ImageImageImage

Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now?

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

Tatum vs. Fultz: What do you think now?

I thought Ainge Should be fired for trade and still do
34
12%
I thought Ainge made a mistake but now like the trade
51
18%
I liked the trade and still do
189
65%
I liked the trade but now wish we picked Fultz
15
5%
 
Total votes: 289

User avatar
DK-All Day
General Manager
Posts: 9,746
And1: 8,458
Joined: Oct 12, 2013
     

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#301 » by DK-All Day » Tue Oct 24, 2017 6:29 pm

Something really bad happened in his meeting with us. Before that everything was pointing toward us taking him and it felt like before Fultz left Boston, Ainge was on the phone in Philly rushing to get a deal done.

When Ainge retires, I hope he writes a book...
Handsome.
FinallyImHere
Junior
Posts: 254
And1: 196
Joined: Nov 13, 2010
Location: MA
       

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#302 » by FinallyImHere » Tue Oct 24, 2017 6:45 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
FinallyImHere wrote:
DarkAzcura wrote:
It will work perfectly fine. This isn't the 90s anymore. Tatum has the length of a modern PF. Weight is not there quite yet. It's clear the Celtics want to be able to seamlessly switch between the 2-4 positions. In fact Stevens has gone on record multiple times believing there is only 3 main positions in today's NBA (ball handler, wing, big), and even then there can be crossover between those 3 positions.


I hope you're right I just don't feel comfortable having Tatum at the 4 I see him as the perfect 3. Maybe if he puts on some series weight grows an inch or two then I'll feel better with him at the 4.


He needs to add some bulk for sure. I do believe he’s taller than the 6’8 number he measured at in high school, though.

If I had to guess, he’s a solid 6’9 to 6’9.5 with a 9 foot standing reach— both of which are solid for a PF.


Thank god Tatum has a frame that can easily be bulked just by looking at his dads IG you can tell his body has bulk potential. Can't say the same for a player like Ingram.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#303 » by Slartibartfast » Tue Oct 24, 2017 6:48 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
FinallyImHere wrote:
DarkAzcura wrote:
It will work perfectly fine. This isn't the 90s anymore. Tatum has the length of a modern PF. Weight is not there quite yet. It's clear the Celtics want to be able to seamlessly switch between the 2-4 positions. In fact Stevens has gone on record multiple times believing there is only 3 main positions in today's NBA (ball handler, wing, big), and even then there can be crossover between those 3 positions.


I hope you're right I just don't feel comfortable having Tatum at the 4 I see him as the perfect 3. Maybe if he puts on some series weight grows an inch or two then I'll feel better with him at the 4.


He needs to add some bulk for sure. I do believe he’s taller than the 6’8 number he measured at in high school, though.

If I had to guess, he’s a solid 6’9 to 6’9.5 with a 9 foot standing reach— both of which are solid for a PF.


Height-wise he's fine for PF.

It's the lower-body that's more at issue. If you aren't freakishly long like Davis, Porzingis, Giannis or Durant, it's easier to hack it as a full-time PF if you have low center of gravity and a lot of lower-body strength. The other premiere PFs in the game - LBJ, Green, Griffin, Millsap - aren't much heightwise but they all have lower centers of gravity and a lot of leg power. Even Ben Simmons is a solid 230 pounds with a strong base.

Tatum looks like he's filling out, but his physical profile is still closer to the lighter combo forwards (somewhere in between a total stick figure like Ingram and the thicker Rudy Gay).
FinallyImHere
Junior
Posts: 254
And1: 196
Joined: Nov 13, 2010
Location: MA
       

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#304 » by FinallyImHere » Tue Oct 24, 2017 6:53 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
FinallyImHere wrote:
I hope you're right I just don't feel comfortable having Tatum at the 4 I see him as the perfect 3. Maybe if he puts on some series weight grows an inch or two then I'll feel better with him at the 4.


He needs to add some bulk for sure. I do believe he’s taller than the 6’8 number he measured at in high school, though.

If I had to guess, he’s a solid 6’9 to 6’9.5 with a 9 foot standing reach— both of which are solid for a PF.


Height-wise he's fine for PF.

It's the lower-body that's more at issue. If you aren't freakishly long like Davis, Porzingis, Giannis or Durant, it's easier to hack it as a full-time PF if you have low center of gravity and a lot of lower-body strength. The other premiere PFs in the game - LBJ, Green, Griffin, Millsap - aren't much heightwise but they all have lower centers of gravity and a lot of leg power. Even Ben Simmons is a solid 230 pounds with a strong base.

Tatum looks like he's filling out, but his physical profile is still closer to the lighter combo forwards (somewhere in between a total stick figure like Ingram and the thicker Rudy Gay).


