ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XV

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,354
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1261 » by verbal8 » Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:31 pm

Maybe we didn’t take Trump literally enough :(

I guess he meant every wetland standing the way of a golf course, factory or strip mall being built should be drained.
Wizardspride wrote:
CobraCommander wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:ok, um,i got sumtin' for yoos guys to git all hot and bothered up about.

EPA is considering mining in natural Salmon "farms" in alaska. dont let them build a mine here. write your congressmen/women!!!!

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/10/politics/bristol-bay-salmon-invs/index.html



I saw this on CNN...it was hillarious. The CEO of the mine meets with the newly assigned director of the EPA for 30 minutes and the director of the EPA says...”yeah we will consider your mine” after the career people at the EPA said it will KILL the environment and NONE of the people in the area want the mine there. One of the problems with our political system is that the president and congress ASSIGN the head of a department and that HEAD of the department doesnt need to know JACK SHEET about the department thier mandate or anything to get the job...but now he is the boss. Its like if I buy the Spurs and make my girlfriends cousins niece the coach and make Pop listen to her when its time to run plays...but she doesn’t like Pop so she calls all the plays...but we expect to win...its broken man...”DRAIN THE SWAMP”

Don't get me started about the EPA in this administration.

It's basically a race to see how many "job killing regulations" (life saving regulations actually) they can get rid of.

But as you say, they're "DRAINING THE SWAMP". :nonono:
CobraCommander
RealGM
Posts: 25,494
And1: 16,599
Joined: May 01, 2014
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1262 » by CobraCommander » Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:44 pm

verbal8 wrote:Maybe we didn’t take Trump literally enough :(

I guess he meant every wetland standing the way of a golf course, factory or strip mall being built should be drained.
Wizardspride wrote:
CobraCommander wrote:

I saw this on CNN...it was hillarious. The CEO of the mine meets with the newly assigned director of the EPA for 30 minutes and the director of the EPA says...”yeah we will consider your mine” after the career people at the EPA said it will KILL the environment and NONE of the people in the area want the mine there. One of the problems with our political system is that the president and congress ASSIGN the head of a department and that HEAD of the department doesnt need to know JACK SHEET about the department thier mandate or anything to get the job...but now he is the boss. Its like if I buy the Spurs and make my girlfriends cousins niece the coach and make Pop listen to her when its time to run plays...but she doesn’t like Pop so she calls all the plays...but we expect to win...its broken man...”DRAIN THE SWAMP”

Don't get me started about the EPA in this administration.

It's basically a race to see how many "job killing regulations" (life saving regulations actually) they can get rid of.

But as you say, they're "DRAINING THE SWAMP". :nonono:


Hillarious and damn it why didnt i think of that first! Hell a ton of good golf courses are built on swamps and DC is actually built on a swamp....trump is at least honest! He is going to litterially drain the DC swamp of all money, pride, logic, and credibity (draining the swamp in one way) then he will drain every wetland around the world to get the gold, minerals, or build golf courses...draining the swamp in another way! BRILLIANT

Image
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,827
And1: 7,961
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1263 » by montestewart » Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:50 pm

For the billionth time, just in case you weren't kidding, DC is NOT built on a swamp.

A major premise of Trump's campaign and policy is factually incorrect. What a surprise.

Carry on.
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,354
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1264 » by verbal8 » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:05 pm

montestewart wrote:For the billionth time, just in case you weren't kidding, DC is NOT built on a swamp.

A major premise of Trump's campaign and policy is factually incorrect. What a surprise.

Carry on.

Are you going to tell us next the Germans didn't bomb Pearl Harbor.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1265 » by stilldropin20 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 1:58 am

Wizardspride wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:

you guys dont watch fox but check out the first 6 minutes of this show. you have to deal with this because even my far left friends are feeling similarly as what is expressed in this show's first 6-7 minutes.

What exactly am I supposed to deal with?

I mean Harvey Weinstein apparently is a predator. Same as Bill Cosby.

Hell, the current president has been accused of the same.


the entire morality police schtick the left has been on for decades. as if hollywood, jimmy kimmel, the music biz, meryl streep et al have any right to guide the moral compass of the United States.

For every "issue" they are squarely on the better side of history there is another issue that they lag far behind. the right used to use "God" for the same moral high ground. it was bad politics then and bad politics now. fact is there are good people on the left and right just as there are bad. but just because you dont agree with the policy, its a weak political argument to play the whole moral high ground BS game. the name calling. deplorables, racists, etc. its just plain old and tired. yes some racists exists. yes they are awful and there is no place for that. same for sexists. and many other issues. ive lived in small towns and big cities. 12 different states and 7 different countries. Ive found that 80-99% of the people I encounter are not racists, depending on the country or region.

I've never seen a president nor candidate ever called so many foul names ever. any part of the world. the name calling has reached a vitriol and incendiary language level that no sane person would ever engage with you guys. i kept at in these pages just to show you guys we actually can have a conversation. i fully understand you. just as i fully understand conservatives. ive taken the time to get to know, trust, and love both liberal and conservatives. I am a true independent. but trust me. some of you guys make it nearly impossible to discuss these things. i dont have any real desire to educate nor persuade you because I understand its futile. But i do think the conversation needs to remain open. ive never seen this country more openly divided in my entire life. i assume the good that will come of this current divide is the long needed discussion on many is worth it. so im attempting to have that discussion. but you guys have to come off the high horse and soap box (of cards.) human being are all liars from time to time, all are self serving on some level.

But we have a country that is in trouble due to its debt. perhaps even a planet that is in trouble. we need to take care of both the country and also the planet, and then the people in it and pay our bills along the way and do so in a way where our money supply remains open and the economy remains flush with cash so we, the people, can hopefully have some "fun" along the way. yet we have a system that allows the elite wealthy to hoard the resources of wealth to absurd levels. and 1 guy in this thread besides me sounds like he is willing tax them hard.

there is a "bad guy" out there. and its not the poor broke powerless backwards azz misled miseducated hillbilly down the street. nor is it the drug dealer down the street. though neither help. they are mostly insignificant. true evil exists in the guy that has all the money and uses that money to buy political favor so he can keep his riches. that money they hoard was meant "for the people" to facilitate the exchange of goods and labor. not to hoard, so as to control.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,159
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1266 » by DCZards » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:04 am

stilldropin20 wrote:
accept trump for what he is. stop fighting him.
all trump wants to make a deal.
thats all he wants. so make him a deal. make both your liberal and conservative congressmen work with him. thats all he wants. a deal. a deal that he feels americans win. become part of his "base." stop working "against" him and negotiate (better).

all the whining and fauxrage? he just sees that as very weak and childish negotiating tactics. and its mostly bull crap. he knows its bull crap. give him something real. and negotiate with him.

all this man wants to do is go down as a great american president. and he believes he can "cut deals" to get there. he is fully committed to the working class. I assume every damn one of falls into that category. so he wants to make america "work better" for you.

stop resisting and obstructing and start negotiating and asking for things. make your reps work with him. This man is begging to work across the aisle. begging for it. he wants to make a deal with dems sooooo badly. you can smell it in the air his desperation for it is so thick and heavy. so make your reps work with him. he will cut a deal with them.


Yeah, Trump wanted to "make a deal" and "work across the aisle" with Schumer and Pelosi on DACA...except when it came time to put the "deal" in writing it wasn't what they had agreed upon.

And if Trump was "fully committed to the working class," he would not have just made changes in Obamacare that are going to screw working people, and kick a million or more of them off of healthcare. Trump can talk all he wants about looking out for "working Americans, but actions speak louder than words.

You "accept Trump for what he is." I'm going to call him the fraud that I know he is. Put me down with those who will continue to resist and oppose the clown in the WH and his idiocy.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1267 » by stilldropin20 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:50 am

DCZards wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:
accept trump for what he is. stop fighting him.
all trump wants to make a deal.
thats all he wants. so make him a deal. make both your liberal and conservative congressmen work with him. thats all he wants. a deal. a deal that he feels americans win. become part of his "base." stop working "against" him and negotiate (better).

all the whining and fauxrage? he just sees that as very weak and childish negotiating tactics. and its mostly bull crap. he knows its bull crap. give him something real. and negotiate with him.

all this man wants to do is go down as a great american president. and he believes he can "cut deals" to get there. he is fully committed to the working class. I assume every damn one of falls into that category. so he wants to make america "work better" for you.

stop resisting and obstructing and start negotiating and asking for things. make your reps work with him. This man is begging to work across the aisle. begging for it. he wants to make a deal with dems sooooo badly. you can smell it in the air his desperation for it is so thick and heavy. so make your reps work with him. he will cut a deal with them.


Yeah, Trump wanted to "make a deal" and "work across the aisle" with Schumer and Pelosi on DACA...except when it came time to put the "deal" in writing it wasn't what they had agreed upon.

And if Trump was "fully committed to the working class," he would not have just made changes in Obamacare that are going to screw working people, and kick a million or more of them off of healthcare. Trump can talk all he wants about looking out for "working Americans, but actions speak louder than words.

You "accept Trump for what he is." I'm going to call him the fraud that I know he is. Put me down with those who will continue to resist and oppose the clown in the WH and his idiocy.


trump will deal. he will. but he needs to be made to feel he won the deal. it has to be a deal he can sell to his base. right now that daca reform has the wall funding tied to it. give him his silly wall and chuck and nancy can have daca anyway they want it.

so make the damn deal!!! its right there to be had. but you guys are still laughing at his wall. as long as you laugh at the wall chuck and nancy will continue to scoff at the deal. with daca s chuck and nancy get a small victory to take home. trump gets a major victory. both get to rewrite immigration reform...something no tother president or congress has taken on since Regan.

and maybe, just maybe if we can significantly lower illegal drug distribution with "the wall." and if we do that, the inner city streets might get safer. and if we get behind the police and let them do their job we will have less murder in cities like baltimore and chicago? simultaneously trump is trying to bring back manufacturing to our inner cities.

elections have consequences. thats the whole reason we have elections. the winners of the elections should "win" the deals. thats the way it works. give him his win on the wall. chuck n nancy get daca kids and together they rewrite immigration. its a win-win-win.

do. the. deal.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,159
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1268 » by DCZards » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:33 am

stilldropin20 wrote:
trump will deal. he will. but he needs to be made to feel he won the deal. it has to be a deal he can sell to his base. right now that daca reform has the wall funding tied to it. give him his silly wall and chuck and nancy can have daca anyway they want it.

so make the damn deal!!! its right there to be had. but you guys are still laughing at his wall. as long as you laugh at the wall chuck and nancy will continue to scoff at the deal. with daca s chuck and nancy get a small victory to take home. trump gets a major victory. both get to rewrite immigration reform...something no tother president or congress has taken on since Regan.

and maybe, just maybe if we can significantly lower illegal drug distribution with "the wall." and if we do that, the inner city streets might get safer. and if we get behind the police and let them do their job we will have less murder in cities like baltimore and chicago? simultaneously trump is trying to bring back manufacturing to our inner cities.

elections have consequences. thats the whole reason we have elections. the winners of the elections should "win" the deals. thats the way it works. give him his win on the wall. chuck n nancy get daca kids and together they rewrite immigration. its a win-win-win.

do. the. deal.


No, the Dems should not support the wall...it's a bad, costly idea. BTW, I thought Mexico was going to pay for the wall. What happened to the "deal" that #45 was going to make with Mexico? Didn't happen, right.

Oh, I don't know if you've noticed but Atlantic City is in near ruins thanks in large part to the casino "deals" cut by Trump. But I digress.

You can't seriously believe that manufacturing jobs are coming back to the inner city? That train left the station a long time ago.

And it's simply not true that no president or congress has taken on immigration reform since Reagan. George W. Bush put forth a comprehensive immigration reform bill during his second term that had bipartisan support. That legislation was torpedoed by conservatives, led by Jeff Sessions.
stilldropin20
RealGM
Posts: 11,370
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
 

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1269 » by stilldropin20 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:03 am

DCZards wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:
trump will deal. he will. but he needs to be made to feel he won the deal. it has to be a deal he can sell to his base. right now that daca reform has the wall funding tied to it. give him his silly wall and chuck and nancy can have daca anyway they want it.

so make the damn deal!!! its right there to be had. but you guys are still laughing at his wall. as long as you laugh at the wall chuck and nancy will continue to scoff at the deal. with daca s chuck and nancy get a small victory to take home. trump gets a major victory. both get to rewrite immigration reform...something no tother president or congress has taken on since Regan.

and maybe, just maybe if we can significantly lower illegal drug distribution with "the wall." and if we do that, the inner city streets might get safer. and if we get behind the police and let them do their job we will have less murder in cities like baltimore and chicago? simultaneously trump is trying to bring back manufacturing to our inner cities.

elections have consequences. thats the whole reason we have elections. the winners of the elections should "win" the deals. thats the way it works. give him his win on the wall. chuck n nancy get daca kids and together they rewrite immigration. its a win-win-win.

do. the. deal.


No, the Dems should not support the wall...it's a bad, costly idea. BTW, I thought Mexico was going to pay for the wall. What happened to the "deal" that #45 was going to make with Mexico? Didn't happen, right.

Oh, I don't know if you've noticed but Atlantic City is in near ruins thanks in large part to the casino "deals" cut by Trump. But I digress.

You can't seriously believe that manufacturing jobs are coming back to the inner city? That train left the station a long time ago.

And it's simply not true that no president or congress has taken on immigration reform since Reagan. George W. Bush put forth a comprehensive immigration reform bill during his second term that had bipartisan support. That legislation was torpedoed by conservatives, led by Jeff Sessions.

well there you go. thats why the deal wont get done. you wont negotiate. lets hope chuck and nancy are better at this than you.

additionally, you have no idea if the wall will help or not. maybe it just puts americans to work? maybe it helps keep drugs out? which helps keep crime lower? maybe it cuts down on our heroin epidemic? Furthermore, I'd rather pay americans to work on a wall than to not work. and one thing is for sure about trump. if he campaigned on it, he is going to stay at it. everything he campaigned on he is attempting to push through. so if there is a way he can get mexico to "pay" for it he will stay at it.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,448
And1: 11,644
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1270 » by Wizardspride » Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:35 am

stilldropin20 wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:

you guys dont watch fox but check out the first 6 minutes of this show. you have to deal with this because even my far left friends are feeling similarly as what is expressed in this show's first 6-7 minutes.

What exactly am I supposed to deal with?

I mean Harvey Weinstein apparently is a predator. Same as Bill Cosby.

Hell, the current president has been accused of the same.


the entire morality police schtick the left has been on for decades. as if hollywood, jimmy kimmel, the music biz, meryl streep et al have any right to guide the moral compass of the United States.

For every "issue" they are squarely on the better side of history there is another issue that they lag far behind. the right used to use "God" for the same moral high ground. it was bad politics then and bad politics now. fact is there are good people on the left and right just as there are bad. but just because you dont agree with the policy, its a weak political argument to play the whole moral high ground BS game. the name calling. deplorables, racists, etc. its just plain old and tired. yes some racists exists. yes they are awful and there is no place for that. same for sexists. and many other issues. ive lived in small towns and big cities. 12 different states and 7 different countries. Ive found that 80-99% of the people I encounter are not racists, depending on the country or region.

I've never seen a president nor candidate ever called so many foul names ever. .


Well I've never seen a candidate/President insult as many people as Trump has.

Could THAT be why he elicits such a negative reaction from people?

Just something to ponder...

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1271 » by cammac » Mon Oct 16, 2017 12:35 pm

Lets be honest supply side economics doesn't work all you have to do is look at Kansas and the Brownback Administration which passed a platform like what the Republican are proposing for the economy. Compared to California the highest taxed State in the union which has the most robust economy.
"Just as President Trump is ramping up his push for a major tax cut that he believes will pay for itself through faster economic growth, the Kansas template for that approach has crashed and burned. After four years of below-average growth, deepening budget deficits, and steep spending reductions, the GOP-dominated Kansas legislature has repealed many of the tax cuts at the heart of Governor Sam Brownback fiscal agenda."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/beltway/2017/06/07/the-great-kansas-tax-cut-experiment-crashes-and-burns/#42dbfedc5508
"Kansas embarked on its trickle-down experiment in 2012. Brownback slashed taxes across the board, calling his plan “a shot of adrenaline into the heart of the Kansas economy.” Five years later, the state’s economy is on life support, and government expenses are expected to outpace income by $1.1 billion through June 2019. Instead of a poster child for the small-government theories championed by economist Arthur Laffer, tax reform activist Grover Norquist and the rest of the Republican Party, Kansas has become a cautionary tale about what happens when you expose their economic ideas to sunlight"
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-steyer-kansas-tax-cuts-brownback-california-20170622-story.html

I believe that tax reform is essential to any democratic society and also believe that citizens should get value for the taxes paid. Who are the major beneficiaries for the proposed tax cuts top 1% and corporations. I haven't a problem with a reduction in reducing the corporation tax rate as long as it is accompanied with closing loopholes which allows major corporations paying zero taxes. The 1% are like pigs to the trough no minimum tax 15% if you notice in the one tax return we saw for Trump that was the only tax he paid. No estate tax as I mentioned in a earlier post 8 of the richest 20 people have a good chance of dying in the 1st Trump administration and both the Koch and Mars fortunes were inherited. Plus the 3 Walton siblings are getting along in years as well. Plus again the top tax bracket is being reduced "winner,winner chicken dinner".

Who loses healthcare, environment, social services and diplomacy.
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 5,122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1272 » by JWizmentality » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:10 pm

stilldropin20 wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:

you guys dont watch fox but check out the first 6 minutes of this show. you have to deal with this because even my far left friends are feeling similarly as what is expressed in this show's first 6-7 minutes.

What exactly am I supposed to deal with?

I mean Harvey Weinstein apparently is a predator. Same as Bill Cosby.

Hell, the current president has been accused of the same.


the entire morality police schtick the left has been on for decades. as if hollywood, jimmy kimmel, the music biz, meryl streep et al have any right to guide the moral compass of the United States.

For every "issue" they are squarely on the better side of history there is another issue that they lag far behind. the right used to use "God" for the same moral high ground. it was bad politics then and bad politics now. fact is there are good people on the left and right just as there are bad. but just because you dont agree with the policy, its a weak political argument to play the whole moral high ground BS game. the name calling. deplorables, racists, etc. its just plain old and tired. yes some racists exists. yes they are awful and there is no place for that. same for sexists. and many other issues. ive lived in small towns and big cities. 12 different states and 7 different countries. Ive found that 80-99% of the people I encounter are not racists, depending on the country or region.

I've never seen a president nor candidate ever called so many foul names ever. any part of the world. the name calling has reached a vitriol and incendiary language level that no sane person would ever engage with you guys. i kept at in these pages just to show you guys we actually can have a conversation. i fully understand you. just as i fully understand conservatives. ive taken the time to get to know, trust, and love both liberal and conservatives. I am a true independent. but trust me. some of you guys make it nearly impossible to discuss these things. i dont have any real desire to educate nor persuade you because I understand its futile. But i do think the conversation needs to remain open. ive never seen this country more openly divided in my entire life. i assume the good that will come of this current divide is the long needed discussion on many is worth it. so im attempting to have that discussion. but you guys have to come off the high horse and soap box (of cards.) human being are all liars from time to time, all are self serving on some level.

But we have a country that is in trouble due to its debt. perhaps even a planet that is in trouble. we need to take care of both the country and also the planet, and then the people in it and pay our bills along the way and do so in a way where our money supply remains open and the economy remains flush with cash so we, the people, can hopefully have some "fun" along the way. yet we have a system that allows the elite wealthy to hoard the resources of wealth to absurd levels. and 1 guy in this thread besides me sounds like he is willing tax them hard.

there is a "bad guy" out there. and its not the poor broke powerless backwards azz misled miseducated hillbilly down the street. nor is it the drug dealer down the street. though neither help. they are mostly insignificant. true evil exists in the guy that has all the money and uses that money to buy political favor so he can keep his riches. that money they hoard was meant "for the people" to facilitate the exchange of goods and labor. not to hoard, so as to control.

