stilldropin20 wrote:yes that POS Wilson passed the federal reserve act essentially turning our country over to the Rothschild banking cartel.
BS -- utter & awful BS.
stilldropin20 wrote:This was the beginning of the end.
So... you are saying that people are less prosperous now than before the Wilson regime. & that the American economy stalled at that point & has had insignificant growth since then.
Honestly, you are a bag of nonsensical gas, man. Wow!
And all of our fore father save that original POS Hamilton knew the dangers. 2 of the worst president of all-time just due to their clamoring for the central banks.
stilldropin20 wrote: a sovereign country can provide a stable economy. Once we let europeans control the money supply we were screwed. we sold the country right there.
The government provides economic stability? Not the market? Europeans control our money supply?
We lost control of our country in 1913? That must mean that in 1913 we were the most powerful nation on Earth but now we are a 3d class power? That in 1913 our economy was the most productive on the planet, but now it is a 3d class economy?
That's what you are saying, right?
stilldropin20 wrote:Why are we still on a gold back currency which makes it harder to create a free and flowing money supply as gold has a limited money supply. We weren't suppose to end up (entirely dependent on) money. The original intent of "money" was to create an easy and stable way to exchanged goods or labor. Historically, various regimes/empires, like King George of England and his tally sticks, have used various forms of currency and made that currency abundant. Problems aka recession and depressions seem to only occur when the money supply is silver or gold backed. When the money supply is made abundant like tally sticks were, economies flourish. when the money supply is constricted we end up in recessions and depressions.
Just think for a second: if everyone had enough "money" to exchange goods and services and the value of that money wasn't diminished, the economy would flourish. Good and services would flow freely. it really is that simple. the problem is that their would be no "poor." without the "poor" there would also be no "rich." We cant have that!!!
This is totally amazing.
1. Our currency is *not* based on gold or other species. What are you talking about?
2. Tally sticks aren't money. They're a way of recording debts. Yes, you could trade them -- just as you can trade debt today -- that doesn't mean they are money, & certainly not that you could run an economy like ours using them.... Wow!!
3. Relating recessions/depressions to gold-backed currencyis plain idiotic. It's the opposite of the truth.
4. "It really is that simple." -- you misspelled that. You meant to write "I really am that simple."
As to all this:
stilldropin20 wrote:getting back to the point you made on the federal reserve act. Original board members Morgan and Rockefellor were funded by whom? Rothschild. Why was european born and Rothschild baking agent JP Morgan even allowed to essentially write the charter for the fed reserve. It's disgusting. Woodrew wilson (and congress) sold us out right then and there to the european banking cartel. this was the 3rd and final try. It stuck. It's now "too big to" get out from under. they own our entire economy and have been allowed to implement their central banks the world over. whoever buys your debt or lends you money owns you. Think about it. "what do you need the money for? oh sure! here you go. just do this one thing more me first." there is no reason for the U.S.A. to borrow money from anyone, let alone international bankers who have international interests. This goes against all common sense thinking on foreign policy...especially considering we can print our own money and successfully have done just that in some of the most flourishing era's of our history. eg. greenbacks. Lincoln used the greenback to keep the north funded. The united states simply printed money not backed by gold or silver. just the confidence of the united states government.
As you know Lincoln was assassinated by a rando dude. Not unlike kennedy, assassinated by a rando. Andrew Jackson who battled alexander hamilton's attempts to form a central bank and crushed the first incarnation of the european central bank and delayed future attempts faced attempted assassination also by a rando dude as well.
think about it.
It's not possible to "think about it", as it's a stream of inventions.
