
This will be the avg boston fan reaction to what eventually takes place
Moderator: ijspeelman
Stillwater wrote:
This will be the avg boston fan reaction to what eventually takes place
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Honestly if Altman's caught out being sneaky, Boston can do him a big favor by throwing him a bone, like a second-rounder - but just as likely we do something that lets him save face while actually rescinding value. Like, BKN pick goes back, Cleveland gets BOS 18, BOS 20, LAC 1st.
GregB wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:Honestly if Altman's caught out being sneaky, Boston can do him a big favor by throwing him a bone, like a second-rounder - but just as likely we do something that lets him save face while actually rescinding value. Like, BKN pick goes back, Cleveland gets BOS 18, BOS 20, LAC 1st.
That makes abosultely zero sense. You are overthinking it.
They want more and if more is adding a future Boston first or the clippers pick then fine. But not Brown, Tatum or Lakers pick. Not a chance.
jbk1234 wrote:GregB wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:Honestly if Altman's caught out being sneaky, Boston can do him a big favor by throwing him a bone, like a second-rounder - but just as likely we do something that lets him save face while actually rescinding value. Like, BKN pick goes back, Cleveland gets BOS 18, BOS 20, LAC 1st.
That makes abosultely zero sense. You are overthinking it.
They want more and if more is adding a future Boston first or the clippers pick then fine. But not Brown, Tatum or Lakers pick. Not a chance.
I think they could add Rozier and that would be fine. It's just that the Cavs don't have a starting PG right now and that needs to be fixed.
Andrew McCeltic wrote:What your GM is doing is basically unprecedented. Trades have fallen through because of failed physicals, but no one's ever tried "He passed the physical, but we have a different assessment of his readiness to play, so give us Jayson Tatum."
Stillwater wrote:If IT4 will miss the majority of the season needing surgery they will either not come to an agreement , or Boston will give up lakers pick call it deal or to lesser extent if they value that pick that much give up Tatum or Brown along with Rozier and take back Zizic & a salary dump.
But if IT4 can play in 120 days or something as the outside timeline without surgery maybe we take back Rozier for Felder and they give us a future early 2nd or something much more simple.
My main concern is if because the surgery was not done earlier,has his condition worsened enough (maybe since the Boston doctors exams and the info that was initially reported in the trade proposal )so that he may never return to form,even with the surgery. if so, he is of little value and cannot be included in this trade.Then they likely void the deal and move on or if Ainge is that motivated to get KI knowing he would be taking back a digruntled injured worse than he thought pg so he sends out 1 of his 2 sf not named Hayward and lives with & still aslo includes Rozier and a filler
Sactowndog wrote:Stillwater wrote:If IT4 will miss the majority of the season needing surgery they will either not come to an agreement , or Boston will give up lakers pick call it deal or to lesser extent if they value that pick that much give up Tatum or Brown along with Rozier and take back Zizic & a salary dump.
But if IT4 can play in 120 days or something as the outside timeline without surgery maybe we take back Rozier for Felder and they give us a future early 2nd or something much more simple.
My main concern is if because the surgery was not done earlier,has his condition worsened enough (maybe since the Boston doctors exams and the info that was initially reported in the trade proposal )so that he may never return to form,even with the surgery. if so, he is of little value and cannot be included in this trade.Then they likely void the deal and move on or if Ainge is that motivated to get KI knowing he would be taking back a digruntled injured worse than he thought pg so he sends out 1 of his 2 sf not named Hayward and lives with & still aslo includes Rozier and a filler
If I'm Ainge I walk away. The Nets pick is the best pick you will get plus you get Crowder and Zizic. Your free to find a better deal elsewhere if you can. It's only going to get worse for you the longer you wait
Stillwater wrote:Sactowndog wrote:Stillwater wrote:If IT4 will miss the majority of the season needing surgery they will either not come to an agreement , or Boston will give up lakers pick call it deal or to lesser extent if they value that pick that much give up Tatum or Brown along with Rozier and take back Zizic & a salary dump.
But if IT4 can play in 120 days or something as the outside timeline without surgery maybe we take back Rozier for Felder and they give us a future early 2nd or something much more simple.
