Image

What looked bleak now looks bright!

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,434
And1: 5,110
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: RE: Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#21 » by Wizop » Thu Dec 7, 2017 10:59 pm

pacers33granger wrote:
Wizop wrote:not many Pacer fans thought we'd be better without PG (my son did) but even fewer would want him back now.


The recent past and his sometimes crap attitude aside, he'd be the perfect free agent from an on-court fit standpoint.

size wise. talent wise. but not temperament wise.

Sent from my SM-G935P using RealGM mobile app
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
pacers33granger
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 15,079
And1: 6,586
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
 

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#22 » by pacers33granger » Thu Dec 7, 2017 11:02 pm

Biggest thing that has turned this season around so quickly is the attitude of everyone in the organization. Even though most of Pritchard's moves were questioned, he didn't really make a bad one and he stood by his statement that he wanted guys who want to be in Indy and want to work.

All 3 draft picks are ones fans are very happy with so far
Getting Joseph for free was an excellent move
Poythress is a nice 2 way contract guy
DC/Bojan have been good value signings

Plus we have a bit of cap space to and a roster spot (with the ability to easily make more) try to leverage closer to the deadline. Pritchard has a lot of work to still do, but we're much farther along in our retool than we expected.
User avatar
boomershadow
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 5,981
And1: 7,480
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
Location: Naptown
   

Re: RE: Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#23 » by boomershadow » Fri Dec 8, 2017 2:22 am

Wizop wrote:
pacers33granger wrote:
Wizop wrote:not many Pacer fans thought we'd be better without PG (my son did) but even fewer would want him back now.


The recent past and his sometimes crap attitude aside, he'd be the perfect free agent from an on-court fit standpoint.

size wise. talent wise. but not temperament wise.

Sent from my SM-G935P using RealGM mobile app


I maintain that PG24 would fit this team perfectly. PG13, not so much.
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,434
And1: 5,110
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#24 » by Wizop » Fri Dec 8, 2017 2:24 am

LOL

Sent from my SM-G935P using RealGM mobile app
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
8305
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,486
And1: 632
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
     

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#25 » by 8305 » Fri Dec 8, 2017 10:33 am

pacers33granger wrote:
Wizop wrote:not many Pacer fans thought we'd be better without PG (my son did) but even fewer would want him back now.


The recent past and his sometimes crap attitude aside, he'd be the perfect free agent from an on-court fit standpoint.


In terms of theoretical fit he would be perfect. While not his intention he did us a solid by requesting the trade.
Pacers_Freak
Veteran
Posts: 2,967
And1: 2,817
Joined: Oct 06, 2016
   

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#26 » by Pacers_Freak » Fri Dec 8, 2017 2:17 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,434
And1: 5,110
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#27 » by Wizop » Fri Dec 8, 2017 2:26 pm

RealGM Duncd On Podcast today starts with a lengthy discussion of Pacer offense.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,030
And1: 4,335
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#28 » by basketballwacko2 » Fri Dec 8, 2017 4:05 pm

Nuntius wrote:It never looked that bleak, imo. The trade return was as good as we could get given the circumstances.

Plus, we now have Kevin Pritchard instead of Larry Bird. That is enough reason for me to be happy :D


Well if you listened to the nay sayers on the Trade forum you'd think the Pacers gave PG away. Now I have always liked Oladipo and Sabonis. I wanted both of them in their drafts but the Pacers were not in high enough position to get them. I actually posted a trade that was similar to what happened. I suggested PG and Jefferson for Kanter, Sabonis, Oladipo and a pick. I'm not motivated enough to go back and find the post.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,030
And1: 4,335
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#29 » by basketballwacko2 » Fri Dec 8, 2017 4:11 pm

Nuntius wrote:
Wizop wrote:
Nuntius wrote:It never looked that bleak, imo. The trade return was as good as we could get given the circumstances.


but now it looks good regardless of the circumstances. not many Pacer fans thought we'd be better without PG (my son did) but even fewer would want him back now. perhaps, it never looked bleak but expectations were low and most saw this as a rebuilding year. I did think expectations were too low (when people were predicting season wins, I said I'd go 1 higher than the next highest guess) but I didn't think the team would be this fun to watch.


