PG: Lakers vs. Frank - Remi Keys pg 16

BeagleBoss · Post #321 » by **BeagleBoss** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:44 pm

JohnWillow wrote:Jordan had a flu game, KP had a Jen Selter game tbh.

Good boy.

Post #322 » by **mpharris36** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:47 pm

BeagleBoss wrote:
JohnWillow wrote:Jordan had a flu game, KP had a Jen Selter game tbh.

Good boy.

Post #323 » by **mpharris36** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:48 pm

rumors are KP used this pickup line...

Watch on YouTube

matchman · Post #324 » by **matchman** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:52 pm

Some decent surprise and findings:

If we compare Beasley and any former Knick, Candyman ala Al Harrington comes to my mind;

Frank has range. That buzzer beater with several feet beyond the 3 point line wows me a lot.

thebuzzardman · Post #325 » by **thebuzzardman** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:59 pm

Are We Ther Yet wrote:I hope Lavar marries a Kardashian!

I kept seeing what looked like a bootleg Kardashian in the crowd behind one of the benches

thebuzzardman · Post #326 » by **thebuzzardman** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:01 pm

GONYK wrote:
knuckles862 wrote:Missed the game someone give me a quick run down please

Knicks outplayed the Lakers

GONYK "Super Cliff Notes Keys To The Game"

Triple C · Post #327 » by **Triple C** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:01 pm

Read on Twitter

Clyde_Style · Post #328 » by **Clyde_Style** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:07 pm

j4remi wrote:More on Frank: Didn't want to overload yall but there's a couple more things to point out from Frank's game last night. One, on switches against big men, Frank used his length to still force them into difficult takes. Two, he hit 3 of 4 three pointers and is stringing together multi-three pointer games. His absolute floor is a 3 and D player with PG skills above any 3/d guy I can think of off the top of my head. His ceiling with that wingspan, size and PG ability is higher than the dome flat earthers believe in.

Judge Ginsberg Approves

Clyde_Style · Post #329 » by **Clyde_Style** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:09 pm

matchman wrote:Some decent surprise and findings:

If we compare Beasley and any former Knick, Candyman ala Al Harrington comes to my mind;

Frank has range. That buzzer beater with several feet beyond the 3 point line wows me a lot.

Free Candy!

You're right. Hadn't thought of that comparison

The KnicksFix · Post #330 » by **The KnicksFix** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:10 pm

frank can continue to develop if we keep playing him in crunch time, we gotta let him grow

The KnicksFix · Post #331 » by **The KnicksFix** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:11 pm

frank, kp, thjr... good future

Post #332 » by **mpharris36** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:11 pm

The Uknickorn wrote:frank can continue to develop if we keep playing him in crunch time, we gotta let him grow

Phish Tank · Post #333 » by **Phish Tank** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:12 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
Are We Ther Yet wrote:I hope Lavar marries a Kardashian!

I kept seeing what looked like a bootleg Kardashian in the crowd behind one of the benches

his wife was sitting next to him

John Murdoch · Post #334 » by **John Murdoch** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:14 pm

Ingram fell asleep or we would of had this one . Good game, KP showed up for sure.

thebuzzardman · Post #335 » by **thebuzzardman** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:14 pm

So, what would it take for the Knicks to get Julius Randle from the Lakers, and would we want to, based on his ability but also that the Knicks would have to resign him.

KOQ and Chicago's 2nd?

WHG and Chicago's 2nd?

Knicks have a center glut, Lakers have a PG glut. I mean, it's not like the Lakers are dying for a C, but how long before Broke Lopez goes down with an injury, plus I know they have a young C to develop, but either of those guys would give them someone who would have some use for a few years.

I guess they could do better than that.

I'll have to rewatch the game - how is Randle on defense?

I just know that after a SF with athleticism and legit offensive skill, the Knicks next need is a young PF with some bounce who can defend and isn't a stiff on offense. I know Randle's shot isn't that great, but he'd be good next to KP where KP slides to C and Randle at PF. Unless his defense is bad. I've never thought it was, but looking for some input from guys who watch more Lakers games than me.

F N 11 · Post #336 » by **F N 11** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:14 pm

Me welcoming back GOD MODE KP and good Frank

shtolky · Post #337 » by **shtolky** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:15 pm

Triple C wrote:

Read on Twitter

thebuzzardman · Post #338 » by **thebuzzardman** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:16 pm

John Murdoch wrote:Ingram fell asleep or we would of had this one . Good game, KP showed up for sure.

Is him throwing the ball into the stands 5 times a game normal?

I like him as a player, but in an admittedly small sample size, whenever I've seen him play he's good for at least 3 really dumb turnovers a game.

Post #339 » by **mpharris36** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:17 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:So, what would it take for the Knicks to get Julius Randle from the Lakers, and would we want to, based on his ability but also that the Knicks would have to resign him.

KOQ and Chicago's 2nd?

WHG and Chicago's 2nd?

Knicks have a center glut, Lakers have a PG glut. I mean, it's not like the Lakers are dying for a C, but how long before Broke Lopez goes down with an injury, plus I know they have a young C to develop, but either of those guys would give them someone who would have some use for a few years.

I guess they could do better than that.

I'll have to rewatch the game - how is Randle on defense?

I just know that after a SF with athleticism and legit offensive skill, the Knicks next need is a young PF with some bounce who can defend and isn't a stiff on offense. I know Randle's shot isn't that great, but he'd be good next to KP where KP slides to C and Randle at PF. Unless his defense is bad. I've never thought it was, but looking for some input from guys who watch more Lakers games than me.

i wouldn't do either of those trades. Your basically trading for the right to pay him. No thanks.

The CHI 2nd rounder is basically has better value than a late 1st rounder. And I wouldn't trade WHG for him either, WHG is still on a great contract for 2 additional years and we will need his scoring and rebounder when eventually kanter isn't here.

IllmaticHandler · Post #340 » by **IllmaticHandler** » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:20 pm