This is now the offensive core I'd strongly consider us going after.
Their offensive games are comparable to Steph and Klay.
And a core of Trae Young, Taurean Prince, Michael Porter, Jr and John Collins...could be an elite offensive collection.

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver



ATL Boy wrote:Sexton's emergence is indeed pleasing as far as the Hawks are concerned in the draft. In the off chance that we don't end up with a top 3 pick (be it because of a fluke surge or a crooked lottery), that second tier of Porter, Sexton, Bamba will be a nice consolation prize after missing out on Doncic, Bagley, Ayton.
jayu70 wrote:ATL Boy wrote:Sexton's emergence is indeed pleasing as far as the Hawks are concerned in the draft. In the off chance that we don't end up with a top 3 pick (be it because of a fluke surge or a crooked lottery), that second tier of Porter, Sexton, Bamba will be a nice consolation prize after missing out on Doncic, Bagley, Ayton.
Oh God, No - that's my worse fear. I don't want us to have to settle for another because we missed out on the top 3. See missing out on Durant for Horford.
I want us in the top spot to have the most choices. So even as Jamaal suggested trading out for a future pick added.
hawkmanreturns wrote:We were so close. I don't even want to mention Giannis, or even Porzingis.

CP War Hawks wrote:For the time being, I'm ready to commit to Luka with the top first rounder. I want Sexton and would trade Dennis for him if Phoenix decides that's what they want.
Jamaaliver wrote:CP War Hawks wrote:For the time being, I'm ready to commit to Luka with the top first rounder. I want Sexton and would trade Dennis for him if Phoenix decides that's what they want.
So does this mean you're in favor of a Luke/Sexton backcourt pairing?
That would be intriguing...
CP War Hawks wrote:hawkmanreturns wrote:We were so close. I don't even want to mention Giannis, or even Porzingis.
I don't see how KP connected to the Hawks, but the Greek Freak should of been had. Ferry was solid in trading and under the radar signings, but his drafting left alot to be desired. He should have leap frogged Milwaukee and selected Giannis. If it came down to it, trade picks 16 and 17 to move up.
CP War Hawks wrote:hawkmanreturns wrote:We were so close. I don't even want to mention Giannis, or even Porzingis.
I don't see how KP connected to the Hawks.....
MaceCase wrote:CP War Hawks wrote:hawkmanreturns wrote:We were so close. I don't even want to mention Giannis, or even Porzingis.
I don't see how KP connected to the Hawks, but the Greek Freak should of been had. Ferry was solid in trading and under the radar signings, but his drafting left alot to be desired. He should have leap frogged Milwaukee and selected Giannis. If it came down to it, trade picks 16 and 17 to move up.
Word was that if Porzingis stayed in the 2014 draft that he had a promise from Ferry. KP decided to pull out and try for a higher draft slot the following year. I'd have to find it but there was a tidbit in a thread on the Bucks' board where a beat writer claimed in a radio interview that there was something akin to audible chair and table throwing on the phone when Ferry called about trading up for Giannis. It happens, Ainge tried to trade 6 picks (4 1sts rounders) to move up from 16th to 9th to select Justise Winslow and was soundly rebuffed. Sometimes just having the ammunition doesn't guarantee you hit your target.
CP War Hawks wrote:MaceCase wrote:CP War Hawks wrote:
I don't see how KP connected to the Hawks, but the Greek Freak should of been had. Ferry was solid in trading and under the radar signings, but his drafting left alot to be desired. He should have leap frogged Milwaukee and selected Giannis. If it came down to it, trade picks 16 and 17 to move up.
Word was that if Porzingis stayed in the 2014 draft that he had a promise from Ferry. KP decided to pull out and try for a higher draft slot the following year. I'd have to find it but there was a tidbit in a thread on the Bucks' board where a beat writer claimed in a radio interview that there was something akin to audible chair and table throwing on the phone when Ferry called about trading up for Giannis. It happens, Ainge tried to trade 6 picks (4 1sts rounders) to move up from 16th to 9th to select Justise Winslow and was soundly rebuffed. Sometimes just having the ammunition doesn't guarantee you hit your target.
I get it, but then again I don't. Were people expecting KP to fall out the lotto in a relatively weak 2014 draft. I have to think it's an easy yes for Boston or Minny for their pick with the Hawks pick 16 and 17.
Any other GM accepts the Boston offer except the Bobcats. They are horrifically bad with their evals. Ferry also passed up on Rudy for Lucas. Granted most teams fell asleep on him, but still.
atlantabbq99 wrote:I think the team with the worst record in the league is guaranteed a pick no lower than #3, even with the new rules.

SichtingLives wrote:life hack:
When a man heaves a live chainsaw towards you from distance, stand still. No one has good accuracy throwing a chainsaw.

ESPNYoung sets Big 12 record with 22 assists in Oklahoma win
Freshman Trae Young had 26 points and a Big 12 Conference-record 22 assists as No. 17 Oklahoma rolled past Northwestern State 105-68 on Tuesday night in the Sooners' first game since moving into the Top 25.


ATL Boy wrote:Didn't we have a trade in place to get Milwaukee's 2013 first round pick for Josh Smith at the trade deadline that year?
...but Ferry changed his mind at the last minute.

The RingerProspect Status Update: Does Marvin Bagley III Have a Position in the “Positionless” NBA?
The Duke freshman could be a special talent at the next level, but the strengths and weaknesses he’s shown under Coach K have established a unique wrinkle to the age-old “tweener” conundrum
Marvin Bagley III doesn’t fit neatly into any one category when projecting him to the NBA. The Duke freshman is averaging 21.3 points and 11.3 rebounds a game this season on 61.1 percent shooting, but his game has fallen out of fashion at the next level. No one in the NBA plays quite like him. At 6-foot-11 and 234 pounds, he is a supersized forward who does most of his damage in the paint, and he hasn’t shown the ability to spread the floor like a power forward or protect the rim like a center.
There’s no place for a traditional power forward who scores in the post. Those players either have to move out to the 3-point line and space the floor, or move to center and become a defensive anchor. NBA offenses don’t want anyone in the spots on the court where Bagley operates best.
Bagley is practically unguardable in the NCAA, but his position doesn’t really exist anymore at the next level.
...there are many front-office people who are skeptical about his ability to play power forward in the NBA. I talked to one Eastern Conference executive who was blunt in his assessment. “Bagley is a 5 in today’s NBA,” he told me. “Trying to make him a 4 will be an exercise in failure.”
The issue with playing Bagley at the 5 is on defense. He is rarely in the right position to make a play, and he doesn’t have the length to make up for it. He has only a 7-foot wingspan, which would give him one of the shortest reaches of any starting center in the NBA. Interior defense is one of the hardest things to learn to do at the next level, and Bagley doesn’t have the instincts for it, much less the physical tools.
The things Bagley does best just aren’t done anymore in the NBA; it’s a big gamble to take with a top-three pick.