jakecronus8 wrote:yannisk wrote:jakecronus8 wrote:Long term his ideal role is a 20ish mpg gunner. Simply this role and let him guard lesser bench players for the most part.
If that will be his role, maybe it would be better to have kept Beasley with 3m per year
If Beasley wasn't batsh*t crazy for sure. I will say, Beasley will be a better value at 3mil per than Jabari on his next contract without any hesitation.M-C-G wrote:jakecronus8 wrote:Long term his ideal role is a 20ish mpg gunner. Simply this role and let him guard lesser bench players for the most part.
So James Johnson is his ideal role, huh?
Pretty much. He's not going to be such an elite scorer where you can justify him playing 32+mpg. His defense is that bad. Add in the strain heavy minutes you're putting on what's left of his knee and you're asking for trouble.
People need to quit with the dream that Jabari is going to be the savior we hoped when we drafted him #2. You're only going to be disappointed.
Thanks for looking out for my feelings. As for Jabari's defense being set in stone, its one of the fun things that gets talked about on these boards as facts. But he has about two seasons in the scheme, obviously separated by long breaks, and we have a team that can put someone vocal behind him and help make up for mistakes, then I think the issue isn't nearly as bad and as permanently debilitating as you make it sound.
Bottom line is no one knows what he is going to be, stop being a turd and pretending like you've come back from the future with the Grays 2000-2050 Sports Almanac