Three Georgia police officers indicted for tasing to death black man who had committed no crime
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/21/1726673/-Three-Georgia-police-officers-indicted-for-tasing-to-death-black-man-who-had-committed-no-crime
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Three Georgia police officers indicted for tasing to death black man who had committed no crime
Over the months ahead, as thousands of top-dollar accountants and lawyers get to work, expect to see many more routes to tax avoidance emerge — but only for the rich and well connected.
Over the months ahead, as thousands of top-dollar accountants and lawyers get to work, expect to see many more routes to tax avoidance emerge — but only for the rich and well connected.
One of the biggest beneficiaries of the massive, slapdash tax bill that President Trump and Republican lawmakers celebrated at the White House on Wednesday will be, wait for it . . . President Trump. What a coincidence!
The rest of Trump’s wealthy family will benefit lavishly as well, including his son-in-law and all-purpose adviser, Jared Kushner. And, of course, it’s not a coincidence at all. The chance that this president would preside over a revision of the tax code without lining his own pockets was zero. Anyone who believed Trump’s claim that the tax bill would “cost me a fortune” hasn’t been paying attention.
In a 2015 interview with the Los Angeles Times, Disney, who is a documentary filmmaker, said she has always felt like a rebel in her conservative family. When she attended Columbia University, she recalled being so anxious about her peers viewing her as a snob that she had a cab drop her off blocks from school. In 2014, when Meryl Streep called Walt Disney a “bigot,” his grandniece publicly agreed by posting on Facebook how much she loved the actress’s remarks
cammac wrote:SD20, Popper and Nate 33 get there time in the sun to gloat about the abomination of the Republican tax bill and only one of the three will benefit from it!
The Democratic Tidal Wave is coming these are the reasons why!
#1 Trump is the most hated President since polling began in his 1st year. Yes he will hold 25 to 35% of the electorate mostly radical Christians and deplorable's.
#2 The Republican Party is growing increasingly unpopular in the polls losing key constituencies.
#3 Polls show at best they will turn out average turnouts in the midterms while the Democratic base is motivated.
#4 The stunning victory by Doug Jones in Alabama shows that no Republican seat can be considered safe.
#5 The Democrats had a tough row to hoe in the Senate in the midterms are now much less daunting in that two more seats may come into play on or before the midterms McCain's ( respect him as a man hate his politics ) and Cochran from Alabama. The Democrats would have a excellent chance of taking 2 Senate Seats in Arizona which has been trending Democratic but a renewed chance in 2 in Mississippi since 40% of the population is Afro American. With higher % of motivated Afro American turnout and less than 20% of the white vote could take 2 Senate seats in Mississippi. The Democrats are running a excellent candidate in Nevada and should take the Senate seat there. Tennessee could also be up for grabs with a former Democratic Governor ready to run.Yes the Democrats have some tough races of there own but they also also have both the Trump unpopularity and the Republican unpopularity to help.
#6 How safe is any Republican congressman in California, NJ, NY, Massachusetts and Ill?
#7 A real indication will be in Pennsylvania in March where a Trump before Trump candidate against a Doug Jones type democrat face off in a strong Republican district. If the Democrats win the wave could be more than the 60 seats the Republicans gained in the 1st Obama midterm.
cammac wrote:dckingsfan wrote:
Did they do the analysis for corporate tax cuts?
Not that I'm aware of but surely someone has.
My concern is that the major corporate cuts a ruse in that Fortune 500 type companies will not change habits but in fact profit exponentially since loopholes haven't been eliminated and in many areas increased especially in the real estate companies. You know I'm not against corporate tax cuts but like the Canadian model for small corporations better.
JWizmentality wrote:cammac wrote:SD20, Popper and Nate 33 get there time in the sun to gloat about the abomination of the Republican tax bill and only one of the three will benefit from it!
The Democratic Tidal Wave is coming these are the reasons why!
#1 Trump is the most hated President since polling began in his 1st year. Yes he will hold 25 to 35% of the electorate mostly radical Christians and deplorable's.
#2 The Republican Party is growing increasingly unpopular in the polls losing key constituencies.
#3 Polls show at best they will turn out average turnouts in the midterms while the Democratic base is motivated.
#4 The stunning victory by Doug Jones in Alabama shows that no Republican seat can be considered safe.
#5 The Democrats had a tough row to hoe in the Senate in the midterms are now much less daunting in that two more seats may come into play on or before the midterms McCain's ( respect him as a man hate his politics ) and Cochran from Alabama. The Democrats would have a excellent chance of taking 2 Senate Seats in Arizona which has been trending Democratic but a renewed chance in 2 in Mississippi since 40% of the population is Afro American. With higher % of motivated Afro American turnout and less than 20% of the white vote could take 2 Senate seats in Mississippi. The Democrats are running a excellent candidate in Nevada and should take the Senate seat there. Tennessee could also be up for grabs with a former Democratic Governor ready to run.Yes the Democrats have some tough races of there own but they also also have both the Trump unpopularity and the Republican unpopularity to help.
#6 How safe is any Republican congressman in California, NJ, NY, Massachusetts and Ill?
#7 A real indication will be in Pennsylvania in March where a Trump before Trump candidate against a Doug Jones type democrat face off in a strong Republican district. If the Democrats win the wave could be more than the 60 seats the Republicans gained in the 1st Obama midterm.
It has been such a train wreck that they grasp on any headline to "prove" that they are #winning. Just like nate jumped on the whole Carrier nonsense, before he retreated to his safe.....sabbatical. How is Carrier doing lately?
popper wrote:gtn130 wrote:popper wrote:
Some day you're going to have to get out on your own and try to make something of yourself. Don't let the fear of failure stop you.
Popper, I'm deeply worried about what you think of me. Very astute observation on your part when you began this line of posting.
I shouldn"t be pulling your chain gtn, even though you try to provoke me. I sincerely hope you have a great future ahead of you.
dckingsfan wrote:cammac wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Did they do the analysis for corporate tax cuts?
Not that I'm aware of but surely someone has.
My concern is that the major corporate cuts a ruse in that Fortune 500 type companies will not change habits but in fact profit exponentially since loopholes haven't been eliminated and in many areas increased especially in the real estate companies. You know I'm not against corporate tax cuts but like the Canadian model for small corporations better.
Yup, the carveouts are killing us. The problem is both sides love them... this has been a truly bipartisan train wreck.
Pointgod wrote:I have a serious question for the Republican posters in this thread. They mindlessly agree and follow every single thing that Trump and the Republicans do. Would they rather have a government that rushes bad legislation just so they can say they did something?
cammac wrote:dckingsfan wrote:cammac wrote:Not that I'm aware of but surely someone has.
My concern is that the major corporate cuts a ruse in that Fortune 500 type companies will not change habits but in fact profit exponentially since loopholes haven't been eliminated and in many areas increased especially in the real estate companies. You know I'm not against corporate tax cuts but like the Canadian model for small corporations better.
Yup, the carveouts are killing us. The problem is both sides love them... this has been a truly bipartisan train wreck.
I agree the need for Americans in general is to remember the old Kennedy axiom! Not ask what the country can do for you but what you can do for your country.
As you know I'm a fiscal conservative and believe the 1% and 10% should shoulder more of the burden. But the special interest groups whether Republican or Democrat should be ignored. Yes business should have deductions but realistic ones rather than the current rape and pillage.
A example of a progressive tax is one in Australia which is aimed specifically at banks but could be useful in other sectors.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/story-streams/federal-budget-2017/2017-05-10/federal-budget-2017-bank-tax-explained/8513264
I know it would be effective in Canada in our banking sector where Canadian Banks are hiding vast amounts in countries like Bermuda, Turks & Caicos, Ireland and other countries.
It can be done to make changes the independents must get more active to promote a agenda rather than be drones moving from one party to the other.
gtn130 wrote:Pointgod wrote:I have a serious question for the Republican posters in this thread. They mindlessly agree and follow every single thing that Trump and the Republicans do. Would they rather have a government that rushes bad legislation just so they can say they did something?
The answer is yes.
Additionally, here are the reasons there are still Republicans in 2017:
-Identity politics / racism
-tax cuts
dckingsfan wrote:cammac wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Yup, the carveouts are killing us. The problem is both sides love them... this has been a truly bipartisan train wreck.
I agree the need for Americans in general is to remember the old Kennedy axiom! Not ask what the country can do for you but what you can do for your country.
As you know I'm a fiscal conservative and believe the 1% and 10% should shoulder more of the burden. But the special interest groups whether Republican or Democrat should be ignored. Yes business should have deductions but realistic ones rather than the current rape and pillage.
A example of a progressive tax is one in Australia which is aimed specifically at banks but could be useful in other sectors.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/story-streams/federal-budget-2017/2017-05-10/federal-budget-2017-bank-tax-explained/8513264
I know it would be effective in Canada in our banking sector where Canadian Banks are hiding vast amounts in countries like Bermuda, Turks & Caicos, Ireland and other countries.
It can be done to make changes the independents must get more active to promote a agenda rather than be drones moving from one party to the other.
But I think until there is a 3rd party there isn't much to be done - and getting that third party going is going to take quite some doing here.
If you just removed all the carveouts our system would be relatively fair and progressive. But neither the Ds or the Rs have ANY interest in doing that...
Millions of American families are currently facing economic hardship in their retirement years. The chief executives of large U.S. corporations, meanwhile, are sitting on massive retirement nest eggs. In 2015 the retirement savings of just 100 top CEOs totaled $4.9 billion, a sum equivalent to the entire retirement savings of 41 percent of American families, 50 million Americans in all
cammac wrote:Millions of American families are currently facing economic hardship in their retirement years. The chief executives of large U.S. corporations, meanwhile, are sitting on massive retirement nest eggs. In 2015 the retirement savings of just 100 top CEOs totaled $4.9 billion, a sum equivalent to the entire retirement savings of 41 percent of American families, 50 million Americans in all
https://inequality.org/facts/inequality-and-health/
Sorry for posting so frequently today you would think I'm SD20 but at least no FOX NEWS
cammac wrote:Millions of American families are currently facing economic hardship in their retirement years. The chief executives of large U.S. corporations, meanwhile, are sitting on massive retirement nest eggs. In 2015 the retirement savings of just 100 top CEOs totaled $4.9 billion, a sum equivalent to the entire retirement savings of 41 percent of American families, 50 million Americans in all
https://inequality.org/facts/inequality-and-health/
Sorry for posting so frequently today you would think I'm SD20 but at least no FOX NEWS
gtn130 wrote:Pointgod wrote:I have a serious question for the Republican posters in this thread. They mindlessly agree and follow every single thing that Trump and the Republicans do. Would they rather have a government that rushes bad legislation just so they can say they did something?
The answer is yes.
Additionally, here are the reasons there are still Republicans in 2017:
-Identity politics / racism
-tax cuts
gtn130 wrote:Pointgod wrote:I have a serious question for the Republican posters in this thread. They mindlessly agree and follow every single thing that Trump and the Republicans do. Would they rather have a government that rushes bad legislation just so they can say they did something?
The answer is yes.
Additionally, here are the reasons there are still Republicans in 2017:
-Identity politics / racism
-tax cuts