Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

711takeover
Veteran
Posts: 2,838
And1: 2,135
Joined: Jun 30, 2017

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#141 » by 711takeover » Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:57 pm

axeman23 wrote:
711takeover wrote:
Potedon wrote:
You do realize that Jordan quitting is a negative right? Never had the mental fortitude to withstand the NBA grind like LeBron can.


Lol Jordan as a quitter ok. Thanks for the daily laugh!

So he DIDN'T quit the game twice, BEFORE his eventual retirement? Thanks for the daily laugh, and lesson in revisionist history... :lol:


Yeah MJ is such a quitter you're right. That's one of his defining traits right? I mean do we want to bring up LeBron's quitting on the court or nah?
User avatar
Lauri_Legend
Analyst
Posts: 3,017
And1: 1,667
Joined: Dec 13, 2010
 

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#142 » by Lauri_Legend » Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:57 pm

It's the circle of sports.

Oscar Robertson fans didn't think Magic was the goat.

Magic fans didn't think Jordan was the goat.

Jordan fans don't think Lebron is the goat.

Lebron fans won't think the next big name will be the goat.

Just depends on what era you watched growing up. Your memory will deceive you.
Admin of DieHardChicagoBullsFans: https://www.facebook.com/DieHardChicagoBullsFans
711takeover
Veteran
Posts: 2,838
And1: 2,135
Joined: Jun 30, 2017

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#143 » by 711takeover » Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:59 pm

Karate Diop wrote:
Benedict_Boozer wrote:The argument will end the same every time. MJ fans will point to his 6 rings and unblemished Finals record, and cite things like "closing" ability. LBJ fans will point to his numbers, longevity, overall dominance on the court. Rinse and repeat.

Both are great, both very different players in terms of style, both right up there in the all time top 5-10 players no matter your personal bias.


The unblemished finals record is stupid. Speaking purely hypothetical a star player who goes 2-0 in the finals, all other things equal, is less accomplished than a player who goes 2-3 in the finals... Making the finals as the lead guy is an accomplishment.


Except he has 6, not 2. 6-0 is better than 3-5 every day of the week sorry
nikster
RealGM
Posts: 14,535
And1: 13,018
Joined: Sep 08, 2013

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#144 » by nikster » Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:59 pm

Star-Lord wrote:
Lovethisgamegr wrote:
711takeover wrote:
Stats in an era with less defense .

MJ vs Lebron is a debate but forget about it for a moment.

'Era with less defense' is an absolutely false statement.Team's defense has evolved unquestionably since the 90's.Pistons ran 2 to 3 defensive systems, at most. This era Spurs, have had a defensive system for each possiple possesion.

Life evolves.Technology evolves.The game evolves.


All well and good, but players today have simply been stripped of the tools to play what has always been considered effective defense.

Basketball is way more fun to watch on a given day than it was in 2005 or 1995, and maybe that means its better, depending on what you value. This idea that defenses are so much better today is just a myth, though. Evolution often doesn't follow a linear path.

In a sense individual players have been stripped of tools they had in the 90s. But team defense in the 90s was highly constricted by the illegal defense rules. Defenses are way more complex today, with a huge variety of defensive schemes and strategies. Multiple star players were against the removing illegal defense, saying that would negatively impact high scorers
711takeover
Veteran
Posts: 2,838
And1: 2,135
Joined: Jun 30, 2017

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#145 » by 711takeover » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:00 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
711takeover wrote:
ckmcnutt wrote:Jordan had the better legacy (muh ringz), but LeBron is the better player (muh statz).

That's as close as I believe we can make it.


Stats in an era with less defense and more pace doesn't make you the better player lol. Also, MJ averaged 3 more PPG, 1 less RPG, and 1 less APG as a 6-6 SG compared to a 6-8 SF. I fail to see where Lebron definitively has the advantage in stats.


You might want to list all their stats, their team pace, team defensive rating, offensive rating, go year by year, compare vs the league averages in on each and every stat. Instead you picked 3 almost useless stats....


