Luka Doncic part II

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

J_T
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 1,844
Joined: May 07, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#201 » by J_T » Mon Dec 18, 2017 8:32 pm

Ettorefm wrote:Great post. I love this kind of discussions. i'll dive into each segment:

1. I completely agree. Nash is my favorite player of all time, I'm a Suns fan, btw. I'm all in favor of playing your strengths and not forcing the issue. The thing is , Nash was never a great scorer. An EFFICIENT and prolific scorer who could go HAM in the playoffs, but he was a 15 ppg scorer in his career. I think Doncic has potential to be a higher scorer for sure.

Yeah, I love Nash as a player, could watch him whole day. I think that if Nash was entering the league today, he would have been scoring considerably more, making top 20 in scoring. Different league.

2. I don't understand your point, honestly. What do you mean by "if you're taller, there is no reason to go for for the layup"? Why would you do a stepback jumper instead of finishing at the rim when you're 6'8, and leave layups to guys who are 6'2? Shouldn't it be the opposite; guys who can easily get blocked by being shorter should use moves like midrange shots and floaters to prevent getting blocked?

What I am thinking of are shots from inside the post, but not necessarily going all the way under the basket. On top of everything it's more difficult in Europe as they don't have the 3 second violation. There is always heavy traffic. Examples
https://youtu.be/U79SnAoV7MM?t=149
https://youtu.be/U79SnAoV7MM?t=232
(the last one having also the contact, that you say he is avoiding at all costs, but I see this type of contact all the time this season)
What I think he doesn't have to be doing is this:
https://youtu.be/U79SnAoV7MM?t=306
In this case he did it because the post was empty, no typical Euro big men party.
He doesn't necessarily need to do this for me to say he is driving in:
https://youtu.be/U79SnAoV7MM?t=199
In this case he did it because the PnR created a great mismatch.
There's quite a few other drives in this game, including being fouled at it so I don't know... I don't see this game as being reason to be frustrated with his selection of shots is what I guess my point is. :)

He's extremely crafty and plays like a vet, making defenders commit and then drawing a stupid foul. It's not like he's going hard to the rim and guys can't do anything, so they have to foul him. I honestly don't understand where you're comin from, because if there is one guy that will do ANYTHING not to shoot a contested layup with contact, it's doncic.

Even if you are right, this is a skill that I think is relatively easily translatable to NBA. By skill I mean being able to draw fouls without defenders being "forced" to commit one. I'd say that drawing fouls is one of the most important skills of any NBA star player. I think we will have to wait and see how successful he will be in NBA at drawing fouls. A player that was athletically much less gifted than Doncic, Dejan Bodiroga, had no problems drawing fouls against more athletic players. What was the reason he was able to do so? I'd say... technique. And if you are able to draw a foul because of your superior skill, it gets slightly dodgy to say that players were not forced to foul him.

You know what, I wanted to post this but then, under impression of the Olympiacos highlight video, which I thought was not showing exactly what you saw (are we looking for different things maybe?), I decided to check his shot selection in first 12 rounds of Euroleague. Basically what interested me mostly was how many 2-pointers did he attempt from outside the post. For me when a 6'8 player gets inside the post and is able to shoot relatively uncontested he should do so, doesn't matter if layup or a hook or even a jumper (although he doesn't do many of those, it's mainly one leg one handers). If the shot was around the FT line, I counted is outside of post, even if it was inside.

Shots taken from inside the post: 57 (FG% 70.2%)
2P shots taken from outside the post: 17 (FG% 41.2%)

So he takes 77% of his two point shots from well inside the post. That's smart and I'd say that he uses his length and technique well enough.
Bob8
RealGM
Posts: 10,869
And1: 4,568
Joined: Feb 08, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#202 » by Bob8 » Mon Dec 18, 2017 8:40 pm

There is one logical mistake from the start of this thread. Nobody from anti-Doncic camp don’t want to look at Doncic like he’s a prospect, like all others. He’s compared to Nba legends at this moment, his weaknesses are analyzed in details, like there’s no tomorrow...On the other hand Porter is new KD, just because he’s tall and could shot in school. Ayton and Bagley are future superstars just because they can run. We all agree 18 years Doncic is not superstar in Nba. But who is at this age?
J_T
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 1,844
Joined: May 07, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#203 » by J_T » Mon Dec 18, 2017 9:06 pm

