ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XV

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,088
And1: 4,768
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1061 » by Zonkerbl » Wed Oct 4, 2017 8:02 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:We spend 3.5% of our GDP on 'liberty', but healthcare costs money and doesn't fit our made-up definition of random words in the constitution, so it's totally impossible that we provide better health coverage. Story checks out.

It isn't that we spend a lot of entitlements - most would agree that is a good thing. What is a bad thing is that they aren't sustainable. And folks like Trump and Bernie lie continually about this.

BTW, we spend way more than 3.5% of our GDP on liberty. Think of the courts, police, industrial prison complex, etc.

Image


What a hilariously incorrect graph. Where'd you get this? Where's military expenditures? Where's tax cuts? Where's the stimulus package? How can you say "entitlements are the only things contributing to the debt" with a straight face?
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,130
And1: 20,587
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1062 » by dckingsfan » Wed Oct 4, 2017 11:20 pm

Zonkerbl wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:We spend 3.5% of our GDP on 'liberty', but healthcare costs money and doesn't fit our made-up definition of random words in the constitution, so it's totally impossible that we provide better health coverage. Story checks out.

It isn't that we spend a lot of entitlements - most would agree that is a good thing. What is a bad thing is that they aren't sustainable. And folks like Trump and Bernie lie continually about this.

BTW, we spend way more than 3.5% of our GDP on liberty. Think of the courts, police, industrial prison complex, etc.

Image


What a hilariously incorrect graph. Where'd you get this? Where's military expenditures? Where's tax cuts? Where's the stimulus package? How can you say "entitlements are the only things contributing to the debt" with a straight face?

Zonk, you know me way better than that - and you know entitlements are growing faster that we can keep up with them. This figure is just historical with a projection.

First, total revenues at the federal level have yo-yoed but have stayed between 18 and 20 percent of GDP. And entitlements have climbed to over 50% historically.

It goes well with this figure which is a snapshot of 2016 federal outlays.

Image

Both figures paint the same point :) one as historical growth and the other as a snapshot.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,130
And1: 20,587
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1063 » by dckingsfan » Wed Oct 4, 2017 11:34 pm

gtn130 wrote:No, I understand what he's saying, and his point is totally asinine.

His original argument, which he's already abandoned, was that healthcare can't technically be an unalienable right because it, on its face, costs money whereas life, liberty and happiness are just vague concepts that are free. I made the point early on that we spend a huge % of our GDP on 'liberty' alone, so this entire dialog is a waste of time.

Almost but not quite. It can't be an inalienable right because it involves others providing labor to that end.

Zonk's point, although a good one - involves the enforcement vs. providing a specific service. And it is a good argument to blur the line. But... you (the citizen) doesn't receive a tangible service (for you vs. society) from law enforcement like you would from say providing housing, food or medical services.

And although you want to dismiss any arguments that you don't want to agree with - these are the very arguments that will need to be discussed to get universal healthcare, universal housing, universal education or universal food stipends.

And eventually, there will need to be the conversation of allocation of our tax receipts and our priorities (or we can have the liar liar pants of fire statements from Trump and Bernie and be good with that - I'm not ready for that personally).

Entitlement spending is already squeezing other spending - infrastructure, R&D, etc.

Now that the Rs have decided that the don't care about deficit spending and are willing to reduce tax receipts and military spending + Trump and the Ds saying there won't be any decreases in entitlement spending (of course Trump lied about that too). Well, the choices will come sooner rather than later.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1064 » by stilldropin20 » Thu Oct 5, 2017 12:19 am

Lots off silly talk going in here regarding "rights"vs "priveledges"

Driving, for example is a privilege. And this can easily be revoked.

Life (as in breathing) is a "right" which can be legally taken away by our court systems. As well as legally by an every day citizen in their home protecting themselves from some one else threatening their life.

As we see, Both Rights and privileges can be legally revoked ot taken away at any time.

Where does healthcare fall in between these 2 as well as many other rights and privileges? It's definitely a privilege. Nothing about healthcare in the constitution or Bill of rights.

And this privilege has a cost just like the military and police forces also have a cost. If the military and police cost pay for our freedom and protection which some here are equating to " life" I'm fine with that logic. But as stated by others, life n freedom are indeed rights in this country. The government should pay for those protections and collect tax as appropriate to cover.

Driving and healthcare are not.

And the right to bear arms is also a right btw.



Sent from my SM-N920T using RealGM mobile app
like i said, its a full rebuild.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1065 » by gtn130 » Thu Oct 5, 2017 12:38 am

dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:No, I understand what he's saying, and his point is totally asinine.

His original argument, which he's already abandoned, was that healthcare can't technically be an unalienable right because it, on its face, costs money whereas life, liberty and happiness are just vague concepts that are free. I made the point early on that we spend a huge % of our GDP on 'liberty' alone, so this entire dialog is a waste of time.

Almost but not quite. It can't be an inalienable right because it involves others providing labor to that end.

