Coach Ideas

Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47

User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#41 » by bondom34 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:33 am

getrichordie wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
getrichordie wrote:
Oh, really? Can you link me to your thread?

Also, is it possible Westbrook only knows how to play one way? I heard Van Gundy (in reply to Lowe) said players have their "limitations" on how much a coach can change them after they have played a certain way for so long and it's the coaches job to best utilize that skill set. Which makes sense to me. If Rondo was our point instead of Russ, I think we see more ball movement because he's a pass-first point-guard and that's the way he plays. The way Westbrook plays and has always played is all action is created off of a Westbrook action, usually a drive and kick or drive and dump off. This is really the first time we've seen Westbrook give up the ball this much.

If Rondo was this team's PG they'd have been in the lotto for years and never made the WCF. He's just bad.


And we've never seen a coach in OKC who had an offense.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/7eowqj/unpopular_opinion_in_response_to_lowe_okcs/?utm_content=title&utm_medium=new&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=nba

It's gradually being downvoted, the circlejerk is in full effect.


That's what I don't understand. Donovan was known for his offensive system - the motion offense. We see bits and pieces of it, but it's hard to run the motion offense when you have Roberson who doesn't pull his weight offensively and Russ who likes to hold the ball. Donovan didn't put this roster together. Presti did. Donovan is just working with what he's got: three career high-usage ISO players who are having to work out these old habits and incorporate the new. It's not as easy as it might seem "in theory." It's almost like driving a racecar to suddenly having to play chess and be good at it. It would take time. That's a drastic example, but you get the idea. Kobe didn't learn the triangle in one year. It took him a few years to really get it down pat.

I also can't tell you how many times I've seen players cut and ask for the ball, but Westbrook just holds it and tries to drive which is antithetical to Donovan's offense system he's known for. Also, I noticed that you pointed out that if Westbrook isn't cutting, that doesn't mean his teammates can't. Well, he's the leader of the team. He should be cutting like everyone else should. He doesn't get a pass because he's Westbrook. The offense starts with him and he has to embrace his new coach and the new system.

Nobody cuts , thats the problem.

You can't blame him for 3 guys standing still and 1 high screen set. We saw 35 go to a new team and had to break the habit of standing there without the ball because he never moved under 2 coaches.
its no surpise guys move when they are in a system promoting it, and that's a coach's job, not a PG. You could put Stockton out there and nobody is going to move, its a high screen and PG/Melo?Abrines/Dre standing there.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#42 » by Pillendreher » Wed Nov 22, 2017 8:48 am

Thundershock88 wrote:
slick_watts wrote:you think melo is posting up a lot now? wait until mark jackson got a hold of him.

i'd try to get george karl.



George Karl trashed Melo in his memoir. Thats a no go.


That would for sure get him to opt out. :wink:
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#43 » by bondom34 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:18 am

Also saw the GB post. Russ isn't bad from mid range. This year yes, but historically no. He's been better than Harden the last few years, and they were elite with him on court offensively. So saying he's not capable of leading a good offense is...well false.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#44 » by Pillendreher » Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:45 am

Lowe's argument is flawed. The coach didn't change. We just got another yes-man who clearly is not gettin through to anybody. And the Wizards aren't passing the ball either.

The thing that's changed this season is Russ going from GOAT level offensive impact to Jrue Holiday/Jeff Teauge offensive impact and that's exposing our non-existent offensive system. Our offense works because of individually great players. Both Melo and George never were on that same offensive level as Russ. They can't just carry an offense completely.
So now that Russ is not playing at the same level, our offense sucks. And I'm sorry, but at some point you can't just ignore the coaches he has had and the way they run their teams. Afaik, Donovan was never known for a fancy offensive system in College. In fact, didn't people say this is what his College teams looked like?

Russ is not out there screaming 'Just stand around'. It's up to the coaching staff to get people to move. He might be trying, but it clearly isn't working. And it never worked even a little bit in the close to 200 games Donovan has coached this team.

