RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,454
And1: 8,115
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#1 » by trex_8063 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 7:28 pm

1. Michael Jordan
2. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
3. Lebron James
4. Bill Russell
5. Tim Duncan
6. Wilt Chamberlain
7. Magic Johnson
8. Shaquille O'Neal
9. Hakeem Olajuwon
10. Larry Bird
11. Kobe Bryant
12. Kevin Garnett
13. Oscar Robertson
14. Karl Malone
15. Jerry West
16. Julius Erving
17. Dirk Nowitzki
18. David Robinson
19. Charles Barkley
20. Moses Malone
21. John Stockton
22. Dwyane Wade
23. Chris Paul
24. Bob Pettit
25. George Mikan
26. Steve Nash
27. Patrick Ewing
28. Kevin Durant
29. Stephen Curry
30. Scottie Pippen
31. John Havlicek
32. Elgin Baylor
33. Clyde Drexler
34. Rick Barry
35. Gary Payton
36. Artis Gilmore
37. Jason Kidd
38. Walt Frazier
39. Isiah Thomas
40. Kevin McHale
41. George Gervin
42. Reggie Miller
43. Paul Pierce
44. Dwight Howard
45. Dolph Schayes
46. Bob Cousy
47. Ray Allen
48. Pau Gasol
49. Wes Unseld
50. Robert Parish
51. Russell Westbrook
52. Alonzo Mourning
53. Dikembe Mutombo
54. Manu Ginobili
55. Chauncey Billups
56. Willis Reed
57. Bob Lanier
58. Allen Iverson
59. Adrian Dantley
60. Dave Cowens
61. Elvin Hayes
62. Dominique Wilkins
63. Vince Carter
64. ????

Seems like McGrady and Harden are probably the front-runners, though could be sleeping on someone like English (or even Thurmond??). You decide.....

Spoiler:
eminence wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

Colbinii wrote:.

Texas Chuck wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dr Spaceman wrote:.

fpliii wrote:.

euroleague wrote:.

pandrade83 wrote:.

Hornet Mania wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

SactoKingsFan wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

JordansBulls wrote:.

RSCS3_ wrote:.

BasketballFan7 wrote:.

micahclay wrote:.

ardee wrote:.

RCM88x wrote:.

Tesla wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

MyUniBroDavis wrote:.

kayess wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

MisterHibachi wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

mischievous wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

Bad Gatorade wrote:.

andrewww wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Cyrusman122000 wrote:.

Winsome Gerbil wrote:.

Narigo wrote:.

wojoaderge wrote:.

TrueLAfan wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.

Outside wrote:.

scabbarista wrote:.

janmagn wrote:.

Arman_tanzarian wrote:.

oldschooled wrote:.

Pablo Novi wrote:.

john248 wrote:.

mdonnelly1989 wrote:.

Senior wrote:.

twolves97 wrote:.

CodeBreaker wrote:.

JoeMalburg wrote:.

dhsilv2 wrote:.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,454
And1: 8,115
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#2 » by trex_8063 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 7:38 pm

1st vote: Tracy McGrady

I'm very very big on meaningful longevity, and McGrady suffers in comparison to many other candidates on the basis of his longevity/durability--->more the durability than the longevity. He did play 15+ seasons (though only seven of them prime-level, 2 others were relatively "near-prime", and he was at least marginally useful in all the others)......that's OK in terms of longevity; he did miss large chunks of multiple seasons, though (so durability is certainly an issue).

If not for this, I'd have supported him earlier. With the exception of Bill Walton, Tracy McGrady is [imo] the best peak [and best average level during prime] left on the table (and obviously his longevity/durability soundly trounces Walton's).

While WS/48 doesn't rate him overly generous, the other rate metrics do. In a decent length career (938 rs games, >30,000 rs minutes), TMac has the 31st highest career PER of all-time (in NBA/ABA combined); he has the 12th-best career playoff PER of all-time. He has the 26th-best rs BPM of all-time (or since 1973, I should say), 15th-best playoff BPM.
He's also 49th all-time in MVP award shares, fwiw.

Impact data doesn't exactly love him (but it doesn't rate him poorly either). Spreadsheet I have which compiled data for many notable players from the following sources:
*colts18's rs-only APM for '94-'96
**ascreamingcomesacrossthecourt RAPM for '97-'00 (NPI for '97, PI otherwise)
***shutupandjam RAPM for '01-'07 (NPI for '01, PI otherwise)
****GotBuckets? PI RAPM for '08-'14
*****JE's google sheets PI RAPM for '15-'17

......from those, TMac's best 7 years combined is extremely similar to that of the following players who are off the table: Gary Payton (#35), Dwight Howard (#44), Ray Allen (#47), Reggie Miller (#42), and Russell Westbrook (#51).

imho, #64 is probably marginally past time for TMac. I'm pretty dead-set on him as my top pick.
Also just noted McGrady went #48 in the last project. There are only 2-3 current players who have surpassed him since; so I'd suggest either we [somewhat drastically] overrated him in that project, or we're on the verge of significantly underrating him in this one (or possibly a little bit of both).