Zonk's point, although a good one - involves the enforcement vs. providing a specific service. And it is a good argument to blur the line. But... you (the citizen) doesn't receive a tangible service (for you vs. society) from law enforcement like you would from say providing housing, food or medical services.

And although you want to dismiss any arguments that you don't want to agree with - these are the very arguments that will need to be discussed to get universal healthcare, universal housing, universal education or universal food stipends.

And eventually, there will need to be the conversation of allocation of our tax receipts and our priorities (or we can have the liar liar pants of fire statements from Trump and Bernie and be good with that - I'm not ready for that personally).

Entitlement spending is already squeezing other spending - infrastructure, R&D, etc.

Now that the Rs have decided that the don't care about deficit spending and are willing to reduce tax receipts and military spending + Trump and the Ds saying there won't be any decreases in entitlement spending (of course Trump lied about that too). Well, the choices will come sooner rather than later.


lol, ok, so this was your original statement:

Actually, I am with Senator Johnson on this... life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are the inalienable rights. With healthcare there is a cost - someone has to pay for the service and someone has to render the service. I don't think that can be an inalienable right - right?


You immediately shifted the goal posts from 'a right' to 'an inalienable right' to make this pedantic argument, but your entire point about paying for a service rendered is decimated by the fact that we pay a **** ton of money for the services rendered by the military that enable life, liberty, etc.

And on the subject of the military - why weren't you banging the drum against the Senate dumping $700 billion into military spending last month? Is this just a service that you happen to like? I thought deficit hawks were waaayyyy more principled than that!

Or is this actually about what fits into your extremely narrow definition of 'life, liberty and happiness'? If it's the latter, why don't you fill me in, explicitly, on what the government should pay for based on the very literal reading of the words "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" because I have no idea where the boundaries are on those vague concepts. Seriously, can you make me a list?

You want to de-contextualize every conversation and instead talk about deficit spending, which is your thing I guess, but I've asked you two times already to give me your take on healthcare. You haven't said a word. This is textbook fiscal conservative rabble-rousing wherein you crow about the deficit but don't actually have any policy ideas (or interests!) beyond privatizing stuff.

To put it more bluntly: instead of derailing every single conversation with everyone's favorite game of Who's Gonna Pay For It, why don't you actually provide some pragmatic fiscal policy ideas that elude this thread?
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 5,122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1066 » by JWizmentality » Thu Oct 5, 2017 12:57 am

stilldropin20 wrote:Lots off silly talk going in here regarding "rights"vs "priveledges"

Driving, for example is a privilege. And this can easily be revoked.

Life (as in breathing) is a "right" which can be legally taken away by our court systems. As well as legally by an every day citizen in their home protecting themselves from some one else threatening their life.

As we see, Both Rights and privileges can be legally revoked ot taken away at any time.

Where does healthcare fall in between these 2 as well as many other rights and privileges? It's definitely a privilege. Nothing about healthcare in the constitution or Bill of rights.

And this privilege has a cost just like the military and police forces also have a cost. If the military and police cost pay for our freedom and protection which some here are equating to " life" I'm fine with that logic. But as stated by others, life n freedom are indeed rights in this country. The government should pay for those protections and collect tax as appropriate to cover.

Driving and healthcare are not.

And the right to bear arms is also a right btw.



Sent from my SM-N920T using RealGM mobile app


Let me ask you something. Someone shoots you. You're lying on the ground bleeding out. The medics arrive. Do you expect to be treated?
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1067 » by stilldropin20 » Thu Oct 5, 2017 2:01 am

JWizmentality wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:Lots off silly talk going in here regarding "rights"vs "priveledges"

Driving, for example is a privilege. And this can easily be revoked.

Life (as in breathing) is a "right" which can be legally taken away by our court systems. As well as legally by an every day citizen in their home protecting themselves from some one else threatening their life.

As we see, Both Rights and privileges can be legally revoked ot taken away at any time.

Where does healthcare fall in between these 2 as well as many other rights and privileges? It's definitely a privilege. Nothing about healthcare in the constitution or Bill of rights.

And this privilege has a cost just like the military and police forces also have a cost. If the military and police cost pay for our freedom and protection which some here are equating to " life" I'm fine with that logic. But as stated by others, life n freedom are indeed rights in this country. The government should pay for those protections and collect tax as appropriate to cover.

Driving and healthcare are not.

And the right to bear arms is also a right btw.



Sent from my SM-N920T using RealGM mobile app


Let me ask you something. Someone shoots you. You're lying on the ground bleeding out. The medics arrive. Do you expect to be treated?


yes, and I absolutely expect to pay for it. And i dont have insurance. so by pay for it i mean out of my pocket. and pay for it I will just as I pay for my own braces when I was 17. just as I paid for some dental fillings when i was 22. And when i was 22 I had dental insurance and didn't even know it. and I was covered under my dads insurance for braces and didn't know that either.

I had a job and i paid for it out of pocket. Just as my patients do today at my office. if their employer provides some insurance? great!!! Good for them good for that employer. Its a benefit of working there. Why in gods name are we making our neighbors pay for our health issues? especially when most health care issues arise from unhealthy life style(diet and lack of exercise)???!!!

