lilfishi22 wrote:LukasBMW wrote:My problem with Mike James an Cannan is that:
-At 26 and 27, neither fit the timeline.
-They are monthly or yearly rentals. Anything they do for us goes away at the end of the year.
-They are taking time and opportunities away from the other guys. (both playing minutes and time handling the ball).
If we had traded for a project like Mudiay or French Frank and THEY were putting up the numbers, I'd be ecstatic since we'd be in control and likley able to keep them.
I disagree
At 26-27, they are perfect for the timeline. You can't have a team of 21-22 year olds play good basketball and expect to get good development out of a team without any experience. At 26-27, they largely know how to play the game, they have good experience, they mostly know what their strengths and weaknesses are and they know what they need to do to be productive. Even a young team like Sixers have TJ, Bayless, Reddick playing significant minutes.
As for being rentals, just because they go doesn't mean they take everything with them. If they play well, it gives us a better look at the type of players we should be pursuing. Maybe Booker plays his best ball next to a Marcus Smart type bruiser or maybe he plays his best next to a McConnell type passer or perhaps he's better with a scorer like Harris.
They aren't taking minutes or roles from anyone worth playing anyway. Ulis has regressed and it's not trending upwards at this point. It's entirely debatable whether he's even a 2nd stringer.
That's a fine age for a backup PG. If we can find a legit starting PG and Canaan was to somehow keep playing as he has so far, I'd be fine keeping him on as backup PG.