I'm ready for a real change. Because I'm sick of this. You can be as optimistic as you want, but we never fulfil expectations and that needs to change. This team has the potential to be the 2nd best team in the league, but not with this idiot leading it. People in the media don't realize that because they don't pay attention to lineup choices. They don't pay attention to defensive schemes and don't spend hours looking at lineup data like us fools. They have to cover 29 other teams and watch the Thunder play maybe 3x a year. Add a little bit of film study if they're doing a piece on them and that's it.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#45 » by getrichordie » Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:42 am

bondom34 wrote:
getrichordie wrote:
bondom34 wrote:If Rondo was this team's PG they'd have been in the lotto for years and never made the WCF. He's just bad.


And we've never seen a coach in OKC who had an offense.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/7eowqj/unpopular_opinion_in_response_to_lowe_okcs/?utm_content=title&utm_medium=new&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=nba

It's gradually being downvoted, the circlejerk is in full effect.


That's what I don't understand. Donovan was known for his offensive system - the motion offense. We see bits and pieces of it, but it's hard to run the motion offense when you have Roberson who doesn't pull his weight offensively and Russ who likes to hold the ball. Donovan didn't put this roster together. Presti did. Donovan is just working with what he's got: three career high-usage ISO players who are having to work out these old habits and incorporate the new. It's not as easy as it might seem "in theory." It's almost like driving a racecar to suddenly having to play chess and be good at it. It would take time. That's a drastic example, but you get the idea. Kobe didn't learn the triangle in one year. It took him a few years to really get it down pat.

I also can't tell you how many times I've seen players cut and ask for the ball, but Westbrook just holds it and tries to drive which is antithetical to Donovan's offense system he's known for. Also, I noticed that you pointed out that if Westbrook isn't cutting, that doesn't mean his teammates can't. Well, he's the leader of the team. He should be cutting like everyone else should. He doesn't get a pass because he's Westbrook. The offense starts with him and he has to embrace his new coach and the new system.

Nobody cuts , thats the problem.

You can't blame him for 3 guys standing still and 1 high screen set. We saw 35 go to a new team and had to break the habit of standing there without the ball because he never moved under 2 coaches.
its no surpise guys move when they are in a system promoting it, and that's a coach's job, not a PG. You could put Stockton out there and nobody is going to move, its a high screen and PG/Melo?Abrines/Dre standing there.


Sorry that I'm just now getting back to this. Our starters are doing fine. I mean, Donovan isn't going to make us into the Spurs or GSW. We are going to be closer Houston's style of play with better defense and some Melo ISO sprinkled in. The idea of a spread pick and roll is to open up shooters and lanes to take advantage of. If you watch Houston, they do the same thing we do. The only difference is they have 5 offensive players and 4 of them can shoot 3s at an elite level.

Our issue is that we have 4 offensive players in our starting lineup and only 2 can shoot 3s at an elite level (Melo/PG). Houston has better spacing so it works. It's why they don't make a lot of passes. Harden drives the offense and takes what they give him. Let's say pick and roll action dictates that Roberson pulls off of Gordon to help contain Harden. If no one rotates, then Gordon is open. If Roberson doesn't help, Harden tries to get a step on his defender and finish or create some space using a dribble move to create offense. If our defense was to make a bad rotation and help off of let's say Anderson, then it's Harden's job to find that man. Sometimes Gordon & Paul are the other guys that have this responsibility as well.

For us, it's a little harder because there's not as much space, Westbrook doesn't have much of a lane since defenses pack the paint since Roberson doesn't command a defender and Westbrook's 3 is not respected. George is much more effective at running this action that Westbrook because of his 3 and his height which gives him better vision of what's going on.

Anyways, Roberson can't cut often because he would be cutting into a lane defender where his weakness is finishing contested shots. He can set screens though, but the issue is that his man isn't going to be worried about him enough for it to make any difference.



In that video, watch Roberson's defender and how he packs the paint. It forces Westbrook to get rid of it. A lot of his turnovers are created this way. If you notice, not a lot of this action is created with Roberson on the floor, because it doesn't work well. Around the 1:20 mark, you can see Roberson try to make a baseline cut to the basket, but it's unproductive because his man has helped off him and someone is packing the paint on his side to deny any type of action other than a wide open 3 which they don't mind Roberson taking. It really kills spacing.