Yes his lower body does look a little weak. Went to the home opener and I cringe every time he's in the post fighting for rebounds against bigger guys.
User avatar
jmr07019
General Manager
Posts: 8,771
And1: 8,882
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
       

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#305 » by jmr07019 » Tue Oct 24, 2017 7:28 pm

FinallyImHere wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
He needs to add some bulk for sure. I do believe he’s taller than the 6’8 number he measured at in high school, though.

If I had to guess, he’s a solid 6’9 to 6’9.5 with a 9 foot standing reach— both of which are solid for a PF.


Height-wise he's fine for PF.

It's the lower-body that's more at issue. If you aren't freakishly long like Davis, Porzingis, Giannis or Durant, it's easier to hack it as a full-time PF if you have low center of gravity and a lot of lower-body strength. The other premiere PFs in the game - LBJ, Green, Griffin, Millsap - aren't much heightwise but they all have lower centers of gravity and a lot of leg power. Even Ben Simmons is a solid 230 pounds with a strong base.

Tatum looks like he's filling out, but his physical profile is still closer to the lighter combo forwards (somewhere in between a total stick figure like Ingram and the thicker Rudy Gay).


Yes his lower body does look a little weak. Went to the home opener and I cringe every time he's in the post fighting for rebounds against bigger guys.


His DREB% is very similar to the numbers Durant and LeBron have posted throughout their careers.

Durant career - 18.5
James career - 17.9
Melo career - 15.1
Tatum 3 games - 18.6
Show Love Spread Love
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 37,105
And1: 67,994
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#306 » by Duke4life831 » Tue Oct 24, 2017 7:30 pm

FinallyImHere wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
FinallyImHere wrote:
I hope you're right I just don't feel comfortable having Tatum at the 4 I see him as the perfect 3. Maybe if he puts on some series weight grows an inch or two then I'll feel better with him at the 4.


He needs to add some bulk for sure. I do believe he’s taller than the 6’8 number he measured at in high school, though.

If I had to guess, he’s a solid 6’9 to 6’9.5 with a 9 foot standing reach— both of which are solid for a PF.


Thank god Tatum has a frame that can easily be bulked just by looking at his dads IG you can tell his body has bulk potential. Can't say the same for a player like Ingram.


You can just tell from Tatum's shoulders that his body is going to bulk up pretty easy.

The weird thing with Ingram is that his dad is a pretty thick dude.

Image

Just look at the arm difference between the two. I do remember hearing that Ingram's dad said he was pretty skinny as well as a teenager and didnt really grow into his body till his early to mid 20s. So who knows it may happen for him, but ya he doesnt seem to have the body that will put on too much weight.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 37,105
And1: 67,994
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#307 » by Duke4life831 » Tue Oct 24, 2017 7:34 pm

jmr07019 wrote:
FinallyImHere wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
Height-wise he's fine for PF.

It's the lower-body that's more at issue. If you aren't freakishly long like Davis, Porzingis, Giannis or Durant, it's easier to hack it as a full-time PF if you have low center of gravity and a lot of lower-body strength. The other premiere PFs in the game - LBJ, Green, Griffin, Millsap - aren't much heightwise but they all have lower centers of gravity and a lot of leg power. Even Ben Simmons is a solid 230 pounds with a strong base.

Tatum looks like he's filling out, but his physical profile is still closer to the lighter combo forwards (somewhere in between a total stick figure like Ingram and the thicker Rudy Gay).


Yes his lower body does look a little weak. Went to the home opener and I cringe every time he's in the post fighting for rebounds against bigger guys.


His DREB% is very similar to the numbers Durant and LeBron have posted throughout their careers.

Durant career - 18.5
James career - 17.9
Melo career - 15.1
Tatum 3 games - 18.6


This is one thing that puzzled me with Tatum at Duke and one of the reasons I had hope for his explosion all around. There were plenty of times that when Tatum went up for a rebound, the dude really got up there. But then he would attack the basket on a drive and barely get any lift. I think hes a better 2 foot jumper than 1 foot jumper. But I think he is a good rebounder because he has good length, a great knack for where the ball is going to be and he can get up pretty well jumping off 2 feet and not from the run.
IBelieveInBrad
Ballboy
Posts: 19
And1: 10
Joined: Jun 21, 2017
       

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#308 » by IBelieveInBrad » Tue Oct 24, 2017 7:35 pm

You can tell by Tatum's very narrow waist that bulking will NOT be easy for him.
FinallyImHere
Junior
Posts: 254
And1: 196
Joined: Nov 13, 2010
Location: MA
       

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#309 » by FinallyImHere » Tue Oct 24, 2017 7:44 pm

IBelieveInBrad wrote:You can tell by Tatum's very narrow waist that bulking will NOT be easy for him.