I wanted to check how does that 70.2% inside the paint FG% compare to some NBA numbers. So in 2016, mid-season, top FG% from inside the paint were:

DeAndre Jordan 71.4%
Hassan Whiteside 65.8%
LeBron James 64.4%
Dwight Howard 63.1%
Steph Curry 62.5%
Kevin Durant 61.4%
Jimmy Butler 60.9%
LaMarcus Aldridge 60.6%
KAT 60.5%

I think that somebody will probably write that I'm claiming he is as good as this list of players even before I press the Submit button, but for the sane ones - my point is that I think:
a) his shot selection is fine
b) he is not a bad finisher
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,536
And1: 9,959
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#204 » by The-Power » Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:49 pm

pacersGM wrote:i dont know how long you watched basketball, but i can ashure you that curry is not one of the first score first point guards.
start by googling marbury and google will take you from there.

You should work on your reading comprehension before trying to be condescending or else you'll just look foolish. Curry indeed changed the way people are thinking about shoot-/score-first PGs and their ability to lead great offenses. Maravich never led a good offense, so how about you start looking at the numbers first and then work your way forward?

pacersGM wrote:and magic johnson was an average athlete at 6 ft 9 pg? wow, really. im learning something new each day.

Again, reading comprehension. Or is it fun to make stuff up and put words into other posters' mouths? Tell me how often Magic used his one-on-one skills to isolate and blow by his defender by virtue of his first step. Are you seriously telling me that this is how Magic became one of the best offensive players in history? Because this is what you're implying or else your statements about Doncic don't make any sense.

Since you were so kind to give me advice I'll do the same here and say: maybe it's time for you to actually watch some games of Magic, you'll learn so much new about him and his tendencies!
pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#205 » by pacersGM » Tue Dec 19, 2017 5:38 am

The-Power wrote:
pacersGM wrote:i dont know how long you watched basketball, but i can ashure you that curry is not one of the first score first point guards.
start by googling marbury and google will take you from there.

You should work on your reading comprehension before trying to be condescending or else you'll just look foolish. Curry indeed changed the way people are thinking about shoot-/score-first PGs and their ability to lead great offenses. Maravich never led a good offense, so how about you start looking at the numbers first and then work your way forward?

pacersGM wrote:and magic johnson was an average athlete at 6 ft 9 pg? wow, really. im learning something new each day.

Again, reading comprehension. Or is it fun to make stuff up and put words into other posters' mouths? Tell me how often Magic used his one-on-one skills to isolate and blow by his defender by virtue of his first step. Are you seriously telling me that this is how Magic became one of the best offensive players in history? Because this is what you're implying or else your statements about Doncic don't make any sense.

Since you were so kind to give me advice I'll do the same here and say: maybe it's time for you to actually watch some games of Magic, you'll learn so much new about him and his tendencies!


indeed you are the one steering away from my initial point. to redirect you to it once again: name a few average athletic players between 6ft3 and 6ft8 who were or are superstars in the nba in the last 15-20 years?

and you drifted out to currys scoring first ability somehow, i cant even follow how you got there after my simple request, as you are not making sence or doing any good to steer away from my initial question.

so, il wait for that do it al good, but average athlete sg-sf SUPERSTAR from the 2000s until today? no need to drift away.
User avatar
SportsGuy8
Starter
Posts: 2,160
And1: 1,050
Joined: Jun 17, 2006

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#206 » by SportsGuy8 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:00 am

Paul Pierce really wasn't that much more athletic. He was a lot more aggressive and confident on his drives, though, going for dunks a whole lot more. Doncic rarely even tries it in traffic, so we don't even have a true idea what he's capable of. Personally I think that he got less aggressive in the past couple years because he had to adapt to playing vs. grown men, and his subconscious still didn't adapt to the fact that he now has an adult-like body also.

Or take Andre Miller. If he had decent shooting abilities (instead of being a worse shooter than Rubio), he would have easily been a perennial All-Star, maybe even a superstar. Andre did everything by being smart, crafty and strong, which is exactly what Doncic's game is all about. But he's also a whole 4 inches taller and with a very good (most likely great in the future) shooting ability.

We can also go back to a player like Chris Mullin. His prime years were in early 90s, when the league was already very athletic. You give Mullin slightly better passing and rebounding, and you're at superstar level. Compared to him, Doncic is a super athlete, ha.

