ImageImageImage

Markelle Fultz Discussion II

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,657
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#21 » by LloydFree » Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:28 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
Unbreakable99 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
Monk was 1-9 (1-6 from 3) last night. I think he might have forgotten how to shoot as well.


One game.


He's shooting 33% FG and 31% 3FG in his preseason games + first regular season game including a 7-22 (2-11) performance earlier in the preseason.

I'm not sure where you stand on the Monk train, but his purpose is to hit shots, which he has not been doing. It's not even a comparison between Fultz and Monk. Fultz is objectively a better player even if he shoots like Shaq.

Naaaa. Fultz has more avenues towards being a useful NBA player... because he has a more varied skillset. If Fultz doesn't shoot, he's Evan Turner. Evan Turner has a more varied skillset and is well rounded than JJ Redick, but he isn't a better player than Redick.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,675
And1: 17,292
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#22 » by Negrodamus » Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:31 pm

LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
Unbreakable99 wrote:
One game.


He's shooting 33% FG and 31% 3FG in his preseason games + first regular season game including a 7-22 (2-11) performance earlier in the preseason.

I'm not sure where you stand on the Monk train, but his purpose is to hit shots, which he has not been doing. It's not even a comparison between Fultz and Monk. Fultz is objectively a better player even if he shoots like Shaq.

Naaaa. Fultz has more avenues towards being a useful NBA player... because he has a more varied skillset. If Fultz doesn't shoot, he's Evan Turner. Evan Turner has a more varied skillset and is well rounded than JJ Redick, but he isn't a better player than Redick.


It's an insult to JJ Redick and how far he's come to compare him to Monk.
Gsraider
Starter
Posts: 2,371
And1: 111
Joined: Jun 10, 2003

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#23 » by Gsraider » Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:38 pm

Still missing the point. I didn't see Monk's first game, but I'm guessing the majority of his misses were jumpers. I wasn't making a case for Monk either, but at least he is who he is and I'll take my chances that he'll ultimately be a pretty solid shooter in the NBA, even if that's all he winds up being overall. Anyway, at least Monk missed shots. Fultz WON'T TAKE THEM. I'm not talking about layups and finishes in the paint either. If anyone has watched Fultz play prior to pre-season, you would never have seen a player that is playing (or not playing as the case may be) like he is now. You would never have seen a guy shoot a FT like that. This isn't about reading the boxscore and seeing that Fultz shot 5-9.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,657
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#24 » by LloydFree » Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:50 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
He's shooting 33% FG and 31% 3FG in his preseason games + first regular season game including a 7-22 (2-11) performance earlier in the preseason.

I'm not sure where you stand on the Monk train, but his purpose is to hit shots, which he has not been doing. It's not even a comparison between Fultz and Monk. Fultz is objectively a better player even if he shoots like Shaq.

Naaaa. Fultz has more avenues towards being a useful NBA player... because he has a more varied skillset. If Fultz doesn't shoot, he's Evan Turner. Evan Turner has a more varied skillset and is well rounded than JJ Redick, but he isn't a better player than Redick.


It's an insult to JJ Redick and how far he's come to compare him to Monk.

I don't think it's an insult at all. Malik was a far superior prospect than JJ Redick, coming into the league. If Monk works on his fundamentals, he will get to where Redick is in 3-4 years, rather than the 7-10 years it took Redick.

Point is, Evan Turner has always had a more varied skillset than the one-dimensional shooters in the league, but that doesn't mean he's been a better player than any of them. If Fultz doesn't shoot then he's Evan Turner.

***I actually think Fultz's shooting is the last thing to worry about. It will come along. I just don't like his athletic ceiling or his motor.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,675
And1: 17,292
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#25 » by Negrodamus » Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:54 pm

Gsraider wrote:Still missing the point. I didn't see Monk's first game, but I'm guessing the majority of his misses were jumpers. I wasn't making a case for Monk either, but at least he is who he is and I'll take my chances that he'll ultimately be a pretty solid shooter in the NBA, even if that's all he winds up being overall. Anyway, at least Monk missed shots. Fultz WON'T TAKE THEM. I'm not talking about layups and finishes in the paint either. If anyone has watched Fultz play prior to pre-season, you would never have seen a player that is playing (or not playing as the case may be) like he is now. You would never have seen a guy shoot a FT like that. This isn't about reading the boxscore and seeing that Fultz shot 5-9.


And when Monk's shot isn't falling, that 0-0 from the FT line is particularly glaring. If Fultz's shot isn't falling, he is capable of drawing fouls. Yes, I get it, his FT shot looks bad. But he puts pressure on the other team's bigs with foul trouble.

I also don't think his shooting issues is a long term thing, so I'm not freaking out about it.
James40
Veteran
Posts: 2,824
And1: 1,048
Joined: Mar 24, 2014
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#27 » by James40 » Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:13 pm

Gsraider wrote:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2737893-nba-exec-on-bizarre-markelle-fultz-shooting-form-this-is-mind-boggling


It looks like Barkley’s golf swing, he should be hitting 500 ft’s a day with proper form before it becomes psychological.
Gsraider
Starter
Posts: 2,371
And1: 111
Joined: Jun 10, 2003

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#28 » by Gsraider » Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:22 pm

James40 wrote:
Gsraider wrote:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2737893-nba-exec-on-bizarre-markelle-fultz-shooting-form-this-is-mind-boggling


It looks like Barkley’s golf swing, he should be hitting 500 ft’s a day with proper form before it becomes psychological.


