ImageImage

ATL - New Lottery Rules Move to Owner Vote - pg59

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

Rainwater
RealGM
Posts: 12,306
And1: 7,404
Joined: Apr 02, 2017

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - IT has bad hip, trade in question pg 13 

Post#701 » by Rainwater » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:50 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
Rainwater wrote:If Jabari comes healthy, I don't think we see that Middleton again. Arguably the best player during a time where the bucks were terrible and Giannis and Jabari were still developing.

Middleton was that guy with a healthy Jabari already though.....


I really don't believe when Giannis and Parker hit their peak potential that khris can maintain those numbers. Its a little easier to increase your stats when the talent is not at its peak or not quite there.
User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 24,239
And1: 4,555
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#702 » by raferfenix » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:51 am

Relieved.
User avatar
MidnightBuck
Junior
Posts: 372
And1: 219
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
       

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - IT has bad hip, trade in question pg 13 

Post#703 » by MidnightBuck » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:52 am

thonnisbeastley wrote:
MidnightBuck wrote:
thonnisbeastley wrote:11/12: 21-45
12/13: 24-58
13/14: 33-49
+Lebron
14/15: 53-29

Haha you're joking! You're one of those "Kyrie wasn't good before Lebron" truthers?? This is too good.

Go take a look at Giannis' teams' records in his first 2 years in the league.

Nah, I'm not one of those people. Point is he's not a #1 over Giannis and I'm not trading two young, team first intelligent players that fit around Giannis and will be more important to our future success than 2 years of Kyrie. Kyrie will kill Giannis' enthusiasm for Milwaukee and both will be gone when their contracts are over. Nothing says you're our guy like trading away two of your best friends on the team for a shoot first PG who has demanded a trade from a team thats made 3 straight finals because he thinks he's more important than Lebron James and wants to be the man while shooting 30 times a game. Especially when you took millions of dollars less than you could have in order to help the team build a championship around you.

Could Kyrie and Giannis work? Possibly..Or it could be a more toxic version of Westbrook and Durant with far less success.

The difference is Durant could shoot, Giannis can't. We need an instant-offense point guard. Kyrie shooting 30 times a game will be him taking away all of Giannis' low percentage perimeter looks and leaving him with what he does best - scoring in transition and making unbelievable plays on mismatches.

Giannis can be a league MVP on 15-20 shots per game because the rest of his game is so unprecedentedly complete.

It's over now, but the fit was an absolute no brainer.

Personality-wise, I don't know anything about it. I suppose I'm just hoping for the best there.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,349
And1: 25,534
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - IT has bad hip, trade in question pg 13 

Post#704 » by Baddy Chuck » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:52 am

Rainwater wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
Rainwater wrote:If Jabari comes healthy, I don't think we see that Middleton again. Arguably the best player during a time where the bucks were terrible and Giannis and Jabari were still developing.

Middleton was that guy with a healthy Jabari already though.....


I really don't believe when Giannis and Parker hit their peak potential that khris can maintain those numbers. Its a little easier to increase your stats when the talent is not at its peak.

But guys like Beal and McCollum would? Ok I guess. But anyways, that just goes back to the "Midds has never shown the promise" and changing it to "I don't think Midds could replicate the promise he showed" which I guess is a step towards a logical argument.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,325
And1: 4,719
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#705 » by Max Green » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:53 am

Disappointed.

We've could've taken the next step if we were able to trade for Kyrie.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
:wizard: Maxtradamus
Buck Dweller
Starter
Posts: 2,325
And1: 988
Joined: Mar 04, 2015
   

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#706 » by Buck Dweller » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:58 am

MidnightBuck wrote:
thonnisbeastley wrote:
MidnightBuck wrote:Haha you're joking! You're one of those "Kyrie wasn't good before Lebron" truthers?? This is too good.

Go take a look at Giannis' teams' records in his first 2 years in the league.

Nah, I'm not one of those people. Point is he's not a #1 over Giannis and I'm not trading two young, team first intelligent players that fit around Giannis and will be more important to our future success than 2 years of Kyrie. Kyrie will kill Giannis' enthusiasm for Milwaukee and both will be gone when their contracts are over. Nothing says you're our guy like trading away two of your best friends on the team for a shoot first PG who has demanded a trade from a team thats made 3 straight finals because he thinks he's more important than Lebron James and wants to be the man while shooting 30 times a game. Especially when you took millions of dollars less than you could have in order to help the team build a championship around you.

Could Kyrie and Giannis work? Possibly..Or it could be a more toxic version of Westbrook and Durant with far less success.

The difference is Durant could shoot, Giannis can't. We need an instant-offense point guard. Kyrie shooting 30 times a game will be him taking away all of Giannis' low percentage perimeter looks and leaving him with what he does best - scoring in transition and making unbelievable plays on mismatches.

Giannis can be a league MVP on 15-20 shots per game because the rest of his game is so unprecedentedly complete.

It's over now, but the fit was an absolute no brainer.

