Both teams were riding high at the start of the season and both teams were fun to watch, but both have slipped alot.
Which team has been the most disappointing as the season starts to wind down?
Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
Moderator: bwgood77
Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,208
- And1: 522
- Joined: Mar 29, 2013
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
- High 5
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,660
- And1: 2,190
- Joined: Apr 21, 2006
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
5-0 -> 6-5 is probably more disappointing than 3-0 -> 7-4. And the Falcons are playing better now than they were to start the season. Unfortunately we gave away a couple of games early and our remaining schedule is brutal. 10-6 would be an accomplishment.
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 97,966
- And1: 60,910
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
Chiefs at this point. They look like a shell of themselves. The Falcons are still playing well.
When asked how Fascism starts, Bertrand Russell once said:
"First, they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent."
"First, they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent."
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,915
- And1: 5,550
- Joined: Dec 24, 2012
-
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
To me the Falcons are more disappointing. They made the Super Bowl last year, I thought they'd be better.
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,476
- And1: 16,062
- Joined: Jul 31, 2010
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
Falcons are 7-4 and trending upwards. It's definitely KC for me, especially after their 5-0 start and how they demolished the Patriots on opening night. They've gone from SB favorites and Alex Smith being an MVP frontrunner to barely holding onto the lead in arguably the weakest division in football and possibly not even making the playoffs.
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
- Otis Driftwood
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,732
- And1: 2,096
- Joined: Feb 25, 2015
- Contact:
-
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
One thing for certain... if the Chiefs yak up this season there is no way Andy Reid can go into next season with Alex Smith as his starter.
No. Way.
No. Way.
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
- FNQ
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 62,963
- And1: 20,008
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: EOL 6/23
-
Re: Who has been more disappointing: Kansas City Chiefs or Atlanta Falcons
Otis Driftwood wrote:One thing for certain... if the Chiefs yak up this season there is no way Andy Reid can go into next season with Alex Smith as his starter.
No. Way.
I think if the Chiefs wind up tied for 1st in the AFCW at any time this year, Mahomes comes in.
Either way, after his fall from grace, Alex Smith is very unlikely to be a Chief next year. He should settle into the life of being a high-priced backup, because that's what I see in his future. Find a team with a good defense that needs a game manager backup (BAL? MIN? CAR? JAX?) and just be ready to jump in if necessary. Initiate Hasselbeck phase of his career.
Return to The General NFL Board