Our guys are just so talented that how Roberson affect's spacing isn't enough to stop them from getting buckets. Thanks to Melo, Adams, and George's efficiencies, our starting lineup is producing 120 pts on average per 100 poss. this season, which is 5th best in the league. Assuming Westbrook gets back on track and starts shooting at least above league average, this offense will look closer to HOU in terms of productivity and efficiency.

So our starting lineup is fine. Westbrook will figure it out, I'm sure, and we will have a top 5 defense and top 5 offense in the league as far as our starters go. But the real issue is the bench.

Why are our second units so awful? Number one = we don't have an experienced true big. Patterson and Grant are playing out of position. Again, Donovan is just working with what he's been given (It's not like college, where he can go recruiting players). Not only is this bad for defense, but this is an entirely new offense for Patterson and new position. He's not well accustomed to playing the 5. But once he starts hitting 3s, the offense will open up much more for the second unit, where Patterson (assuming we keep playing him at the 5) is able to exploit his mismatch more effectively. Grant will be able to get inside and finish in spurts as he's been doing pretty well this season. Either Anthony or George (and I think it should be Anthony) will run with the second unit and either be able to draw defenders and allow Abrines, Felton, Grant, or Patterson to take advantage of space. This is much harder when Patterson is out of sync (due to surgery, missing chunks of practice) and not hitting shots which really leaves you playing 3 on 5 offense (because Grant really doesn't space floor much either). Patterson has been so bad in that role that he's killing offense and defense and the numbers back that up.

It's weird because we are in kind of a conundrum too. Grant is playing well and Patterson is not. So we are giving Grant minutes over Patterson due to defensive reasons (and maybe to boost trade value), but where do we go with the rotation if Dakari starts seeing all of the minutes at the 5? Do you play Patterson or Grant?

Anyways, you can see why the bench is an issue.
[twitter] @thunderdustin
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#46 » by ThunderBolt » Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:36 am

getrichordie wrote:
Knrstz wrote:As good of a college coach as Dononvan was, I always thought it strange that his success was followed by long periods of mediocrity.


It’s not like Florida is known for their basketball. It’s almost like asking a good coach to make the Alabama basketball team winners. Not going to happen.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

Yes and no. Good coaches typically sustain success even if they aren’t at traditional powers. Yes he was successful at Florida but was he more of a teacher of the game or an accumulator of talent?
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#47 » by Pillendreher » Wed Nov 22, 2017 12:12 pm

getrichordie wrote:Our starters are doing fine.


No, they are not. Out of the 26 lineups with at least 100 mp so far, our starters are 19th in ORtG. Filtering for starters on stats.nba.com gives our starters the 20th best ORtG. It's their defense that's giving them a decent enough NetRtG (98.7 DRtG; +5.3 NetRtG), but their offense has been trash.

Our starters' ORtG this season (104.0) is worse than our starters' ORtG last season (105.5). This starting 5 should be close offensively to the 2015-2016 lineup at (111.8), but they're closer to the Atlanta Hawks or Brooklyn Nets offensively. Even 2009-2010, Westbrook's 2nd season, our starters' ORtG was better than this: 106.9.

So no, they are not doing fine. Their massive underperforming is one of the huge reasons we're in this mess.


getrichordie wrote:Our issue is that we have 4 offensive players in our starting lineup and only 2 can shoot 3s at an elite level (Melo/PG). Houston has better spacing so it works. It's why they don't make a lot of passes. Harden drives the offense and takes what they give him. Let's say pick and roll action dictates that Roberson pulls off of Gordon to help contain Harden. If no one rotates, then Gordon is open. If Roberson doesn't help, Harden tries to get a step on his defender and finish or create some space using a dribble move to create offense. If our defense was to make a bad rotation and help off of let's say Anderson, then it's Harden's job to find that man. Sometimes Gordon & Paul are the other guys that have this responsibility as well.