Personality-wise, I don't know anything about it. I suppose I'm just hoping for the best there.


we need an instant offense point guard. okay, we can agree on that. but we don't need to give up practically our entire team outside of giannis to get one of those.
Rainwater
RealGM
Posts: 12,306
And1: 7,404
Joined: Apr 02, 2017

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - IT has bad hip, trade in question pg 13 

Post#707 » by Rainwater » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:59 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
Rainwater wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:Middleton was that guy with a healthy Jabari already though.....


I really don't believe when Giannis and Parker hit their peak potential that khris can maintain those numbers. Its a little easier to increase your stats when the talent is not at its peak.

But guys like Beal and McCollum would? Ok I guess. But anyways, that just goes back to the "Midds has never shown the promise" and changing it to "I don't think Midds could replicate the promise he showed" which I guess is a step towards a logical argument.


If a peak Beal or McCollum were on the Bucks they would be fighting a healthy Parker for Second fiddle. I don't think Middleton does that. He is a 3rd option to to me until he has a break out year.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,349
And1: 25,534
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - IT has bad hip, trade in question pg 13 

Post#708 » by Baddy Chuck » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:00 am

Rainwater wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
Rainwater wrote:
I really don't believe when Giannis and Parker hit their peak potential that khris can maintain those numbers. Its a little easier to increase your stats when the talent is not at its peak.

But guys like Beal and McCollum would? Ok I guess. But anyways, that just goes back to the "Midds has never shown the promise" and changing it to "I don't think Midds could replicate the promise he showed" which I guess is a step towards a logical argument.


If a peak Beal or McCollum were on the Bucks they would be fighting a healthy Parker for Second fiddle. I don't think Middleton does that. He is a 3rd option to to me until he has a break out year.

15-16 Midds was a better player than 16-17 McCollum or Beal.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
MidnightBuck
Junior
Posts: 372
And1: 219
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
       

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#709 » by MidnightBuck » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:00 am

BucksIn6ix wrote:
MidnightBuck wrote:
thonnisbeastley wrote:Nah, I'm not one of those people. Point is he's not a #1 over Giannis and I'm not trading two young, team first intelligent players that fit around Giannis and will be more important to our future success than 2 years of Kyrie. Kyrie will kill Giannis' enthusiasm for Milwaukee and both will be gone when their contracts are over. Nothing says you're our guy like trading away two of your best friends on the team for a shoot first PG who has demanded a trade from a team thats made 3 straight finals because he thinks he's more important than Lebron James and wants to be the man while shooting 30 times a game. Especially when you took millions of dollars less than you could have in order to help the team build a championship around you.

Could Kyrie and Giannis work? Possibly..Or it could be a more toxic version of Westbrook and Durant with far less success.

The difference is Durant could shoot, Giannis can't. We need an instant-offense point guard. Kyrie shooting 30 times a game will be him taking away all of Giannis' low percentage perimeter looks and leaving him with what he does best - scoring in transition and making unbelievable plays on mismatches.

Giannis can be a league MVP on 15-20 shots per game because the rest of his game is so unprecedentedly complete.

It's over now, but the fit was an absolute no brainer.

Personality-wise, I don't know anything about it. I suppose I'm just hoping for the best there.


we need an instant offense point guard. okay, we can agree on that. but we don't need to give up practically our entire team outside of giannis to get one of those.

Snell slides in where Middleton was (decent downgrade as of now), and Kyrie slides in where Brogdon was (massive upgrade).

We lose a bit of depth that can be regained through FA once some of these contracts come off the books.

I'd hardly say we're mortgaging our whole team....
Rainwater
RealGM
Posts: 12,306
And1: 7,404
Joined: Apr 02, 2017

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - IT has bad hip, trade in question pg 13 

Post#710 » by Rainwater » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:03 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
Rainwater wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:Middleton was that guy with a healthy Jabari already though.....


I really don't believe when Giannis and Parker hit their peak potential that khris can maintain those numbers. Its a little easier to increase your stats when the talent is not at its peak.

But guys like Beal and McCollum would? Ok I guess. But anyways, that just goes back to the "Midds has never shown the promise" and changing it to "I don't think Midds could replicate the promise he showed" which I guess is a step towards a logical argument.


Nice try, 15-16 Middleton was your sign of promise not mine. I never mentioned "promise" when it came to 15-16 Middleton. That was inferred/assumed by you when I said i don't think he ever gets to that point again with a healthy Parker at his peak. That season was nothing remarkable to me.
Rainwater
RealGM
Posts: 12,306
And1: 7,404
Joined: Apr 02, 2017

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - IT has bad hip, trade in question pg 13 

Post#711 » by Rainwater » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:05 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
Rainwater wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:But guys like Beal and McCollum would? Ok I guess. But anyways, that just goes back to the "Midds has never shown the promise" and changing it to "I don't think Midds could replicate the promise he showed" which I guess is a step towards a logical argument.


