
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
Spoiler:
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,075
- And1: 41,531
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
tydett wrote:Max Green wrote:DanoMac wrote:
Agree with all of this. I started listening to a GOT podcast last week on a long drive to Nashville and had to turn it off after 15 mins because of the overanalyzing.
I enjoyed this episode immensely, was on the edge of my seat.
I think I can appreciate GOT more comparing it to **** booking/storylines like WWE.
We've had 6 seasons worth of slow build. The fuse has been burning long enough, it's time for **** to explode. I'm enjoying the pacing immensely. There's no filler, every scene and conversation means something now.Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,075
- And1: 41,531
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
There's a false dilemma here between fast pace and organic plot.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
-
jimmybones
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,728
- And1: 3,240
- Joined: May 29, 2009
- Location: MKE
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
GoT
Spoiler:
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
-
KidA24
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,070
- And1: 11,383
- Joined: Nov 01, 2012
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
jimmybones wrote:GoTSpoiler:
Spoiler:
Amos Barshad: "So you got a job, a place to live, a license? What’s left?"
Giannis: “Nothing. Just get a ring now.”
Giannis: “Nothing. Just get a ring now.”
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
-
RRyder823
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,020
- And1: 5,072
- Joined: May 06, 2014
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
I'm genually suprised so many are giving the show runners a pass for GRRM not supplying them with ready made material.
They still have the major plot points to follow. Profesional writers and producers shouldn't be given a pass for not being able to fill in the blanks in a way that makes any kind of sense.
If they can't come up with an original thought on their own they shouldn't have been allowed to do the show in the first place
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using RealGM mobile app
They still have the major plot points to follow. Profesional writers and producers shouldn't be given a pass for not being able to fill in the blanks in a way that makes any kind of sense.
If they can't come up with an original thought on their own they shouldn't have been allowed to do the show in the first place
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using RealGM mobile app
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
-
jimmybones
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,728
- And1: 3,240
- Joined: May 29, 2009
- Location: MKE
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
I don't see many people giving a pass. I see a lot of people pointing out what they see as flaws, but acknowledging they are in a kinda f'd spot.
Take ravens with them? I thought maester's were the only ones who could control ravens?
KidA24 wrote:jimmybones wrote:GoTSpoiler:Spoiler:
Take ravens with them? I thought maester's were the only ones who could control ravens?
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
-
WeekapaugGroove
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,538
- And1: 20,241
- Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
GOT
Spoiler:
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
-
jimmybones
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,728
- And1: 3,240
- Joined: May 29, 2009
- Location: MKE
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
WeekapaugGroove wrote:GOTSpoiler:
Spoiler:
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
-
El Duderino
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
WeekapaugGroove wrote:GOTSpoiler:
Spoiler:
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- WRau1
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,947
- And1: 5,156
- Joined: Apr 30, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
El Duderino wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:GOTSpoiler:Spoiler:
Spoiler:
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- WRau1
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,947
- And1: 5,156
- Joined: Apr 30, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
I find it hilarious that in a show about dragons, magic and undead, people draw the line at realistic travel times.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 33,122
- And1: 16,777
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
WRau1 wrote:I find it hilarious that in a show about dragons, magic and undead, people draw the line at realistic travel times.
This is such a red herring. People are objecting to story where an established narrative and understanding is being upended by the way the plot is being moved towards its resolution.
Spoiler:
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- Turk Nowitzki
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,544
- And1: 11,572
- Joined: Feb 26, 2010
- Location: on the Hellmouth
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
WRau1 wrote:I find it hilarious that in a show about dragons, magic and undead, people draw the line at realistic travel times.
You aren't the first person to throw this hot take out there. You can watch a show however you like of course and take from it what you want, but this particular line makes me think that anyone who says it doesn't have any concept of why people consider this a great show and are disappointed in recent episodes.
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,075
- And1: 41,531
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
WRau1 wrote:I find it hilarious that in a show about dragons, magic and undead, people draw the line at realistic travel times.
Do you watch the show and if so have you ever described it this way to someone who doesn't?
Would you be happy if at the end of the show, it was revealed that all of the characters were actually one character? I would think so since there are also dragons.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- Siefer
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,348
- And1: 6,894
- Joined: Nov 05, 2006
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
It's a common enough response to the criticism, but a weird amalgam of misunderstandings.