2nd vote: Alex English
penbeast0 is probably happy to see one more person cast some support his way. Solid scorer (inflated a bit by Denver pace, but still one of the better scorers of his generation), OK playmaker and rebounder from the SF position, very good turnover rate, fair/decent defensive player for at least a few years. Decent longevity (though not as long as one might think based on length of career: his prime was really only about 8 seasons), though super-durable.
I'm set on TMac as my top pick, but think I'll go with the Blade for my second now. I'm also thinking on Kevin Johnson for reasons stated in last thread (lacking durability holds him back a bit), or potentially Nate Thurmond (era considerations and question marks about his offensive game hold him back for me).
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,271
And1: 16,251
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#3 » by Dr Positivity » Mon Nov 20, 2017 7:49 pm

Vote Hal Greer

2nd: Sam Jones

I would have supported Greer earlier but admittedly I forgot about him as happens too often with him. Yes he is the definition of a 2nd team All-NBA, 2nd option type of star instead of an MVP caliber one as a 22/6/5 type of guard, but he has a 10-11 year prime and 15 year career giving him a longevity advantage. From what I can tell he's one of the fastest guards of his era and was a master midrange player, and is a highly respected portable teammate. Played 2nd option role on one of the greatest teams of all time in 67 Sixers. Here is a good post that I found on Hal Greer and Sam Jones by the poster oolala on insidehoops which also helped sell me on him

Spoiler:
Hal Greer

Shooting guard
6"2
175+ lbs
13th overall pick in the 1958 draft
Selected to 10 all star games and 7 all nba 2nd teams

Career regular season stats:
35.5 mpg, 19.2 ppg on .452 fg%, 5.0 rpg, 4.0 apg, .801 ft% on 5.1 fta
Regular season peak (1967/68):
39.8 mpg, 24.1 ppg on .478 fg%, 5.4 rpg, 4.5 apg, .769 ft% on 6.7 fta

Career post season stats:
39.6 mpg, 20.4 ppg on .425 fg%, 5.5 rpg, 4.3 apg, .812 ft% on 6.2 fta
Post season peak (1966/67):
45.9 mpg, 27.7 ppg on .429 fg%, 5.9 rpg, 5.3 apg, .797 ft% on 7.9 fta

By all accounts, Greer was one of the best jumpshooters of his era. He had a quick, unconventional release, appearing to push the ball with both hands, waiting until the last instant to take his left hand off the ball...

http://youtu.be/eJaFNsa-Bqs?t=12m21s
http://youtu.be/eJaFNsa-Bqs?t=25m40s
http://youtu.be/eJaFNsa-Bqs?t=35m57s
http://youtu.be/CW5-PEx0n2E?t=1m45s

Billy Cunningham had high praise for Greer's jumpshot - "It was as good as anybody’s who ever played the game. I think the beauty of Hal Greer’s game is that he knew where he was most effective and he never shot the ball from an area where he was not completely confident and comfortable. He never went outside of 18-20 feet maximum, but he was deadly and he had the ability to get to that spot".

Alex Hannum once said - "He's so good on his jumper that it startles you when he misses".

In fact, his jumpshot was so reliable, he used it at the free throw line!! http://youtu.be/eJaFNsa-Bqs?t=17m35s

But, Greer wasn't just a jumpshooter. He was a tenacious defender, a good passer and was considered to be the fastest man in the league throughout the 60s, making him dangerous on the fast break. http://youtu.be/eJaFNsa-Bqs?t=21m45s His speed was also a factor in his great shooting ability, according to Alex Hannum - "Hal's quickness enables him to free himself for the moment of daylight that he needs".

Billy Cunningham recalled - “Hal Greer was such a smart player. In his mind he had a book about every player he played against and what he had to do to make sure that he got free to get shots. He was probably as fine a screener as a guard as anybody. The thing about it was he knew that if he set a good screen then he would be open because he would force a switch and he would end up being matched up with a bigger, slower player that he knew he could easily beat to get whatever shot he wanted”.

Progress was initially slow and steady for Greer upon entering the league as the 13th overall pick in the 1958 draft. He averaged 11 points in 24 minutes for the Dolph Schayes led Sycrause Nationals in his rookie campaign, which included a truly mind boggling explosion of 39 points in one half against the great Boston Celtics (is it just me or does this seem too bizarre to be true?!).

His minutes and touches steadily rose year by year (he averaged a 23/7/4 in the 61/62 season) and with the arrival of Chamberlain in 1965, the Philadelphia 76ers (the Nationals moved to Philadelphia in 63' and changed their name) now had a real shot at winning their second championship.

