It's really not THAT far off when you consider what it's based on and how limited in scope it is.
Top 25 players of all time based on MVP shares
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Re: Top 25 players of all time based on MVP shares
-
NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,185
- And1: 20,246
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
Re: Top 25 players of all time based on MVP shares
It's probably the best you'll ever see if you use one number to try and rate how valuable a guy was both peak and longevity wise over the course of their regular seasons.
It's really not THAT far off when you consider what it's based on and how limited in scope it is.
It's really not THAT far off when you consider what it's based on and how limited in scope it is.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"