So PPG, RPG, and APG are useless? Aren't those the three most common stats when comparing? Lol ok, chief

MJ had higher PER, defensive and offensive rating, and more WS. There, happy now?
User avatar
levon
RealGM
Posts: 17,413
And1: 27,216
Joined: Aug 04, 2017

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#146 » by levon » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:00 pm

711takeover wrote:Yes. I don't find averaging what 35 on below 40% shooting all that impressive in 2015 vs GS

The spin that was put on 2015 was amazing. We saw Lebron in the Finals without all-star offensive options against a good team, like in 2007, and his efficiency took an insane dive. I agree winning rings is a team accomplishment; there was no way the Cavs were pulling that off. But instead of that series being used as insight into the weaknesses of James' game, it's hailed as the great heroic performances of his career.

The next year, when the Cavs come back from 3-1 with Kyrie dropping historic scoring nights alongside him (two teammates with 40+ pts in the finals), the same "rings are a team accomplishment" folks idolize Lebron for "beating a 73-9 team down 3-1."
711takeover
Veteran
Posts: 2,838
And1: 2,135
Joined: Jun 30, 2017

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#147 » by 711takeover » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:01 pm

Lauri_Legend wrote:It's the circle of sports.

Oscar Robertson fans didn't think Magic was the goat.

Magic fans didn't think Jordan was the goat.

Jordan fans don't think Lebron is the goat.

Lebron fans won't think the next big name will be the goat.

Just depends on what era you watched growing up. Your memory will deceive you.


Magic fans did think MJ was the goat. Magic himself said that MJ took his crown.
nikster
RealGM
Posts: 14,535
And1: 13,018
Joined: Sep 08, 2013

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#148 » by nikster » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:02 pm

so_bored wrote:
Lovethisgamegr wrote:
711takeover wrote:
Stats in an era with less defense .

MJ vs Lebron is a debate but forget about it for a moment.

'Era with less defense' is an absolutely false statement.Team's defense has evolved unquestionably since the 90's.Pistons ran 2 to 3 defensive systems, at most. This era Spurs, have had a defensive system for each possiple possesion.

Life evolves.Technology evolves.The game evolves.


Game has evolved to favor the offensive end tremendously. All these extreme offensive outbursts, especially from perimeter players would not be possible 20 years ago.

How can you argue these outbursts are based on changes in team defense, and not the increased reliance on 3 point shooting? For example, when Terrence Ross went off for 50 points he made 10 3 pointers. It would be unheard of to even attempt that many in the 90s
Karate Diop
General Manager
Posts: 9,422
And1: 11,381
Joined: May 19, 2017
 

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#149 » by Karate Diop » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:02 pm

711takeover wrote:
Karate Diop wrote:
Benedict_Boozer wrote:The argument will end the same every time. MJ fans will point to his 6 rings and unblemished Finals record, and cite things like "closing" ability. LBJ fans will point to his numbers, longevity, overall dominance on the court. Rinse and repeat.

Both are great, both very different players in terms of style, both right up there in the all time top 5-10 players no matter your personal bias.


The unblemished finals record is stupid. Speaking purely hypothetical a star player who goes 2-0 in the finals, all other things equal, is less accomplished than a player who goes 2-3 in the finals... Making the finals as the lead guy is an accomplishment.


Except he has 6, not 2. 6-0 is better than 3-5 every day of the week sorry


The point is diminishing finals appearances because it fits your narrative is moronic (not saying you are, but others have done this).

Would 2-0 be better than 1-5? There's a sliding scale that forces you to look at other factors.