Agreed. I realize that everyone is looking for hope and a silver lining, but if anyone thinks that the current version of Fultz looks anything like this guy, they are deluding themselves:



This was 3 months ago. There is zero hesitation on his shot and a desire to shoot it no less. This is not the same guy right now.
User avatar
cksdayoff
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 3,639
Joined: Jun 21, 2010

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#29 » by cksdayoff » Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:24 pm

a whole lotta overreactions part II
#failforfultz
User avatar
phiphan
Head Coach
Posts: 7,382
And1: 2,348
Joined: Oct 13, 2004
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#30 » by phiphan » Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:54 pm

He may have lost his mojo somewhere in training camp. It's not surprising given that he's still learning his role. It's apparent that he's got the skills but he's kind of rudderless out there, learning a new style of play of not being "the guy." Now's not the time to freak out and dogpile him. If he looks lost this time next year then we can all gather and have a collective panic attack.
agiaco
Analyst
Posts: 3,726
And1: 1,161
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#31 » by agiaco » Thu Oct 19, 2017 8:19 pm

phiphan wrote:He may have lost his mojo somewhere in training camp. It's not surprising given that he's still learning his role. It's apparent that he's got the skills but he's kind of rudderless out there, learning a new style of play of not being "the guy." Now's not the time to freak out and dogpile him. If he looks lost this time next year then we can all gather and have a collective panic attack.


I can tell how driven Markelle is. He's just pretty timid right now, but rightfully so. I think he's going to adjust just fine.
User avatar
cksdayoff
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 3,639
Joined: Jun 21, 2010

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#32 » by cksdayoff » Thu Oct 19, 2017 8:20 pm

phiphan wrote:He may have lost his mojo somewhere in training camp. It's not surprising given that he's still learning his role. It's apparent that he's got the skills but he's kind of rudderless out there, learning a new style of play of not being "the guy." Now's not the time to freak out and dogpile him. If he looks lost this time next year then we can all gather and have a collective panic attack.


he probably finds his groove by november
#failforfultz
CoreyGallagher
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,137
And1: 12,928
Joined: Feb 02, 2012
Contact:

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#33 » by CoreyGallagher » Thu Oct 19, 2017 8:37 pm

I understand if he’s self conscious to shoot right now. I paint and imagining somebody watching, analyzing, and critiquing every brush stroke I made, I wouldn’t want to paint then, tbh.

I think he just has to make a few to relax the bs narrative.
CoreyGallagher wrote:I hope the Cavs don't take Embiid because then we'll take Embiid.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,675
And1: 17,292
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#34 » by Negrodamus » Thu Oct 19, 2017 8:40 pm

CoreyGallagher wrote:I understand if he’s self conscious to shoot right now. I paint and imagining somebody watching, analyzing, and critiquing every brush stroke I made, I wouldn’t want to paint then, tbh.

I think he just has to make a few and relax the bs narrative.


We already have one self conscious shooter in Ben Simmons. How could we have already acquired another one?
CoreyGallagher
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,137
And1: 12,928
Joined: Feb 02, 2012
Contact:

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#35 » by CoreyGallagher » Thu Oct 19, 2017 8:44 pm

Negrodamus wrote:We already have one self conscious shooter in Ben Simmons. How could we have already acquired another one?

I think he’s just self conscious to shoot, I don’t think he actually has a reason to be. Simmons does, lol.
CoreyGallagher wrote:I hope the Cavs don't take Embiid because then we'll take Embiid.
Winejk
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,515
And1: 452
Joined: Jun 28, 2010

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#36 » by Winejk » Thu Oct 19, 2017 9:02 pm

Regardless of whatever is going on with Fultz's shot and shoulder, I thought he played a good game last night. He was effective taking it to the hoop and scoring in the paint which is what he should be doing if his jumpshot is messed up. Shows he isn't a one trick pony and can do other things. Sure he had some turnovers and rookie plays, but overall he showed some positive glimpses. Just keep building on it.
User avatar
cksdayoff
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 3,639
Joined: Jun 21, 2010

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#37 » by cksdayoff » Thu Oct 19, 2017 9:04 pm

there seems to be a misconception about fultz in his first regular season game, he had 0 turnovers.
#failforfultz
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,675
And1: 17,292
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#38 » by Negrodamus » Thu Oct 19, 2017 9:15 pm

cksdayoff wrote:there seems to be a misconception about fultz in his first regular season game, he had 0 turnovers.


Yea, that's incorrect. What's happening here: https://youtu.be/5J4GMiHJjow?t=27s
Unbreakable99
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 3,993
Joined: Jul 04, 2014

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#39 » by Unbreakable99 » Thu Oct 19, 2017 9:21 pm

cksdayoff wrote:there seems to be a misconception about fultz in his first regular season game, he had 0 turnovers.


He may have had 0 turnovers but he had his fair share of bad plays which is expected of any rookie in their first game. He got swallowed up by Wall a few times and got his shot swatted. I just want him to stand outside the 3 point line and take the shot just once.
User avatar
cksdayoff
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 3,639
Joined: Jun 21, 2010

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion II 

Post#40 » by cksdayoff » Thu Oct 19, 2017 9:21 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
cksdayoff wrote:there seems to be a misconception about fultz in his first regular season game, he had 0 turnovers.


Yea, that's incorrect. What's happening here: https://youtu.be/5J4GMiHJjow?t=27s


the statiticians were so impressed with the block on oubre that they decided to wipe away the turnover
#failforfultz

Return to Philadelphia 76ers