Adrian Peterson Traded to the Cardinals

Otis Driftwood · Post #1 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:08 pm

For a conditional pick...

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/saints-trade-adrian-peterson-to-cardinals-for-conditional-draft-pick/

Seems like a fair deal for both teams. Cardinals have they type of offense where AP can succeed if he has anything left in the tank. Saints move a guy who clearly doesn't fit in their scheme.

If AP can't do it here, then he's done.

Post #2 » by **Cactus Jack** » Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:25 pm

There line is still garbage.

Otis Driftwood · Post #3 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:33 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:There line is still garbage.

True... but even a half assed line can go forward. Cowboys did it for years.

Post #4 » by **jwise44** » Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:38 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:There line is still garbage.

Shouldn't throw stones

Speaking of that, I shouldn't either

Post #5 » by **Cactus Jack** » Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:41 pm

jwise44 wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:There line is still garbage.

Shouldn't throw stones

Speaking of that, I shouldn't either

I still picked him up in fantasy.

Post #6 » by **Cactus Jack** » Tue Oct 10, 2017 7:10 pm

Read on Twitter

RavenMad31 · Post #7 » by **RavenMad31** » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:02 am

Cactus Jack wrote:

Read on Twitter

Pretty much this. Old, washed up RB going to an old, washed up team.

bluejerseyjinx · Post #8 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:12 am

Cactus Jack wrote:There line is still garbage.

Nervous are we Jackie? :wink:

Post #9 » by **Cactus Jack** » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:15 am

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:There line is still garbage.

Nervous are we Jackie?

Cactus Jack wrote:

Read on Twitter

bluejerseyjinx · Post #10 » by **bluejerseyjinx** » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:26 am

Remember the 1972 Washington Redskins?

Post #11 » by **bleu** » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:04 am

I really hate Adrian Peterson. He's a total POS and I was thrilled when he got picked up by New Orleans cause I knew he would do terrible there. I don't see him doing much better in Arizona.

bmurph128 · Post #12 » by **bmurph128** » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:35 pm

Pharmcat · Post #13 » by **Pharmcat** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:48 am

he's done

hermes · Post #14 » by **hermes** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 10:34 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:

Read on Twitter

those teams combined only have 3 or they have three each?

Post #15 » by **Cactus Jack** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 10:35 pm

hermes wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:

Read on Twitter

those teams combined only have 3 or they have three each?

Each team has three.

The Hawks have a total of 5, fwiw. (Graham, Bennett, Avril, Wilhoite, Ryan)

The Cards literally are a retirement home compared to the average team. :lol:

nicholas88 · Post #16 » by **nicholas88** » Fri Oct 13, 2017 7:49 am

Buckle up, bettors & doubters . . . Adrian Peterson is going to show an all-generational-RB heart; stumping over & stiff-arming slackers. Lo and behold, the Curtain Call. . . .

-(hopeful) Cards fan

PS Glitchy site

Ballerhogger · Post #17 » by **Ballerhogger** » Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:42 pm

Team old

RaoulDuke79 · Post #18 » by **RaoulDuke79** » Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:04 pm

He's gonna get his second wind playing for Arizona, and he's gonna beat down the opposition like he's beating one of his kids.

Otis Driftwood · Post #19 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:04 pm

Yeah.

Looks washed up.

Especially with that crappy offensive line.

bmurph128 · Post #20 » by **bmurph128** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:35 pm

Definitely start him next week. He's good for a 60 yard run against the Rams.