ImageImageImage

Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion)

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

gdog2004
Starter
Posts: 2,183
And1: 706
Joined: Jun 01, 2014
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1141 » by gdog2004 » Fri Dec 29, 2017 4:42 pm

Ericb5 wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:
Ericb5 wrote:

That’s true, but the circumstances are very different because the Sixers only need a 3rd best player, but the Celtics still need a best player.

You guys have two Robins and two potential Robins. The Sixers have one Batman, one potential Batman, and one potential Robin.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Kyrie Irving is in the running for MVP of the entire league. I would say he's Batman more than anyone else on the Sixers right now. (which is in part because Simmons and Embiid are rookies...skies the limit for them , but right now Kyrie is the man)


I think that Kyrie is what Kyrie is, which is a secondary star on a contender. He can be one of the best secondary stars in the league though, but shouldn’t have left LeBron.

I’d take Kyrie over Isaiah Thomas by a hair, and think that the Celtics are improved, but I still don’t think that they beat the Cavs in the playoffs.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Kyrie is one of the 10 best players in the league this year. Not sure how that doesn't make him a "star" .
OzCastiel
Senior
Posts: 500
And1: 531
Joined: Aug 24, 2017
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#1142 » by OzCastiel » Fri Dec 29, 2017 8:37 pm

PLO wrote:Jayson Tatum has the same wingspan as Markelle Fultz, and as far as shot-creation goes, Fultz crushes him with his arsenal of hesi pull-up jimbos and whatnot.

lord have mercy this is hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
dkj5061
Junior
Posts: 288
And1: 177
Joined: Jan 17, 2016
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#1143 » by dkj5061 » Fri Dec 29, 2017 9:57 pm

OzCastiel wrote:
PLO wrote:Jayson Tatum has the same wingspan as Markelle Fultz, and as far as shot-creation goes, Fultz crushes him with his arsenal of hesi pull-up jimbos and whatnot.

lord have mercy this is hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I don't think he's making the claim that Fultz is currently better than Tatum. It would be impossible to do so given how little Fultz has played and how well Tatum has played.

Working off only what is quoted, I'm not sure how its all that hilarious. The first statement is basically true (differing reports. Tatum might beat out Fultz by an inch, but it's clear Fultz has the better positional wingspan). The second statement is a bit of hyperbole, but Tatum is currently being assisted on over 50% of his shots (49.6 for 2's, 94.6 for 3's). Compared to any point guard, let alone one lauded for his shot creation pre-injury, that is a fairly small percentage of shots that Tatum is actually creating. Tatum is having a spectacular rookie year, but wings by default aren't the shot creators that point guards are.
PLO
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 1,306
Joined: Aug 04, 2016
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#1144 » by PLO » Fri Dec 29, 2017 10:20 pm

dkj5061 wrote:
OzCastiel wrote:
PLO wrote:Jayson Tatum has the same wingspan as Markelle Fultz, and as far as shot-creation goes, Fultz crushes him with his arsenal of hesi pull-up jimbos and whatnot.

lord have mercy this is hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I don't think he's making the claim that Fultz is currently better than Tatum. It would be impossible to do so given how little Fultz has played and how well Tatum has played.

Working off only what is quoted, I'm not sure how its all that hilarious. The first statement is basically true (differing reports. Tatum might beat out Fultz by an inch, but it's clear Fultz has the better positional wingspan). The second statement is a bit of hyperbole, but Tatum is currently being assisted on over 50% of his shots (49.6 for 2's, 94.6 for 3's). Compared to any point guard, let alone one lauded for his shot creation pre-injury, that is a fairly small percentage of shots that Tatum is actually creating. Tatum is having a spectacular rookie year, but wings by default aren't the shot creators that point guards are.