Why!! I plead!! Why!!

and i'm a doctor. i make more money when when everyone has insurance. and I gladly give back that 10% of revenue to get rid of unjust tax burden and skyrocketing US debt.

i'll tell you what...if health care is so damn necessary then take it directly out of existing entitlement pay outs. take it out of SS or other gov assistance. if some one gets $80-2000 per month and they want healthcare? take it out their $800-2000. and guess what will happen. they will say no thanks give me my $800. I need a new iphone. or new louis bag. and before anyone says a word. I see it every single day. for 15 years. new iphones, new louis, and medical card for the kids. every single day. its a broken system. it doesn't work.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,159
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1068 » by DCZards » Thu Oct 5, 2017 2:39 am

stilldropin20 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:



Let me ask you something. Someone shoots you. You're lying on the ground bleeding out. The medics arrive. Do you expect to be treated?


yes, and I absolutely expect to pay for it. And i dont have insurance. so by pay for it i mean out of my pocket. and pay for it I will just as I pay for my own braces when I was 17. just as I paid for some dental fillings when i was 22. And when i was 22 I had dental insurance and didn't even know it. and I was covered under my dads insurance for braces and didn't know that either.


...but if healthcare is a privilege, as you apparently believe it is, and you didn't have a health insurance card or proof that you could pay, would it be alright if the medics didn't treat you and left you there bleeding instead?
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 5,122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1069 » by JWizmentality » Thu Oct 5, 2017 2:46 am

stilldropin20 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:Lots off silly talk going in here regarding "rights"vs "priveledges"

Driving, for example is a privilege. And this can easily be revoked.

Life (as in breathing) is a "right" which can be legally taken away by our court systems. As well as legally by an every day citizen in their home protecting themselves from some one else threatening their life.

As we see, Both Rights and privileges can be legally revoked ot taken away at any time.

Where does healthcare fall in between these 2 as well as many other rights and privileges? It's definitely a privilege. Nothing about healthcare in the constitution or Bill of rights.

And this privilege has a cost just like the military and police forces also have a cost. If the military and police cost pay for our freedom and protection which some here are equating to " life" I'm fine with that logic. But as stated by others, life n freedom are indeed rights in this country. The government should pay for those protections and collect tax as appropriate to cover.

Driving and healthcare are not.

And the right to bear arms is also a right btw.



Sent from my SM-N920T using RealGM mobile app


Let me ask you something. Someone shoots you. You're lying on the ground bleeding out. The medics arrive. Do you expect to be treated?


yes, and I absolutely expect to pay for it. And i dont have insurance. so by pay for it i mean out of my pocket. and pay for it I will just as I pay for my own braces when I was 17. just as I paid for some dental fillings when i was 22. And when i was 22 I had dental insurance and didn't even know it. and I was covered under my dads insurance for braces and didn't know that either.

I had a job and i paid for it out of pocket. Just as my patients do today at my office. if their employer provides some insurance? great!!! Good for them good for that employer. Its a benefit of working there. Why in gods name are we making our neighbors pay for our health issues? especially when most health care issues arise from unhealthy life style(diet and lack of exercise)???!!!

Why!! I plead!! Why!!

and i'm a doctor. i make more money when when everyone has insurance. and I gladly give back that 10% of revenue to get rid of unjust tax burden and skyrocketing US debt.

i'll tell you what...if health care is so damn necessary then take it directly out of existing entitlement pay outs. take it out of SS or other gov assistance. if some one gets $80-2000 per month and they want healthcare? take it out their $800-2000. and guess what will happen. they will say no thanks give me my $800. I need a new iphone. or new louis bag. and before anyone says a word. I see it every single day. for 15 years. new iphones, new louis, and medical card for the kids. every single day. its a broken system. it doesn't work.


And you pay for your gun too. Difference is I don't walk into a gun shop and expect them to give me a gun because of my 2nd amendment rights, neither do they have to sell it me. But if I walk into a hospital needing care, I will be treated regardless of my ability to pay. That's the difference between a right and privilege. You Americans are so backwards it's really a spectacle to behold.

Why in Gods name are your neighbors paying for our health issues? Because that's how democracy works!! You don't pick and choose what to pay for. Bloody hell pick up freakin Civics book.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1070 » by stilldropin20 » Thu Oct 5, 2017 2:53 am

ya know. i wanna add some more common sense to my last post.

as ive said. I grew up a poor kid. lower "working" class/low class. broken home. lived with grand parents. yada yada yada. step dad got hurt in car accident was off work for a while. all these entitlements were their for me. I'm sure they helped on some level. but i never went to the doctor or dentist growing up. so i didn't use that. I did eat well, from a garden (parents had at least a bit of generational knowledge). we had food stamps. a monthly stipend of like 250 per month. and my lazy ass mom and step dad sat on their butts for 4 years on these entitlement. almost lost our home. grandparents bailed them out multiple times. free lunch (which was embarrassing) so i almost never used it. went hungry or packed a lunch.