If a peak Beal or McCollum were on the Bucks they would be fighting a healthy Parker for Second fiddle. I don't think Middleton does that. He is a 3rd option to to me until he has a break out year.

15-16 Midds was a better player than 16-17 McCollum or Beal.


Again, that is your opinion not mine.
User avatar
BucksFanSD
Veteran
Posts: 2,869
And1: 1,505
Joined: Jun 28, 2012

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#712 » by BucksFanSD » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:07 am

Hopefully Middleton and Brogdon have an awesome year with Middleton becoming an all star and a household name with all the national TV games we have.
User avatar
Pachinko_
RealGM
Posts: 20,693
And1: 23,985
Joined: Jun 13, 2016
 

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - IT has bad hip, trade in question pg 13 

Post#713 » by Pachinko_ » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:08 am

MidnightBuck wrote:The difference is Durant could shoot, Giannis can't. We need an instant-offense point guard. Kyrie shooting 30 times a game will be him taking away all of Giannis' low percentage perimeter looks and leaving him with what he does best - scoring in transition and making unbelievable plays on mismatches.

i mean sure this is a valid and tested way to play bsketball, but it's not the only way.

Our offense is simple but it's actually quite efficient, almost fail-proof: start by giving the ball to Giannis, see if he can find a lane to attack the basket, if he can't he drives anyway to force the double team and then kicks to the open player, who gets an open 3 or attacks the closeout. Or maybe does a dribble hand off to Snell, or some other simple play. These things work 50-60% of the time because we have just the right players for it. If this fails, the remaining 40% of the time you just give the ball to Khris who mostly comes up with something good, and if that fails too you bring some instant offense off the bench, usually Monroe or sometimes Beasley.

The reason this fell through against Toronto was because Khris was gassed after missing most of his training camp and half the season, Thon was still too raw, Beasley kind of disappeared after his injury and our D still needed finetuning. All these things are getting slowly better. Give it one year, just one.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,830
And1: 11,566
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#714 » by midranger » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:09 am

chonestown wrote:Hayward and Kyrie. Name a more iconic duo.

Image
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
chonestown
General Manager
Posts: 9,563
And1: 13,403
Joined: Mar 13, 2010

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#715 » by chonestown » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:09 am

I'm just a fan of spirited discussion more than anything else!
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,797
And1: 8,191
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#716 » by jakecronus8 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:12 am

Bucks fans right now

Image
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
Prez
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,323
And1: 44,645
Joined: Jan 26, 2015
 

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#717 » by Prez » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:13 am

Max Green wrote:Disappointed.

We've could've taken the next step if we were able to trade for Kyrie.

We're going to take the next step with or without Kyrie. We're going to be really good this year.
chonestown
General Manager
Posts: 9,563
And1: 13,403
Joined: Mar 13, 2010

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#718 » by chonestown » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:16 am

midranger wrote:
chonestown wrote:Hayward and Kyrie. Name a more iconic duo.

Image


I'll have to agree on this one. Bacardi outdoes Haircut Hayward on the follicles and Coke's slightly knees-bent stance and icy visage show a commitment to defense unfathomable to Kyrie.

Also: Brad Stevens is far too youthful to fulfill the grizzled "I'm too old for this isht" police sergeant the C's sorely need to keep their unruly young charges in line.
Buck Dweller
Starter
Posts: 2,325
And1: 988
Joined: Mar 04, 2015
   

ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#719 » by Buck Dweller » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:16 am

MidnightBuck wrote:
BucksIn6ix wrote:
MidnightBuck wrote:The difference is Durant could shoot, Giannis can't. We need an instant-offense point guard. Kyrie shooting 30 times a game will be him taking away all of Giannis' low percentage perimeter looks and leaving him with what he does best - scoring in transition and making unbelievable plays on mismatches.

Giannis can be a league MVP on 15-20 shots per game because the rest of his game is so unprecedentedly complete.

It's over now, but the fit was an absolute no brainer.

Personality-wise, I don't know anything about it. I suppose I'm just hoping for the best there.


we need an instant offense point guard. okay, we can agree on that. but we don't need to give up practically our entire team outside of giannis to get one of those.

Snell slides in where Middleton was (decent downgrade as of now), and Kyrie slides in where Brogdon was (massive upgrade).

We lose a bit of depth that can be regained through FA once some of these contracts come off the books.

I'd hardly say we're mortgaging our whole team....


1. even when snell shot his outlier 40% from three this year, he was still significantly worse than middleton. midds brings the whole package (3, D, distributing, scoring, commanding the defense), snell is nothing without the 3. big drop off there, not a decent downgrade.

2. our defense falls off a cliff which you're not accounting for

3. regarding regaining depth through FA - we all know how that's worked out for the Bucks the past 2 decades
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 35,989
And1: 11,891
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: ATL - Kyrie trade - Cav's approve trade - pg 35 

Post#720 » by MikeIsGood » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:19 am

jakecronus8 wrote:Bucks fans right now

Image


Yes. Large bullet with teeth = dodged.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks