Hesh wrote:Apparently Gambo today said that Len prefers to be somewhere else next year. Can anyone confirm he said this and elaborate as to whether Gambo is just speculating or actually hearing whispers from Len's camp.
He gone...
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
Hesh wrote:Apparently Gambo today said that Len prefers to be somewhere else next year. Can anyone confirm he said this and elaborate as to whether Gambo is just speculating or actually hearing whispers from Len's camp.
NavLDO wrote:bwgood77 wrote:cosmofizzo wrote:
We're looking at this all wrong. Memphis, Clippers and Kings should finish below us. Only 7 teams in the west with a .500 record. We can sneak in if we get our **** together. That should be the aim.
... I'm also not nearly as impressed with this draft class as some seem to be. I like Bagley and Doncic rn, I'm not convinced that the best PG won't be selected outside the lotto, and there are promising bigs in the late lotto as well. I think we'd be better off building some momentum with a strong season.
I'm sure a lot of people would like to make the playoffs, but the best predictor of final record based on history is point differential and we have the third worst in the league and have played one of the easiest schedules.
If I thought there was a glimmer of hope for us to make the playoffs I'd be pulling for it. But it's just not in the cards and such raised expectations will just leave people more disappointed in the end. Having momentum and getting the best player in the draft late lotto or after is a nice thought, but highly improbable to say the least.
But you also have to admit/realize, we lost our first game by 50, which highly skews that number, but yes, the fact that we've played a rather easy schedule does portend difficult times ahead.
Kerrsed wrote:The thing that scares me about Len is that it took us to not extend his contract for him to actually step up and play like his career depended on it (Which it does). The rest of the years he's been with us, he's just been kinda ho-hum and really under preformed.
And even with his step up in play, he still makes a lot of stupid mistakes. For a Center he makes a loooooooow percentage of his shots. Now i am loving his rebounding and defensive effort, but if he lands a new contract with us, will he revert back to the same old Len, or stay the guy with increased play once he had a fire lit under his ass. Thats the real question.
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
AtheJ415 wrote:There is plenty of ways to finish behind Dallas, Brooklyn, and Sac. Maybe even Atl once our schedule balances out. We have played one of the easiest schedules so far. Our schedule is going to be infinitely tougher than all of those teams down the stretch. Losing does not mean there is no development. Individual players need to develop, and that can happen despite losses, as it has with Booker.
Sent from my SM-G935T using RealGM Forums mobile app
DarkHawk wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:There is plenty of ways to finish behind Dallas, Brooklyn, and Sac. Maybe even Atl once our schedule balances out. We have played one of the easiest schedules so far. Our schedule is going to be infinitely tougher than all of those teams down the stretch. Losing does not mean there is no development. Individual players need to develop, and that can happen despite losses, as it has with Booker.
Sent from my SM-G935T using RealGM Forums mobile app
Dallas is the only team I think could get hot. The others have no talent. Brooklyn lost Lin and Russel. Sacramento is more raw than we are with less star power. Atlanta? Maybe because they are in the East.
The Clippers will catch up until Griffin returns. And by then, they might decide to just crash the season and get a high pick (so they won't let him return if that's the case).
You can grow while losing but not learning how to win is dangerous.
Sure, Embiid and Simmons were higher picks, but when we compare our higher picks, they aren't very impressive. Bender, Len, and (so far) Jackson. Chriss to a lesser extent considering where we picked him. You'd like to think one of these guys will hit but so far, only Bender and Jackson have the most hope but neither has had that game yet where you say 'THAT'S the guy we drafted.
I'm hoping swapping coaches and getting improved player dev from Triano will be enough to turn the corner for some of these guys.
AtheJ415 wrote:DarkHawk wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:There is plenty of ways to finish behind Dallas, Brooklyn, and Sac. Maybe even Atl once our schedule balances out. We have played one of the easiest schedules so far. Our schedule is going to be infinitely tougher than all of those teams down the stretch. Losing does not mean there is no development. Individual players need to develop, and that can happen despite losses, as it has with Booker.
Sent from my SM-G935T using RealGM Forums mobile app
Dallas is the only team I think could get hot. The others have no talent. Brooklyn lost Lin and Russel. Sacramento is more raw than we are with less star power. Atlanta? Maybe because they are in the East.
The Clippers will catch up until Griffin returns. And by then, they might decide to just crash the season and get a high pick (so they won't let him return if that's the case).
You can grow while losing but not learning how to win is dangerous.
Sure, Embiid and Simmons were higher picks, but when we compare our higher picks, they aren't very impressive. Bender, Len, and (so far) Jackson. Chriss to a lesser extent considering where we picked him. You'd like to think one of these guys will hit but so far, only Bender and Jackson have the most hope but neither has had that game yet where you say 'THAT'S the guy we drafted.
I'm hoping swapping coaches and getting improved player dev from Triano will be enough to turn the corner for some of these guys.
This ignores the actual draft classes and quality of those higher picks, and there is a big difference in most drafts between pick 1 and the rest. Simmons is way better than everyone else in the draft. Embiid was in a loaded draft and would have been pick 1 if not for injury. Expecting our top picks like Bender, who was a long term project big man and the youngest player in the NBA, to be close to as impressive as the 76ers top picks, is just crazy.
Sent from my SM-G935T using RealGM Forums mobile app
WeekapaugGroove wrote:I hate the notion that since the suns haven't hit on a top pick that they shouldn't care if they have more high picks. Such a defeatist way of thinking. How about they do a better job and pick the right **** player this time.
Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
DarkHawk wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:I hate the notion that since the suns haven't hit on a top pick that they shouldn't care if they have more high picks. Such a defeatist way of thinking. How about they do a better job and pick the right **** player this time.
Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
It's not that they shouldn't care. It's that more teams are worse than us. There are no players to sit in hopes of getting a higher pick outside of Chandler and Dudley. If we get a high pick, it's because we aren't winning games with the kids we have. Sure, it's growing pains, but getting blown out by 20+ points multiple times doesn't display team growth.
WeekapaugGroove wrote:DarkHawk wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:I hate the notion that since the suns haven't hit on a top pick that they shouldn't care if they have more high picks. Such a defeatist way of thinking. How about they do a better job and pick the right **** player this time.
Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
It's not that they shouldn't care. It's that more teams are worse than us. There are no players to sit in hopes of getting a higher pick outside of Chandler and Dudley. If we get a high pick, it's because we aren't winning games with the kids we have. Sure, it's growing pains, but getting blown out by 20+ points multiple times doesn't display team growth.
I agree that the growth aspect is concerning. Not that I'm writing these guys off or that PER is some perfect stat but it's pretty damn horrible that the 4 draft picks (Bender, Chriss, Ulis, and Jackson) from the last two years who actually get minutes right now all have under a 10 PER.... that's not good at all.
That's why I've been an advocate of firing McD. Let's face the facts he's been here for 5 years and the Suns have a grand total of 2 guys in Warren and Booker who look like sure fire long term rotation players for this team. And that's not just counting draft picks where his record is mixed at best but that's including trades and FA. To me it's simply not good enough.
NavLDO wrote:cosmofizzo wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Without Blake, they are in the tank battle. They only have one more win than us and will be awful. Tougher to have a worst 5 record now.
We're looking at this all wrong. Memphis, Clippers and Kings should finish below us. Only 7 teams in the west with a .500 record. We can sneak in if we get our **** together. That should be the aim.
... I'm also not nearly as impressed with this draft class as some seem to be. I like Bagley and Doncic rn, I'm not convinced that the best PG won't be selected outside the lotto, and there are promising bigs in the late lotto as well. I think we'd be better off building some momentum with a strong season.
I appreciate your enthusiasm, but without a PG (basically, barring a sudden influx of talent to Ulis/James), we aren't going anywhere.
I'm all for 'going for the win', but McD needs to act on 14 Dec...like, immediately and get us a PG somehow. If that were to happen...AND we rid ourselves of Chandler in the process while keeping Monroe (or be willing to start Len), then I think we have a strong chance to compete for that 7 or 8 seed, so long as Warren and Booker stay healthy.
Basically, we need to shore up our 1 and 5 positions. And again, Len played 30 minutes last night (and no, I don't know how he looked), but he posted a nice 13/18 game with no PFs (no Blks, either, though), but point is, when Len gets 25+ minutes, good things typically happen. However, I understand that often he doesn't GET 25 minutes because he's playing like a$$ and he's pulled before he can get his 25 minutes, but I would still start him over Chandler. Get him a decent PG, and yes, his game will improve also.
DarkHawk wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:DarkHawk wrote:
It's not that they shouldn't care. It's that more teams are worse than us. There are no players to sit in hopes of getting a higher pick outside of Chandler and Dudley. If we get a high pick, it's because we aren't winning games with the kids we have. Sure, it's growing pains, but getting blown out by 20+ points multiple times doesn't display team growth.
I agree that the growth aspect is concerning. Not that I'm writing these guys off or that PER is some perfect stat but it's pretty damn horrible that the 4 draft picks (Bender, Chriss, Ulis, and Jackson) from the last two years who actually get minutes right now all have under a 10 PER.... that's not good at all.
That's why I've been an advocate of firing McD. Let's face the facts he's been here for 5 years and the Suns have a grand total of 2 guys in Warren and Booker who look like sure fire long term rotation players for this team. And that's not just counting draft picks where his record is mixed at best but that's including trades and FA. To me it's simply not good enough.
Agreed. I was a huge McD defender, but his overall picture isn't pretty. I have a feeling James Jones will take his place soon.
Kerrsed wrote:The thing that scares me about Len is that it took us to not extend his contract for him to actually step up and play like his career depended on it (Which it does). The rest of the years he's been with us, he's just been kinda ho-hum and really under preformed.
And even with his step up in play, he still makes a lot of stupid mistakes. For a Center he makes a loooooooow percentage of his shots. Now i am loving his rebounding and defensive effort, but if he lands a new contract with us, will he revert back to the same old Len, or stay the guy with increased play once he had a fire lit under his ass. Thats the real question.
LukasBMW wrote:Kerrsed wrote:The thing that scares me about Len is that it took us to not extend his contract for him to actually step up and play like his career depended on it (Which it does). The rest of the years he's been with us, he's just been kinda ho-hum and really under preformed.
And even with his step up in play, he still makes a lot of stupid mistakes. For a Center he makes a loooooooow percentage of his shots. Now i am loving his rebounding and defensive effort, but if he lands a new contract with us, will he revert back to the same old Len, or stay the guy with increased play once he had a fire lit under his ass. Thats the real question.
Exactly. This is what scares me too.
I'll take him as a backup at 3 years 18 million though.