Number of rings needs to be looked at in context it's why Horry isn't even close to being on the same level as Duncan.
711takeover
Veteran
Posts: 2,838
And1: 2,135
Joined: Jun 30, 2017

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#150 » by 711takeover » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:02 pm

levon wrote:
711takeover wrote:Yes. I don't find averaging what 35 on below 40% shooting all that impressive in 2015 vs GS

The spin that was put on 2015 was amazing. We saw Lebron in the Finals without all-star offensive options against a good team, like in 2007, and his efficiency took an insane dive. I agree winning rings is a team accomplishment; there was no way the Cavs were pulling that off. But instead of that series being used as insight into the weaknesses of James' game, it's hailed as the great heroic performances of his career.

The next year, when the Cavs come back from 3-1 with Kyrie dropping historic scoring nights alongside him (two teammates with 40+ pts in the finals), the same "rings are a team accomplishment" folks idolize Lebron for "beating a 73-9 team down 3-1."


Could not agree more. It's what LeBron fans do though. When the Cavs lose, "LeBron needs more help". When he gets help from Kyrie and win, "LeBron is a god"
711takeover
Veteran
Posts: 2,838
And1: 2,135
Joined: Jun 30, 2017

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#151 » by 711takeover » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:03 pm

Karate Diop wrote:
711takeover wrote:
Karate Diop wrote:
The unblemished finals record is stupid. Speaking purely hypothetical a star player who goes 2-0 in the finals, all other things equal, is less accomplished than a player who goes 2-3 in the finals... Making the finals as the lead guy is an accomplishment.


Except he has 6, not 2. 6-0 is better than 3-5 every day of the week sorry


The point is diminishing finals appearances because it fits your narrative is moronic (not saying you are, but others have done this).

Would 2-0 be better than 1-5? There's a sliding scale that forces you to look at other factors.

Number of rings needs to be looked at in context it's why Horry isn't even close to being on the same level as Duncan.


Depends on the circumstances. 2-0 could be better than 1-5 if for example getting to the finals isn't difficult because the conference you're in is trash. All have to take in context
nikster
RealGM
Posts: 14,535
And1: 13,018
Joined: Sep 08, 2013

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#152 » by nikster » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:04 pm

Antinomy wrote:The numbers argument is always laughable. The best of the best players will always put up numbers across the board if that’s what their role is.

Lebron puts up his loaded box score numbers because he has the ball in his hands every possession & he basically runs a drive & kick system to run his numbers up.

When MJ was placed in a similar role in the late 80s, he put up 33/8/8. MJ put up monster box score numbers before Phil Jackson came in & installed a system. Even Kobe put up monster assist stats when he played a similar style as Lebron.

We just saw Westbrook & Harden put up monster stats across the board last season because they played that “archangel” offense Lebron runs.

Let’s not act like MJ doesn’t have crazy numbers himself when compared to Lebron.

Fact of the matter is, Lebron will always get his numbers because he is the system on his teams. I guarantee if he actually stopped trying to be the coach & GM on his teams, he would’ve won more than the 3 titles he had to squeeze out.

No MJ propogator uses the ring argument because it’s lazy. Although I see a lot of Lebron fans trying to use that strawman.

Lebron’s GOAT argument is built on excuses.

Well, when someone like Jordan has created and cemented his role as GOAT, anybody trying to take that title will have to tear him down. And many MJ propogators use the ring arguement, you see it all the time in these forums
The4thHorseman
General Manager
Posts: 9,132
And1: 5,717
Joined: Jun 18, 2011

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#153 » by The4thHorseman » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:06 pm

711takeover wrote:
Porzingod wrote:Well everyone knows that LeBron will not get 6 rings therefore MJ stans will always come back to this argument but then i guess Horry is one of the GOATs? Or you can pick and choose when you use the ring argument?

Sure i agree MJ was the most dominant offensive force NBA has ever seen but it's enough to see one game of LeBron(lets take as an example yesterdays game against Hawks) and how he runs the offence to conclude who is the greatest player ever. He looks like a basketball maestro. He makes dozens of passes to set up his teammates each game which just blow your mind. And if we take in to account all other things which he is doing - scoring and shooting 3pt shots with high efficiency, defense and all in all his overall impact on the game i don't see an argument really.

Best offensive player ever - MJ without an argument
Best overall player ever - LeBron


How was LeBron better overall? You know that when MJ played PG for the Bulls (50 game sample size), he averaged 33.4 PPG, 10.4 APG, and 11.2 RPG.

:lol: Why not just use the stats from the 24 games he did play at PG?

"Obviously, Jordan had been playing terrific basketball as a point guard. In the 24 games he played at the position, he dropped 12 triple-doubles and averaged 30.4 PPG, 10.7 APG, and 9.2 RPG"


https://aminoapps.com/c/hoops/page/blog/the-time-jordan-played-point-guard/eYnH_3uvWXXko844rw8nNRl6p3aRX1
MavsDirk41 wrote:

Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
User avatar
levon
RealGM
Posts: 17,413
And1: 27,216
Joined: Aug 04, 2017

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#154 » by levon » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:11 pm

Antinomy wrote:The numbers argument is always laughable. The best of the best players will always put up numbers across the board if that’s what their role is.

Lebron puts up his loaded box score numbers because he has the ball in his hands every possession & he basically runs a drive & kick system to run his numbers up.

When MJ was placed in a similar role in the late 80s, he put up 33/8/8. MJ put up monster box score numbers before Phil Jackson came in & installed a system. Even Kobe put up monster assist stats when he played a similar style as Lebron.

We just saw Westbrook & Harden put up monster stats across the board last season because they played that “archangel” offense Lebron runs.

Let’s not act like MJ doesn’t have crazy numbers himself when compared to Lebron.

Fact of the matter is, Lebron will always get his numbers because he is the system on his teams. I guarantee if he actually stopped trying to be the coach & GM on his teams, he would’ve won more than the 3 titles he had to squeeze out.

No MJ propogator uses the ring argument because it’s lazy. Although I see a lot of Lebron fans trying to use that strawman.

Lebron’s GOAT argument is built on excuses.

Thank you so much. When Doug Collins moved MJ to point, he fired off 10 triple doubles in 11 games. 7 in a row. Those numbers are about role, system, and teambuilding. We've seen increasing evidence that more and more players are capable of the "all-around game". It's especially exploitable with the spacing of today.

The argument about illegal defenses is a respectable one. One poster said you could space out with no 3pt shooters. But the difference is now if the ballhandler draws help and kicks out, all those dudes on the perimeter are elite 3pt shooters, so that's easily a way more potent offense than anything in the 90's.
The4thHorseman
General Manager
Posts: 9,132
And1: 5,717
Joined: Jun 18, 2011

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#155 » by The4thHorseman » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:15 pm

Tribe wrote:
The4thHorseman wrote:
711takeover wrote:
LeBron doesn't belong in the same sentence as Jordan. You should know that as a Bulls fan or maybe you're too young to remember MJ. LeBron is a better scoring version of Pippen with the offense revolved around him. Just imagine the stats MJ would put up in today's era. Scottie said it himself - he would kill in today's era even more than he did back then.

Statistically Westbrook is the best point guard in the league.. Does that mean he's the best PG though? He fills up the stat sheet more than any other guard.

MJ said it himself if zone defense was allowed back when he played compared to today when it's been allowed since LeBron got into the league.

April 01, 2001|By Sam Smith.

"The subject was defense in the NBA, and Michael Jordan was speaking, although more about offense, especially his. We know few defenses could do anything about that.

But there was one that might be bothersome, the zone defense. It was the topic du jour at last month's All-Star Game, and Jordan was making an impassioned plea before the competition committee that had gathered to consider rules changes to enliven the NBA game. Jordan spoke passionately. If teams were able to play zone defenses, he said, he never would have had the career he did.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2001-04-01/sports/0104010375_1_defense-recommendations-nba


A washed up 40 year old Jordan then proceeds to re enters the league with the new rule changes and averages over 20 PPG including multiple 40+ point games

Teams didn't use it right away. It was eased in over time
MavsDirk41 wrote:

Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
711takeover
Veteran
Posts: 2,838
And1: 2,135
Joined: Jun 30, 2017

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#156 » by 711takeover » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:18 pm

The4thHorseman wrote:
Tribe wrote:
The4thHorseman wrote:MJ said it himself if zone defense was allowed back when he played compared to today when it's been allowed since LeBron got into the league.