The mistake you make is comparing Doncic to the players in recent years who had nowhere near the combination of physical characteristics and skill level that Doncic possesses. Sure there were some similarly skilled players with equally "questionable" athleticism, but nobody also had his combination of strength, frame and even height. He's simply unique, like Jokic is unique for C position. The same doubters who are now doubting Doncic are probably the ones who were doubting that there's still a place in the NBA for slow Cs, since all tall guys are super agile and fast nowadays.

Just as Jokic crushed those beliefs for Cs, I think Doncic is going to do the same for perimeter players.
Image
User avatar
SportsGuy8
Starter
Posts: 2,160
And1: 1,050
Joined: Jun 17, 2006

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#207 » by SportsGuy8 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:09 am

Bob8 wrote:There is one logical mistake from the start of this thread. Nobody from anti-Doncic camp don’t want to look at Doncic like he’s a prospect, like all others. He’s compared to Nba legends at this moment, his weaknesses are analyzed in details, like there’s no tomorrow...On the other hand Porter is new KD, just because he’s tall and could shot in school. Ayton and Bagley are future superstars just because they can run. We all agree 18 years Doncic is not superstar in Nba. But who is at this age?

You're correct that the standard for Doncic and the level of scrutiny seem to be a lot higher, however, it's not like others don't get criticized. Ayton's defense, for example, keeps getting pointed out. And Bagley isn't even in top5 on some people's boards ... Even the biggest Doncic doubters have him at like 4 right now, they just don't think he can be the top pick due to his non-elite athleticism.
Image
pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#208 » by pacersGM » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:53 am

SportsGuy8 wrote:Paul Pierce really wasn't that much more athletic. He was a lot more aggressive and confident on his drives, though, going for dunks a whole lot more. Doncic rarely even tries it in traffic, so we don't even have a true idea what he's capable of. Personally I think that he got less aggressive in the past couple years because he had to adapt to playing vs. grown men, and his subconscious still didn't adapt to the fact that he now has an adult-like body also.

Or take Andre Miller. If he had decent shooting abilities (instead of being a worse shooter than Rubio), he would have easily been a perennial All-Star, maybe even a superstar. Andre did everything by being smart, crafty and strong, which is exactly what Doncic's game is all about. But he's also a whole 4 inches taller and with a very good (most likely great in the future) shooting ability.

We can also go back to a player like Chris Mullin. His prime years were in early 90s, when the league was already very athletic. You give Mullin slightly better passing and rebounding, and you're at superstar level. Compared to him, Doncic is a super athlete, ha.

The mistake you make is comparing Doncic to the players in recent years who had nowhere near the combination of physical characteristics and skill level that Doncic possesses. Sure there were some similarly skilled players with equally "questionable" athleticism, but nobody also had his combination of strength, frame and even height. He's simply unique, like Jokic is unique for C position. The same doubters who are now doubting Doncic are probably the ones who were doubting that there's still a place in the NBA for slow Cs, since all tall guys are super agile and fast nowadays.

Just as Jokic crushed those beliefs for Cs, I think Doncic is going to do the same for perimeter players.


first of / forget jokic - 7 ft 3 wingspan and no need for speed at the center position. + he is a big liability at the 5 defensively.

second / i dont know where you got andre miller from, but since i can remember he was a very good athlete. certanly very well above doncic. a solid role player starter, so i dont know what that has to do with superstars or below average athletes? hes 6ft1



third / pierce elite iso player - crazy finisher, loved the contact / the things doncic is lacking

mullin - elite shooter

doncics elite skill is his vision, but that wont take him over the top into superstardom, just like it cant help teodosic in the nba.

what combination of skill and physical attributes are you talking about (strength, frame and height?- is it something out of the ordinary with doncic? i see a normal 6ft8 guy with a normal frame. you see someting else? if you say he will get stronger with age. but he shurely wont get faster or quicker.
BlueSan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,938
And1: 828
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#209 » by BlueSan » Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:00 am

This talk about cant beat players 1 vs 1... Luka is not a guy who is going to try to constantly take his man on one on one situations mostly, he is a guy who will play it smart and find the easiest bucket, best option... that's why he passes a lot and he is very good at it, thats why he would maybe pass his man but then instead of going for the contact and basket, he will from a corner of his eye spot a guy who is now alone on a 3 and pass to him instead, or he will make his famous step back or wait for a P&R and so on and on...
Yes I agree that he doesn't do it often and I also agree that it is something I hope he will improve at and will take the ball to the rim by himself more often.
But to say he cant do it, that he doesn't do it or that he is terrible at it, just shows people's ignorance in my humble opinion.