My main concern is if because the surgery was not done earlier,has his condition worsened enough (maybe since the Boston doctors exams and the info that was initially reported in the trade proposal )so that he may never return to form,even with the surgery. if so, he is of little value and cannot be included in this trade.Then they likely void the deal and move on or if Ainge is that motivated to get KI knowing he would be taking back a digruntled injured worse than he thought pg so he sends out 1 of his 2 sf not named Hayward and lives with & still aslo includes Rozier and a filler
If I'm Ainge I walk away. The Nets pick is the best pick you will get plus you get Crowder and Zizic. Your free to find a better deal elsewhere if you can. It's only going to get worse for you the longer you wait
Yeah Boston can't walk away,the decision is up to Cleveland only.
Granted if Ainge plays hardball and actually did think he gave accurate information regarding IT4's condition and that's why the trade included a lottery pick, and refuses to give up more even with new info on IT4's timeline, then The Cavs will void the deal if it's true IT4 will miss most if not all of the season.
They won't likely get a high lottery pick unless they deal with Phoenix (who has a pg) or ATL (who has a pg). But there are plenty of teams such as Milwaukee, Dallas etc that we could get a deal we like who have assets & players that they would consider moving if KI is their missing piece.
I think Boston misrepresented how bad IT4 was.
If it turns out IT4's timeline is just pushed back without surgery but the med examiners determined he will heal fine in time just longer than Boston docs projected for the 2nd half of the season, the Cavs probably are just asking for another asset in picks so they can combine the pick(s) with a salary dump to get an upgrade to Rose.
Not that unreasonable to ask, whether they get it or not is another story.
The Cavs got a solid 3 & D player in Crowder and a potential #1 pick (could be as low as 6) but still valuable. & they got an under rated young center.
But the entire deal was hinged on IT4 being able to compete with the Cav's for a championship even if he wasn't the "prize" of the trade , so you almost have to believe they would not have done this deal knowing IT4 was not going to be ready until after the all star break or something similar and want compensation for the misrepresentation by Ainge.
The other possibility here is IT4 is much worse now than when Boston examined him(aggravated it further possibly trying to work out or something) and so it brings an entire new set of circumstances to any deal with Boston.
Boston does not want to lose KI and bring back an injured player who is worse than they thought if that proves to be true, so I think they would be wise to add a couple 2nd rounders and Rozier at minimum taking back somebody like Jefferson as a veteran presence for his young core.
I don't believe the Cavs would deny that,unless IT4 will need surgery to recover to full strength and be available to them only if he were to sign with them in fa which would never had been agreed a pon by Cleveland had they known that up front even with as much other assets as they got in return.
Sactowndog wrote:Stillwater wrote:Sactowndog wrote:
If I'm Ainge I walk away. The Nets pick is the best pick you will get plus you get Crowder and Zizic. Your free to find a better deal elsewhere if you can. It's only going to get worse for you the longer you wait
Yeah Boston can't walk away,the decision is up to Cleveland only.
Granted if Ainge plays hardball and actually did think he gave accurate information regarding IT4's condition and that's why the trade included a lottery pick, and refuses to give up more even with new info on IT4's timeline, then The Cavs will void the deal if it's true IT4 will miss most if not all of the season.
They won't likely get a high lottery pick unless they deal with Phoenix (who has a pg) or ATL (who has a pg). But there are plenty of teams such as Milwaukee, Dallas etc that we could get a deal we like who have assets & players that they would consider moving if KI is their missing piece.
I think Boston misrepresented how bad IT4 was.
If it turns out IT4's timeline is just pushed back without surgery but the med examiners determined he will heal fine in time just longer than Boston docs projected for the 2nd half of the season, the Cavs probably are just asking for another asset in picks so they can combine the pick(s) with a salary dump to get an upgrade to Rose.
Not that unreasonable to ask, whether they get it or not is another story.
The Cavs got a solid 3 & D player in Crowder and a potential #1 pick (could be as low as 6) but still valuable. & they got an under rated young center.
But the entire deal was hinged on IT4 being able to compete with the Cav's for a championship even if he wasn't the "prize" of the trade , so you almost have to believe they would not have done this deal knowing IT4 was not going to be ready until after the all star break or something similar and want compensation for the misrepresentation by Ainge.
The other possibility here is IT4 is much worse now than when Boston examined him(aggravated it further possibly trying to work out or something) and so it brings an entire new set of circumstances to any deal with Boston.
Boston does not want to lose KI and bring back an injured player who is worse than they thought if that proves to be true, so I think they would be wise to add a couple 2nd rounders and Rozier at minimum taking back somebody like Jefferson as a veteran presence for his young core.
