Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
ReasonablySober wrote:Uh, Hill looks ridiculously good.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:The fight for civil rights just like for liberty and justice and peace won't be won by man. It will take a god...so lets move on to sports.
Magic Giannison wrote:Giannis is god but even god's cannot save our **** team.
bizarro wrote:Swan Vox wrote:I'd think long and hard about it, but at the end of the day I think Hill gets cut. He's perfect for the practice squad. Just really need that roster spot. I'm cutting Fackrell after this game as well.
The Brooks signing, again, can not be overlooked. We are 3 solid deep at OLB. Who is the 4th. I can only see them keeping 4, honestly. I think they try to stash Gilbert PS and cut Fackrell. Keep Elliott. I also think they consider cutting one of the interior LB's so Mathews can be the swing LB. Frankly, at this point, I would argue moving Clay back to the OLB position was a mistake. He's simply not the same player there.
Swan Vox wrote:weezybaby856 wrote:Swan Vox wrote:I'd think long and hard about it, but at the end of the day I think Hill gets cut. He's perfect for the practice squad. Just really need that roster spot. I'm cutting Fackrell after this game as well.
Fackrell stinks. It's disgusting we wasted a 3rd round pick on him. He's an OLB that is supposed to rush the passer but he looks like Jeff Janis and is flat out weak. We better cut him and keep Gilbert. Gilbert Jayrone Biegel Perry Clay Brooks should be the OLBs.
He's gotten swallowed up whole almost every snap. I think they reported that he was 0-24(!!) in the one on one pass rush drill in practice before beating some scrub...that. is. not. good.
Looks like a total bust.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
dietac wrote:Serious question... I only watched the 2nd quarter and didn't key on him on every play but when I watched Spriggs, he looked solid... at least there weren't any major breakdowns on pass plays. Was he that bad?
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
dietac wrote:Serious question... I only watched the 2nd quarter and didn't key on him on every play but when I watched Spriggs, he looked solid... at least there weren't any major breakdowns on pass plays. Was he that bad?
WiscoKing13 wrote:dietac wrote:Serious question... I only watched the 2nd quarter and didn't key on him on every play but when I watched Spriggs, he looked solid... at least there weren't any major breakdowns on pass plays. Was he that bad?
Doesn't really matter how he did this game. He's playing against construction workers for the most part.
Swan Vox wrote:dietac wrote:Serious question... I only watched the 2nd quarter and didn't key on him on every play but when I watched Spriggs, he looked solid... at least there weren't any major breakdowns on pass plays. Was he that bad?
To my admittedly untrained eye, I thought Spriggs looked better than hGe has in the previous weeks. No glaring miscues. I believe that Hundley sack was on Amichia.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
WiscoKing13 wrote:Swan Vox wrote:dietac wrote:Serious question... I only watched the 2nd quarter and didn't key on him on every play but when I watched Spriggs, he looked solid... at least there weren't any major breakdowns on pass plays. Was he that bad?
To my admittedly untrained eye, I thought Spriggs looked better than hGe has in the previous weeks. No glaring miscues. I believe that Hundley sack was on Amichia.
Got beat at least 3 times in Denver inside and had an awful holding call.
Swan Vox wrote:WiscoKing13 wrote:Swan Vox wrote:
To my admittedly untrained eye, I thought Spriggs looked better than hGe has in the previous weeks. No glaring miscues. I believe that Hundley sack was on Amichia.
Got beat at least 3 times in Denver inside and had an awful holding call.
I agree he was a turnstile in Denver, but I think he was asking about this game. You are right though that he's going against 3rd stringers today. That said, I might be more inclined to keep Spriggs than Fackrell. Spriggs problems seem mental, Fackrell just doesn't seem to physically able to compete. I don't see that improving. The dude is what? 26?
Bye Felicia.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
slappyg wrote:i remember wanting Schobert...we took fackrell in the 3rd round and cleveland got Schobert at the top of the 4th round...sounds like Schobert is doing well
JimmyTheKid wrote:4 week self ban?
Nah. I'm good on that. Down for a gentleman's bet however. So...
I win if:
1) Clark makes the 53
2) Clark gets cut and doesn't make it back to the Packers' practice squad due to being on another team's 53
You win if:
1) Clark gets cut, no other team picks him up, and he ends up on the Packers' practice squad, or completely out of the league.