Bishop45 wrote:I come in piece
Seeing how #2 is an option, how would you guys feel collectively about a Monroe/Jackson/18' pick for Whiteside trade?
Give us Goran back, I miss having competent play from the PG position

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
Bishop45 wrote:I come in piece
Seeing how #2 is an option, how would you guys feel collectively about a Monroe/Jackson/18' pick for Whiteside trade?
Revived wrote:Bishop45 wrote:I come in piece
Seeing how #2 is an option, how would you guys feel collectively about a Monroe/Jackson/18' pick for Whiteside trade?
Give us Goran back, I miss having competent play from the PG position
sunsbum wrote:Dear God. What if we had Goran and Booker
sunsbum wrote:Dear God. What if we had Goran and Booker
Revived wrote:1UPZ wrote:ginobiliflops wrote:Yep. I do. Both extremely limited on offense. Being athletic and active on defense are his main selling points. I don't know. I guess we'll see what he can do.
Josh Jackson being "extremely limited" on offense is hyperbole to a T.
He cant shoot...
He can penetrate, pass, slash and push the ball in transition.... yes, he's extremely limited.... "extreme"
He can’t dribble either.
He’s nothing like Childress though cause yeah he can actually drive and pass somewhat.
sunskerr wrote:sunsbum wrote:Dear God. What if we had Goran and Booker
Still miss Dragic...
handsome salary wrote:sunskerr wrote:sunsbum wrote:Dear God. What if we had Goran and Booker
Still miss Dragic...
One time the Suns had KJ, Kidd and Nash together. Two of them are in the Ring of Honor.
At another point Suns had Bledsoe, Dragic and IT together. None of them now would put out Ryan if he was on fire.
AtheJ415 wrote:I can't believe some of these proposals that I'm reading. George Hill? Trading to get Goran, who publicly demanded a trade and would probably go ring chasing at the end of his deal since he'll be old by then? Mike Conley? Not to mention all of these guys remove the possibility of a max player over the next 2 offseasons. That is just insane. None of them get us into the playoffs even as the 8 seed, and each costs us the chance to take a longshot pursuit of someone like Cousins or Capela or whoever (and I'd rather take the longshot at either of those guys than pay Mike Conley $30 mil a year and George Hill $20 mil a year).
The real truth here is that we don't NEED to get a PG to pair with Booker this year. It would be nice if there was one who didn't cost a lot to get and who had a low or expiring salary, but that guy doesn't exist. Furthermore, the most valuable SG in basketball is James Harden, who was also asked to create for and carry an NBA offense in a PG-like fashion, which turned him into the player he is now. While it might not be fair to make Booker do that at 21, it will allow him to develop on that end and in that fashion. The whole, "New Kobe" mantra has been misguided. Kobe would not be THAT valuable in the league today relative to a guy like Harden. We should want him to become Harden, and in my opinion he has shown enough playmaking to potentially become that.
All of that is besides the point that we really do need a top 5 pick this season, so adding a PG who helps us win today isn't necessarily great for us. Getting one of Ayton, Doncic, Porter, Bagley, Bamba is a big freaking deal for this team. Besides that, we still need Ulis to get his minutes and improve since he is probably our future long-term 2nd PG no matter what happens. We can address starting PG this upcoming offseason for a bargain vet or through the draft or both. That Miami pick should let us to get somebody like Sexton or Young, who I like. Duval also is there. None are sure things but all have the potential to be a starting 1 in the league. If Sexton is projected to go 7th or so like he currently is, we can always package the Miami and Milwaukee picks to move up if needed.
BobbieL wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:I can't believe some of these proposals that I'm reading. George Hill? Trading to get Goran, who publicly demanded a trade and would probably go ring chasing at the end of his deal since he'll be old by then? Mike Conley? Not to mention all of these guys remove the possibility of a max player over the next 2 offseasons. That is just insane. None of them get us into the playoffs even as the 8 seed, and each costs us the chance to take a longshot pursuit of someone like Cousins or Capela or whoever (and I'd rather take the longshot at either of those guys than pay Mike Conley $30 mil a year and George Hill $20 mil a year).
The real truth here is that we don't NEED to get a PG to pair with Booker this year. It would be nice if there was one who didn't cost a lot to get and who had a low or expiring salary, but that guy doesn't exist. Furthermore, the most valuable SG in basketball is James Harden, who was also asked to create for and carry an NBA offense in a PG-like fashion, which turned him into the player he is now. While it might not be fair to make Booker do that at 21, it will allow him to develop on that end and in that fashion. The whole, "New Kobe" mantra has been misguided. Kobe would not be THAT valuable in the league today relative to a guy like Harden. We should want him to become Harden, and in my opinion he has shown enough playmaking to potentially become that.
All of that is besides the point that we really do need a top 5 pick this season, so adding a PG who helps us win today isn't necessarily great for us. Getting one of Ayton, Doncic, Porter, Bagley, Bamba is a big freaking deal for this team. Besides that, we still need Ulis to get his minutes and improve since he is probably our future long-term 2nd PG no matter what happens. We can address starting PG this upcoming offseason for a bargain vet or through the draft or both. That Miami pick should let us to get somebody like Sexton or Young, who I like. Duval also is there. None are sure things but all have the potential to be a starting 1 in the league. If Sexton is projected to go 7th or so like he currently is, we can always package the Miami and Milwaukee picks to move up if needed.
I agree the Suns need a top 5 pick this coming draft - the names you mention would be adding that last game changer
But I also don't think Booker is ready to be James Harden. I think he needs to be a 2 guard first and really get better at that, defense, etc.
So, a guy like George Hill for the rest of this year and next year would be solid for Booker at the PG
Yes, might be taking a risk of winning more games but not sure how many more. George Hill is probably better than Ulis/James - but he is not an all star. I just don't see the team jumping from say projection of 26 wins or so up to 35 with Hill.
Monroe/Daniels for Hill -if they want a second rounder, give them Torontos
jcsunsfan wrote:I think that DAR might be attainable. The Nets have Lin and Dinwiddie is looking like a good guard. The Nets need to rebuild and need multiple assets. Warren and a couple first round picks might get it done.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums