ImageImageImage

Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion)

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

bball4life
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,291
And1: 1,303
Joined: Jul 25, 2001

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#501 » by bball4life » Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:26 pm

MR28 wrote:Did Hayward have a similar injury to Ronald Darby? Darby wound up being out for 2 months.


No. Darby had a dislocated ankle. Hayward's foot was on backwards.
agiaco
Analyst
Posts: 3,726
And1: 1,161
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#502 » by agiaco » Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:29 pm

Simmons25 wrote:Damn. Weren't there people in here wanting us to take Josh Jackson. That would have been a disaster.


LloydFree in particular, who would probably still find a way to justify it over Fultz.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#503 » by LloydFree » Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:45 pm

agiaco wrote:
Simmons25 wrote:Damn. Weren't there people in here wanting us to take Josh Jackson. That would have been a disaster.


LloydFree in particular, who would probably still find a way to justify it over Fultz.

Actually it is pretty easy to justify. We'd have a superior talent who also isnt scared to play basketball. And we'd still have two future unprotected picks (from two of the worst teams in the league) coming to us.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
User avatar
sixerswillrule
RealGM
Posts: 16,682
And1: 3,625
Joined: Jul 24, 2003
Location: Disappointment

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#504 » by sixerswillrule » Thu Dec 14, 2017 5:03 pm

JojoSlimbiid wrote:
JojoSlimbiid wrote:
Read on Twitter


High level athleticism at work for the only rookie that I was told by realgm experts was going to be a net positive his first year.

We sure he doesn't have scapular muscle imbalance? Cause something looks wrong with him


Follows up my post with a mind blowing performance. 2 pts, 0-7, a whopping 0% Fg percentage for my mathematically challenged friends, 1 rebound in 22 minutes. Should probably run the offense through him though seems like a recipe for success


Then he can fulfill his destiny of becoming a bigger Marcus Smart.
cool93
Analyst
Posts: 3,017
And1: 1,996
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
 

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#505 » by cool93 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:54 pm

LloydFree wrote:
agiaco wrote:
Simmons25 wrote:Damn. Weren't there people in here wanting us to take Josh Jackson. That would have been a disaster.


LloydFree in particular, who would probably still find a way to justify it over Fultz.

Actually it is pretty easy to justify. We'd have a superior talent who also isnt scared to play. And we'd still have two future unprotected picks from two of the worst teams in the league coming to us.
Come on, man. Saying that Fultz is scared to play is just stupid, I'm not justifying this situation, it's ugly, but we simply don't know the truth so can't really judge it.

Sent from my [device_name] using [url]RealGM mobile app[/url]
User avatar
BigSleep333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 1,632
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#506 » by BigSleep333 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:59 pm

so is he at least practicing when he has no pain? if not, this shoulder injury thing is 100% a cover-up for his horrible shooting
User avatar
cksdayoff
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 3,639
Joined: Jun 21, 2010

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#507 » by cksdayoff » Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:32 pm

one of the things i didn't like about josh jackson besides his overrated defense was he just looked dumb. and judging by his off the court issues, i don't think i'm that far off in my assessment. the hitch in his shot ruins any chance of him ever becoming an average shooter imo. it's just ugly. he's pretty agile and quick, and i like his motor
#failforfultz
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,514
And1: 17,072
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#508 » by Negrodamus » Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:44 pm

BigSleep333 wrote:so is he at least practicing when he has no pain? if not, this shoulder injury thing is 100% a cover-up for his horrible shooting


You must be 3 weeks pain free and a closed door workout evaluation before you can practice with the team behind closed doors. Then you must get back into shape for an additional 3 weeks with no public appearance. Only until then are you allowed to practice in front of the media (jump shot evaluation permitting).
James40
Veteran
Posts: 2,824
And1: 1,048
Joined: Mar 24, 2014
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#509 » by James40 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:04 pm

LloydFree wrote:
agiaco wrote:
Simmons25 wrote:Damn. Weren't there people in here wanting us to take Josh Jackson. That would have been a disaster.


LloydFree in particular, who would probably still find a way to justify it over Fultz.

Actually it is pretty easy to justify. We'd have a superior talent who also isnt scared to play basketball. And we'd still have two future unprotected picks (from two of the worst teams in the league) coming to us.


Probably because I enjoy someone going against the grain of the forum, keep up the good work.

and yes, until Fultz proves it on the court, you are basically correct. Why folks get upset by is beyond me.
PLO
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 1,306
Joined: Aug 04, 2016
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#510 » by PLO » Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:11 pm

BigSleep333 wrote:so is he at least practicing when he has no pain? if not, this shoulder injury thing is 100% a cover-up for his horrible shooting


Sounds like a fair-minded conclusion based on solid medical data.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.


shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
cool93
Analyst
Posts: 3,017
And1: 1,996
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
 

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#511 » by cool93 » Thu Dec 14, 2017 11:45 pm

James40 wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
agiaco wrote:
LloydFree in particular, who would probably still find a way to justify it over Fultz.

Actually it is pretty easy to justify. We'd have a superior talent who also isnt scared to play basketball. And we'd still have two future unprotected picks (from two of the worst teams in the league) coming to us.


Probably because I enjoy someone going against the grain of the forum, keep up the good work.

and yes, until Fultz proves it on the court, you are basically correct. Why folks get upset by is beyond me.

Wrong. Until Fultz is on the flour no one is correct. We simply don't have enough info.

Sent from my i5030 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
BigSleep333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 1,632
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#512 » by BigSleep333 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:08 am

PLO wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:so is he at least practicing when he has no pain? if not, this shoulder injury thing is 100% a cover-up for his horrible shooting


Sounds like a fair-minded conclusion based on solid medical data.


what other conclusion you have if hes not practicing publicly while having no pain?
PLO
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 1,306
Joined: Aug 04, 2016
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#513 » by PLO » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:52 am

BigSleep333 wrote:
PLO wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:so is he at least practicing when he has no pain? if not, this shoulder injury thing is 100% a cover-up for his horrible shooting


Sounds like a fair-minded conclusion based on solid medical data.


what other conclusion you have if hes not practicing publicly while having no pain?


He wasn't a "horrible" shooter in college and how many open practices do NBA teams have anyway? You might as well jump to the conclusion James Harden will be a horrible shooter from now on because the Rockets don't have any open practices this week. Just because someone isn't practicing in public means nothing. As far as NBA-conclusion-jumping this is up there wih Kyrie's claim that the Earth is flat because it looks that way. Absurd.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.


shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
User avatar
BigSleep333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 1,632
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#514 » by BigSleep333 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:16 am

PLO wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:
PLO wrote:
Sounds like a fair-minded conclusion based on solid medical data.


what other conclusion you have if hes not practicing publicly while having no pain?


He wasn't a "horrible" shooter in college and how many open practices do NBA teams have anyway? You might as well jump to the conclusion James Harden will be a horrible shooter from now on because the Rockets don't have any open practices this week. Just because someone isn't practicing in public means nothing. As far as NBA-conclusion-jumping this is up there wih Kyrie's claim that the Earth is flat because it looks that way. Absurd.


means nothing if there is no open practice. does mean a lot if fultz is the only one whos not out there when others are. since i dont know it, i asked a question if hes practicing. if he is not, my conclusion is most likely the truth. if you dont agree, i think you have more in common with kyrie than me.
PLO
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 1,306
Joined: Aug 04, 2016
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#515 » by PLO » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:34 am

BigSleep333 wrote:
PLO wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:
what other conclusion you have if hes not practicing publicly while having no pain?


He wasn't a "horrible" shooter in college and how many open practices do NBA teams have anyway? You might as well jump to the conclusion James Harden will be a horrible shooter from now on because the Rockets don't have any open practices this week. Just because someone isn't practicing in public means nothing. As far as NBA-conclusion-jumping this is up there wih Kyrie's claim that the Earth is flat because it looks that way. Absurd.


means nothing if there is no open practice. does mean a lot if fultz is the only one whos not out there when others are. since i dont know it, i asked a question if hes practicing. if he is not, my conclusion is most likely the truth. if you dont agree, i think you have more in common with kyrie than me.


Your leaps of logic would do a four year old proud.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.


shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
User avatar
JojoSlimbiid
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,317
And1: 2,239
Joined: Dec 03, 2016
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#516 » by JojoSlimbiid » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:36 am

Fultz isn't even in Philly right now. You wouldn't know it even if practice was open.

They booked another $500-1000 dollar flight to Kentucky to keep up the ruse. Duh
User avatar
BigSleep333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 1,632
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#517 » by BigSleep333 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:49 am

PLO wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:
PLO wrote:
He wasn't a "horrible" shooter in college and how many open practices do NBA teams have anyway? You might as well jump to the conclusion James Harden will be a horrible shooter from now on because the Rockets don't have any open practices this week. Just because someone isn't practicing in public means nothing. As far as NBA-conclusion-jumping this is up there wih Kyrie's claim that the Earth is flat because it looks that way. Absurd.


means nothing if there is no open practice. does mean a lot if fultz is the only one whos not out there when others are. since i dont know it, i asked a question if hes practicing. if he is not, my conclusion is most likely the truth. if you dont agree, i think you have more in common with kyrie than me.


Your leaps of logic would do a four year old proud.


you are delusional if you think everything is fine if fultz is completely healthy and is not practicing with the team. delusional or naive like a 4 year old, hmm..
PhilasFinest
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 3,581
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#518 » by PhilasFinest » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:51 am

JojoSlimbiid wrote:Fultz isn't even in Philly right now. You wouldn't know it even if practice was open.

They booked another $500-1000 dollar flight to Kentucky to keep up the ruse. Duh


Does anyone know why he’s going back to Kentucky so much? Is it part of his rehab?

Literally seems like everyday on IG he puts up a boomerang with Lexington Kentucky tagged in it.
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
User avatar
BigSleep333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 1,632
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#519 » by BigSleep333 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:52 am

JojoSlimbiid wrote:Fultz isn't even in Philly right now. You wouldn't know it even if practice was open.

They booked another $500-1000 dollar flight to Kentucky to keep up the ruse. Duh


lmao. healthy and right back in kentucky? did they tell why?
Simmons25
Analyst
Posts: 3,166
And1: 2,235
Joined: Sep 27, 2016

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#520 » by Simmons25 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 2:01 am

James40 wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
agiaco wrote:
LloydFree in particular, who would probably still find a way to justify it over Fultz.

Actually it is pretty easy to justify. We'd have a superior talent who also isnt scared to play basketball. And we'd still have two future unprotected picks (from two of the worst teams in the league) coming to us.


Probably because I enjoy someone going against the grain of the forum, keep up the good work.

and yes, until Fultz proves it on the court, you are basically correct. Why folks get upset by is beyond me.


Why do folks get upset? because it is not "basically correct" at all. If Fultz was playing 30 games and was playing like trash like say Lonzo then yes... it would be "basically correct" and then you can go for your life... tell everyone "I told you so".

Doing it whilst Fultz is physically unable to shoot and play to his potential because of injury, doesn't make anything correct. It makes it annoying to listen to. It's the basketball equivalent of standing in front of a murderer behind bars and telling them how soft they are and how you would whoop their ass.

Gutless and easy to do when you know they can't reach you to prove you wrong.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers