RUN T M C wrote:Monta Ellis--- When he donned an NBA jersey
FTFY
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
RUN T M C wrote:Monta Ellis--- When he donned an NBA jersey
JunkYardDog6ix wrote:leolozon wrote:JunkYardDog6ix wrote:
Amazing.
This changes everything.
Weird that someone without an argument finds a way to be sarcastic.
I have yet to see an argument from you. Wow his true shooting percentage is amazing , must be nice shooting wide open 3s when the offense is focused on LeBron. I was talking about his Minny days anyways , he was not nearly the impactful player his stats say he was.
I have heard from people I trust that David Kahn presented Love with a contract offer in the training room -- not sure if it was the only formal offer ever made or the latest -- after Monday's loss to Houston and that Love was seen leaving Target Center with it crumpled in his hand and visibly angry.
The four-year deal gives the Timberwolves some flexibility going forward and keeps that maximum offer available for point guard Ricky Rubio, No. 2 overall pick Derrick Williams or another player down the road.
Sometime during all of this, Wolves owner Glen Taylor -- who in 2007 accused Garnett of “tanking” -- said Love wasn’t a star because he hadn’t led the team to the playoffs, a sentiment so delusional it begs the question of if Taylor had ever looked at his own roster.
taikibansei wrote:In 2014, Love finished with a 26.9 PER (same as Duncan’s 2003 MVP season, higher than Barkley’s MVP season, and higher than all three of Bird’s MVP seasons) and .245 win shares per 48 minutes (higher than Bird’s three MVP seasons, LeBron’s first Miami season and Barkley’s MVP season).
RGM_SU wrote:taikibansei wrote:In 2014, Love finished with a 26.9 PER (same as Duncan’s 2003 MVP season, higher than Barkley’s MVP season, and higher than all three of Bird’s MVP seasons) and .245 win shares per 48 minutes (higher than Bird’s three MVP seasons, LeBron’s first Miami season and Barkley’s MVP season).
And that is why stats don't tell the whole story. Love was never as good as the players you listed. In Minnesota Love was the major reason for the Timberwolves being competitive. But he was also a reason for the Timberwolves always finishing below their expected win total in his time there.
Edrees wrote:The hawks and pacers are the king of empty stats, both their stadiums lead the league in empty seats.
Hawks stats:
14,138 seats filled per home game
Pacers stats:
14,792 seats per home game
They are the king of empty stats, for sure.
taikibansei wrote:Did you read the rest of my post? Give me just one example of a year that the Twolves finished "below their expected win total."
Good luck with that!
RGM_SU wrote:taikibansei wrote:Did you read the rest of my post? Give me just one example of a year that the Twolves finished "below their expected win total."
Good luck with that!
2010-11: Expected W/L 24-58 - actual W/L 17-65
2011-12: Expected W/L 28-38 - actual W/L 26-40
2012-13: Expected W/L 34-48 - actual W/L 31-51
2013-14: Expected W/L 48-34 - actual W/L 40-42
Point differential says they should've won the expected number of games. And in each of the seasons he was the main guy there did they finish below it. Says something about inability to win close games.
dhsilv2 wrote:RGM_SU wrote:taikibansei wrote:Did you read the rest of my post? Give me just one example of a year that the Twolves finished "below their expected win total."
Good luck with that!
2010-11: Expected W/L 24-58 - actual W/L 17-65
2011-12: Expected W/L 28-38 - actual W/L 26-40
2012-13: Expected W/L 34-48 - actual W/L 31-51
2013-14: Expected W/L 48-34 - actual W/L 40-42
Point differential says they should've won the expected number of games. And in each of the seasons he was the main guy there did they finish below it. Says something about inability to win close games.
Shows bad luck, not inability to win close games.
RGM_SU wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:RGM_SU wrote:2010-11: Expected W/L 24-58 - actual W/L 17-65
2011-12: Expected W/L 28-38 - actual W/L 26-40
2012-13: Expected W/L 34-48 - actual W/L 31-51
2013-14: Expected W/L 48-34 - actual W/L 40-42
Point differential says they should've won the expected number of games. And in each of the seasons he was the main guy there did they finish below it. Says something about inability to win close games.
Shows bad luck, not inability to win close games.
When it happens once, it's luck. When it happens over the span of multiple years you are making it very easy on yourself to say it's luck. Raw box score statistics always overrated Love. Love's RPM or RAPM for his prime years in Minnesota don't look nearly as impressive.
Edrees wrote:The hawks and pacers are the king of empty stats, both their stadiums lead the league in empty seats.
Hawks stats:
14,138 seats filled per home game
Pacers stats:
14,792 seats per home game
They are the king of empty stats, for sure.
RGM_SU wrote:
2010-11: Expected W/L 24-58 - actual W/L 17-65
RGM_SU wrote:
2011-12: Expected W/L 28-38 - actual W/L 26-40
RGM_SU wrote:
2012-13: Expected W/L 34-48 - actual W/L 31-51
RGM_SU wrote:
2013-14: Expected W/L 48-34 - actual W/L 40-42
dhsilv2 wrote:RAPM looks pretty darn good to me.