Hello Brooklyn wrote:I'm only comparing ages because you wanted to compare Harris's last year to Crabbe from 2 years ago.
Crabbe last year was WAY BETTER than Harris. And since you're so obsessed with 3 point percentage, Crabbe shot 44% from 3 last year which was one of the best in the NBA.
who ever said otherwise? no debated Crabbe was better then Harris last season. the point was that Marks gave Crabbe a huge contract for putting up the same numbers harris put up last year (both their third season)
There was no comparison between Crabbe and Harris last year. You're trying to bring in Crabbe from 2 years ago which makes no sense.
im not "trying" to do anything and if you actually understood the dicussion or took the time to ready these posts you would no why that comparison was made. The orignal argument went like this:
"Crabbe was vastly overpaid"
"no he wasnt"
"Crabbe got paid for putting up the same numbers that harris put up last year"
"ok so marks basically offered crabbe 19 million when he produced like joe harris?
"yup"
then it turned to...
"in an expanded role with more volume crabbe could do alot better"
the ladder we will wait and see. lots of people on both sides. some think with more volume he gets better, other think his percentags drop with more volume
Let's look at Harris's stats from 2 years ago:
.6 PGG on 25% shooting.
LMAO. Trash.
he played 15 minutes total in the entire season. i dont find that to be a very reliable sample size. as a comparison, he has already played twice that amount already this year


