It is a rebuilding year regardless of our record. Making the playoffs doesn't take anything away from that :wink:

But I do agree that the team has exceeded our expectations so far. I'm a very happy camper :D


I had low expectations because I know it takes time when you flip 7-8 players off of last years team. Also Bojan has become a better player than he ever has been, I think brooklyn and Washington had played him at SG and he's more of a SF.

Bojan and Collison may not be in the long term plans of the Pacers but for right now they are working out well.
User avatar
Nuntius
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,943
And1: 23,186
Joined: Feb 28, 2012
   

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#30 » by Nuntius » Fri Dec 8, 2017 6:35 pm

basketballwacko2 wrote:
Nuntius wrote:It never looked that bleak, imo. The trade return was as good as we could get given the circumstances.

Plus, we now have Kevin Pritchard instead of Larry Bird. That is enough reason for me to be happy :D


Well if you listened to the nay sayers on the Trade forum you'd think the Pacers gave PG away. Now I have always liked Oladipo and Sabonis. I wanted both of them in their drafts but the Pacers were not in high enough position to get them. I actually posted a trade that was similar to what happened. I suggested PG and Jefferson for Kanter, Sabonis, Oladipo and a pick. I'm not motivated enough to go back and find the post.


I didn't read a lot of forums when the trade went down so you're probably right.

By the way, there's no way that OKC would trade that trade you're suggesting. They not only give us two more assets than they did (Kanter and a pick) but they also take on Jefferson who is a horrible fit for them.

basketballwacko2 wrote:
Nuntius wrote:
Wizop wrote:
but now it looks good regardless of the circumstances. not many Pacer fans thought we'd be better without PG (my son did) but even fewer would want him back now. perhaps, it never looked bleak but expectations were low and most saw this as a rebuilding year. I did think expectations were too low (when people were predicting season wins, I said I'd go 1 higher than the next highest guess) but I didn't think the team would be this fun to watch.


It is a rebuilding year regardless of our record. Making the playoffs doesn't take anything away from that :wink:

But I do agree that the team has exceeded our expectations so far. I'm a very happy camper :D


I had low expectations because I know it takes time when you flip 7-8 players off of last years team. Also Bojan has become a better player than he ever has been, I think brooklyn and Washington had played him at SG and he's more of a SF.

Bojan and Collison may not be in the long term plans of the Pacers but for right now they are working out well.


Bojan has always been that kind of player. He has been a scorer his entire life. His season so far seems identical to his stint in Brooklyn last season.

I agree with everything else you said, though.
"No wolf shall keep his secrets, no bird shall dance the skyline
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."

She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,030
And1: 4,335
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#31 » by basketballwacko2 » Sat Dec 9, 2017 12:53 am

Nuntius wrote:
basketballwacko2 wrote:
Nuntius wrote:It never looked that bleak, imo. The trade return was as good as we could get given the circumstances.

Plus, we now have Kevin Pritchard instead of Larry Bird. That is enough reason for me to be happy :D


Well if you listened to the nay sayers on the Trade forum you'd think the Pacers gave PG away. Now I have always liked Oladipo and Sabonis. I wanted both of them in their drafts but the Pacers were not in high enough position to get them. I actually posted a trade that was similar to what happened. I suggested PG and Jefferson for Kanter, Sabonis, Oladipo and a pick. I'm not motivated enough to go back and find the post.


I didn't read a lot of forums when the trade went down so you're probably right.

By the way, there's no way that OKC would trade that trade you're suggesting. They not only give us two more assets than they did (Kanter and a pick) but they also take on Jefferson who is a horrible fit for them.

basketballwacko2 wrote:
Nuntius wrote:
It is a rebuilding year regardless of our record. Making the playoffs doesn't take anything away from that :wink:

But I do agree that the team has exceeded our expectations so far. I'm a very happy camper :D


I had low expectations because I know it takes time when you flip 7-8 players off of last years team. Also Bojan has become a better player than he ever has been, I think brooklyn and Washington had played him at SG and he's more of a SF.

Bojan and Collison may not be in the long term plans of the Pacers but for right now they are working out well.


Bojan has always been that kind of player. He has been a scorer his entire life. His season so far seems identical to his stint in Brooklyn last season.

I agree with everything else you said, though.


They wanted to get out of Kanters deal but they ended up making it worse, I think by taking Carmelo and giving more assets. I agree they would not have give a pick. And probably not taken Jefferson for Kanter but I did have the two guys we ended up getting.
User avatar
Nuntius
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,943
And1: 23,186
Joined: Feb 28, 2012
   

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#32 » by Nuntius » Sat Dec 9, 2017 12:55 am

basketballwacko2 wrote:
Nuntius wrote:
basketballwacko2 wrote:
Well if you listened to the nay sayers on the Trade forum you'd think the Pacers gave PG away. Now I have always liked Oladipo and Sabonis. I wanted both of them in their drafts but the Pacers were not in high enough position to get them. I actually posted a trade that was similar to what happened. I suggested PG and Jefferson for Kanter, Sabonis, Oladipo and a pick. I'm not motivated enough to go back and find the post.


I didn't read a lot of forums when the trade went down so you're probably right.

By the way, there's no way that OKC would trade that trade you're suggesting. They not only give us two more assets than they did (Kanter and a pick) but they also take on Jefferson who is a horrible fit for them.

basketballwacko2 wrote:
I had low expectations because I know it takes time when you flip 7-8 players off of last years team. Also Bojan has become a better player than he ever has been, I think brooklyn and Washington had played him at SG and he's more of a SF.

Bojan and Collison may not be in the long term plans of the Pacers but for right now they are working out well.


Bojan has always been that kind of player. He has been a scorer his entire life. His season so far seems identical to his stint in Brooklyn last season.

I agree with everything else you said, though.


They wanted to get out of Kanters deal but they ended up making it worse, I think by taking Carmelo and giving more assets. I agree they would not have give a pick. And probably not taken Jefferson for Kanter but I did have the two guys we ended up getting.


Yep. I've seen way worse proposals in the T&T. This one ended up being sorta true as well :wink:
"No wolf shall keep his secrets, no bird shall dance the skyline
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."

She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
User avatar
Pacersike
Analyst
Posts: 3,401
And1: 836
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Location: Belgium

Re: RE: Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#33 » by Pacersike » Sat Dec 9, 2017 4:01 am

boomershadow wrote:
Wizop wrote:
pacers33granger wrote:
The recent past and his sometimes crap attitude aside, he'd be the perfect free agent from an on-court fit standpoint.

size wise. talent wise. but not temperament wise.

Sent from my SM-G935P using RealGM mobile app


I maintain that PG24 would fit this team perfectly. PG13, not so much.

PG13 none at all. Anigbogu has that number now. :D

PG's desire to want out had a lot to do with his lack of leadership and lack of clutchness. He was being forced to play a role he wasn't comfortable doing and he was tired of carrying that responsibility, which was too heavy for him.

He is still a great player and if he would consider the Pacers as free agent destination, it would imply he would have a positive attitude this time and Paul has always been a Robin looking for a batDipoman. It would be a perfect fit.

Especially because we have already found our starting point guard in Joseph 8-)
Tom White
Starter
Posts: 2,035
And1: 983
Joined: Aug 27, 2001
Location: Indiana
 

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#34 » by Tom White » Sat Dec 9, 2017 2:34 pm

pacers33granger wrote:
Wizop wrote:not many Pacer fans thought we'd be better without PG (my son did) but even fewer would want him back now.