So the 3 is a better suited position than the 4 for him?
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#310 » by SmartWentCrazy » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:02 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
FinallyImHere wrote:
I hope you're right I just don't feel comfortable having Tatum at the 4 I see him as the perfect 3. Maybe if he puts on some series weight grows an inch or two then I'll feel better with him at the 4.


He needs to add some bulk for sure. I do believe he’s taller than the 6’8 number he measured at in high school, though.

If I had to guess, he’s a solid 6’9 to 6’9.5 with a 9 foot standing reach— both of which are solid for a PF.


Height-wise he's fine for PF.

It's the lower-body that's more at issue. If you aren't freakishly long like Davis, Porzingis, Giannis or Durant, it's easier to hack it as a full-time PF if you have low center of gravity and a lot of lower-body strength. The other premiere PFs in the game - LBJ, Green, Griffin, Millsap - aren't much heightwise but they all have lower centers of gravity and a lot of leg power. Even Ben Simmons is a solid 230 pounds with a strong base.

Tatum looks like he's filling out, but his physical profile is still closer to the lighter combo forwards (somewhere in between a total stick figure like Ingram and the thicker Rudy Gay).


Anthony Davis seems to be doing alright with his skinny legs and cannonball shoulders.
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#311 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:03 pm

Well, Woj just confirmed the world's worst kept secret - that Fultz is injured. It will be interesting to hear the Sixers medical staff explain why they let him try to play through that injury.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#312 » by SmartWentCrazy » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:09 pm

CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:Well, Woj just confirmed the world's worst kept secret - that Fultz is injured. It will be interesting to hear the Sixers medical staff explain why they let him try to play through that injury.


They legitimately have the dumbest medical staff on the planet. Letting Embiid play on a torn meniscus last year was terrible, and this is pretty egregious as well. I’d be furious if I were a philly fan.
Baller1234a
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,202
And1: 2,715
Joined: Jun 30, 2017
     

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#313 » by Baller1234a » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:11 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
jmr07019 wrote:
FinallyImHere wrote:
Yes his lower body does look a little weak. Went to the home opener and I cringe every time he's in the post fighting for rebounds against bigger guys.


His DREB% is very similar to the numbers Durant and LeBron have posted throughout their careers.

Durant career - 18.5
James career - 17.9
Melo career - 15.1
Tatum 3 games - 18.6


This is one thing that puzzled me with Tatum at Duke and one of the reasons I had hope for his explosion all around. There were plenty of times that when Tatum went up for a rebound, the dude really got up there. But then he would attack the basket on a drive and barely get any lift. I think hes a better 2 foot jumper than 1 foot jumper. But I think he is a good rebounder because he has good length, a great knack for where the ball is going to be and he can get up pretty well jumping off 2 feet and not from the run.

I think his foot injury had something to do with it as well. He seems a LOT more athletic than I thought he would be. The man is going coast to coast on steals and long rebounds
Bet with Stillwater Celtics will finish 6th or higher in ECF Standings Regular Season(17-18). [WON]
cloverleaf
RealGM
Posts: 10,414
And1: 7,730
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#314 » by cloverleaf » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:11 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
FinallyImHere wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
He needs to add some bulk for sure. I do believe he’s taller than the 6’8 number he measured at in high school, though.

If I had to guess, he’s a solid 6’9 to 6’9.5 with a 9 foot standing reach— both of which are solid for a PF.


Thank god Tatum has a frame that can easily be bulked just by looking at his dads IG you can tell his body has bulk potential. Can't say the same for a player like Ingram.


You can just tell from Tatum's shoulders that his body is going to bulk up pretty easy.

The weird thing with Ingram is that his dad is a pretty thick dude.

Image

Just look at the arm difference between the two. I do remember hearing that Ingram's dad said he was pretty skinny as well as a teenager and didnt really grow into his body till his early to mid 20s. So who knows it may happen for him, but ya he doesnt seem to have the body that will put on too much weight.


They both have relatively broad shoulders, however (as does Tatum, of course).
User avatar
SeizeCoup
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,630
And1: 680
Joined: Apr 26, 2005
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#315 » by SeizeCoup » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:18 pm

Called it, kid has been playing injured.

Should the 6ers try to cash in some of their chips? And could the C's be buyers?
Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#316 » by Banks2Pierce » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:29 pm

FinallyImHere wrote:
IBelieveInBrad wrote:You can tell by Tatum's very narrow waist that bulking will NOT be easy for him.


So the 3 is a better suited position than the 4 for him?


Seems like he'll be able to play either at a high level. Will hurt most 3s with his length and 4s with his skills. Rebounds like a 4. Early returns with guarding 3s quickness-wise have been mixed. If his skills project out to the star level, he will be able to fit in with a wide variety of players because he can shoot.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#317 » by Slartibartfast » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:30 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
He needs to add some bulk for sure. I do believe he’s taller than the 6’8 number he measured at in high school, though.

