Mulhollanddrive wrote:He's in the same bracket as other freak athletes where it's about physical tools and developing skills as a pro.
I don't think NY are letting him go anyway.
Freak athletes? In terms of athleticism Ntilikina is average at best.
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
Mulhollanddrive wrote:He's in the same bracket as other freak athletes where it's about physical tools and developing skills as a pro.
I don't think NY are letting him go anyway.
Fo-Real wrote:RunDogGun wrote:Fo-Real wrote:Has Frank shown one flash of anything since being on Knicks be it preseason, practice, A DAMN PICK UP GAME THAT WAS FILMED?!?! Thought they were crazy to draft him and have not seen a single damn reason why we should want him.
He has only 8 mins in the NBA so far, so no, he hasn’t shown anything yet. But we don’t need him right now, and he is only 19. It would be a prospect for the future, basically the 8th pick and O’Quinn (Who I have wanted since his draft day), for Bledsoe and a second rounder. We don’t need a second rounder next year, for we have a ton of young players plus two firsts, and a limited roster.
If he has done nothing against nba talent (not even a word of being impressive in practice or summer league or in someones backyard), what makes him a better prospect than Mudiay or any other potential clown being mentioned?!?! What makes him worth developing over other young guards who are around?
Frustrated with the direction of the team, its whiffs in free agency and questionable personnel moves during his four years with the franchise, Bledsoe expressed that it was time he moved on, sources said. Bledsoe was then told by management, according to sources, that the team had underperformed ever since he was given starting point guard responsibilities.
bwgood77 wrote:Hadn't seen this yet...Frustrated with the direction of the team, its whiffs in free agency and questionable personnel moves during his four years with the franchise, Bledsoe expressed that it was time he moved on, sources said. Bledsoe was then told by management, according to sources, that the team had underperformed ever since he was given starting point guard responsibilities.
http://www.espn.com/blog/nba/post/_/id/32536/suns-gm-calls-out-bledsoe-and-agent-rich-paul
bwgood77 wrote:Hadn't seen this yet...Frustrated with the direction of the team, its whiffs in free agency and questionable personnel moves during his four years with the franchise, Bledsoe expressed that it was time he moved on, sources said. Bledsoe was then told by management, according to sources, that the team had underperformed ever since he was given starting point guard responsibilities.
http://www.espn.com/blog/nba/post/_/id/32536/suns-gm-calls-out-bledsoe-and-agent-rich-paul
Saberestar wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Hadn't seen this yet...Frustrated with the direction of the team, its whiffs in free agency and questionable personnel moves during his four years with the franchise, Bledsoe expressed that it was time he moved on, sources said. Bledsoe was then told by management, according to sources, that the team had underperformed ever since he was given starting point guard responsibilities.
http://www.espn.com/blog/nba/post/_/id/32536/suns-gm-calls-out-bledsoe-and-agent-rich-paul
And it is absolutely true.
bwgood77 wrote:Hadn't seen this yet...Frustrated with the direction of the team, its whiffs in free agency and questionable personnel moves during his four years with the franchise, Bledsoe expressed that it was time he moved on, sources said. Bledsoe was then told by management, according to sources, that the team had underperformed ever since he was given starting point guard responsibilities.
http://www.espn.com/blog/nba/post/_/id/32536/suns-gm-calls-out-bledsoe-and-agent-rich-paul
RunDogGun wrote:Fo-Real wrote:That response makes more sense than "no need to get all mad", explaining "why Frank over others", O'Quinn didnt come up in my response to your response, there was no anger and I was wondering why you responded specifically me if you did not intend on explaining what you were thinking Crazy of me I guess.
Ugh, you were writing in all caps, and using !?!?!? After a few of your sentences. My trade was what you based your question off of, correct? Or did you just randomly choose Frank?![]()
And I did answer your question, you just didn’t like my answer I guess. He was a future prospect.
RunDogGun wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Saberestar wrote:No, thanks.
How about Kyle O’Quinn, Courtney Lee and a future 2nd?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
I’d take O’Quinn and French Frank, and we’d throw in a second rounder, would that work?