He had a bad post season in 66', scoring only 16 ppg on 35% shooting as the 76ers fell to Boston in 5 games (to be fair, the entire team shot poorly. Wilt was still in his selfish, "i'm gunna poor in a bucket load of points and hope it's enough to win", mode) but he came back next year with a vengeance, averaging a 28/6/5 throughout the playoffs and setting the tone, in the eastern finals against Boston, by pouring in 39 points in game 1. As you know, the 76ers went on to beat Rick Barry's Warriors in the finals.

Billy Cunningham recalls - “We had a team whose only goal was to win a championship...It was a very focused team and a very unselfish team—and that’s the way Hal Greer played. Hal Greer never forced things or did things that would not be beneficial to the team".

Greer was the second best player on one of the greatest teams of all time. Not bad.

He had another great playoffs the following year, averaging a 26/6/4, but the 76ers fell to boston in 7 games. Wilt decided to leave Philly for L.A in the off season and although Greer and Cunningham led the 76ers to 55, 42 and 47 wins between 69' and 71' they couldn't make it past the 1st round of the playoffs, with Greer having 3 pretty poor post seasons (this really hurt his legacy for me). Greer retired after the 72/73 campaign.

A Herald-Tribune sportswriter once claimed that "If there were an award given for a player who is most respected by basketball insiders, while getting the minimum public appreciation, Greer could win hands down".

At the time of his retirement Greer had appeared in more games (1,122) than any other player in nba history and his 21,586 points are still the 76ers franchise record....

VS

Sam Jones

Shooting guard
6"4
200+ lbs
8th overall pick in the 1957 draft
Selected to 5 all star games and 3 all nba 2nd teams

Career regular season stats:
27.9 mpg, 17.7 ppg on .456 fg%, 4.9 rpg, 2.5 apg, .803 ft% on 4.1 fta
Regular seaon peak (1964/65):
36.1 mpg, 25.9 ppg on .452 fg%, 5.1 rpg, 2.8 apg, .820 ft% on 6.5 fta

Career post season stats:
30.2 mpg, 18.9 ppg on .447 fg%, 4.7 rpg, 2.3 apg, .811 ft% on 4.9 fta
Career post season peak (1964/65):
41.3 mpg, 28.6 ppg on .459 fg%, 4.6 rpg, 2.5 apg, .869 ft% on 7.0 fta

Sam Jones was clutch.
Really clutch.
Really, really clutch.
In fact, he was so clutch that his peers called him "mr clutch" (how original )

Anyway, here is a list of his noteworthy clutch feats:

1962 ECFs, game 7 vs Philly - 27 points and the game winning jumper with 2 seconds left
1962 Finals, do-or-die game 6 vs Lakers - 35 points in L.A
1962 Finals, do-or-die game 7 vs Lakers - 5 of the Celtics 10 points in OT
1963 ECFs, game 7 vs Cincy - 47 points (oscar had 43)!!
1965 ECFs, game 7 vs Philly - 37 points
1966 ECSFs, series clinching game 5 vs Cincy - 34 points
1967 ECSFs, series clinching game 5 vs Knicks - 51 points
1969 Finals, game 4 vs Lakers - game winner at the buzzer

For his career, he averaged 27ppg in 9 game 7s (he wasn't even a starter for 2 of those game 7s).

Bill Russell - "Whenever the pressure was greatest, Sam was eager for the ball. To me, that's the sign of a champion...his presence gave me great comfort in key games. In Los Angeles, Jerry West was called "mr clutch", and he was, but in the 7th game of a championship series, i'll take Sam over any player who's ever walked on a court."

HOLY MOLY!

Jones was a teriffic athlete. Although he wasn't quite a fast as Greer on the fasbreak (he was no slouch mind, only Russell was as fast as him on the Celtics), he had a lightening quick first step

http://youtu.be/8UtG7-I2wBw?t=12m4s
http://youtu.be/8UtG7-I2wBw?t=16m5s
http://youtu.be/RtdF7j_m8hA?t=2m56s
http://youtu.be/z70rGJh9WbQ?t=5m18s

and a sweet mid-range jumper

http://youtu.be/y8lEhiHw0Dg?t=2m25s
http://youtu.be/K_h34wT3SHc?t=5m52s
http://youtu.be/hmLe-ZSAHsk?t=29s

He wasn't the 1on1 defender that Greer was and i get the impression he was prone to lapses in concentration on that end but 'lock down' defenders were few and far between in the 50s/60s (K.C Jones and Wali Jones were probably the only 2 that really stood out).

Because of military service, Jones was a late comer to the nba. He was 24 years old in his rookie campaign and just like Greer, progress was initially slow and steady (he averaged just 5ppg in 10mpg his 1st year). It wasn't until the retirement of Bill Sharman following the 60/61 season that Jones became a starter, at the ripe old age of 28.

In 61/62, Jones averaged 18/6/3 in 31 mpg in the regular season and increased those numbers to 21/7/3 in the post season. That would be a theme of his career - he thrived in the playoffs. He didn't drop below 20 ppg in the post season for 7 straight years between 62' and 68'.

Ultimately, Sam Jones was the Celtics 2nd best player for 5 championships (62' through 66') and the 3rd best for another 2 (68' & 69'). How many players can say that? Scottie pippen and....ummmm.....hmmmmmmmm. Jones retired after the 68/69 campaign.

According to Red Auerbach, it was his attitude and dedication that made him stand out - "He'll do anything you ask him...he's always in shape and ready to play, and nobody works any harder at basketball than he does."

At the time of his retirement, Jones had scored the most points in the playoffs for the Celtics and his 51 points against the Knicks is still a Celtics playoff high (tied with RayRay)....


http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=241707
Liberate The Zoomers
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,893
And1: 9,621
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#4 » by penbeast0 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 8:55 pm


Vote Alex English
Alt: Sam Jones



Alex English v. James Harden and Tracy McGrady.

There comes a time when you have to give a player credit for being an outstanding reliable player who gives you good effort every day and that every day is every day for over a decade. This is English, it is not either James Harden or Tracy McGrady. There will come a time very soon where Harden's greater offensive dominance passes English's longevity and consistency or when the Beard steps up and takes over a playoff and this will no longer be close but for me, it's not yet.

All were good scorers, Harden and TMac peaked higher in terms of volume but in short peaks where they dominated the ball to an extreme degree. English had no year where he matched the sheer volume of Harden's 17 season or TMac's 03 but he was a consistent high volume scorer averaging almost 25ppg for a full decade. And, he did it within the confines of a spread, passing offense similar to what Golden State has had such success with.

And, in addition to English's highly efficient, high scoring, consistent offense that he produced for himself, he produced career years for a number of other players around him. Not just Lever and Issel (accounting for ABA/NBA differential) but Michael Adams was a marginal reserve when he came to Denver, playing in an offense that let him spam threes. Kiki Vandeweghe and Calvin Natt, two very different combo forwards, had career years playing next to English because he was able to provide the post up interior scoring that Vandeweghe lacked and the range to spread the floor that Natt lacked (when I saw Natt, he was most comfortable as an Adrian Dantley type post up combo forward). The Nuggests could play TR Dunn (think Andre Roberson with less range and more rebounding), they got career years out of journeymen centers like Wayne Cooper and Danny Schayes, very different stylistic centers. How? (a) an offense that spread the wealth and allowed each player to do what they did best and (b) English's ability to adapt different roles to cover the areas of the offense that those players were less adept at and still produce efficient offenses. I'm not implying that this is a Shaq effect case where English had gravity that warped defenses; but that his versatility extends his value beyond his admittedly outstanding numbers.

Further, English was one of the players universally acknowledged as a great teammate. He won the Walter Kennedy award for citizenship. In addition to his offense, he gave consistent effort on defense as well. Compare that to Harden, practically a byword for lazy defense in today's NBA, TMac, known for lazy practice habits and inconsistency that matched his brilliance, they are more in the Allen Iverson mode. I admire what Harden has accomplished (and actually love his ability to draw fouls as well as shoot threes, a great combination) but cringe every time I see him dog it on defense. Tmac had all the tools to be a top 20 player in NBA history but what bothered me about him is that he would only seem to be fully engaged and playing his best when his best teammates like Yao (or for his one truly great year, Grant Hill) were injured. Then he would suddenly turn himself into superman and carry his team singlehandedly but he never really seemed to get the whole team concept. English did; and made himself the consumate team player . . . outscoring the likes of Larry Bird, Dominique Wilkins, or James Worthy for the decade of the 80s while remaining unselfish and as close to ego free as any superstar I have ever seen. He deserves to be in before Harden (at least at this point in Harden's career) and Tmac.

Alternative

Names mentioned recently, Sam Jones, Nate Thurmond, Sidney Moncrief, KJ, Greer, Tmac, and Harden. OF that group, Moncrief is my favorite though his window is so friggin short, but he basically took a similarly talented Milwaukee team farther than Nique ever took Atlanta even beating Bird's Celtics superteam before running into the fo fo fo Sixers. Of the rest Harden is the biggest game changer, Jones the best second option, think he has an edge on contemporary Hal Greer with his efficiency and playoff performances but willing to listen.

Not a fan of players who only worked hard when they had the ball in their hands, no matter how good they were, thus not a big fan of the Bear(no D) or Tmac. Ignoring defense, Harden is clearly superior to TMac and it isn't close.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
LA Bird
Analyst
Posts: 3,592
And1: 3,327
Joined: Feb 16, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#5 » by LA Bird » Mon Nov 20, 2017 11:24 pm

1. Nate Thurmond
The GOAT low post man defender and one of the top 10 defensive players of all time. A solid passer but unfortunately still a negative on offense because he shot too much at too low of an efficiency. This probably wouldn't be a problem today if he had a better coach who stressed more on team offense rather than measuring player performance by just individual points - opponent points. Thurmond's box score stats weren't great but his WOWYR scores are impressive, which I think is more important considering his defensive impact weren't captured at all without steals or blocks. Thurmond would have ranked slightly higher if he didn't miss significant time in two of his prime seasons (68, 70).