and all because my two very able parents didn't want to work. rather, chose not to work. They both could ahve easily worked and this was in the 70's 80's when work was far more plentiful. instead, they sat around the house and smoked 2 packs per day and smoked weed all day and did coke and sold coke and weed all day. And let me tell you. that is the norm where i come from. we weren't some outlier family. they would "come into some money" from time to time and buy a $10k mcintosh stereo and a 450sl. meanwhile, i'm still on the "free lunch" program. every other family in my hood was exactly like that. 1-2 lazy and able to work parents choosing to have kids that they cant or choose not to afford. this was rampant in my neighborhood. and I fully understand that the children should not suffer due to lazy selfish parents like mine. But the entitlements encourage the laziness. they encourage people to not work and look for cash paying jobs. in my parents case, selling drugs for a number of years.

my step dad has ended up a complete burden on the US tax payer. surgery after surgery after surgery. still hooked on pain meds. all on every one else dime. its not right. and because he never exercised his core. sat around all day long smoking weed and taking codeine.

its a completely broken system. "tweaking it" doesn't work. poor human beings need to be made to understand (from a very young age) that if they dont engage society and work and be productive that they wont eat. I instilled that work ethic into myself due to not ever wanting to be "poor" like my parents.

as for the wealthy elite class and even the leisure class? you guys know how i feel. tax the crap out of them!! hit em hard. the wealth inequality plays a huge role in disillusionment. it makes idiot parent like mine by $25K cars and 10K stereos(in the 80's) while using up entitlement programs. they feel like "screw the rich!" and in a way they are right. the system at the top is broken too. we ridiculously allow the wealthy to hoard away. and live lifestyles out of reach by nearly everyone. we end up creating disillusion more than inspiration and people liek my parents soak the system for every penny.

and thats what i find, in my old neighborhood. able bodies choosing not to work. bad attitudes and unpleasantness due to feeling entitled is what makes them unattractive to employers. entitlements dont work. none of them. allowing the super wealthy to hoard wealth doesn't work either. on any level.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1071 » by stilldropin20 » Thu Oct 5, 2017 2:55 am

DCZards wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:



Let me ask you something. Someone shoots you. You're lying on the ground bleeding out. The medics arrive. Do you expect to be treated?


yes, and I absolutely expect to pay for it. And i dont have insurance. so by pay for it i mean out of my pocket. and pay for it I will just as I pay for my own braces when I was 17. just as I paid for some dental fillings when i was 22. And when i was 22 I had dental insurance and didn't even know it. and I was covered under my dads insurance for braces and didn't know that either.


...but if healthcare is a privilege, as you apparently believe it is, and you didn't have a health insurance card or proof that you could pay, would it be alright if the medics didn't treat you and left you there bleeding instead?


bill em. make that bill as redeemable as owing taxes to the IRS. garnish wages. garnish entitlements to pay that medical bill.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1072 » by stilldropin20 » Thu Oct 5, 2017 3:09 am

JWizmentality wrote:
And you pay for your gun too. Difference is I don't walk into a gun shop and expect them to give me a gun because of my 2nd amendment rights, neither do they have to sell it me. But if I walk into a hospital needing care, I will be treated regardless of my ability to pay. That's the difference between a right and privilege. You Americans are so backwards it's really a spectacle to behold.

Why in Gods name are your neighbors paying for our health issues? Because that's how democracy works!! You don't pick and choose what to pay for. Bloody hell pick up freakin Civics book.

A. we live in more of a republic than democracy. B. and we rarely do things via direct democracy where people vote directly.

C. By definition (we the people) do get to choose. We are suppose to be directly or indirectly in charge of these decisions.

so you got your definitions all screwed up there. to say nothing of your argument which is even more befuddled.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1073 » by cammac » Thu Oct 5, 2017 3:19 am

JWizmentality wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
Let me ask you something. Someone shoots you. You're lying on the ground bleeding out. The medics arrive. Do you expect to be treated?


yes, and I absolutely expect to pay for it. And i dont have insurance. so by pay for it i mean out of my pocket. and pay for it I will just as I pay for my own braces when I was 17. just as I paid for some dental fillings when i was 22. And when i was 22 I had dental insurance and didn't even know it. and I was covered under my dads insurance for braces and didn't know that either.

I had a job and i paid for it out of pocket. Just as my patients do today at my office. if their employer provides some insurance? great!!! Good for them good for that employer. Its a benefit of working there. Why in gods name are we making our neighbors pay for our health issues? especially when most health care issues arise from unhealthy life style(diet and lack of exercise)???!!!

Why!! I plead!! Why!!

and i'm a doctor. i make more money when when everyone has insurance. and I gladly give back that 10% of revenue to get rid of unjust tax burden and skyrocketing US debt.

i'll tell you what...if health care is so damn necessary then take it directly out of existing entitlement pay outs. take it out of SS or other gov assistance. if some one gets $80-2000 per month and they want healthcare? take it out their $800-2000. and guess what will happen. they will say no thanks give me my $800. I need a new iphone. or new louis bag. and before anyone says a word. I see it every single day. for 15 years. new iphones, new louis, and medical card for the kids. every single day. its a broken system. it doesn't work.