Fo-Real wrote:RunDogGun wrote:Fo-Real wrote:That response makes more sense than "no need to get all mad", explaining "why Frank over others", O'Quinn didnt come up in my response to your response, there was no anger and I was wondering why you responded specifically me if you did not intend on explaining what you were thinking Crazy of me I guess.
Ugh, you were writing in all caps, and using !?!?!? After a few of your sentences. My trade was what you based your question off of, correct? Or did you just randomly choose Frank?![]()
And I did answer your question, you just didn’t like my answer I guess. He was a future prospect.
Still not trying to argue with you and you still seem angry. (eye roll?) I get it, you focused on punctuation and trying to prove your point. My post had nothing to do with your post specifically (i did not quote you with the first question about frank). There have been a few posters that have seemed to like the trade possibility with the Knicks and I was asking why Frank, you just happened to be the last to mention Frank so I can see how you could have been confused and figured I was specifically commenting to your post. This is why when you mentioned O'Quinn, I again referred to what qualities Frank had to catapult him to being wanted that bad. Can you not see any of this or are you just focused on disagreement? I have now multiple times tried to calmly explain why we are missing each other on understanding and you keep posting the same ****.
bwgood77 wrote:Fo-Real wrote:RunDogGun wrote:Ugh, you were writing in all caps, and using !?!?!? After a few of your sentences. My trade was what you based your question off of, correct? Or did you just randomly choose Frank?![]()
And I did answer your question, you just didn’t like my answer I guess. He was a future prospect.
Still not trying to argue with you and you still seem angry. (eye roll?) I get it, you focused on punctuation and trying to prove your point. My post had nothing to do with your post specifically (i did not quote you with the first question about frank). There have been a few posters that have seemed to like the trade possibility with the Knicks and I was asking why Frank, you just happened to be the last to mention Frank so I can see how you could have been confused and figured I was specifically commenting to your post. This is why when you mentioned O'Quinn, I again referred to what qualities Frank had to catapult him to being wanted that bad. Can you not see any of this or are you just focused on disagreement? I have now multiple times tried to calmly explain why we are missing each other on understanding and you keep posting the same ****.
I think that's enough of this back and forth.
HarthorneWingo wrote:RunDogGun wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
How about Kyle O’Quinn, Courtney Lee and a future 2nd?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
I’d take O’Quinn and French Frank, and we’d throw in a second rounder, would that work?
Nah, we're keeping Frank ... as far as I know.
Fo-Real wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Fo-Real wrote:
Still not trying to argue with you and you still seem angry. (eye roll?) I get it, you focused on punctuation and trying to prove your point. My post had nothing to do with your post specifically (i did not quote you with the first question about frank). There have been a few posters that have seemed to like the trade possibility with the Knicks and I was asking why Frank, you just happened to be the last to mention Frank so I can see how you could have been confused and figured I was specifically commenting to your post. This is why when you mentioned O'Quinn, I again referred to what qualities Frank had to catapult him to being wanted that bad. Can you not see any of this or are you just focused on disagreement? I have now multiple times tried to calmly explain why we are missing each other on understanding and you keep posting the same ****.
I think that's enough of this back and forth.
I havnt been disrespectful or mean in any way man, whats up?
Still not trying to argue with you and you still seem angry. (eye roll?) I get it, you focused on punctuation and trying to prove your point. ... Can you not see any of this or are you just focused on disagreement? I have now multiple times tried to calmly explain why we are missing each other on understanding and you keep posting the same ****.
RunDogGun wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:RunDogGun wrote:
I’d take O’Quinn and French Frank, and we’d throw in a second rounder, would that work?
Nah, we're keeping Frank ... as far as I know.
That doesn’t mean you won’t do it though, since neither you nor I make any team descisions. Our second rounder was pretty high this last draft, which means you could still get a decent player, that doesn’t have to be guaranteed. Lee for us is not needed, we still have Knight, Reed, and currently Daniels, all behind Booker as it is. And TJ and Jackson taking all the sf mins, with Bender being able to take spot up minutes at that position.
Although I really like O’Quinn, you really aren’t giving me much to work with for Bledsoe. Plus you are trying to keep KP, so I think the trade is pretty even currently.