For us, it's a little harder because there's not as much space, Westbrook doesn't have much of a lane since defenses pack the paint since Roberson doesn't command a defender and Westbrook's 3 is not respected. George is much more effective at running this action that Westbrook because of his 3 and his height which gives him better vision of what's going on.

Anyways, Roberson can't cut often because he would be cutting into a lane defender where his weakness is finishing contested shots. He can set screens though, but the issue is that his man isn't going to be worried about him enough for it to make any difference.



In that video, watch Roberson's defender and how he packs the paint. It forces Westbrook to get rid of it. A lot of his turnovers are created this way. If you notice, not a lot of this action is created with Roberson on the floor, because it doesn't work well. Around the 1:20 mark, you can see Roberson try to make a baseline cut to the basket, but it's unproductive because his man has helped off him and someone is packing the paint on his side to deny any type of action other than a wide open 3 which they don't mind Roberson taking. It really kills spacing.

Our guys are just so talented that how Roberson affect's spacing isn't enough to stop them from getting buckets. Thanks to Melo, Adams, and George's efficiencies, our starting lineup is producing 120 pts on average per 100 poss. this season, which is 5th best in the league. Assuming Westbrook gets back on track and starts shooting at least above league average, this offense will look closer to HOU in terms of productivity and efficiency.


Enough with the **** scapegoating!!! Since 2014-2015, Russ-Roberson on the floor has led to a 111.4 ORtG in over 4000 **** minutes! Stop blaming it on the one guy who's covering 3 or 4 guys constantly on defense and start looking at the guy who's not playing any defense at all and who's having a <.500 TS%/30 USG%/19 TOV% season.


getrichordie wrote:But the real issue is the bench.

Why are our second units so awful? Number one = we don't have an experienced true big. Patterson and Grant are playing out of position. Again, Donovan is just working with what he's been given (It's not like college, where he can go recruiting players). Not only is this bad for defense, but this is an entirely new offense for Patterson and new position. He's not well accustomed to playing the 5. But once he starts hitting 3s, the offense will open up much more for the second unit, where Patterson (assuming we keep playing him at the 5) is able to exploit his mismatch more effectively. Grant will be able to get inside and finish in spurts as he's been doing pretty well this season. Either Anthony or George (and I think it should be Anthony) will run with the second unit and either be able to draw defenders and allow Abrines, Felton, Grant, or Patterson to take advantage of space. This is much harder when Patterson is out of sync (due to surgery, missing chunks of practice) and not hitting shots which really leaves you playing 3 on 5 offense (because Grant really doesn't space floor much either). Patterson has been so bad in that role that he's killing offense and defense and the numbers back that up.

It's weird because we are in kind of a conundrum too. Grant is playing well and Patterson is not. So we are giving Grant minutes over Patterson due to defensive reasons (and maybe to boost trade value), but where do we go with the rotation if Dakari starts seeing all of the minutes at the 5? Do you play Patterson or Grant?

Anyways, you can see why the bench is an issue.


The bench has not been an issue. Compared to the previous season, the bench has been beyond what we could have hoped for. Our bench currently has the 9th best NetRtG per stats.nba.com. I'll take that any day. They have struggled with George and I think we should let Melo play with them, but our bench has been more than fine. They have kept several of our losses close while the starters were terrible.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#48 » by bondom34 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:28 pm

getrichordie wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
getrichordie wrote:
That's what I don't understand. Donovan was known for his offensive system - the motion offense. We see bits and pieces of it, but it's hard to run the motion offense when you have Roberson who doesn't pull his weight offensively and Russ who likes to hold the ball. Donovan didn't put this roster together. Presti did. Donovan is just working with what he's got: three career high-usage ISO players who are having to work out these old habits and incorporate the new. It's not as easy as it might seem "in theory." It's almost like driving a racecar to suddenly having to play chess and be good at it. It would take time. That's a drastic example, but you get the idea. Kobe didn't learn the triangle in one year. It took him a few years to really get it down pat.

I also can't tell you how many times I've seen players cut and ask for the ball, but Westbrook just holds it and tries to drive which is antithetical to Donovan's offense system he's known for. Also, I noticed that you pointed out that if Westbrook isn't cutting, that doesn't mean his teammates can't. Well, he's the leader of the team. He should be cutting like everyone else should. He doesn't get a pass because he's Westbrook. The offense starts with him and he has to embrace his new coach and the new system.

Nobody cuts , thats the problem.

You can't blame him for 3 guys standing still and 1 high screen set. We saw 35 go to a new team and had to break the habit of standing there without the ball because he never moved under 2 coaches.
its no surpise guys move when they are in a system promoting it, and that's a coach's job, not a PG. You could put Stockton out there and nobody is going to move, its a high screen and PG/Melo?Abrines/Dre standing there.


Sorry that I'm just now getting back to this. Our starters are doing fine. I mean, Donovan isn't going to make us into the Spurs or GSW. We are going to be closer Houston's style of play with better defense and some Melo ISO sprinkled in. The idea of a spread pick and roll is to open up shooters and lanes to take advantage of. If you watch Houston, they do the same thing we do. The only difference is they have 5 offensive players and 4 of them can shoot 3s at an elite level.

Our issue is that we have 4 offensive players in our starting lineup and only 2 can shoot 3s at an elite level (Melo/PG). Houston has better spacing so it works. It's why they don't make a lot of passes. Harden drives the offense and takes what they give him. Let's say pick and roll action dictates that Roberson pulls off of Gordon to help contain Harden. If no one rotates, then Gordon is open. If Roberson doesn't help, Harden tries to get a step on his defender and finish or create some space using a dribble move to create offense. If our defense was to make a bad rotation and help off of let's say Anderson, then it's Harden's job to find that man. Sometimes Gordon & Paul are the other guys that have this responsibility as well.

For us, it's a little harder because there's not as much space, Westbrook doesn't have much of a lane since defenses pack the paint since Roberson doesn't command a defender and Westbrook's 3 is not respected. George is much more effective at running this action that Westbrook because of his 3 and his height which gives him better vision of what's going on.

Anyways, Roberson can't cut often because he would be cutting into a lane defender where his weakness is finishing contested shots. He can set screens though, but the issue is that his man isn't going to be worried about him enough for it to make any difference.



In that video, watch Roberson's defender and how he packs the paint. It forces Westbrook to get rid of it. A lot of his turnovers are created this way. If you notice, not a lot of this action is created with Roberson on the floor, because it doesn't work well. Around the 1:20 mark, you can see Roberson try to make a baseline cut to the basket, but it's unproductive because his man has helped off him and someone is packing the paint on his side to deny any type of action other than a wide open 3 which they don't mind Roberson taking. It really kills spacing.

Our guys are just so talented that how Roberson affect's spacing isn't enough to stop them from getting buckets. Thanks to Melo, Adams, and George's efficiencies, our starting lineup is producing 120 pts on average per 100 poss. this season, which is 5th best in the league. Assuming Westbrook gets back on track and starts shooting at least above league average, this offense will look closer to HOU in terms of productivity and efficiency.

So our starting lineup is fine. Westbrook will figure it out, I'm sure, and we will have a top 5 defense and top 5 offense in the league as far as our starters go. But the real issue is the bench.

Why are our second units so awful? Number one = we don't have an experienced true big. Patterson and Grant are playing out of position. Again, Donovan is just working with what he's been given (It's not like college, where he can go recruiting players). Not only is this bad for defense, but this is an entirely new offense for Patterson and new position. He's not well accustomed to playing the 5. But once he starts hitting 3s, the offense will open up much more for the second unit, where Patterson (assuming we keep playing him at the 5) is able to exploit his mismatch more effectively. Grant will be able to get inside and finish in spurts as he's been doing pretty well this season. Either Anthony or George (and I think it should be Anthony) will run with the second unit and either be able to draw defenders and allow Abrines, Felton, Grant, or Patterson to take advantage of space. This is much harder when Patterson is out of sync (due to surgery, missing chunks of practice) and not hitting shots which really leaves you playing 3 on 5 offense (because Grant really doesn't space floor much either). Patterson has been so bad in that role that he's killing offense and defense and the numbers back that up.

