NuggetsWY wrote:U hova wrote:skywalker33 wrote:Guess we’re finding who the real troll is...but I guess that’s just my opinion
Everyone who has ever disagreed with you is a troll and you have never held a terrible opinion.
Actually Sky and I have disagreed and never called each other troll. Not sure I'd call this trolling, it's more like having blinders on. I strongly suspect you never watched the 1960s games. You might notice I've never said there were more athletic players back then, nor have I said there were a higher percentage of athletic players back then. What I have said is there were athletic players back then and some of them might even dominate today. If they played now, would they be GOAT today? A couple might even get consideration because they would do better today than they did back then. Remember that coaches also reigned in many of those players and back then coaches held the power, not the players. Some coaches would even bench superstars. Until the late 1980s, teams totally controlled players. There was no such thing as a free agent. If a team didn't want to trade a player, he was stuck with that team. It was a different world and if you weren't there, you'll probably never understand it.
Who are some players (besides the obvious wilt, Russell, Baylor) that you think would dominate today? Not asking sarcastically because i don’t agree to be clear haha