SupremeHustle wrote:I know some of you guys would rather have CJ McCollum, though.
I'd rather have CJ for 70% of what Irving would cost in terms of assets. All else equal, Kyrie is the superior player.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
SupremeHustle wrote:I know some of you guys would rather have CJ McCollum, though.
chonestown wrote:SupremeHustle wrote:I know some of you guys would rather have CJ McCollum, though.
I'd rather have CJ for 70% of what Irving would cost in terms of assets. All else equal, Kyrie is the superior player.
M-C-G wrote:Prince12 wrote:I'm trying to imagine how horrific our bench would be if we gave up Brog, Mids, Thon and Delly. I don't think I'm capable of imagining something so disgusting.
PG: Kyrie, GP2
SG: Shump, Vaughn, Brown
SF: Snell, Parker
PF: Giannis, Wilson, Mirza
C: Monroe, Henson, Hawes
Maybe that is why they brought in that big list of players to work out today? Sign Burke, Jason Terry with the open roster spots
chonestown wrote:SupremeHustle wrote:I know some of you guys would rather have CJ McCollum, though.
I'd rather have CJ for 70% of what Irving would cost in terms of assets. All else equal, Kyrie is the superior player.
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
M-C-G wrote:Prince12 wrote:I'm trying to imagine how horrific our bench would be if we gave up Brog, Mids, Thon and Delly. I don't think I'm capable of imagining something so disgusting.
PG: Kyrie, GP2
SG: Shump, Vaughn, Brown
SF: Snell, Parker
PF: Giannis, Wilson, Mirza
C: Monroe, Henson, Hawes
Maybe that is why they brought in that big list of players to work out today? Sign Burke, Jason Terry with the open roster spots
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
SupremeHustle wrote:At the end of the day I think we all know that Middleton/Maker or Middleton/Brogdon isn't enough to get it done, whether we like the deal or not.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
trwi7 wrote:M-C-G wrote:Prince12 wrote:I'm trying to imagine how horrific our bench would be if we gave up Brog, Mids, Thon and Delly. I don't think I'm capable of imagining something so disgusting.
PG: Kyrie, GP2
SG: Shump, Vaughn, Brown
SF: Snell, Parker
PF: Giannis, Wilson, Mirza
C: Monroe, Henson, Hawes
Maybe that is why they brought in that big list of players to work out today? Sign Burke, Jason Terry with the open roster spots
The worst part about this is we're already in the tax and this would just take us further into the tax, not by much, about $1.5 million but still.
Marvin Berry wrote:I like Middleton, but you can't dismiss his hammy. If we knew we were getting the Middleton we saw for the second half of last season, I would absolutely have no issue including him in a trade for Kyrie.
trwi7 wrote:SupremeHustle wrote:At the end of the day I think we all know that Middleton/Maker or Middleton/Brogdon isn't enough to get it done, whether we like the deal or not.
Of course Giannis/Irving/complete **** isn't going to get it done either.
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
However, according to a league source who spoke with the Journal Sentinel on Wednesday, there is "nothing" to these reports. In fact, the source says there have not even been conversations between the Bucks and Cavaliers.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
trwi7 wrote:JS says no talks between Bucks and Cavs.
trwi7 wrote:JS says no talks between Bucks and Cavs.However, according to a league source who spoke with the Journal Sentinel on Wednesday, there is "nothing" to these reports. In fact, the source says there have not even been conversations between the Bucks and Cavaliers.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/sports/nba/bucks/2017/08/30/source-nothing-kyrie-irving-trade-rumors-involving-bucks/614121001/
ElPeregrino wrote:trwi7 wrote:JS says no talks between Bucks and Cavs.However, according to a league source who spoke with the Journal Sentinel on Wednesday, there is "nothing" to these reports. In fact, the source says there have not even been conversations between the Bucks and Cavaliers.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/sports/nba/bucks/2017/08/30/source-nothing-kyrie-irving-trade-rumors-involving-bucks/614121001/
We need a politifact for reporters. Matt Velazquez and Jon Krawczynski say there is nothing to this. John Gambodoro and Zach Lowe say the offer was made. Has anybody else claimed to have "sources" regarding the Bucks involvement?
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
trwi7 wrote:SupremeHustle wrote:At the end of the day I think we all know that Middleton/Maker or Middleton/Brogdon isn't enough to get it done, whether we like the deal or not.
Of course Giannis/Irving/complete **** isn't going to get it done either.
BroncoBuck wrote:Marvin Berry wrote:I like Middleton, but you can't dismiss his hammy. If we knew we were getting the Middleton we saw for the second half of last season, I would absolutely have no issue including him in a trade for Kyrie.
You do know Kyrie has a grocery list injury history right?