Since people are just into this highlight plays here... I took 5 minutes of my time to go and search the youtube just for this. Enjoy





pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#210 » by pacersGM » Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:15 am

3 of the 5 videos you posted he got by his guy because of a pick. those are not iso situations.
by the first one he got by at the half court line since he was bodying him.

im shure you could find clips of him actualy getting by in a iso situation but thats not the point.

guys i didnt make the drafexpress doncic iso video, but the pros did.


if you cant accept the fact that he is lacking the iso game because of his lack of burst, quickness i cant help you out.

no one is talking bad about him or trolling him, but im saying ... he relies on the step back 3 and p&r to create. take it or leave it.
and he wont get much quicker, thats my point.

ben simmons / quick as f... learning the game in huge steps
doncic / knows the game like a vet ... wont get much quicker, faster etc...

thats all im saying
BlueSan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,938
And1: 828
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#211 » by BlueSan » Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:23 am

No 2 of them

And number 1 should end all the debate about his ability to pass his man as also finish while contested, but for some reason it does not. I have no desire to argue about such things or talk about the topic to no end, like I said, it is definitely not something Doncic does often and no one here is claiming that, in fact like I said, I also wish for him to do it more often, if for no other reason than to improve on it (you have to try things more often if you want to improve on them) but to say he cant, or he doesn't is where I get this face palm feeling coming in...

Btw, the guy has his 3rd topic open now. This one he has opened for what a week now and is already at 10 pages... This just shows that he is some special dude among the pack of the guys going for the 2018 NBA Draft
AJ3
Sophomore
Posts: 240
And1: 63
Joined: Nov 02, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#212 » by AJ3 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:25 am

pacersGM wrote:3 of the 5 videos you posted he got by his guy because of a pick. those are not iso situations.
by the first one he got by at the half court line since he was bodying him.

im shure you could find clips of him actualy getting by in a iso situation but thats not the point.

guys i didnt make the drafexpress doncic iso video, but the pros did.


if you cant accept the fact that he is lacking the iso game because of his lack of burst, quickness i cant help you out.

no one is talking bad about him or trolling him, but im saying ... he relies on the step back 3 and p&r to create. take it or leave it.
and he wont get much quicker, thats my point.

ben simmons / quick as f... learning the game in huge steps
doncic / knows the game like a vet ... wont get much quicker, faster etc...

thats all im saying


Can you give me one good argument as in why Luka cannot get faster/quicker? Present me a case study or some kind of proof that says peple after 18 years of age cannot improve in speed, please.
pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#213 » by pacersGM » Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:29 am

BlueSan wrote:No 2 of them

(you have to try things more often if you want to improve on them) but to say he cant or he doesn't is where I get this face palm feeling comes in...


thats very childish. deandre jordan also can hit a 3 pointer but that doesnt mean he is good at it.
is doncic good at 1 on 1 play without a pick or without a stepback 3? NO? do i see him in the future getting the quicknes burst do do much better at it? also no.
pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#214 » by pacersGM » Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:31 am

AJ3 wrote:
pacersGM wrote:3 of the 5 videos you posted he got by his guy because of a pick. those are not iso situations.
by the first one he got by at the half court line since he was bodying him.

im shure you could find clips of him actualy getting by in a iso situation but thats not the point.

guys i didnt make the drafexpress doncic iso video, but the pros did.


if you cant accept the fact that he is lacking the iso game because of his lack of burst, quickness i cant help you out.

no one is talking bad about him or trolling him, but im saying ... he relies on the step back 3 and p&r to create. take it or leave it.
and he wont get much quicker, thats my point.

ben simmons / quick as f... learning the game in huge steps
doncic / knows the game like a vet ... wont get much quicker, faster etc...

thats all im saying


Can you give me one good argument as in why Luka cannot get faster/quicker? Present me a case study or some kind of proof that says peple after 18 years of age cannot improve in speed, please.


because no one went from below/average athlete to superstar level. they got stronger bulked up but thats it. vince carter didnt jump higher in the nba then he did at UNC, so there will be no magic potion to elevate him or make strides like ben simmons is doing now by learning the game.
BlueSan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,938
And1: 828
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#215 » by BlueSan » Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:34 am

Saying he is not good at something is completely different than saying he cannot do it. I never said Doncic is good at iso play in fact I said it is one area I want to see him improve on...