STFU. The left doesn't portray itself as the party of "family values." Monsters can come from any party, be any color, any gender. Its when you morally bankrupt conservatives stand on your Christian soapbox to preach to others about how to live their life and make policies because of your so called righteous cause. Meanwhile, we have a president, divorced 2 times, 3 baby mamas, accused of sexual assault. A pro life senator forcing his mistress to get an abortion, Sarah Palin daughter getting paid for abstinence speeches and I don't even remember how many babies she's pumped out now. Yes, Weinstein is scum. This is not political so stop trying to make it. You've got your head so far up your own ass, you don't even see what a parody it is for Fox news to be casting aspersions on anyone.

Sent from my ASUS_Z01BDC using RealGM mobile app
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1273 » by cammac » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:37 pm

JWizmentality wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:What exactly am I supposed to deal with?

I mean Harvey Weinstein apparently is a predator. Same as Bill Cosby.

Hell, the current president has been accused of the same.


the entire morality police schtick the left has been on for decades. as if hollywood, jimmy kimmel, the music biz, meryl streep et al have any right to guide the moral compass of the United States.

For every "issue" they are squarely on the better side of history there is another issue that they lag far behind. the right used to use "God" for the same moral high ground. it was bad politics then and bad politics now. fact is there are good people on the left and right just as there are bad. but just because you dont agree with the policy, its a weak political argument to play the whole moral high ground BS game. the name calling. deplorables, racists, etc. its just plain old and tired. yes some racists exists. yes they are awful and there is no place for that. same for sexists. and many other issues. ive lived in small towns and big cities. 12 different states and 7 different countries. Ive found that 80-99% of the people I encounter are not racists, depending on the country or region.

I've never seen a president nor candidate ever called so many foul names ever. any part of the world. the name calling has reached a vitriol and incendiary language level that no sane person would ever engage with you guys. i kept at in these pages just to show you guys we actually can have a conversation. i fully understand you. just as i fully understand conservatives. ive taken the time to get to know, trust, and love both liberal and conservatives. I am a true independent. but trust me. some of you guys make it nearly impossible to discuss these things. i dont have any real desire to educate nor persuade you because I understand its futile. But i do think the conversation needs to remain open. ive never seen this country more openly divided in my entire life. i assume the good that will come of this current divide is the long needed discussion on many is worth it. so im attempting to have that discussion. but you guys have to come off the high horse and soap box (of cards.) human being are all liars from time to time, all are self serving on some level.

But we have a country that is in trouble due to its debt. perhaps even a planet that is in trouble. we need to take care of both the country and also the planet, and then the people in it and pay our bills along the way and do so in a way where our money supply remains open and the economy remains flush with cash so we, the people, can hopefully have some "fun" along the way. yet we have a system that allows the elite wealthy to hoard the resources of wealth to absurd levels. and 1 guy in this thread besides me sounds like he is willing tax them hard.

there is a "bad guy" out there. and its not the poor broke powerless backwards azz misled miseducated hillbilly down the street. nor is it the drug dealer down the street. though neither help. they are mostly insignificant. true evil exists in the guy that has all the money and uses that money to buy political favor so he can keep his riches. that money they hoard was meant "for the people" to facilitate the exchange of goods and labor. not to hoard, so as to control.

STFU. The left doesn't portray itself as the party of "family values." Monsters can come from any party, be any color, any gender. Its when you morally bankrupt conservatives stand on your Christian soapbox to preach to others about how to live their life and make policies because of your so called righteous cause. Meanwhile, we have a president, divorced 2 times, 3 baby mamas, accused of sexual assault. A pro life senator forcing his mistress to get an abortion, Sarah Palin daughter getting paid for abstinence speeches and I don't even remember how many babies she's pumped out now. Yes, Weinstein is scum. This is not political so stop trying to make it. You've got your head so far up your own ass, you don't even see what a parody it is for Fox news to be casting aspersions on anyone.