It's weird because we are in kind of a conundrum too. Grant is playing well and Patterson is not. So we are giving Grant minutes over Patterson due to defensive reasons (and maybe to boost trade value), but where do we go with the rotation if Dakari starts seeing all of the minutes at the 5? Do you play Patterson or Grant?

Anyways, you can see why the bench is an issue.

Except the bench hasn't been this year. The starters have been awful, especially late game. Because there's nothing off ball.

Edit: 2 more things...
1. Not sure why you go from the starters being fine to saying Roberson is the issue, when Roberson is a starter and not the bench.

2. Watch that video again. Its a screen and thats it. 3 guys not taking a single step elsewhere.
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,564
And1: 6,824
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#49 » by slick_watts » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:14 pm

whatever coach you bring in is going to have to contend with the fact that westbrook is going to do what he wants. i see plenty of movement in our offense when westbrook wants the movement to be there. i do not believe the coach is at fault in this respect.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#50 » by bondom34 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:21 pm

Could you then explain the lack.of movement in the Wizards offense. Because that was the coach. Or why it took 3months for Durant to learn to move at all. Because I don't think that was Russ either.

They have the least offensive movement of any team in the league iirc. Bench does the same thing. Abrines and Vic and PG and Melo and Roberson and Morrow and Martin and on and on. Nobody moves, at least consistently. That's on a coach implementing a real offense.

We've seen 2 coaches and the first is literally doing the same stuff on his 2nd team.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#51 » by Pillendreher » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:24 pm

slick_watts wrote:whatever coach you bring in is going to have to contend with the fact that westbrook is going to do what he wants. i see plenty of movement in our offense when westbrook wants the movement to be there. i do not believe the coach is at fault in this respect.


So get somebody who can get him to play the way everybody wins. Are we going to give Donovan another 200 + games only to realize 'Well, it's not happening', but alas, Russ will be out of his prime by then, so it doesn't matter anyway?

Also: I just don't buy this. Is Russ yelling 'STOP MOVING'?
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#52 » by bondom34 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:29 pm

Pillendreher wrote:

Also: I just don't buy this. Is Russ yelling 'STOP MOVING'?

I'm imagining this and the picture is really funny.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,564
And1: 6,824
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#53 » by slick_watts » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:38 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
slick_watts wrote:whatever coach you bring in is going to have to contend with the fact that westbrook is going to do what he wants. i see plenty of movement in our offense when westbrook wants the movement to be there. i do not believe the coach is at fault in this respect.


So get somebody who can get him to play the way everybody wins. Are we going to give Donovan another 200 + games only to realize 'Well, it's not happening', but alas, Russ will be out of his prime by then, so it doesn't matter anyway?

Also: I just don't buy this. Is Russ yelling 'STOP MOVING'?


i don't know what he's doing, but there are stretches where we run plays and stretches where we don't. who is that on?
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#54 » by bondom34 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:40 pm

Were still acting like Brooks had movement? Or is the Wizards stagnant offense Russ too? Or KD standing around in Oakland for months? Russ? In having a hard time believing Westbrook has magical powers that cause a stagnant offense hundreds of miles away.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#55 » by Pillendreher » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:43 pm

slick_watts wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
slick_watts wrote:whatever coach you bring in is going to have to contend with the fact that westbrook is going to do what he wants. i see plenty of movement in our offense when westbrook wants the movement to be there. i do not believe the coach is at fault in this respect.


So get somebody who can get him to play the way everybody wins. Are we going to give Donovan another 200 + games only to realize 'Well, it's not happening', but alas, Russ will be out of his prime by then, so it doesn't matter anyway?

Also: I just don't buy this. Is Russ yelling 'STOP MOVING'?


i don't know what he's doing, but there are stretches where we run plays and stretches where we don't. who is that on?