April 01, 2001|By Sam Smith.

"The subject was defense in the NBA, and Michael Jordan was speaking, although more about offense, especially his. We know few defenses could do anything about that.

But there was one that might be bothersome, the zone defense. It was the topic du jour at last month's All-Star Game, and Jordan was making an impassioned plea before the competition committee that had gathered to consider rules changes to enliven the NBA game. Jordan spoke passionately. If teams were able to play zone defenses, he said, he never would have had the career he did.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2001-04-01/sports/0104010375_1_defense-recommendations-nba


A washed up 40 year old Jordan then proceeds to re enters the league with the new rule changes and averages over 20 PPG including multiple 40+ point games

Teams didn't use it right away. It was eased in over time


Can you name a team that plays zone defense? I've literally never seen a team today do so
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,755
And1: 27,373
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#157 » by dhsilv2 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:19 pm

711takeover wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
711takeover wrote:
Stats in an era with less defense and more pace doesn't make you the better player lol. Also, MJ averaged 3 more PPG, 1 less RPG, and 1 less APG as a 6-6 SG compared to a 6-8 SF. I fail to see where Lebron definitively has the advantage in stats.


You might want to list all their stats, their team pace, team defensive rating, offensive rating, go year by year, compare vs the league averages in on each and every stat. Instead you picked 3 almost useless stats....


So PPG, RPG, and APG are useless? Aren't those the three most common stats when comparing? Lol ok, chief

MJ had higher PER, defensive and offensive rating, and more WS. There, happy now?


Per game stats are useless cross era. And PER is a rather dated and poor stats as well. We can talk WS, but I'm not sure digging in is going to conclude what you want it to.
711takeover
Veteran
Posts: 2,838
And1: 2,135
Joined: Jun 30, 2017

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#158 » by 711takeover » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:20 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
711takeover wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
You might want to list all their stats, their team pace, team defensive rating, offensive rating, go year by year, compare vs the league averages in on each and every stat. Instead you picked 3 almost useless stats....


So PPG, RPG, and APG are useless? Aren't those the three most common stats when comparing? Lol ok, chief

MJ had higher PER, defensive and offensive rating, and more WS. There, happy now?


Per game stats are useless cross era. And PER is a rather dated and poor stats as well. We can talk WS, but I'm not sure digging in is going to conclude what you want it to.


So what stat do you want me to look at?
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,755
And1: 27,373
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#159 » by dhsilv2 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:23 pm

711takeover wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
711takeover wrote:
So PPG, RPG, and APG are useless? Aren't those the three most common stats when comparing? Lol ok, chief

MJ had higher PER, defensive and offensive rating, and more WS. There, happy now?


Per game stats are useless cross era. And PER is a rather dated and poor stats as well. We can talk WS, but I'm not sure digging in is going to conclude what you want it to.


So what stat do you want me to look at?


Look at WS, look at VORP. Look at BPM and WS/48. Look at the metrics relative to peers. Look at career totals. Look at their playoff numbers. use PER with context and understand why it favors jordan.

Spend a few hours and if you can't see why there's a number's case for Lebron, make a post and ask people to help you. There's clearly a case to be made here, even if I personally would still rank MJ ahead of Lebron at this point. But no reasonable person would argue there's no stats case for Lebron, that's just not true.
alebaba
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,827
And1: 4,425
Joined: Dec 01, 2012

Re: Pippen on First Take about Jordan vs Lebron 

Post#160 » by alebaba » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:26 pm

Can you imagine a bigger version of Westbrook with higher bball iq, more efficient and a even higher motor, it would be downright scary....

Return to The General Board