Snakebites wrote:Yeah, Galloway was shooting hot early on but he's really proving to be a lousy signing.
The fact that he has now shown he can't play point guard even in a pinch when someone's hurt was really the last nail in the coffin in that regard for me.
In the last 2 years we've given a number of nice contracts to guys in the 6-9 Milliion dollar range to play bench roles for us:
Leur
Boban
Ish
Galloway
All of those were overpays at the time. Only one of those I'm happy with is Ish. He's been damn good. Everyone else? Those contracts are hindering us. No sense pretending they aren't.
The trio of Boban, Leur, and Galloway will be making a combined 26 million for us next year after Boban's contract goes up to 9.5 million. Does that make anyone else cry? Just me? That's one fourth of our cap on 3 guys who don't belong in an NBA rotation. Christ on a bike, I didn't realize it was that bad. That's also when Avery Bradley is due a new deal. We wouldn't even need the "is he worth it" discussion if we didn't have 26 mill devoted to those guys. But it gets worse. Tobias is a UFA after next year, and we'll still be stuck with Leuer and Galloway then.
Boban's contract was 7 mill per, but I didn't realize it was back loaded. Van Gundy has made some absolutely horrific free agent signings, and those 3 might prevent us from resigning useful players like Bradley, Tobias, and Ish, all of whom come off the books in the next couple of years while some or all of those paper weights are still on payroll.
He goes a year too long every damn time. I know there is a Detroit tax, but it shouldn't be in years when we're already overpaying on money.
Stan wants what he wants when he wants it - he's an instant gratification personality. Wait until the end of the FA period and you can get a Tyreke Evans for a one year "prove it" deal.
I do think Galloway was signed in part to be a check against KCP leaving late in the FA season as Rich Paul really likes to stretch things out for maximum leverage. If Detroit signed nobody and the KCP walked we would have been looking at Kennard and Bullock as our SG starters. I wonder if Evans, among others, was targeted at all and maybe turned down the same offer.
Galloway still serves his purpose ROS because Kennard will hit the rookie wall, and he'll still struggle against more athletic players (probably his whole career). Also Bradley is a UFA and could leave in the off-season so We could be Kennard/Galloway next season - if AB left and we didn't have Langston here we'd be in a bit of a pickle to try and sign another SG with the MLE while trying to keep other's like Tolliver, or fill out roster with other vets by splitting the MLE.
If we re-sign AB though, Galloway NEEDS to be dealt. Kennard should get ALL the back-up 2-guard minutes behind Avery, and Galloway would be useless as a $7M third string SG.