If I had to guess, he’s a solid 6’9 to 6’9.5 with a 9 foot standing reach— both of which are solid for a PF.


Height-wise he's fine for PF.

It's the lower-body that's more at issue. If you aren't freakishly long like Davis, Porzingis, Giannis or Durant, it's easier to hack it as a full-time PF if you have low center of gravity and a lot of lower-body strength. The other premiere PFs in the game - LBJ, Green, Griffin, Millsap - aren't much heightwise but they all have lower centers of gravity and a lot of leg power. Even Ben Simmons is a solid 230 pounds with a strong base.

Tatum looks like he's filling out, but his physical profile is still closer to the lighter combo forwards (somewhere in between a total stick figure like Ingram and the thicker Rudy Gay).


Anthony Davis seems to be doing alright with his skinny legs and cannonball shoulders.


See my second paragraph. He measured a 7'5.5 wingspan and he grew an extra inch post draft so it's probably more like 7'6.

Low center of gravity doesn't make much difference at all when you are freakishly long (and freakishly athletic to boot). People could move KG around all over the place but he was so long it didn't matter. Likewise he was actually quite poor at moving people on the block (remember how he got nowhere against undersized tanks like Maxiell and Hayes) but he could still just shoot over them, stuff them or snatch rebounds from over their heads as needed.

Tatum's length isn't freakish so he's not going to have rougher match-up issues against similarly sized PFs with stronger bases.

Against SFs though he should be fine. He moves his feet well enough to at least bother the quicker guys and he has plus length for a wing. I think he rebounds really nicely in space too, which is as valuable at SF as at PF.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#318 » by SmartWentCrazy » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:35 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
Height-wise he's fine for PF.

It's the lower-body that's more at issue. If you aren't freakishly long like Davis, Porzingis, Giannis or Durant, it's easier to hack it as a full-time PF if you have low center of gravity and a lot of lower-body strength. The other premiere PFs in the game - LBJ, Green, Griffin, Millsap - aren't much heightwise but they all have lower centers of gravity and a lot of leg power. Even Ben Simmons is a solid 230 pounds with a strong base.

Tatum looks like he's filling out, but his physical profile is still closer to the lighter combo forwards (somewhere in between a total stick figure like Ingram and the thicker Rudy Gay).


Anthony Davis seems to be doing alright with his skinny legs and cannonball shoulders.


See my second paragraph. He measured a 7'5.5 wingspan and he grew an extra inch post draft so it's probably more like 7'6.

Low center of gravity doesn't make much difference at all when you are freakishly long (and freakishly athletic to boot). People could move KG around all over the place but he was so long it didn't matter. Likewise he was actually quite poor at moving people on the block (remember how he got nowhere against undersized tanks like Maxiell and Hayes) but he could still just shoot over them, stuff them or snatch rebounds from over their heads as needed.

Tatum's length isn't freakish so he's not going to have rougher match-up issues against similarly sized PFs with stronger bases.

Against SFs though he should be fine. He moves his feet well enough to at least bother the quicker guys and he has plus length for a wing. I think he rebounds really nicely in space too, which is as valuable at SF as at PF.


To be honest, I had no idea his wingspan was that ridiculous. I stand fully corrected.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#319 » by Slartibartfast » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:49 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Anthony Davis seems to be doing alright with his skinny legs and cannonball shoulders.


See my second paragraph. He measured a 7'5.5 wingspan and he grew an extra inch post draft so it's probably more like 7'6.

Low center of gravity doesn't make much difference at all when you are freakishly long (and freakishly athletic to boot). People could move KG around all over the place but he was so long it didn't matter. Likewise he was actually quite poor at moving people on the block (remember how he got nowhere against undersized tanks like Maxiell and Hayes) but he could still just shoot over them, stuff them or snatch rebounds from over their heads as needed.

Tatum's length isn't freakish so he's not going to have rougher match-up issues against similarly sized PFs with stronger bases.

Against SFs though he should be fine. He moves his feet well enough to at least bother the quicker guys and he has plus length for a wing. I think he rebounds really nicely in space too, which is as valuable at SF as at PF.


To be honest, I had no idea his wingspan was that ridiculous. I stand fully corrected.


It's not really fair to be that athletic and that long. Once/if he's freed of idiotic NOP management he's going to rule the league defensively as a 5.
Jakeopp
General Manager
Posts: 9,785
And1: 10,442
Joined: Feb 20, 2017
     

Re: Fultz vs. Tatum: What do you think now? 

Post#320 » by Jakeopp » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:57 pm

SeizeCoup wrote:Called it, kid has been playing injured.

Should the 6ers try to cash in some of their chips? And could the C's be buyers?

What chips?

Return to Boston Celtics