Sent from my ASUS_Z01BDC using RealGM mobile app


1st. let me say I'm a atheist. I respect that most people need some type of fortification that death is not the end and that some type of afterlife is available. Plus I do believe in its purest form religion has given people a direction in how to conduct themselves in society.

I look at the radical christian right in the USA today and look at the Catholic Church in Quebec which dominated the French part of the electorate until 1960. The priests dominated in how the populous voted and controlled thought and social aspects in the Province. They also did some positive things in creating unions and cooperatives for farmers and credit unions. But from that period Quebec went from the highest birthrate in Canada to the lowest and the highest. The church now plays a insignificant role in politics.

Radicalized religions whether they are Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist or others are destabilizing factors in countries around the world whether it is the USA, Middle East, Israel, Myanmar, African States and others. Hopefully the youth will see the hypocrisy in fundamentalist thought and reject it for a more humanistic approach.
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1274 » by cammac » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:04 pm

This is obviously tongue and check so don't get your shorts knotted up.
Therefore, I propose that the Prime Minister immediately extends an offer of annexation. Of course, this would not be available to everyone. Obviously Puerto Rico would make the cut. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if they’ve already asked. The western seaboard would be another perfect candidate for annexation. The cultural and economic ties that stretch from Vancouver to San Diego are already strong and the economies are well integrated. One important consideration, however, is whether or not to leave the Vestigial States of America (VSA) their own Pacific port? (The President, for example, will still want somewhere to ship in his Trump brand hats and ties from China.)

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/is-it-time-for-canada-to-annex-blue-america/ar-AAtdYTL?ocid=spartandhp

Hopefully it lightens the mood.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,448
And1: 11,644
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1275 » by Wizardspride » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:17 pm

He's literally contradicting his rationale for ending the ACA subsidies....but its not as if we don't know what this is about.

Trump has been obsessed with destroying President Obama's legacy for years now.



Read on Twitter

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,140
And1: 20,590
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1276 » by dckingsfan » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:07 pm

Wizardspride wrote:He's literally contradicting his rationale for ending the ACA subsidies....but its not as if we don't know what this is about.

Trump has been obsessed with destroying President Obama's legacy for years now.

Read on Twitter

He did run on it as part of his platform - so there is that.

And he was/is able to do in now because of what he has done:
1) Reduce Marketing for ACA
2) Reduce/Eliminate CSR payments

In both cases they weren't in the law - so Administrative Action are possible. I think both parties should be concerned with the growth of Administrative Action(s) starting back with the Kennedy Administration - they continue to grow. We are seeing this with the Dreamers Act as well.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,202
And1: 24,501
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: RE: Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1277 » by Pointgod » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:09 pm

JWizmentality wrote:
stilldropin20 wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:What exactly am I supposed to deal with?

I mean Harvey Weinstein apparently is a predator. Same as Bill Cosby.

Hell, the current president has been accused of the same.


the entire morality police schtick the left has been on for decades. as if hollywood, jimmy kimmel, the music biz, meryl streep et al have any right to guide the moral compass of the United States.

For every "issue" they are squarely on the better side of history there is another issue that they lag far behind. the right used to use "God" for the same moral high ground. it was bad politics then and bad politics now. fact is there are good people on the left and right just as there are bad. but just because you dont agree with the policy, its a weak political argument to play the whole moral high ground BS game. the name calling. deplorables, racists, etc. its just plain old and tired. yes some racists exists. yes they are awful and there is no place for that. same for sexists. and many other issues. ive lived in small towns and big cities. 12 different states and 7 different countries. Ive found that 80-99% of the people I encounter are not racists, depending on the country or region.

I've never seen a president nor candidate ever called so many foul names ever. any part of the world. the name calling has reached a vitriol and incendiary language level that no sane person would ever engage with you guys. i kept at in these pages just to show you guys we actually can have a conversation. i fully understand you. just as i fully understand conservatives. ive taken the time to get to know, trust, and love both liberal and conservatives. I am a true independent. but trust me. some of you guys make it nearly impossible to discuss these things. i dont have any real desire to educate nor persuade you because I understand its futile. But i do think the conversation needs to remain open. ive never seen this country more openly divided in my entire life. i assume the good that will come of this current divide is the long needed discussion on many is worth it. so im attempting to have that discussion. but you guys have to come off the high horse and soap box (of cards.) human being are all liars from time to time, all are self serving on some level.