I don't believe the Cavs would deny that,unless IT4 will need surgery to recover to full strength and be available to them only if he were to sign with them in fa which would never had been agreed a pon by Cleveland had they known that up front even with as much other assets as they got in return.
I don't think Isaiah is worse than Boston thought he would be. I think no one knows for sure which is why Danny gave you a great pick in a top loaded draft. Kyrie isn't going to waive his no trade clause for Phoenix or Atlanta. And even if he did his presence makes that team better which only helps Boston by increasing the chance both the Nets pick and the LA pick are top 5.
Your only real option is Milwaukee or the Clippers and adding Kyrie makes the pick a late first rounder. Cleveland thought they got a steal for one of the worst defensive guards in the league. Now they realize the trade is fairer than they thought. Rookie GM..... Walk away no problem.
Stillwater wrote:Sactowndog wrote:Stillwater wrote:Yeah Boston can't walk away,the decision is up to Cleveland only.
Granted if Ainge plays hardball and actually did think he gave accurate information regarding IT4's condition and that's why the trade included a lottery pick, and refuses to give up more even with new info on IT4's timeline, then The Cavs will void the deal if it's true IT4 will miss most if not all of the season.
They won't likely get a high lottery pick unless they deal with Phoenix (who has a pg) or ATL (who has a pg). But there are plenty of teams such as Milwaukee, Dallas etc that we could get a deal we like who have assets & players that they would consider moving if KI is their missing piece.
I think Boston misrepresented how bad IT4 was.
If it turns out IT4's timeline is just pushed back without surgery but the med examiners determined he will heal fine in time just longer than Boston docs projected for the 2nd half of the season, the Cavs probably are just asking for another asset in picks so they can combine the pick(s) with a salary dump to get an upgrade to Rose.
Not that unreasonable to ask, whether they get it or not is another story.
The Cavs got a solid 3 & D player in Crowder and a potential #1 pick (could be as low as 6) but still valuable. & they got an under rated young center.
But the entire deal was hinged on IT4 being able to compete with the Cav's for a championship even if he wasn't the "prize" of the trade , so you almost have to believe they would not have done this deal knowing IT4 was not going to be ready until after the all star break or something similar and want compensation for the misrepresentation by Ainge.
The other possibility here is IT4 is much worse now than when Boston examined him(aggravated it further possibly trying to work out or something) and so it brings an entire new set of circumstances to any deal with Boston.
Boston does not want to lose KI and bring back an injured player who is worse than they thought if that proves to be true, so I think they would be wise to add a couple 2nd rounders and Rozier at minimum taking back somebody like Jefferson as a veteran presence for his young core.
I don't believe the Cavs would deny that,unless IT4 will need surgery to recover to full strength and be available to them only if he were to sign with them in fa which would never had been agreed a pon by Cleveland had they known that up front even with as much other assets as they got in return.
I don't think Isaiah is worse than Boston thought he would be. I think no one knows for sure which is why Danny gave you a great pick in a top loaded draft. Kyrie isn't going to waive his no trade clause for Phoenix or Atlanta. And even if he did his presence makes that team better which only helps Boston by increasing the chance both the Nets pick and the LA pick are top 5.
Your only real option is Milwaukee or the Clippers and adding Kyrie makes the pick a late first rounder. Cleveland thought they got a steal for one of the worst defensive guards in the league. Now they realize the trade is fairer than they thought. Rookie GM..... Walk away no problem.
Irving doesn't have a no trade clause
Sactowndog wrote:Stillwater wrote:Sactowndog wrote:
I don't think Isaiah is worse than Boston thought he would be. I think no one knows for sure which is why Danny gave you a great pick in a top loaded draft. Kyrie isn't going to waive his no trade clause for Phoenix or Atlanta. And even if he did his presence makes that team better which only helps Boston by increasing the chance both the Nets pick and the LA pick are top 5.
Your only real option is Milwaukee or the Clippers and adding Kyrie makes the pick a late first rounder. Cleveland thought they got a steal for one of the worst defensive guards in the league. Now they realize the trade is fairer than they thought. Rookie GM..... Walk away no problem.
Irving doesn't have a no trade clause
What did he waive to go to Boston?
Stillwater wrote:Sactowndog wrote:Stillwater wrote:Irving doesn't have a no trade clause
What did he waive to go to Boston?
trade kicker