And you pay for your gun too. Difference is I don't walk into a gun shop and expect them to give me a gun because of my 2nd amendment rights, neither do they have to sell it me. But if I walk into a hospital needing care, I will be treated regardless of my ability to pay. That's the difference between a right and privilege. You Americans are so backwards it's really a spectacle to behold.

Why in Gods name are your neighbors paying for our health issues? Because that's how democracy works!! You don't pick and choose what to pay for. Bloody hell pick up freakin Civics book.


Everyday I hear that the USA is the greatest country in the world? But it is the only advanced democracy that can't figure out giving affordable health care to its populace? It really isn't that difficult if your government stopped pandering to special interest groups. Health care is a right in every other advanced democracy. The USA is I believe 32nd in the world in life expectancy wedged between Costa Rica & Cuba two 3rd world countries. Plus I think most advanced democracies pay higher personal taxes across the board than Americans but is the value they get for those taxes not the $ number. Those of you that pay privately or through your company are hidden taxes. I know when Canadians are faced with having lower taxes or maintaining healthcare it wins every time.

I listen to debates and look at charts but the USA is deluded with the concept that private business can do things like health care better than government which is disproved but at least 20 advanced democracies. I'm a senior my cost of medication is less than $150 a year and low income Canadians pay $1 a prescription. Sometimes JFK rings in my ears and I hear "Ask not what my country can do for me but what can I do for my country."
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,130
And1: 20,587
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1074 » by dckingsfan » Thu Oct 5, 2017 3:34 am

gtn130 wrote:lol, ok, so this was your original statement:
Actually, I am with Senator Johnson on this... life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are the inalienable rights. With healthcare there is a cost - someone has to pay for the service and someone has to render the service. I don't think that can be an inalienable right - right?

You immediately shifted the goal posts from 'a right' to 'an inalienable right' to make this pedantic argument, but your entire point about paying for a service rendered is decimated by the fact that we pay a **** ton of money for the services rendered by the military that enable life, liberty, etc.

Why is shifting to from right to inalienable right a pedantic argument. My point is when you have to use someone else to service your specific need (healthcare, food, housing) then it moves away from being a right/inalienable right. Then it becomes a government service vs. supporting a right. I get it - you still can't wrap your head around that one - or you disagree with that perspective. If so, we get to agree to disagree :)
gtn130 wrote:And on the subject of the military - why weren't you banging the drum against the Senate dumping $700 billion into military spending last month? Is this just a service that you happen to like? I thought deficit hawks were waaayyyy more principled than that!

HAHAHA!! BS. Go back and read my posts!!! Not only that - read the posts about what percentage of GDP I think we should spend on the military. I think you have me confused with someone.
gtn130 wrote:Or is this actually about what fits into your extremely narrow definition of 'life, liberty and happiness'? If it's the latter, why don't you fill me in, explicitly, on what the government should pay for based on the very literal reading of the words "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" because I have no idea where the boundaries are on those vague concepts. Seriously, can you make me a list?

Narrow - really - geez. I should just put you on ignore - you can't help but attack anyone to which you respond.

But, I am a fiscal conservative and social liberal. I think we should maximize growth and maximize tax receipts and then try to maximize the return from those tax receipts. What I have seen is that those that are willing to spend more than we take in begin to minimize the return of those receipts - those like your hero Bernie the liar. Or on a more micro level - those in Detroit and Puerto Rico. At the same time, we should remove barriers to allowing people to live full lives - that isn't what this is about so I won't delve further.
gtn130 wrote:You want to de-contextualize every conversation and instead talk about deficit spending, which is your thing I guess, but I've asked you two times already to give me your take on healthcare. You haven't said a word. This is textbook fiscal conservative rabble-rousing wherein you crow about the deficit but don't actually have any policy ideas (or interests!) beyond privatizing stuff.

To put it more bluntly: instead of derailing every single conversation with everyone's favorite game of Who's Gonna Pay For It, why don't you actually provide some pragmatic fiscal policy ideas that elude this thread?

Wrong - I have said what we should do - and that is to go after the cost drivers of healthcare first (pharma, legal, cost of labor, lack of deductibles, having employer provided healthcare be tax deductible, tax codes that incentivizes hospital mergers, Fee-for-service during hospital stays vs. single cost, etc., etc.)

It doesn't matter if you put in single payer until you hit the cost drivers - I have said this maybe 50 times in this thread. Guess you weren't paying attention. If you go after the cost drivers it will lower the cost of service for all. THEN you can put in single payer and other initiatives - until then - it is just politicians lying. Single payer will get crushed under those very same burden's I list above.

Also, read cammac's posts on not mandating to many services in a plan(s) - one of the fatal flaws of the ACA.