That's a valid point. Of course Donovan is not out there on the court. Yet it's up to him to devise a gameplan and get his squad to run a certain way. Who's to say that he wants us to run a play every time, yet Russ is just ignoring everything? If Russ were that completely uncoachable, I guess we'd have heard of it by now.

And in the end, it doesn't really matter imo. You need to find someone Russ listens to. Of course you blame Russ if he doesn't listen and just ignores the coaches, but we're not gaining anything by keeping the current coaches if they don't have any control over him.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,564
And1: 6,824
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#56 » by slick_watts » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:29 pm

bondom34 wrote:Were still acting like Brooks had movement? Or is the Wizards stagnant offense Russ too? Or KD standing around in Oakland for months? Russ? In having a hard time believing Westbrook has magical powers that cause a stagnant offense hundreds of miles away.


brooks' offenses here with kevin durant were effective. his offenses in washington are effective. billy's offense with kd here was effective. warriors with kd is effective.

westbrook last year without kd was effective.

westbrook this year has not been effective.

it's on westbrook.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#57 » by bondom34 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:32 pm

slick_watts wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Were still acting like Brooks had movement? Or is the Wizards stagnant offense Russ too? Or KD standing around in Oakland for months? Russ? In having a hard time believing Westbrook has magical powers that cause a stagnant offense hundreds of miles away.


brooks' offenses here with kevin durant were effective. his offenses in washington are effective. billy's offense with kd here was effective. warriors with kd is effective.

westbrook last year without kd was effective.

westbrook this year has not been effective.

it's on westbrook.

Its on him playing poorly yes.

Its not an indictment of him as a player. That was the point.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: RE: Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#58 » by Pillendreher » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:59 pm

bondom34 wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Were still acting like Brooks had movement? Or is the Wizards stagnant offense Russ too? Or KD standing around in Oakland for months? Russ? In having a hard time believing Westbrook has magical powers that cause a stagnant offense hundreds of miles away.


brooks' offenses here with kevin durant were effective. his offenses in washington are effective. billy's offense with kd here was effective. warriors with kd is effective.

westbrook last year without kd was effective.

westbrook this year has not been effective.

it's on westbrook.

Its on him playing poorly yes.

Its not an indictment of him as a player. That was the point.

Once he stopped having an all time great offensive output/impact, our offense completely fell apart. I don't think there could be stronger evidence of the fact that Russell Westbrook is our offense and that there's no real backup plan if he fails to carry.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Thundershock88
Starter
Posts: 2,301
And1: 2,234
Joined: Jul 08, 2015

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#59 » by Thundershock88 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:47 pm

He's Scott Brooks 2.0. He's literally admitted he didn't want to change the offense. I cant believe anyone can watch this team and think otherwise. Can't believe it's even being debated.
User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: Coach Ideas 

Post#60 » by getrichordie » Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:53 am

In response to Pill stating that the bench isn’t the problem and referring to the NetRtg on stats.nba.com, those stats are taking the on-court time played with our starting lineup.

If you actually look at each individual players on/off numbers and a number of recently used lineups, you will see where the issues are - particularly lineups where Patterson is playing center for us and also when Grant and Patterson are played together in the front-court.

Opponent’s ORtg
On = 106.9
Off = 100.2

Team TRB %
On = 42.5
Off = 52.1

ORtg difference
On = -3.5
Off = +8.8
Total = -12.3

In fact the only positive tick on Patterson’s on/off differences is the teams STL% and it’s minimal (+0.2%)...

Jerami Grant also is showing some issues despite his solid play:

-0.4 ORtg difference
-11.4 DRB % difference

The big weakness with these two are rebounding which is a huge issue on your second unit when you are asking them to play the 4&5.

This might be okay against worse teams m, but better teams and deeper teams are going to exploit this.

Let’s move on to our back up point-guard.

Felton’s differences:

-8.4 ORtg
-17.4 TRB %
-9.5 AST %

Abrines is the one guy who has shown some positive offensive difference:

+8.2 ORtg
- 6.6 TRB %

So yeah, bench isn’t contributing a ton outside of Abrines.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
[twitter] @thunderdustin

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder