boomann21 wrote:We wouldn't need to sign a plethora of Point Guards if we would of just Drafted Dennis Smith Jr.
That's why Dallas has 6 of them?
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23

boomann21 wrote:We wouldn't need to sign a plethora of Point Guards if we would of just Drafted Dennis Smith Jr.
newyorker4ever wrote:Knickstape1214 wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:
He's not better then Sessions. He hasn't really done anything in the league since being drafted so this is a confusing move to me. There has recently been rumors of teams being interested in KOQ and LT so maybe Perry has a trade about to go down.
He's better than Sessions, younger than Sessions, allows us to move Sessions to a purely mentor role, and he played with THJr at Michigan (so maybe there's some chemistry there). This move isn't very confusing at all.
I agree with all besides him being better then Sessions. Burke has been bad since he's been in the league and he got his chances in Utah to show something but never took advantage of those chances. Sessions is and has been one of the best backup PG's in the league every year he's been in the league. As of now Sessions is the better player but hoping that can change if the Knicks are actually planning on keeping Burke. The kid obviously has talent which he showed in college which got him drafted in the lottery and i think top 10 but as we all know, some of these kids just can't translate their games from college to the pros.
Capn'O wrote:GONYK wrote:Kristaps6_NYK wrote:Burke played great in Utah then played behind Wall so his minutes cut a lot
He's probably confusing him with Alec Burks.
Greenie wrote:El Poochio wrote:Greenie wrote:Not with the Knicks
I KNEW IT
Whatever you say comes true sooo
Horny on the hot seat then RIP
That’s common sense though.
Have you seen Jeff's coaching?

GONYK wrote:boomann21 wrote:We wouldn't need to sign a plethora of Point Guards if we would of just Drafted Dennis Smith Jr.
That's why Dallas has 6 of them?

GONYK wrote:boomann21 wrote:We wouldn't need to sign a plethora of Point Guards if we would of just Drafted Dennis Smith Jr.
That's why Dallas has 6 of them?
Newyorknick94 wrote:Jack getting cut he looked like booty vs Houston

Knickstape1214 wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:Knickstape1214 wrote:
He's better than Sessions, younger than Sessions, allows us to move Sessions to a purely mentor role, and he played with THJr at Michigan (so maybe there's some chemistry there). This move isn't very confusing at all.
I agree with all besides him being better then Sessions. Burke has been bad since he's been in the league and he got his chances in Utah to show something but never took advantage of those chances. Sessions is and has been one of the best backup PG's in the league every year he's been in the league. As of now Sessions is the better player but hoping that can change if the Knicks are actually planning on keeping Burke. The kid obviously has talent which he showed in college which got him drafted in the lottery and i think top 10 but as we all know, some of these kids just can't translate their games from college to the pros.
*Was one of the best backups*
E-Balla wrote:Man you know its bad when Trey Burke is about to get minutes at PG next year.
moocow007 wrote:GONYK wrote:Why is it worth angst at all? We're swapping scrubs.moocow007 wrote:This really isn't even about Burke. Much as the angst about the Hardaway Jr signing wasn't about Hardaway.
Why wait until after the preseason is pretty much over to bring the guy in? Didn't they not realize that Jack is toast from Hornacek sitting and watching Hoodie Melo practice? Wouldn't you want the guy in so he gets comfortable with the players and/or system (such as it is)?

newyorker4ever wrote:Knickstape1214 wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:
I agree with all besides him being better then Sessions. Burke has been bad since he's been in the league and he got his chances in Utah to show something but never took advantage of those chances. Sessions is and has been one of the best backup PG's in the league every year he's been in the league. As of now Sessions is the better player but hoping that can change if the Knicks are actually planning on keeping Burke. The kid obviously has talent which he showed in college which got him drafted in the lottery and i think top 10 but as we all know, some of these kids just can't translate their games from college to the pros.
*Was one of the best backups*
Which Burke has never been
thebuzzardman wrote:Newyorknick94 wrote:Jack getting cut he looked like booty vs Houston
I mean, I get that teams usually carry 3 PG's - I mean, teams would do this on a 12 man roster and it's up to 15 now.
So, other than there is a roster glut and Baker is theoretically a SG/Pg, it was Frank/Session and then Jack - to be the 3rd string PG/mentor/guy who barely plays - because experience.
Jack didn't cut it (clearly) so they sign a young guy? It's not mentorship. If it's the "have PG depth" what about Baker?
I don't mind it, it's just confusing on the heels of giving Baker 4 million a year, then also signing Sessions.
Not to overanalyze it, just a weird move for a team that already is sort of crowded, roster wise.

Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Knickstape1214 wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:Knickstape1214 wrote:
*Was one of the best backups*
Which Burke has never been
Actually, the last two years he was a solid backup - his issue is that he can't start.

Knickstape1214 wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:Knickstape1214 wrote:
He's better than Sessions, younger than Sessions, allows us to move Sessions to a purely mentor role, and he played with THJr at Michigan (so maybe there's some chemistry there). This move isn't very confusing at all.
I agree with all besides him being better then Sessions. Burke has been bad since he's been in the league and he got his chances in Utah to show something but never took advantage of those chances. Sessions is and has been one of the best backup PG's in the league every year he's been in the league. As of now Sessions is the better player but hoping that can change if the Knicks are actually planning on keeping Burke. The kid obviously has talent which he showed in college which got him drafted in the lottery and i think top 10 but as we all know, some of these kids just can't translate their games from college to the pros.
*Was one of the best backups*

thebuzzardman wrote:Knickstape1214 wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:
I agree with all besides him being better then Sessions. Burke has been bad since he's been in the league and he got his chances in Utah to show something but never took advantage of those chances. Sessions is and has been one of the best backup PG's in the league every year he's been in the league. As of now Sessions is the better player but hoping that can change if the Knicks are actually planning on keeping Burke. The kid obviously has talent which he showed in college which got him drafted in the lottery and i think top 10 but as we all know, some of these kids just can't translate their games from college to the pros.
*Was one of the best backups*
If Sessions is about as cooked as we thought Jack was (seems true) and rosters are 17, but two of that 17 is "two way contracts"
Frank/Burke/Sessions (3)
THJr/CLee/Baker (6)
McD/Kuz/LFT (9)
KP/Beasley/ (11)
WHG/Noah/KOQ/Kan (15)
Dotson (16)
It's one guy too many. Kornet is on a two way to the G League. I thought Dotson was not on a G-League two way.