Now that I have listed what I would do - do you feel that we don't have a spending problem? Or do you feel this debt talk is just getting in the way. It certainly doesn't seem to be getting in the way of the Rs. There plan will actually sink us faster than Bernie's - so there is that...
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1075 » by stilldropin20 » Thu Oct 5, 2017 3:41 am

cammac wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:
yes, and I absolutely expect to pay for it. And i dont have insurance. so by pay for it i mean out of my pocket. and pay for it I will just as I pay for my own braces when I was 17. just as I paid for some dental fillings when i was 22. And when i was 22 I had dental insurance and didn't even know it. and I was covered under my dads insurance for braces and didn't know that either.

I had a job and i paid for it out of pocket. Just as my patients do today at my office. if their employer provides some insurance? great!!! Good for them good for that employer. Its a benefit of working there. Why in gods name are we making our neighbors pay for our health issues? especially when most health care issues arise from unhealthy life style(diet and lack of exercise)???!!!

Why!! I plead!! Why!!

and i'm a doctor. i make more money when when everyone has insurance. and I gladly give back that 10% of revenue to get rid of unjust tax burden and skyrocketing US debt.

i'll tell you what...if health care is so damn necessary then take it directly out of existing entitlement pay outs. take it out of SS or other gov assistance. if some one gets $80-2000 per month and they want healthcare? take it out their $800-2000. and guess what will happen. they will say no thanks give me my $800. I need a new iphone. or new louis bag. and before anyone says a word. I see it every single day. for 15 years. new iphones, new louis, and medical card for the kids. every single day. its a broken system. it doesn't work.


And you pay for your gun too. Difference is I don't walk into a gun shop and expect them to give me a gun because of my 2nd amendment rights, neither do they have to sell it me. But if I walk into a hospital needing care, I will be treated regardless of my ability to pay. That's the difference between a right and privilege. You Americans are so backwards it's really a spectacle to behold.

Why in Gods name are your neighbors paying for our health issues? Because that's how democracy works!! You don't pick and choose what to pay for. Bloody hell pick up freakin Civics book.


Everyday I hear that the USA is the greatest country in the world? But it is the only advanced democracy that can't figure out giving affordable health care to its populace? It really isn't that difficult if your government stopped pandering to special interest groups. Health care is a right in every other advanced democracy. The USA is I believe 32nd in the world in life expectancy wedged between Costa Rica & Cuba two 3rd world countries. Plus I think most advanced democracies pay higher personal taxes across the board than Americans but is the value they get for those taxes not the $ number. Those of you that pay privately or through your company are hidden taxes. I know when Canadians are faced with having lower taxes or maintaining healthcare it wins every time.

I listen to debates and look at charts but the USA is deluded with the concept that private business can do things like health care better than government which is disproved but at least 20 advanced democracies. I'm a senior my cost of medication is less than $150 a year and low income Canadians pay $1 a prescription. Sometimes JFK rings in my ears and I hear "Ask not what my country can do for me but what can I do for my country."


the "united states" is a house of cards. Once we became fully beholden (for good) to the elite ruling class bankers in 1913 we became a house of cards. we borrowed into oblivion. the wealthy elite ruling class bankers needed a "neutral" place to protect their wealth. They accumulated this wealth via centuries of wars in europe created a a debt based system for the birtish empire first and then employing that banking system everywhere else. 2 world wars were fought over this wealth. as well as tons of conflicts. So a massive safe haven with a other worldly military was created. enter the United States.

I submit to you and everyone reading this thread that there is no conflict where some significant "resource" or "wealth" is NOT at stake.

every thing about the american dream is dead and been dead. it's a debt based system build on smoke and mirrors.

let me ask this board again, does anyone want to actually learn something today??????????
like i said, its a full rebuild.
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1076 » by cammac » Thu Oct 5, 2017 4:20 am

dckingsfan wrote:
gtn130 wrote:lol, ok, so this was your original statement:
Actually, I am with Senator Johnson on this... life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are the inalienable rights. With healthcare there is a cost - someone has to pay for the service and someone has to render the service. I don't think that can be an inalienable right - right?

You immediately shifted the goal posts from 'a right' to 'an inalienable right' to make this pedantic argument, but your entire point about paying for a service rendered is decimated by the fact that we pay a **** ton of money for the services rendered by the military that enable life, liberty, etc.

Why is shifting to from right to inalienable right a pedantic argument. My point is when you have to use someone else to service your specific need (healthcare, food, housing) then it moves away from being a right/inalienable right. Then it becomes a government service vs. supporting a right. I get it - you still can't wrap your head around that one - or you disagree with that perspective. If so, we get to agree to disagree :)
gtn130 wrote:And on the subject of the military - why weren't you banging the drum against the Senate dumping $700 billion into military spending last month? Is this just a service that you happen to like? I thought deficit hawks were waaayyyy more principled than that!

HAHAHA!! BS. Go back and read my posts!!! Not only that - read the posts about what percentage of GDP I think we should spend on the military. I think you have me confused with someone.
gtn130 wrote:Or is this actually about what fits into your extremely narrow definition of 'life, liberty and happiness'? If it's the latter, why don't you fill me in, explicitly, on what the government should pay for based on the very literal reading of the words "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" because I have no idea where the boundaries are on those vague concepts. Seriously, can you make me a list?

