verbal8 wrote:tontoz wrote:In before AFM posts about Smith's upcoming triple double.
10 turnovers, 10 missed shots and 10 fouls?
10 awesome dance moves, 10 splashes of Rogain, 10 waves of the towel from the bench
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
verbal8 wrote:tontoz wrote:In before AFM posts about Smith's upcoming triple double.
10 turnovers, 10 missed shots and 10 fouls?
Dark Faze wrote:zero2hero wrote:Dark Faze wrote:I'm really of the opinion that are very few centers that, as the last line of defense can provide much resistance against strong penetrating players.
I really think in todays NBA 90% of the defense is dependent on your 1-4 moving on a string, making good decisions on screens and bringing help fast enough/in the right moments.
Now the big concern is switching assignments with a center, but the solution is to just not switch. When Gortat switched onto good guards it was game over. There are very few guys that can switch onto a guard and be successful. It's an old argument since I made a thread about it and most agreed that we should start Gortat but I really think Smiths spacing would benefit the team more than Gortats defense.
Although I do believe we should trot out Smith at C at times to give certain looks, I don't agree with replacing Gortat with Smith in our most effective lineups (Ex: Our "death" lineup last year with Wall/Beal/Porter/Oubre/Gortat). The Wall/Gortat PNR action was very effective because Gortat was a threat finishing in the paint - forcing the defense to collapse and bring help. And it should be even more effective this year with Wall improving his pull up game.
Giving up a Wall and Gortat pick and roll is basically a breakdown in the defense though these days. Because why wouldn't you go under the screen against Wall and why wouldn't you just back up to cut off the roll as the big man against Gortat who has limited range on the pick and pop?
Sluggerface wrote:I don't get all the hand wringing about Smith. He was just as good as Scott during the preseason, and even if your dreaded scenario of Smith starting comes to fruition, all he has to do is show that he's consistent at shooting threes for two seasons in a row for him to be infinitely more tradeable than he was going into the season, or he just declines his PO.
BearlyBallin wrote:Wonder if Brooks will try this lineup. I think he played it in one of the first few preseason games for a flash...
Wall, Meeks, Beal, Porter, Gortat
Sluggerface wrote:BearlyBallin wrote:Wonder if Brooks will try this lineup. I think he played it in one of the first few preseason games for a flash...
Wall, Meeks, Beal, Porter, Gortat
He ran this and another 3 guard lineup with frazier in the 3rd quarter last night. Philly didn't respond well to it. Meeks shooting ability lets him slot in naturally between the 2 and 3, at least offensively.
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract
Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
dangermouse wrote:I saw he ran a Wall/Frazier lineup at one stage
That wasn't good. I wish he'd stop doing that. Wall/Jennings was terrible, we had enough of that I thought.
closg00 wrote:dangermouse wrote:I saw he ran a Wall/Frazier lineup at one stage
That wasn't good. I wish he'd stop doing that. Wall/Jennings was terrible, we had enough of that I thought.
WHY TF does he do this?
DCZards wrote:closg00 wrote:dangermouse wrote:I saw he ran a Wall/Frazier lineup at one stage
That wasn't good. I wish he'd stop doing that. Wall/Jennings was terrible, we had enough of that I thought.
WHY TF does he do this?
What's the big deal? Wall and Frazier played together maybe 3-4 minutes...in the first game. Shouldn't we be giving Brooks a chance to figure out what combos will or will not work before we render a verdict?