2. Kevin Johnson

EDIT: Dropped Harden as possible alternate vote
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,454
And1: 8,115
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#6 » by trex_8063 » Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:33 am

LA Bird wrote:Might change to Harden for my alternate vote if he maintains his current level of performance.


Quoting everyone because I want this perfectly clear (if it isn't implicit based on the project title: "RealGM
2017 Top 100 List"): for active players, you are NOT in any way to factor in the season currently under way while ranking players (given this project started 4 months prior to the start of this current season).


Spoiler:
eminence wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

Colbinii wrote:.

Texas Chuck wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dr Spaceman wrote:.

fpliii wrote:.

euroleague wrote:.

pandrade83 wrote:.

Hornet Mania wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

SactoKingsFan wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

JordansBulls wrote:.

RSCS3_ wrote:.

BasketballFan7 wrote:.

micahclay wrote:.

ardee wrote:.

RCM88x wrote:.

Tesla wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

MyUniBroDavis wrote:.

kayess wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

MisterHibachi wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

mischievous wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

Bad Gatorade wrote:.

andrewww wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Cyrusman122000 wrote:.

Winsome Gerbil wrote:.

Narigo wrote:.

wojoaderge wrote:.

TrueLAfan wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.

Outside wrote:.

scabbarista wrote:.

janmagn wrote:.

Arman_tanzarian wrote:.

oldschooled wrote:.

Pablo Novi wrote:.

john248 wrote:.

mdonnelly1989 wrote:.

Senior wrote:.

twolves97 wrote:.

CodeBreaker wrote:.

JoeMalburg wrote:.

dhsilv2 wrote:.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
pandrade83
Starter
Posts: 2,040
And1: 604
Joined: Jun 07, 2017
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#7 » by pandrade83 » Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:36 am

Rather than copying/pasting the same stuff over & over . . .

I'm looking at the list of who else is getting some traction here: Thurmond, Jones, English, Greer, KJ (and I really like KJ & I'll be going to bat for him soon.

They're all very good players. They all deserve to be on this list in the not too distant future.

But with the exception of KJ, comparing their peaks to McGrady's averages on PER & BPM (and 4th best WS season) - their peaks are about what McGrady did routinely. That factors in his post prime & it factors in his pre-prime. Everything. With that dragging him down, their peaks only hit his average. And he has 7.5 years of what I'd call prime play - it's not nothing.

There's very few players left who are of the caliber where they truly move the needle and were amongst the very best and truly in MVP conversations (or got them) with any kind of longevity. Those guys need to go in before the 2nd tier.

I'm barely taking Harden over Tmac. I can tell by the posts that many of you are subjectively disappointed with Harden's style. I'm right there with you. I hate the flopping. I hate the lack of effort on D. He's my least favorite truly elite player in the league to watch. But he is a truly elite player and he's doing it in a pretty strong era in the better conference. The tiebreaker in Harden's favor for me is that he has 2 seasons that are rougly equal to McGrady's peak - and McGrady's other prime seasons - while outstanding - are not on the same level as that '03 year.

Nomination: James Harden
Alternate: Tracy McGrady
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 48,881
And1: 26,309
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#8 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:10 am

Speaking of players with no traction that seem odd, no Tony Parker yet? 6 time allstar, 4 time all nba. Likely would have more allstars if not for being in the west and pop for his career limiting his minutes just due to Duncan and Manu having injuries before him.

Winshare of 109 ranks him 65th (looking at basketball reference sorry trex I'm on my laptop so I don't have excel to run the rankings without this year in them but should matter much).
VORP at ~27 seems light and doesn't register on basketball reference's rankings.

Still 4 titles, a finals MVP (which doesn't add any value for me at least), and 220 career playoff games.

He's not there yet for me, but since KJ is coming up, Parker seems like a guy that should be in that conversation. 840 games total for KJ including playoffs vs Parker at 1364. Now I believe KJ was better at his peak, but I'm not sure the gap is enough to overcome with success (if you factor that in) + massive games played difference.
pandrade83
Starter
Posts: 2,040
And1: 604
Joined: Jun 07, 2017
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#9 » by pandrade83 » Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:14 am

dhsilv2 wrote:Speaking of players with no traction that seem odd, no Tony Parker yet? 6 time allstar, 4 time all nba. Likely would have more allstars if not for being in the west and pop for his career limiting his minutes just due to Duncan and Manu having injuries before him.

