Revived wrote:JJ13 wrote:Revived wrote:Mike James since their acquiring 2 guards in the deal in Beasley and Mudiay.
Or Alec Peters.
Have you watched one suns game this year? Why on earth would we cut Mike James, one of few bright spots so far
He's had like one or two good games, he's gonna come back to earth soon.
I doubt he's better than Mudiay who is someone I think very lowly of as well.
You think too lowly of James then. I sarcastically bought into the hype and joined his cult and while he won't blow up the boxscore, I think he's a decent player who's game is pretty much set. That's not necessarily a bad thing because on a team full of youngsters, it's good to have "veterans" who are still in their athletic prime. As mentioned, James won't ever be much more than what we've already seen but I like that he plays calm, he mostly plays within himself, doesn't pound the ball and is quietly our 4th leading scorer with a .418 3P% and a solid 2:1 AST:TO ratio. He's no world-beater but he's a guy who's been around the block and for better or worse, he's a guy we could use. He certainly could be coming back down to Earth soon but he's a perfectly fine stop gap option until we have a proper PG who's ready to start (Ulis?) or Booker gets moved to PG full time.
This is not a Mudiay vs James debate because a lot NBA fans would rather have Mudiay over a 27yo rookie from nowhere with no hype just based on potential/talent/name value. A few years ago I was asked by a Houston fan who I'd rather have on my team, Len or Dwight and I took Len despite the talent difference because it's not always a talent debate. In terms of fit for the roster, I'd rather have a James who isn't looking to take the spotlight and is just playing within himself.