Game 6: Pack at Minny - Noon on Fox

TJ_Ford_11 · Post #361 » by **TJ_Ford_11** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:42 pm

It can't be normal to lose 10 starters every year. Or Aaron Rodgers get injured. The last year I remember the Packers being healthy was 2007 or 2008 I think.

trwi7 · Post #362 » by **trwi7** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:51 pm

TJ_Ford_11 wrote:Who all got injured, I quit watching after the first half? And how bad were the injuries?

Ullrich John was playing right tackle at the end of the game. I have no idea if I'm even spelling his name right.

WeekapaugGroove · Post #363 » by **WeekapaugGroove** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:56 pm

trwi7 wrote:
TJ_Ford_11 wrote:Who all got injured, I quit watching after the first half? And how bad were the injuries?

Ullrich John was playing right tackle at the end of the game. I have no idea if I'm even spelling his name right.

Yeah Im not sure I've ever seen a team have 6 of their top 8 olineman hurt. Its **** ridiculous.

Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app

FAH1223 · Post #364 » by **FAH1223** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:59 pm

TJ_Ford_11 wrote:It can't be normal to lose 10 starters every year. Or Aaron Rodgers get injured. The last year I remember the Packers being healthy was 2007 or 2008 I think.

Packers were pretty healthy in 2014

DavidDunn21 · Post #365 » by **DavidDunn21** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:01 pm

Watch on YouTube

midranger · Post #366 » by **midranger** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:09 pm

trwi7 wrote:
TJ_Ford_11 wrote:Who all got injured, I quit watching after the first half? And how bad were the injuries?

Ullrich John was playing right tackle at the end of the game. I have no idea if I'm even spelling his name right.

I think it may have been Skeet Ulrich.

rilamann · Post #367 » by **rilamann** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:28 pm

Watching that Youtube video there was related videos of Packer highlights from last season, it's sad to think Micah Hyde would easily be our 3rd or 4th best defensive player this season.Not even the Buffalo Bills version of Hyde, last year's Packer version.

One consultation of Rodgers getting hurt is the fact there was no way in hell the Packers were winning a Super Bowl with this defense.Let's be real here.

rilamann · Post #368 » by **rilamann** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:36 pm

Watching the play where Rodgers got hurt, Rodgers' injury is still almost overshadowed by Bennett not catching the ball.That was a ''dude, you need to retire like now.'' kind of play.

bizarro · Post #369 » by **bizarro** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:38 pm

Profound23 wrote:
TJ_Ford_11 wrote:Who all got injured, I quit watching after the first half? And how bad were the injuries?

We were literally down to no backup offensive lineman and no back up defensive backs before the game was over.

At this point shut all the best players like Bakhtiari down and hope for a top 5 draft pick while giving your younger players some experience.

Seriously. If there ever was a time to Tank, this is it. Never going to happen. I am predicting an 8-8 or 7-9 finish and picking right around that coveted 15 spot.

rilamann · Post #370 » by **rilamann** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:46 pm

humanrefutation wrote:I had to pop into work this morning for a few hours, so I ended up starting my recording of the game after Rodgers got hurt.

Barr didn't have to drive him into the ground. He could have released him. But, I can't be incredibly upset by it. It was a football play. He didn't try to take his head off or go at his knees. He hit him straight on.

.

I'd be 100% ok with Rodgers getting nailed on that play, it's football, but Barr didn't have to pick Rodgers up off the ground and slam him like he did.IMO that was dirty, not the hit but picking him up like he did.

Post #371 » by **humanrefutation** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:51 pm

rilamann wrote:
humanrefutation wrote:I had to pop into work this morning for a few hours, so I ended up starting my recording of the game after Rodgers got hurt.

Barr didn't have to drive him into the ground. He could have released him. But, I can't be incredibly upset by it. It was a football play. He didn't try to take his head off or go at his knees. He hit him straight on.

.

I'd be 100% ok with Rodgers getting nailed on that play, it's football, but Barr didn't have to pick Rodgers up off the ground and slam him like he did.IMO that was dirty, not the hit but picking him up like he did.