Winshare of 109 ranks him 65th (looking at basketball reference sorry trex I'm on my laptop so I don't have excel to run the rankings without this year in them but should matter much).
VORP at ~27 seems light and doesn't register on basketball reference's rankings.

Still 4 titles, a finals MVP (which doesn't add any value for me at least), and 220 career playoff games.

He's not there yet for me, but since KJ is coming up, Parker seems like a guy that should be in that conversation. 840 games total for KJ including playoffs vs Parker at 1364. Now I believe KJ was better at his peak, but I'm not sure the gap is enough to overcome with success (if you factor that in) + massive games played difference.


Parker hasn't played this year. Remember that nasty injury he took in the playoffs that (probably) should've been career ending?
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 48,881
And1: 26,309
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#10 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:20 am

pandrade83 wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:Speaking of players with no traction that seem odd, no Tony Parker yet? 6 time allstar, 4 time all nba. Likely would have more allstars if not for being in the west and pop for his career limiting his minutes just due to Duncan and Manu having injuries before him.

Winshare of 109 ranks him 65th (looking at basketball reference sorry trex I'm on my laptop so I don't have excel to run the rankings without this year in them but should matter much).
VORP at ~27 seems light and doesn't register on basketball reference's rankings.

Still 4 titles, a finals MVP (which doesn't add any value for me at least), and 220 career playoff games.

He's not there yet for me, but since KJ is coming up, Parker seems like a guy that should be in that conversation. 840 games total for KJ including playoffs vs Parker at 1364. Now I believe KJ was better at his peak, but I'm not sure the gap is enough to overcome with success (if you factor that in) + massive games played difference.


Parker hasn't played this year. Remember that nasty injury he took in the playoffs that (probably) should've been career ending?


Yes, but I'm not sure if other active players have moved up and shifted the list.
User avatar
Outside
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,002
And1: 16,523
Joined: May 01, 2017
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#11 » by Outside » Tue Nov 21, 2017 6:43 am

Vote: Nate Thurmond

Alternate: James Worthy


Nate has to get in at some point, right? He was among the very best all-time at individual defense, team defense, shotblocking, and rebounding, and he is acknowledged as an excellent leader and teammate.

He made it to the finals twice, with Wilt in his rookie season where they lost to the Celtics (a team Russell has called the best he played on) and in 1967 where they lost to Wilt's Sixers (who set the record for wins that season and a team considered among the best of all time).

A pared down list of notable info (my hope is that a shorter list will be more impactful).

-- NBA record for rebounds in a quarter - 18
-- One of only four players with 40 rebounds in a game
-- One of only five players to average 20 rebounds for a season
-- 10th all time in career rebounds
-- Averaged 15.0 points and 15.0 rebounds for his career
-- Five consecutive seasons averaging 20 PPG
-- Six seasons with MVP shares, including 2nd in 1966-67 (behind Wilt, ahead of Russell, Robertson, and Rick Barry)

As for the alternate, I talked myself into Worthy with my discussion on the previous thread (thanks to everyone who participated in that, btw). Others I'm considering are Sam Jones and Alex English. Hal Greer and Kevin Johnson are intriguing newcomers to that discussion. Sidney Moncrief, too. The discussion about TMac and Harden is probably convincing me to move them up my list, but I'm inclined to go with some of these other guys first.
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 48,881
And1: 26,309
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#12 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:12 pm

Tony Parker vs Worthy - The Battle of the 3rd Wheel Winners

Allstars Parker 6 Worthy 7
All NBA Parker 4 Worthy 2
Finals MVPs Parker 1 Worthy 1
NBA Titles Parker 4 Worthy 3
WS Parker 109.0 Worthy 81.2
VORP Parker 27.1 Worthy 28.5

Peak season 86 and 90 stand out for Worthy. His 87 and 89 playoffs also stand up fairly well. Parker doesn't really have any signature playoff runs, just a lot of solid ones.

An interesting head to head imo. Worthy looks to have a better peak, but Parker has a rather large advantage in longevity and they both measure out about even in awards.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,893
And1: 9,621
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#13 » by penbeast0 » Tue Nov 21, 2017 6:30 pm

I know Parker improved later in his career as he was featured more but is his longevity really strong enough to pick him over players like English, Sam Jones, or even Kevin Johnson?
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,614
And1: 3,131
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#14 » by Owly » Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:02 pm

Outside wrote:[b]Vote: Nate Thurmond

....
A pared down list of notable info (my hope is that a shorter list will be more impactful).

-- NBA record for rebounds in a quarter - 18
-- One of only four players with 40 rebounds in a game
-- One of only five players to average 20 rebounds for a season
-- 10th all time in career rebounds
-- Averaged 15.0 points and 15.0 rebounds for his career
-- Five consecutive seasons averaging 20 PPG
-- Six seasons with MVP shares, including 2nd in 1966-67 (behind Wilt, ahead of Russell, Robertson, and Rick Barry)

Might want to build up or modify the list.