But we have a country that is in trouble due to its debt. perhaps even a planet that is in trouble. we need to take care of both the country and also the planet, and then the people in it and pay our bills along the way and do so in a way where our money supply remains open and the economy remains flush with cash so we, the people, can hopefully have some "fun" along the way. yet we have a system that allows the elite wealthy to hoard the resources of wealth to absurd levels. and 1 guy in this thread besides me sounds like he is willing tax them hard.

there is a "bad guy" out there. and its not the poor broke powerless backwards azz misled miseducated hillbilly down the street. nor is it the drug dealer down the street. though neither help. they are mostly insignificant. true evil exists in the guy that has all the money and uses that money to buy political favor so he can keep his riches. that money they hoard was meant "for the people" to facilitate the exchange of goods and labor. not to hoard, so as to control.

STFU. The left doesn't portray itself as the party of "family values." Monsters can come from any party, be any color, any gender. Its when you morally bankrupt conservatives stand on your Christian soapbox to preach to others about how to live their life and make policies because of your so called righteous cause. Meanwhile, we have a president, divorced 2 times, 3 baby mamas, accused of sexual assault. A pro life senator forcing his mistress to get an abortion, Sarah Palin daughter getting paid for abstinence speeches and I don't even remember how many babies she's pumped out now. Yes, Weinstein is scum. This is not political so stop trying to make it. You've got your head so far up your own ass, you don't even see what a parody it is for Fox news to be casting aspersions on anyone.

Sent from my ASUS_Z01BDC using RealGM mobile app


Again these people need to stop this both sides are the same crap. Seriously people need to get off the Democrats was they've never portrayed themselves as some infallible moral actors. There are scumbag in both parties, remember Anthony weiner and Elliot Spitzer? Harvey Weinstein was a donor the guy wasn't a party leader or prominent Democrat the right politicizing this is rich,the guy quotes a Foxnews segment which is rich considering the place is a sexual harassment factory. When it comes to doing what's right for all Americans and basic human decency Democrats are miles ahead of Republicans on that front.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,159
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1278 » by DCZards » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:24 pm

Wizardspride wrote:He's literally contradicting his rationale for ending the ACA subsidies....but its not as if we don't know what this is about.

Trump has been obsessed with destroying President Obama's legacy for years now.



Read on Twitter


Nice try, DT. But for many of us "Obamacare" has always been more of a principle than a law...the principle that healthcare should be a right and not a privilege. So no matter what Trump and the Repubs might do to ACA, they are not going to reverse that principle and kick off the healthcare roles the more than 20 mil Americans who now have coverage because of Obamacare. That would be political suicide.

Bottomline: Obamacare will always be an essential and positive aspect of Barack Obama's legacy. Long overdue healthcare reform had been talked about in this country for more than 50 years and through numerous presidents...the Obama Administration finally kickstarted the process.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,448
And1: 11,644
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1279 » by Wizardspride » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:26 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
Wizardspride wrote:He's literally contradicting his rationale for ending the ACA subsidies....but its not as if we don't know what this is about.

Trump has been obsessed with destroying President Obama's legacy for years now.

Read on Twitter

He did run on it as part of his platform - so there is that.

And he was/is able to do in now because of what he has done:
1) Reduce Marketing for ACA
2) Reduce/Eliminate CSR payments

In both cases they weren't in the law - so Administrative Action are possible. I think both parties should be concerned with the growth of Administrative Action(s) starting back with the Kennedy Administration - they continue to grow. We are seeing this with the Dreamers Act as well.

No doubt he ran on it.

I just question his motivations for being opposed to it.


The ironic thing is the majority of the public would now prefer the ACA be fixed, not dismantled.

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,448
And1: 11,644
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Political Roundtable Part XV 

Post#1280 » by Wizardspride » Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:59 pm

Read on Twitter



Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.

Return to Washington Wizards