Even fantasy worlds have rules, and often they have a great many rules in common with the real world. Take for example:
In the above example, the rule is established in a sensible way, and treated as a discovery. The characters didn't know it before, learned about it in a believable way, and can now apply that knowledge in the future.
Folks aren't complaining about elements of the fantasy world that have been established (dragons, magic, and the undead), nor are they complaining about new rules that have recently been established. Folks are complaining about structural problems with the narrative, and the fast and loose handling of established rules.
TVTropes explains this well.
Even fantasy worlds have rules, and often they have a great many rules in common with the real world. Take for example:
Spoiler:
In the above example, the rule is established in a sensible way, and treated as a discovery. The characters didn't know it before, learned about it in a believable way, and can now apply that knowledge in the future.
Folks aren't complaining about elements of the fantasy world that have been established (dragons, magic, and the undead), nor are they complaining about new rules that have recently been established. Folks are complaining about structural problems with the narrative, and the fast and loose handling of established rules.
TVTropes explains this well.
Viewers are usually willing to go along with creative explanations which is why people don't criticize your wormhole travel system or how a shrinking potion doesn't violate the laws of matter conservation, but even in the more fantastical genres, suspension of disbelief can be broken when a work breaks its own established laws or asks the audience to put up with too many things that come off as contrived.
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- Iheartfootball
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,818
- And1: 5,877
- Joined: May 09, 2014
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
Honestly, the blame probably falls at the feet of the viewers and HBO. It's a costly show to produce, if you want it last as many seasons as it takes to wrap it all up they would have to no doubt increase the monthly subscription rates. It doesn't help that people illegally watch the show and they don't see that revenue. HBO execs probably told show runners you have X amount of episodes to wrap this up and this is the best they could do.
Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 33,122
- And1: 16,777
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
Iheartfootball wrote:Honestly, the blame probably falls at the feet of the viewers and HBO. It's a costly show to produce, if you want it last as many seasons as it takes to wrap it all up they would have to no doubt increase the monthly subscription rates. It doesn't help that people illegally watch the show and they don't see that revenue. HBO execs probably told show runners you have X amount of episodes to wrap this up and this is the best they could do.
You might be right about HBO putting the screws to the showrunners, but I don't buy that rationale. It's not like they didn't know how complicated the plot was when they first started the show. Don't commit to the start if you can't commit to the finish.
And HBO's parent company, Time Warner, is likely to crack $6 Billion in PROFIT during 2017. I find it hard to believe that HBO couldn't have financed another 6-8 episodes to help the final couple seasons wrap up at a more reasonable pace (which would also earn more revenue from HBO for subscribers who only signed up to watch GOT and will cancel when the season is over).
Maybe B&W didn't want to commit to two full seasons, but that's on them.
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
- Siefer
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,348
- And1: 6,894
- Joined: Nov 05, 2006
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
Iheartfootball wrote:Honestly, the blame probably falls at the feet of the viewers and HBO. It's a costly show to produce, if you want it last as many seasons as it takes to wrap it all up they would have to no doubt increase the monthly subscription rates. It doesn't help that people illegally watch the show and they don't see that revenue. HBO execs probably told show runners you have X amount of episodes to wrap this up and this is the best they could do.
We know that's not what happened, though. HBO would have loved for this to go on for more than 73 episodes. This season could have easily been 10 episodes long, and it would have still moved at a good clip. I suspect D&D are closing up shop because they ran out of source material, and have decided that the safest path is to focus on hitting the bullet points GRRM gave them. Remember, they signed up to adapt A Song of Ice and Fire, not finish it from scratch. The quality has consistently dipped every time D&D have gone it alone, and I think they know it. Now, they're just trying to finish the damn thing with as little difficulty as possible.
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
-
DingleJerry
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,284
- And1: 10,933
- Joined: Jul 09, 2015
-
Re: 2017 TV/Movie/Book Thread with Spoilers
Keep in mind these last two seasons are fixing to be very expensive to produce due to all the CGI of the dragons, white walkers, etc. That stuff popped up here and there before, now it's every episode and battles between different CGI elements. It might be costing them just as much to do 6 episodes this way as it was to do 10 before. Still, this show seems profitable so no need to cut corners, but business is business and they'll essentially get the same income for 15ish episodes as they would have for 20. But this way they save the cost of the other 5 to help the bottom line.
Resident Lillard truther since 2015.