So yeah on your second notion on him getting much better at it, I disagree and think he will. But that is only a difference on opinion.
User avatar
SportsGuy8
Starter
Posts: 2,160
And1: 1,050
Joined: Jun 17, 2006

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#216 » by SportsGuy8 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:59 am

pacersGM wrote:
SportsGuy8 wrote:Paul Pierce really wasn't that much more athletic. He was a lot more aggressive and confident on his drives, though, going for dunks a whole lot more. Doncic rarely even tries it in traffic, so we don't even have a true idea what he's capable of. Personally I think that he got less aggressive in the past couple years because he had to adapt to playing vs. grown men, and his subconscious still didn't adapt to the fact that he now has an adult-like body also.

Or take Andre Miller. If he had decent shooting abilities (instead of being a worse shooter than Rubio), he would have easily been a perennial All-Star, maybe even a superstar. Andre did everything by being smart, crafty and strong, which is exactly what Doncic's game is all about. But he's also a whole 4 inches taller and with a very good (most likely great in the future) shooting ability.

We can also go back to a player like Chris Mullin. His prime years were in early 90s, when the league was already very athletic. You give Mullin slightly better passing and rebounding, and you're at superstar level. Compared to him, Doncic is a super athlete, ha.

The mistake you make is comparing Doncic to the players in recent years who had nowhere near the combination of physical characteristics and skill level that Doncic possesses. Sure there were some similarly skilled players with equally "questionable" athleticism, but nobody also had his combination of strength, frame and even height. He's simply unique, like Jokic is unique for C position. The same doubters who are now doubting Doncic are probably the ones who were doubting that there's still a place in the NBA for slow Cs, since all tall guys are super agile and fast nowadays.

Just as Jokic crushed those beliefs for Cs, I think Doncic is going to do the same for perimeter players.


first of / forget jokic - 7 ft 3 wingspan and no need for speed at the center position. + he is a big liability at the 5 defensively.

second / i dont know where you got andre miller from, but since i can remember he was a very good athlete. certanly very well above doncic. a solid role player starter, so i dont know what that has to do with superstars or below average athletes? hes 6ft1



third / pierce elite iso player - crazy finisher, loved the contact / the things doncic is lacking

mullin - elite shooter

doncics elite skill is his vision, but that wont take him over the top into superstardom, just like it cant help teodosic in the nba.

what combination of skill and physical attributes are you talking about (strength, frame and height?- is it something out of the ordinary with doncic? i see a normal 6ft8 guy with a normal frame. you see someting else? if you say he will get stronger with age. but he shurely wont get faster or quicker.

Your problem is that you look at things in vacuum. I made it clear several times that it's his COMBINATION of skills and physical attributes. His strength, frame and height are nothing that special compared to some great athletes, however, it is very special when you compare him to similarly skilled players. That's extremely rare. That's why some people say that he's like LeBron without elite athleticism. Because there really aren't (m)any other similar players.

As for Andre Miller, even when he lost his athleticism, he stayed productive, simply because he was smart, crafty and strong. He never really struggled vs. all the elite PGs who should in theory be running circles around him.

Btw., since you posted that clip. It's not like Doncic isn't capable of dunking over people:

He was 16 in this clip, going up against mostly 18-year-olds.

He just stopped being as aggressive when he transitioned to the pros, simply because he realized that he's a boy going up against grown men. Wait until he gets comfortable and realizes that he's also got a grown man's body now, or at least very close to it ... We can start seeing a whole different Doncic in a year or 2. He also really needs to start jumping off of 1 foot again.
Image
pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#217 » by pacersGM » Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:05 am

SportsGuy8 wrote:what combination of skill and physical attributes are you talking about (strength, frame and height?- is it something out of the ordinary with doncic? i see a normal 6ft8 guy with a normal frame. you see someting else? if you say he will get stronger with age. but he shurely wont get faster or quicker.

Your problem is that you look at things in vacuum. I made it clear several times that it's his COMBINATION of skills and physical attributes. His strength, frame and height are nothing that special compared to some great athletes, however, it is very special when you compare him to similarly skilled players. That's extremely rare. That's why some people say that he's like LeBron without elite athleticism. Because there really aren't (m)any other similar players.

As for Andre Miller, even when he lost his athleticism, he stayed productive, simply because he was smart, crafty and strong. He never really struggled vs. all the elite PGs who should in theory be running circles around him.

