Pointgod wrote:http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/fcc-votes-repeal-net-neutralityIn a vote along party lines, the federal government has ended sweeping net-neutrality rules that guaranteed equal access to the internet.
The Thursday vote at the Federal Communications Commission will likely usher in big changes in how Americans use the internet, a radical departure from more than a decade of federal oversight. The move not only rolls back restrictions that keep broadband providers like Comcast, Verizon and AT&T from blocking or collecting tolls from services they don’t like, but bars states from imposing their own rules.
Customers hate this. Corporations hate this. Democrats hate this. Republicans hate this. The fact that so many opposing forces can agree that repealing net neutrality is horrible decision should tell you something. It’s like when superheros team up with super villains to defeat a world ending threat. Hopefully this gets tied up in lawsuits for years and a new administration can reverse this decision.
I think we are on the opposite side of this one. The key point that supporters of net neutrality have missed is that ISPs and the companies that control the Internet backbone infrastructure that knits everything together do not have the power to pick winners and losers either.
Consumers decide what products and services are successful because we adopt them. If an ISP blocks Amazon Prime because of the bandwidth it requires, consumers who want Amazon Prime will take their business elsewhere. If enough people do so, the ISP will have to change policies or go out of business.
The only reason to have Net Neutrality in place is so that the government can have oversight. The only way to do that is to have companies that have enough personnel to fill out the gobs of paperwork required and to collect the inevitable taxes that go with the administrative overhead. It isn't a model for innovation.