Narrow - really - geez. I should just put you on ignore - you can't help but attack anyone to which you respond.

But, I am a fiscal conservative and social liberal. I think we should maximize growth and maximize tax receipts and then try to maximize the return from those tax receipts. What I have seen is that those that are willing to spend more than we take in begin to minimize the return of those receipts - those like your hero Bernie the liar. Or on a more micro level - those in Detroit and Puerto Rico. At the same time, we should remove barriers to allowing people to live full lives - that isn't what this is about so I won't delve further.
gtn130 wrote:You want to de-contextualize every conversation and instead talk about deficit spending, which is your thing I guess, but I've asked you two times already to give me your take on healthcare. You haven't said a word. This is textbook fiscal conservative rabble-rousing wherein you crow about the deficit but don't actually have any policy ideas (or interests!) beyond privatizing stuff.

To put it more bluntly: instead of derailing every single conversation with everyone's favorite game of Who's Gonna Pay For It, why don't you actually provide some pragmatic fiscal policy ideas that elude this thread?

Wrong - I have said what we should do - and that is to go after the cost drivers of healthcare first (pharma, legal, cost of labor, lack of deductibles, having employer provided healthcare be tax deductible, tax codes that incentivizes hospital mergers, Fee-for-service during hospital stays vs. single cost, etc., etc.)

It doesn't matter if you put in single payer until you hit the cost drivers - I have said this maybe 50 times in this thread. Guess you weren't paying attention. If you go after the cost drivers it will lower the cost of service for all. THEN you can put in single payer and other initiatives - until then - it is just politicians lying. Single payer will get crushed under those very same burden's I list above.

Also, read cammac's posts on not mandating to many services in a plan(s) - one of the fatal flaws of the ACA.

Now that I have listed what I would do - do you feel that we don't have a spending problem? Or do you feel this debt talk is just getting in the way. It certainly doesn't seem to be getting in the way of the Rs. There plan will actually sink us faster than Bernie's - so there is that...


I'm a fiscal conservative and a social liberal like yourself and we have much in common with some differences. Yes you are right while I believe that Sanders heart is in the right place his single payer proposal would be a disaster without fundamental changes. The tax plan is a farce again it gives the rich the preponderance of the tax break and gives the middle class scraps or higher taxes. The inefficiency of the federal government is abhorrent again look at law enforcement Homeland Security, CIA, FBI, ICE, Marshall's, ATF, NSA, Border Patrol and more they have their own turf and don't communicate. While I dislike Homeland Security it is to Orwellian for me I think law enforcement could be include them, CIA, FBI and Border Security. To many positions in the Federal Government are political and especially in this administration totally unqualified. If you look at the American Constitution a great document from 18th Century many amendment have been made but to many Judges look at it as it was passed down like the tablets from Moses. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have some alienable rights but much is also left vague so that it can be refreshed with time and changes in society. The Supreme Court in Canada is the bastion against the government and is much more independent than in the USA. One of the justices remarked on being criticized that the government could overrule a decision by the courts but at there own peril. Why should states control federal elections by redistricting is that a states right? Rather than a independent federal commission? Then again you have a archaic electoral college what impedes popular vote.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,159
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1077 » by DCZards » Thu Oct 5, 2017 4:50 am

stilldropin20 wrote:
DCZards wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:
yes, and I absolutely expect to pay for it. And i dont have insurance. so by pay for it i mean out of my pocket. and pay for it I will just as I pay for my own braces when I was 17. just as I paid for some dental fillings when i was 22. And when i was 22 I had dental insurance and didn't even know it. and I was covered under my dads insurance for braces and didn't know that either.


...but if healthcare is a privilege, as you apparently believe it is, and you didn't have a health insurance card or proof that you could pay, would it be alright if the medics didn't treat you and left you there bleeding instead?


bill em. make that bill as redeemable as owing taxes to the IRS. garnish wages. garnish entitlements to pay that medical bill.


Based on your response, it sounds like you agree that everyone should get healthcare regardless of their ability to pay or whether or not they have insurance. So why not institute universal healthcare coverage?

If we're proactive and give people easy access to preventative care (which is a big part of Obamacare), maybe we can change some people's bad health habits and reduce the number of obese Americans--or those with diabetes, high blood pressure and other diseases. Not everyone will take advantage of preventative care, but the surest way to bring down healthcare costs is to reduce the number of people who are forced to rely on emergency care, which is the most costly kind of care.

It really doesn't matter to me whether it's labeled a "right" or a "privilege" as long as everyone has access to affordable healthcare coverage.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1078 » by stilldropin20 » Thu Oct 5, 2017 6:20 am

DCZards wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:
DCZards wrote:
...but if healthcare is a privilege, as you apparently believe it is, and you didn't have a health insurance card or proof that you could pay, would it be alright if the medics didn't treat you and left you there bleeding instead?


bill em. make that bill as redeemable as owing taxes to the IRS. garnish wages. garnish entitlements to pay that medical bill.


Based on your response, it sounds like you agree that everyone should get healthcare regardless of their ability to pay or whether or not they have insurance. So why not institute universal healthcare coverage?

