Bledsoe to the Bucks For Monroe/#1 - POLL ADDED

Post #1041 » by **Prez** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 8:01 am

freewhitemoon wrote:
Prez wrote:knew delly's numbers this year were probably bad but holy **** lmao.

LOL

Outside of 3s he takes most of his shots in the 3-10 range and has a 9% FG there atm

oh and he's literally dead last in the league in VORP

also lol rose

DanoMac · Post #1042 » by **DanoMac** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 8:05 am

JEIS wrote:
HKPackFan wrote:
StickeeFingaz wrote:
Velazquez said Bledsoe was in MKE today to get a physical and would probably join the team tonight or tomorrow.
Will he play vs spurs?

Pretty sure Paschke said his first game was going to be against the Lakers.

During the game against Cleveland he was saying that Kidd told him that Bledsoe would play "some minutes" against San Antonio.

3Diamantidis · Post #1043 » by **3Diamantidis** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 8:25 am

So, we'll be using this thread for bledsoe?
Or we'll create a new one :nod:

for the guy that solves the "we need a 2nd star" thing?

blazza18 · Post #1044 » by **blazza18** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 8:26 am

Prez wrote:
freewhitemoon wrote:
Prez wrote:knew delly's numbers this year were probably bad but holy **** lmao.

LOL

Outside of 3s he takes most of his shots in the 3-10 range and has a 9% FG there atm

oh and he's literally dead last in the league in VORP

also lol rose

Dirk

Jez2983 · Post #1045 » by **Jez2983** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 9:48 am

Maker is only 11 spots below nurkic

illusional · Post #1046 » by **illusional** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 10:02 am

oo regular. 2 many point guards, a small player handling the ball. Too regular. Too many point guards too regular. Small ball too regular.

It's too Milwaukee Bucks, it's too common that they go back too the regular pointguard fashion of this team.

Too small too many.

I've seen enough little guys & small ballers over the pass 20+ years come in and have a roll as a so called contributing "non championship" factor on this team.

Brogdon should continue too start at the point. They always needed wing players that could start at point. Smaller players have always let them down, & will continue to no matter what position?

By the way.........

I know their missing a piece( in Jabari or for Jabari)

But,

What's wrong with a starting line up of Thon/Henson, Giannis, Snell, Middleton, Brogdon?

That is a very disruptive(on opposing offense) & to the basket line up.

Eazy E · Post #1047 » by **Eazy E** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:35 pm

illusional wrote:What's wrong with a starting line up of Thon/Henson, Giannis, Snell, Middleton, Brogdon?

They have lost 4 games in a row.

TroyD92 · Post #1048 » by **TroyD92** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:36 pm

illusional wrote:oo regular. 2 many point guards, a small player handling the ball. Too regular. Too many point guards too regular. Small ball too regular.

It's too Milwaukee Bucks, it's too common that they go back too the regular pointguard fashion of this team.

Too small too many.

I've seen enough little guys & small ballers over the pass 20+ years come in and have a roll as a so called contributing "non championship" factor on this team.

Brogdon should continue too start at the point. They always needed wing players that could start at point. Smaller players have always let them down, & will continue to no matter what position?

By the way.........

I know their missing a piece( in Jabari or for Jabari)

But,

What's wrong with a starting line up of Thon/Henson, Giannis, Snell, Middleton, Brogdon?

That is a very disruptive(on opposing offense) & to the basket line up.

wut

Novocaine · Post #1049 » by **Novocaine** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:40 pm

illusional wrote:What's wrong with a starting line up of Thon/Henson, Giannis, Snell, Middleton, Brogdon?

That is a very disruptive(on opposing offense) & to the basket line up.

Well, the Thon/Henson bit, but I agree, Bucks should bring Bledsoe off the bench. Brogdon plays well along Giannis/Middleton and the Bucks badly need shot making in their bench units. Having Bledsoe and Giannis on the court simultaneously, plus Middleton, creates some diminishing returns in terms of shot-creation/playmaking. Brogdon will be less effective playing with bench units.

Bledsoe playing 30mpg off the bench would be ideal.

buckboy · Post #1050 » by **buckboy** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:41 pm

Illusional has a little SneakyPete in him.

DingleJerry · Post #1051 » by **DingleJerry** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:45 pm

buckboy wrote:Illusional has a little SneakyPete in him.

I'm refusing to engage.

NothingEasy · Post #1052 » by **NothingEasy** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:46 pm

illusional wrote:oo regular. 2 many point guards, a small player handling the ball. Too regular. Too many point guards too regular. Small ball too regular.

It's too Milwaukee Bucks, it's too common that they go back too the regular pointguard fashion of this team.

Too small too many.

I've seen enough little guys & small ballers over the pass 20+ years come in and have a roll as a so called contributing "non championship" factor on this team.

Brogdon should continue too start at the point. They always needed wing players that could start at point. Smaller players have always let them down, & will continue to no matter what position?

By the way.........

I know their missing a piece( in Jabari or for Jabari)

But,

What's wrong with a starting line up of Thon/Henson, Giannis, Snell, Middleton, Brogdon?

That is a very disruptive(on opposing offense) & to the basket line up.

buckboy · Post #1053 » by **buckboy** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:50 pm

DingleJerry wrote:
buckboy wrote:Illusional has a little SneakyPete in him.

I'm refusing to engage.

He's fantastic. I wonder if he's an orange belt in karate.

illusional · Post #1054 » by **illusional** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 4:00 pm

Eazy E wrote:
illusional wrote:What's wrong with a starting line up of Thon/Henson, Giannis, Snell, Middleton, Brogdon?

They have lost 4 games in a row.

They don't have the right bench in order with guys like Dellevedova & putting players like tele at non wing positions & Horst stifled them by cutting players like Gerald Green(who would have finalized them right) a few hours after he made the cut.

There will be an official fire horst thread/job termination in days to come.

Eazy E · Post #1055 » by **Eazy E** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 4:34 pm

illusional wrote:
Eazy E wrote:
illusional wrote:What's wrong with a starting line up of Thon/Henson, Giannis, Snell, Middleton, Brogdon?

They have lost 4 games in a row.

They don't have the right bench in order with guys like Dellevedova & putting players like tele at non wing positions & Horst stifled them by cutting players like Gerald Green(who would have finalized them right) a few hours after he made the cut.

There will be an official fire horst thread/job termination in days to come.

Horst has actually done a fabulous job since taking over as GM. Jury is still out on the DJ Wilson pick, but I'm not going to rush to judgment on that pick until the rookie gets a chance to prove himself.

MartyConlonOnTheRun · Post #1056 » by **MartyConlonOnTheRun** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 4:44 pm

Was Bogut seriously that bad that he wouldn't be able to provide 15 min (take the minutes away from henson) for the min?

illusional · Post #1057 » by **illusional** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 4:56 pm

Eazy E wrote:
illusional wrote:
Eazy E wrote:
They have lost 4 games in a row.

They don't have the right bench in order with guys like Dellevedova & putting players like tele at non wing positions & Horst stifled them by cutting players like Gerald Green(who would have finalized them right) a few hours after he made the cut.

There will be an official fire horst thread/job termination in days to come.

Horst has actually done a fabulous job since taking over as GM. Jury is still out on the DJ Wilson pick, but I'm not going to rush to judgment on that pick until the rookie gets a chance to prove himself.

We'll see when he wants to make moves to stifle the Versatility, Quickness, Athleticism, Defense & Height Advantage of this team.

Post #1058 » by **MickeyDavis** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 4:59 pm

I don't know how anyone can rip on Horst. So far the only real move he made was the Bledsoe trade. The end of the bench moves don't mean much one way or another. Sure it would be great to clear salary and reformulate the rotation but that's easier said than done. If a year from now there is criticism of Horst I would understand. It's just too early.

KidA24 · Post #1059 » by **KidA24** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 5:10 pm

NothingEasy wrote:
illusional wrote:oo regular. 2 many point guards, a small player handling the ball. Too regular. Too many point guards too regular. Small ball too regular.

It's too Milwaukee Bucks, it's too common that they go back too the regular pointguard fashion of this team.

Too small too many.

I've seen enough little guys & small ballers over the pass 20+ years come in and have a roll as a so called contributing "non championship" factor on this team.

Brogdon should continue too start at the point. They always needed wing players that could start at point. Smaller players have always let them down, & will continue to no matter what position?

By the way.........

I know their missing a piece( in Jabari or for Jabari)

But,

What's wrong with a starting line up of Thon/Henson, Giannis, Snell, Middleton, Brogdon?

That is a very disruptive(on opposing offense) & to the basket line up.

TroyD92 · Post #1060 » by **TroyD92** » Thu Nov 9, 2017 5:12 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:I don't know how anyone can rip on Horst. So far the only real move he made was the Bledsoe trade. The end of the bench moves don't mean much one way or another. Sure it would be great to clear salary and reformulate the rotation but that's easier said than done. If a year from now there is criticism of Horst I would understand. It's just too early.

I'd argue Horst has well exceeded expectations. Every move has at the very least made sense, and has netted some kind of positive result.

Thoughts On The Trade