rzzzzz wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:I look at how Boston’s worked with Olynyk, Smart, Jaylen Brown, Terry Rozier, Avery Bradley - they set reasonable expectations and goals, let guys build habits, gradually increase responsibilities and degrees of difficulty.
i think the best indicator is how well Stevens did with Evan Turner. same kind of polarizing figure here. washed up when y'all picked him up for a song. and too bad for you he did well enough to get offered the big, big bucks from a number of teams. 'cause he was your ham and egger, right? anyway, Stevens would know how to use OK4, if he's healthy. and again, no offense, i hope you guys don't get him, 'cause i believe the old rivalry is just about to switch back on again, and he would fit you too well.
Turner and Okafor are very different players. Stevens did think of a way to use him, and I'd bet he could do the same with Okafor.
But I mean more like, Kelly Olynyk got limited minutes and gradually improved defensively, and a little bit with his offensive assertiveness. By last year, he was a great contributor for us. If he'd been given major minutes right away, he'd probably have a different reputation.
Jaylen Brown, the third pick, spent his rookie year playing limited minutes, learning the system, and how to find occasional spots for himself, and playing defense. His instructions for the summer were to work on becoming a lockdown defender.
Rozier spent a whole season on the bench, they told him to work on his jump-shot and his ability to run an offense - he had a great summer league and then earned some end of the rotation minutes last season.
Smart, too - great defense, and on offense they just asked him to take threes to be guard-able, not much else. Gradually he got more responsibility making decisions with the ball and shooting from midrange.
The point is that if you bring players along slowly and gate their progress, it gives them an incentive to work on their weaknesses, and keeps them from being over-confident or under-confident, and doesn't overload them with responsibilities or give them minutes without accountability.
Boston was in a position to do that because we'd lucked into the Brooklyn trade. But it still matters.
The other issue is how team needs, expectations, and fan bases can distort the narrative around a player.
If you offered Okafor to the Suns board for Devin Booker, they'd laugh at you. But Booker also sucks on defense, and he shoots horrible percentages, but he can score the hell out of the ball. The reason he's "untouchable" and Okafor's considered toxic isn't their respective talent or upside, it's the narratives around them. Booker was the 13th pick, no one expected much, so his shooting is a pleasant surprise, and the team's been going nowhere, and everyone assumes he can get better defensively and in efficiency. Okafor was the third pick, he scores the hell out of the ball, but he's disappointed expectations, so all his weaknesses are seen as weights dragging the team down, not areas where he needs to improve.