The recent past and his sometimes crap attitude aside, he'd be the perfect free agent from an on-court fit standpoint.


I think he would be a terrible on-court fit. He's a me-first ball stopping prima-donna. Doesn't fit at all with this team, and would ruin the chemistry these guys have been generating.
Tom White
Starter
Posts: 2,035
And1: 983
Joined: Aug 27, 2001
Location: Indiana
 

Re: RE: Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#35 » by Tom White » Sat Dec 9, 2017 2:40 pm

Pacersike wrote:
boomershadow wrote:
Wizop wrote:size wise. talent wise. but not temperament wise.

Sent from my SM-G935P using RealGM mobile app


I maintain that PG24 would fit this team perfectly. PG13, not so much.

PG13 none at all. Anigbogu has that number now. :D

PG's desire to want out had a lot to do with his lack of leadership and lack of clutchness. He was being forced to play a role he wasn't comfortable doing and he was tired of carrying that responsibility, which was too heavy for him.

He is still a great player and if he would consider the Pacers as free agent destination, it would imply he would have a positive attitude this time and Paul has always been a Robin looking for a batDipoman. It would be a perfect fit.

Especially because we have already found our starting point guard in Joseph 8-)


Please take this with the humor in which it is intended, but.......

What color is the sky on your planet? :lol:
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,434
And1: 5,110
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#36 » by Wizop » Sat Dec 9, 2017 2:58 pm

Point guard of the future? Positionalist basketball? Say we had a tall, long, good shooting wing like Paul with a new attitude or a hit in the draft, who would sit? I think the answer is DC and the lineup would be Dipo, NewWing, Bojan, Thad, and Turner. So the point guard of the future is Victor.

This is a recent thought for me. Previously I assumed Bojan would be the first man out but his play has changed my mind. I think he's one of those players who can have a long career because his game isn't based on athleticism .

That said, you take what the draft gives you and that could change everything.

Sent from my SM-T237P using RealGM mobile app
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
User avatar
Pacersike
Analyst
Posts: 3,401
And1: 836
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Location: Belgium

Re: RE: Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#37 » by Pacersike » Sat Dec 9, 2017 3:43 pm

Tom White wrote:
Pacersike wrote:
boomershadow wrote:
I maintain that PG24 would fit this team perfectly. PG13, not so much.

PG13 none at all. Anigbogu has that number now. :D

PG's desire to want out had a lot to do with his lack of leadership and lack of clutchness. He was being forced to play a role he wasn't comfortable doing and he was tired of carrying that responsibility, which was too heavy for him.

He is still a great player and if he would consider the Pacers as free agent destination, it would imply he would have a positive attitude this time and Paul has always been a Robin looking for a batDipoman. It would be a perfect fit.

Especially because we have already found our starting point guard in Joseph 8-)


Please take this with the humor in which it is intended, but.......

What color is the sky on your planet? :lol:

Blue and Gold :)
User avatar
boomershadow
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 5,981
And1: 7,480
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
Location: Naptown
   

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#38 » by boomershadow » Sat Dec 9, 2017 4:44 pm

Don't get me wrong. The fit is there. I just think the relationship between PG and the organization/fanbase is wrecked beyond repair. Only way I want him back is if he's willing to play third banana behind Dipo and Turner.

That said, if Pritchard really could trade a player with a year left on his contract, get very unexpected value in return, then convince that player to come back, I would be very very impressed. That would be a cold blooded Donnie Walsh type of move.
BooomBaby
Junior
Posts: 396
And1: 261
Joined: Oct 20, 2017
         

Re: What looked bleak now looks bright! 

Post#39 » by BooomBaby » Sat Dec 9, 2017 8:11 pm

boomershadow wrote:Only way I want him back is if he's willing to play third banana behind Dipo and Turner.


That is never going to happen, and personally, I don't even want him back anymore.

Return to Indiana Pacers