He didn't pick him up, though. Rodgers was on one foot when the hit was made and he hopped on the other foot as Barr tackled him.

rilamann · Post #372 » by **rilamann** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:07 pm

humanrefutation wrote:
rilamann wrote:
humanrefutation wrote:I had to pop into work this morning for a few hours, so I ended up starting my recording of the game after Rodgers got hurt.

Barr didn't have to drive him into the ground. He could have released him. But, I can't be incredibly upset by it. It was a football play. He didn't try to take his head off or go at his knees. He hit him straight on.

.

I'd be 100% ok with Rodgers getting nailed on that play, it's football, but Barr didn't have to pick Rodgers up off the ground and slam him like he did.IMO that was dirty, not the hit but picking him up like he did.

He didn't pick him up, though. Rodgers was on one foot when the hit was made and he hopped on the other foot as Barr tackled him.

It's close but Barr did kind of pick him up when he really didn't have to.I think you can make a case it was a dirty play but it wasn't blatant.If that exact same play and happens and Rodgers gets up uninjured no one scoffs at the play.I'll give you that.

Hindsight obviously 20/20, if we knew Bennett was going to drop a ball my 6 year old nephew probably catches, you wish Rodgers would have just taken the sack there, he takes the sack he doesn't get hurt.I blame Bennett for getting open,**** **** lol.

Bernman · Post #373 » by **Bernman** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:12 pm

I think he definitely wanted to hit him to intimidate, inflict pain, or harm. That was a beat or two after Rodgers released the ball, and then he chose to follow through. Had to see the ball was gone at some point in all that and it created no immediate competitive benefit.

WRau1 · Post #374 » by **WRau1** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:22 pm

I don't think he wanted to injure Rodgers but Barr definitely wanted him to feel it. He put his entire weight onto Rodgers without bracing for the fall.

Post #375 » by **Jollay** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:30 pm

The Rodgers injury is just one of those things. And, some of the massive injuries have been bad luck this decade. But at this point you would have to realize there are other factors at play. Hopefully.

Oh well, go .500, make a playoff run, beat Caleb Hannie in the championship game.

More likely we should just realize football is far too physical a game for a good portion of these guys. Every. Year.

TJ_Ford_11 · Post #376 » by **TJ_Ford_11** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:30 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
TJ_Ford_11 wrote:It can't be normal to lose 10 starters every year. Or Aaron Rodgers get injured. The last year I remember the Packers being healthy was 2007 or 2008 I think.

Packers were pretty healthy in 2014

Nope, that was the year Rodgers hurt his calf and wasn't the mobile QB that makes him dangerous.

El Duderino · Post #377 » by **El Duderino** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:55 pm

TJ_Ford_11 wrote:Who all got injured, I quit watching after the first half? And how bad were the injuries?

I have no clue who the RT is that replaced Bulaga, some random dude named Ulrick John.

Where the hell did he come from?

jazzfanWA · Post #378 » by **jazzfanWA** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:57 pm

El Duderino wrote:
TJ_Ford_11 wrote:Who all got injured, I quit watching after the first half? And how bad were the injuries?

I have no clue who the RT is that replaced Bulaga, some random dude named Ulrick John.

Where the hell did he come from?

AZ practice squad.

BUCKnation · Post #379 » by **BUCKnation** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 1:19 am

Mags FTW wrote:
DigitalFool wrote:The opponent took out your star quarterback - would have like to see a little more fire from the team.

They were shell shocked and it looked like the coaches couldn't get the offense to regain focus.

We'll see how this team looks when they have a full week to prepare for life without Aaron.

Yeah, they were deflated, especially right after the incident. Other than a couple of moments of positivity, the performance in general just seemed like a survive and get out of minnesota with what's left kind of game.

FAH1223 · Post #380 » by **FAH1223** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:30 pm

TJ_Ford_11 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
TJ_Ford_11 wrote:It can't be normal to lose 10 starters every year. Or Aaron Rodgers get injured. The last year I remember the Packers being healthy was 2007 or 2008 I think.

Packers were pretty healthy in 2014

Nope, that was the year Rodgers hurt his calf and wasn't the mobile QB that makes him dangerous.

That happened late in the season against Tampa Bay.

For most of that year, the roster was healthy. WRs, OL, DBs, LBs... no major injuries.

Even with the calf injury, they should have played in the Super Bowl.