I suspect many looking at that (and so far as the above is intended to persuade them that Thurmond was better than their favoured candidate) think ...

-pace
-pace
-pace
-pace
-pace
-pace/was this helpful (TS%)
- More acceptable but even then - what is MVP? fwiw a fairly clear-cut 2nd - but not sure how much many will find this persuasive.

To the extent this line of argument hinges on rebounds, it could just as well be for a version of Jerry Lucas, and given how much his teams missed him (i.e. often not), I wouldn't find it persuasive.

I'm loathe to trust small samples, but to me his best case hinges on being an elite man-defender and the jobs he did on Jabbar. The question is how valuable that is in a vacuum.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 48,881
And1: 26,309
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#15 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:05 pm

penbeast0 wrote:I know Parker improved later in his career as he was featured more but is his longevity really strong enough to pick him over players like English, Sam Jones, or even Kevin Johnson?


I have jones over him. I think I'll take English. Not sure on KJ, I have them close. But since others are bringing up guys like Worthy and we have a guy like Parrish in (not really a better peak), I thought he made sense to bring into the discussion. Same with Hal who seems comparable to Parker?
User avatar
Outside
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,002
And1: 16,523
Joined: May 01, 2017
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#16 » by Outside » Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:28 pm

Owly wrote:
Outside wrote:[b]Vote: Nate Thurmond

....
A pared down list of notable info (my hope is that a shorter list will be more impactful).

-- NBA record for rebounds in a quarter - 18
-- One of only four players with 40 rebounds in a game
-- One of only five players to average 20 rebounds for a season
-- 10th all time in career rebounds
-- Averaged 15.0 points and 15.0 rebounds for his career
-- Five consecutive seasons averaging 20 PPG
-- Six seasons with MVP shares, including 2nd in 1966-67 (behind Wilt, ahead of Russell, Robertson, and Rick Barry)

Might want to build up or modify the list.

I suspect many looking at that (and so far as the above is intended to persuade them that Thurmond was better than their favoured candidate) think ...

-pace
-pace
-pace
-pace
-pace
-pace/was this helpful (TS%)
- More acceptable but even then - what is MVP? fwiw a fairly clear-cut 2nd - but not sure how much many will find this persuasive.

To the extent this line of argument hinges on rebounds, it could just as well be for a version of Jerry Lucas, and given how much his teams missed him (i.e. often not), I wouldn't find it persuasive.

I'm loathe to trust small samples, but to me his best case hinges on being an elite man-defender and the jobs he did on Jabbar. The question is how valuable that is in a vacuum.

LOL, okay. I've been promoting Thurmond since the 30s threads, including numerous lengthy posts. I know others don't hold him in as high regard as I do, so I've been concerned that my posts would become so much noise that other voters roll their eyes at and skip over, so I've tried to balance keeping him in the discussion with not overdoing it. For this thread, I decided that maybe less was more and a refreshing alternative to presenting a wall of text. In your case, at least, I guess less wasn't more.

As it turns out, I'll be traveling today and don't have time to prepare a proper post in response to your request, but I'll try to add something.

I'm not sure what all the "pace" references you had are getting at, other than teams in Thurmond's era playing at a faster pace. TS% is the biggest argument against Thurmond, and I've addressed that previously, essentially that his impact was huge defensively, second only to Russell, that his TS% was virtually identical to Russell's, and that due to roster construction he was relied upon to provide offensive production and did so, but not efficiently, and likely would've demonstrated greater efficiency if he had better offensive weapons around him.

Here is some info from prior posts.

Nate Thurmond. Nate the Great. My favorite player ever, so I can't claim to be impartial, but I can be his advocate for this project.

Thurmond was a great, great defender and rebounder, and his offense was very good. Even though he was better at defense than Wilt and Kareem and better at offense than Russell, his profile never rose above those three, and he's overlooked because of it.

Defensively, he was second only to Russell. The Warriors with Thurmond were consistently top 5 in DRtg, including 2nd or 3rd for a four-year stretch, and that was with Russell's Celtics in the league. When the league began recognizing All-Defensive Team honors in 1968-69, his sixth season, he was 1st team twice and 2nd team three times.

He was an exceptional shotblocker, one of the best the game has ever seen, but blocks weren't recorded until 1973-74, his 11th season in the league. Even though the game had taken a toll on his knees by that point, he was still top 10 in blocks the next two seasons (8th and 3rd).

Once blocks and steals became official stats, another stat became possible -- the quadruple-double. Thurmond was the first to record one, with 22 points, 14 rebounds, 13 assists, and 12 blocks. There have been only three other quadruple-doubles since.