Btw., since you posted that clip. It's not like Doncic isn't capable of dunking over people:

He was 16 in this clip, going up against mostly 18-year-olds.

He just stopped being as aggressive when he transitioned to the pros, simply because he realized that he's a boy going up against grown men. Wait until he gets comfortable and realizes that he's also got a grown man's body now, or at least very close to it ... We can start seeing a whole different Doncic in a year or 2.


your saying his combination of skill (very skilled) and that of an average body, frame, strength, makes him a lebron without the athletic ability.

im saying he can be an solid nba starter but no where near lebrons stats of 8 reb / 8 assist per game, but the lack of athletic ability hinders him to become a nba superstar.

arent we both saying the same thing?

and also. since everybody wants proof from me why doncic wont be able to progress athleticaly or be an nba superstar, your terms are also very loose and without fundaments. to say: well he doesnt realize hes in a mans body, or he doesnt want to go 1 on1 or he doesnt see the need to look for contact ... i mean that is a very subjective look at things to say the least.
User avatar
SportsGuy8
Starter
Posts: 2,160
And1: 1,050
Joined: Jun 17, 2006

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#218 » by SportsGuy8 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:40 am

There's lots and lots of data of rebounding numbers translating very well from top European leagues to the NBA (rebounding numbers per36, obviously!). He's been averaging 8rpg per36 in Europe for his whole teenage career. Rebounding is the one statistical category that probably translates the best, so as long as he gets 36 minutes in the NBA (star minutes), he should be averaging close to 8 rebounds per game. Even if he's going to be a rare exception of a player whose rebounding rates drop substantially going from Europe to the NBA, he should still have VERY high rebounding numbers.

So the main question is if he can get to 8 APG and I really have no real doubts there. Have you seen his passing out of P'n'Rs? Most of NBA's offenses are centered around the P'n'Rs. Keep in mind that he's going to be looking to pass more than LeBron does. LeBron could easily average over 10 apg (probably even a lot more than that) if he really wanted to.

Btw., I don't know where this notion of Doncic not looking for contact comes from. There are numerous occasions where he clearly goes for the AND1, he just does it in a "slow", controlled way, making it look unimpressive. He just isn't looking to do it really aggressively, trying to dunk over opponents. But he might be capable of that also, looking at the above pasted clip. It's too early to tell, really, that's my point.
Image
pacersGM
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 53
Joined: Mar 29, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#219 » by pacersGM » Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:57 am

SportsGuy8 wrote:
So the main question is if he can get to 8 APG and I really have no real doubts there. Have you seen his passing out of P'n'Rs? Most of NBA's offenses are centered around the P'n'Rs. Keep in mind that he's going to be looking to pass more than LeBron does. LeBron could easily average over 10 apg (probably even a lot more than that) if he really wanted to.
.


my point is: i hope we agree here: you cant have the ball and game in your hands in the nba more then Lebron James has.

meaning that in the uber fantasy scenario where doncic gets the keys to a team, you and many others think he will be able to produce lebron type level assists and rebounds even with his athletic deficiency compared to the probably most complete athlete in the history of the game? really? meaning him being a average level athlete will not mean a thing in the nba stats wise? very optimistic and interesting.

another very up in the air quote is this: lebron could average more assists if he wanted, or doncic could drive if he wanted.
that doesnt make no point and doesnt help you out as you cant ptu that kind ob subjective thinking into a discussion.
User avatar
SportsGuy8
Starter
Posts: 2,160
And1: 1,050
Joined: Jun 17, 2006

Re: Luka Doncic part II 

Post#220 » by SportsGuy8 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:15 am

His rebounding instincts are top-notch, most likely substantially better than LeBron's. Many players in the past proved that rebounding isn't all about athleticism. I also think he plays a lot harder than LeBron. Just watch LeBron, it's like he takes half of the possessions off (mostly during the regular season, but sometimes even the playoffs), especially defensively. He's just so damn sick that he's dominating regardless.

How is LeBron being capable of averaging a lot more assists if he wanted to even questionable?

I do agree with you that Doncic getting the keys to a team is a bit of a pipe-dream. His rebounding numbers aren't going to suffer much if he doesn't, though, just his assist number and obviously scoring numbers.

P.s.: Look over the past couple pages, you're nitpicking every posters' post just to try discrediting the value of their opinions. What does that say about you? And then you're again going to wonder why everyone's blaming you for these discussions going down the drain ... Seriously, how old are you? Serious question.
Image

Return to NBA Draft