If we're proactive and give people easy access to preventative care (which is a big part of Obamacare), maybe we can change some people's bad health habits and reduce the number of obese Americans--or those with diabetes, high blood pressure and other diseases. Not everyone will take advantage of preventative care, but the surest way to bring down healthcare costs is to reduce the number of people who are forced to rely on emergency care, which is the most costly kind of care.

It really doesn't matter to me whether it's labeled a "right" or a "privilege" as long as everyone has access to affordable healthcare coverage.



access? certainly. even absolutely. but i think we all agree on this? Its just how to pay for it is what we are debating.

i dont think I should ever have to pay for someone else's health care. nor they for me. I feel the same for food. for housing. etc.

now if I'm down on my luck and the government spots me some cash? Sure, but I should repay my debt without discount.

i dont believe in insurance of any type to be honest. I do have liability on my car and malpractice due to the law requiring. but i save myself nearly 20K annually by not having health, full coverage auto, excessive house insurance, i have minimal office policies instead of expensive loss of income and other stuff, i dont have disability ins, nor include myself on my workmens comp.

By not having all of these various types of excessive insurance I save nearly 20K annually.

To that end, i believe unemployment "tax" should cover all unemployment costs. If the american people want unemployment insurance? fine I guess. I dont. I never used it. never will. neither has my fiance. I do pay into. And I'm guessing my kids wont use it either. Just like health insurance. I'm 45 and never used any type of health insurance since I was 12 years old. I have not been to the doctor since my exit physical in the navy. I last had dental work done when i was 22. I have no plans to go to a doctor until I have my prostate checked out in 5 years. I'll pay cash. I have saved myself over nearly $300K in various insurance costs over the last 25 years by basically not having insurance but minimal liability.


Additionally, for those chronically unemployed, none of them should be allowed to not work. I dont care if they sweep streets, pick weeds, stand at cross walks, paint buildings, mop floors at a local school, or stare at a screen performing "security" of sorts...whatever it is, everyone works at least 8 hours per day to collect any type of entitlements.

just by virtue of making everyone show up somewhere to "punch" a time card 8 hours per day for their "pay", you create a new dynamic that encourages people to work. where people begin to understand that they will "do something" for 40 hours per week for any given entitlement. so they may as well "try" to find gainful employment. just by showing up somehere 40 hours per week, will make "america" healthier both physically and mentally.

In terms of health care costs. american lifestyles are sedimentary and the diet is poor. lifestyles are stressed and americans consume a lot of drugs. these things drive the need for "more" health care. High costs are driven by the corporate lobbyists owning the established DC politicians who allow (essentially) price gouging.

And it all adds up to a total frickin joke of a "health care" system. just think about that for a second. i'm a doctor and I have NOT seen a doctor in 24 years. Nor a dentist since i left dental school. no dental work has been performed on me by anyone in 23 years. I brush and floss. Thats it. I have a healthy diet. I exercise intelligently. I worked hard which led to some level of self percieved success and therefore I'm happy. my self medication goes no further than a couple drinks per week (its poison) at most, maybe a puff of weed a few time per month(not poison), and maybe some slightly more fun stuff (poison but fun) on 1 or 2 big days per year.

i said this 20 pages ago. I'll say it again. I dont need a doctor and neither do you. you just need to educate yourself on what is healthy.

so you then might then ask," what if you get cancer?" If that happens, then my time has come. like most doctors, no chemo for me thank you very much. no radio. no nothing. when i'm in pain and the end is here? I'll overmedicate with something real good and bow out. sayonara. death is part of life. americans are first too afraid to live. then too afraid to die. so too much "healthcare" is needed in between. and americans dont want to pay for their own effing health care. they want their neighbor to (help) pay for it. don't be such selfish cowards!! That's what i say. and some foo' called me the lunatic fringe. I just might be the most sane person in this thread. can i gets an "AMEN!!" anyone??????
like i said, its a full rebuild.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,827
And1: 7,961
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1079 » by montestewart » Thu Oct 5, 2017 12:30 pm

dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,130
And1: 20,587
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1080 » by dckingsfan » Thu Oct 5, 2017 1:22 pm

cammac wrote:I'm a fiscal conservative and a social liberal like yourself and we have much in common with some differences. Yes you are right while I believe that Sanders heart is in the right place his single payer proposal would be a disaster without fundamental changes.

Yep, it would be an unmitigated disaster. I don't know why the cost drivers aren't even being discussed. Both parties are only discussing how to rearrange the deck chairs. They seem unwilling to take on the real issue(s). Maybe they feel that the electorate wouldn't understand?
cammac wrote:The tax plan is a farce again it gives the rich the preponderance of the tax break and gives the middle class scraps or higher taxes.

Past a farce. Not only will it lead to larger deficits, give the rich unfair tax breaks - it will slow not spur the economy. Pretty sad really. The Rs at this point have no growth plan for the economy. And the fiscal conservatives are going out with a whimper.

I guess sustainable government is in vogue right now.

Return to Washington Wizards