Kupchak9 wrote:Kilroy wrote:Landsberger wrote:Ball and Ingram really just gave up there at the end. The game couldn't get over fast enough it seemed for them.
10 turnovers between them and Ingram was -26 tonight.
Yeah, that was embarrassing... Ball basically walking off the court with 12 sec left and Ingram just standing there.
JC and Randle knew what to do, but everyone else was on the plane home already...
Ball and Ingram don't have any sort of chemistry together, and they know it. When Ball is "leading" the offense, he never gets Ingram involved even though he's always in a good position to score. On the other hand, when Ingram is the priority, Ball just sulks in the corner and becomes a complete non-factor on offense, almost like he refuses to participate in the offense. In both cases, we're playing 4 v 5.
I'm not sure there's a single lineup we can put out there with Ball that makes us a clear positive on offense. I do know that when you put Ingram out there without Ball on the court, the Lakers become very capable of scoring.
I think you're overthinking things here. It's pretty clear to me why Ball and Ingram don't have chemistry. At this point in time, Ingram is a one trick pony (he's simply a pound and drive guy); he's what some would call a blackhole. Ingram being an unwilling shooter, not being a cutter are other issues. I can't count how many times i've see Ingram receive the ball wide open, but chooses to dribble and drive to the paint. It seems we'll have to choose whom to build the team around at some point. Unless one of them radically changes their game, they won't fit well together. A pass first pg (who can't shoot) with an iso driver is simply incompatible.