But to provide some context, Thurmond said this:

Any good basketball fan knows that there were plenty of quadruple-doubles back in the 1960s... Let me put it this way: I had 12 blocks in my quadruple-double game, and it was my 12th year in the league. That’s with two bad knees and more than 30,000 minutes pounding NBA floors, night after night. You bet I had plenty of quadruple-doubles before 1974. I’m not trying to brag, but there were games where it was ridiculous the number of shots I blocked. When I was young, there were nights when guys couldn’t come close to getting shots off on me. Only Russell could have blocked more in his career.

Said Walt Hazzard: "As for blocking shots, I've seen guys get offensive rebounds and then go back 15 feet to make sure they can get a shot off. They know Nate is there."

Kareem said Thurmond was his toughest opponent. "He plays me better than anybody ever has, He's tall, has real long arms, and most of all he's agile and strong. When I score on Nate, I know I've done something."

Wilt Chamberlain: "Nate Thurmond was an incredible defensive basketball player. He played me as well as Bill Russell."

Offensively, Thurmond had an inside and outside game. He averaged 15 PPG for his career and had five straight 20-point seasons. His outside shot could be inconsistent, but he was one of the earliest centers with floor spacing ability, benefitting his team by drawing the opposing center outside. Often overlooked are the other aspects of his offensive game -- he was an excellent passer for a big man and one of the best at setting screens.

Nate Thurmond was beloved by teammates and coaches and respected by opponents. His number 42 jersey is retired by both Golden State and Cleveland.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,454
And1: 8,115
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#17 » by trex_8063 » Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:29 pm

Thru post #15:

Nate Thurmond - 2 (Outside, LABird)
Tracy McGrady - 1 (trex_8063)
James Harden - 1 (pandrade83)
Alex English - 1 (penbeast0)
Hal Greer - 1 (Dr Positivity)


Probably about 23 hours until this one goes to runoff.

Spoiler:
eminence wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

Colbinii wrote:.

Texas Chuck wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dr Spaceman wrote:.

fpliii wrote:.

euroleague wrote:.

pandrade83 wrote:.

Hornet Mania wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

SactoKingsFan wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

JordansBulls wrote:.

RSCS3_ wrote:.

BasketballFan7 wrote:.

micahclay wrote:.

ardee wrote:.

RCM88x wrote:.

Tesla wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

MyUniBroDavis wrote:.

kayess wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

MisterHibachi wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

mischievous wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

Bad Gatorade wrote:.

andrewww wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Cyrusman122000 wrote:.

Winsome Gerbil wrote:.

Narigo wrote:.

wojoaderge wrote:.

TrueLAfan wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.

Outside wrote:.

scabbarista wrote:.

janmagn wrote:.

Arman_tanzarian wrote:.

oldschooled wrote:.

Pablo Novi wrote:.

john248 wrote:.

mdonnelly1989 wrote:.

Senior wrote:.

twolves97 wrote:.

CodeBreaker wrote:.

JoeMalburg wrote:.

dhsilv2 wrote:.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 48,881
And1: 26,309
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#18 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:27 pm

Vote Tmac

Tmac is one of the highest prime left on the board. 7 all nba, 7 time allstar, MVP level seasons in 03. Tmac provided elite scoring, great shooting, and had some of the best passing skills I can think of.

Alt James Harden

Harden is the best peak left. Harden has been an MVP level player the past 3 seasons. He's had some drop off in the playoffs, but still measures out as one of the best playoff performers left. Go back and look at the games he put up against the warriors in 15. 3 serious hall of fame worthy games, but the warriors were just too good.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,454
And1: 8,115
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#19 » by trex_8063 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:51 am

Outside wrote:



Must admit----since the difference between adjacent [or nearly adjacent] spots on my list this far out is nothing more than whim or "gut feel"----that you've got me close to switching my alternate vote to Thurmond.

His defense has long been known to me (especially his low-post man D--->by reputation, Head2Head studies, and minimal "eye-test"), though I kinda want to watch a little more game footage paying more attention to his help D at the rim, and also paying more attention to his passing and screen-setting on offense. Do you have any recommended full or partial game videos to watch?

I've watched this one more than once:


I've seen this one, but not for a long time:

.....actually it was Dipper's (Hal15Greer) 3-part installment that I watched.

And I'm going to watch this one:


There's like a 1-minute recap of G6 of the '67 Finals I've seen (for whatever that's worth).
And I'm pretty sure I've seen at least part of a game with Nate in a Bulls uniform (for whatever that's worth: clearly post-prime).

Would like to see some more, if you know of some video links.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
pandrade83
Starter
Posts: 2,040
And1: 604
Joined: Jun 07, 2017
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List #64 

Post#20 » by pandrade83 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 am

penbeast0 wrote:I know Parker improved later in his career as he was featured more but is his longevity really strong enough to pick him over players like English, Sam Jones, or even Kevin Johnson?


I'm not even close to supporting Parker. There's too many guys left who were flat out better players with at least some longevity behind them.

Some of the guys coming up from me if Harden/McGrady ever get in are KJ, English & McAdoo.

Return to Player Comparisons