ConstableGeneva wrote:Former Cavs GM David Griffin says Celtics are built to beat the Warriors. He didn't specify whether that's with Hayward or not. I believe him. I've thought for a while that we have a better chance of beating the Dubs than the Cavs in a series just based on personnel and how we/they play.
The Celtics do have a lot of what you need to beat them, specifically length on defense and the ability to switch. The Warriors really don't ever beat you physically, they beat you with incredible jump-shooting and tough defense. The Celtics aren't a very strong team, but are long, so the Warriors offensive scheme is more ideal for us to guard. Now, would we beat GS? Absolutely not, obviously, even with Hayward IMO. It's just their scheme that's easier for us.
The Cavs are different in a lot of ways. They have LBJ, the strongest player in the league arguably, and a bunch of shooters and tough rebounders. Guys like Love/Thompson are tough inside. They have basically no offensive scheme at all, but when you have a freight train, you don't really need one. The Celtics have pretty much no one on their roster to slow LBJ down besides maybe Morris; if LBJ dominates the game, so do the Cavs usually. Because the Cavs are more physical, it's harder at times for the small Celtics to guard them.