To add to that (and obviously I agree with you) - Fultz has been compared to James Harden at the same stage in terms of shot-creation - even just aesthetically both are pretty similar in terms of having that ability to "slow down" very quickly to create space for themselves. Boston didn't draft Tatum to be a shot-creator anyway, he's a wing meant to be a third or fourth option behind Kyrie, Horford and Brown. I saw some of the Celtics game yesterday and I came away yet again impressed by Tatum - but that doesn't really change my view on his long-term outlook or the fact I very strongly doubt he's going to be a primary option on a contending team at some stage during his career. However he is a quality starting player and that's something very rare to find only this far into a rookie's career.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.


shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,844
And1: 20,001
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1145 » by Kobblehead » Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:46 pm

Gs are usually predispositioned to be superior shot creators than bigger players, but I think Tatum is on the high end of shotcreating talents for the F spot. He hasn't been used in that way at the NBA level, but he's an isolation player at heart.
Kolkmania
Analyst
Posts: 3,463
And1: 1,737
Joined: Feb 11, 2015

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1146 » by Kolkmania » Sat Dec 30, 2017 4:13 pm

I somehow completely missed that Fultz is training with Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf. Guy had some Curry-esque seasons in his prime, searched for some video's and found this one. Kind of liked his methods, it's all about explosive movements, counters to counters and thinking out of the box and pushing yourself.



Fact that Markelle is working with him probably means that he's at least shooting again.
gdog2004
Starter
Posts: 2,183
And1: 706
Joined: Jun 01, 2014
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#1147 » by gdog2004 » Sat Dec 30, 2017 5:44 pm

PLO wrote:
dkj5061 wrote:
OzCastiel wrote: lord have mercy this is hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I don't think he's making the claim that Fultz is currently better than Tatum. It would be impossible to do so given how little Fultz has played and how well Tatum has played.

Working off only what is quoted, I'm not sure how its all that hilarious. The first statement is basically true (differing reports. Tatum might beat out Fultz by an inch, but it's clear Fultz has the better positional wingspan). The second statement is a bit of hyperbole, but Tatum is currently being assisted on over 50% of his shots (49.6 for 2's, 94.6 for 3's). Compared to any point guard, let alone one lauded for his shot creation pre-injury, that is a fairly small percentage of shots that Tatum is actually creating. Tatum is having a spectacular rookie year, but wings by default aren't the shot creators that point guards are.


To add to that (and obviously I agree with you) - Fultz has been compared to James Harden at the same stage in terms of shot-creation - even just aesthetically both are pretty similar in terms of having that ability to "slow down" very quickly to create space for themselves. Boston didn't draft Tatum to be a shot-creator anyway, he's a wing meant to be a third or fourth option behind Kyrie, Horford and Brown. I saw some of the Celtics game yesterday and I came away yet again impressed by Tatum - but that doesn't really change my view on his long-term outlook or the fact I very strongly doubt he's going to be a primary option on a contending team at some stage during his career. However he is a quality starting player and that's something very rare to find only this far into a rookie's career.


Sixer fans (and I am one) need to chill on Fultz until he actually gets on an NBA court and does something impressive.
Tatum has been great and is in the running for ROTY. I dont care if Fultz has longer arms, Tatum has done it ON AN NBA COURT.
Until Fultz actually plays at a high level on an NBA court, there really are no comparisons...YET
User avatar
BigSleep333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 1,632
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1148 » by BigSleep333 » Sat Dec 30, 2017 5:46 pm

still no footage of him shooting? im not interested in watching fultz stretching.
dkj5061
Junior
Posts: 288
And1: 177
Joined: Jan 17, 2016
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1149 » by dkj5061 » Sat Dec 30, 2017 5:53 pm

Kobblehead wrote:Gs are usually predispositioned to be superior shot creators than bigger players, but I think Tatum is on the high end of shotcreating talents for the F spot. He hasn't been used in that way at the NBA level, but he's an isolation player at heart.


Totally agree, Tatum showed a ton of shot creation potential at Duke and so far this season. I think the fact that he isn’t resorting to it so much has been a big driver of his success so far though.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,522
And1: 17,080
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1150 » by Negrodamus » Sat Dec 30, 2017 6:25 pm

Is today or tomorrow the three week mark? I’m sure we’ll get a satisfying update soon.
Witt
Ballboy
Posts: 3
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 29, 2017

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1151 » by Witt » Sat Dec 30, 2017 6:31 pm

Negrodamus wrote:Is today or tomorrow the three week mark? I’m sure we’ll get a satisfying update soon.

It's a fake injury plain and simple
User avatar
Mik317
RealGM
Posts: 41,284
And1: 19,915
Joined: May 31, 2005
Location: In Spain...without the S
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1152 » by Mik317 » Sat Dec 30, 2017 6:54 pm

Negrodamus wrote:Is today or tomorrow the three week mark? I’m sure we’ll get a satisfying update soon.

they already gave the update, no? He's begun to work w/ the team...ykno stuff he should have been started 3 weeks ago
#NeverGonnaBeGood
PLO
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 1,306
Joined: Aug 04, 2016
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#1153 » by PLO » Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:36 pm

gdog2004 wrote:
PLO wrote:
dkj5061 wrote:
I don't think he's making the claim that Fultz is currently better than Tatum. It would be impossible to do so given how little Fultz has played and how well Tatum has played.

Working off only what is quoted, I'm not sure how its all that hilarious. The first statement is basically true (differing reports. Tatum might beat out Fultz by an inch, but it's clear Fultz has the better positional wingspan). The second statement is a bit of hyperbole, but Tatum is currently being assisted on over 50% of his shots (49.6 for 2's, 94.6 for 3's). Compared to any point guard, let alone one lauded for his shot creation pre-injury, that is a fairly small percentage of shots that Tatum is actually creating. Tatum is having a spectacular rookie year, but wings by default aren't the shot creators that point guards are.


To add to that (and obviously I agree with you) - Fultz has been compared to James Harden at the same stage in terms of shot-creation - even just aesthetically both are pretty similar in terms of having that ability to "slow down" very quickly to create space for themselves. Boston didn't draft Tatum to be a shot-creator anyway, he's a wing meant to be a third or fourth option behind Kyrie, Horford and Brown. I saw some of the Celtics game yesterday and I came away yet again impressed by Tatum - but that doesn't really change my view on his long-term outlook or the fact I very strongly doubt he's going to be a primary option on a contending team at some stage during his career. However he is a quality starting player and that's something very rare to find only this far into a rookie's career.


Sixer fans (and I am one) need to chill on Fultz until he actually gets on an NBA court and does something impressive.
Tatum has been great and is in the running for ROTY. I dont care if Fultz has longer arms, Tatum has done it ON AN NBA COURT.
Until Fultz actually plays at a high level on an NBA court, there really are no comparisons...YET


The digression on the Fultz threads to Tatum largely has come about via trolling Celtics fans, and the odd (no pun intended) 76er fans who wanted to draft Lonzo Ball and/or Josh Jackson. However, even given both players will have pretty different roles they'll always be compared because of being in the same draft and because of the trade. Not sure you can really stop comparisons happening between the two in other words.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.


shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
Mulhollanddrive
RealGM
Posts: 12,555
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1154 » by Mulhollanddrive » Sun Dec 31, 2017 3:12 am

Is Fultz available for the right price, if so what would you want?
PhilasFinest
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 3,581
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1155 » by PhilasFinest » Sun Dec 31, 2017 3:12 am

Mulhollanddrive wrote:Is Fultz available for the right price, if so what would you want?


Don’t think Bryan Colangelo frequents the boards so not sure.
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 17,070
And1: 11,964
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1156 » by Arsenal » Sun Dec 31, 2017 3:17 am

Yeah Tatum is great, but I'm not sure he will ever be a primary scoring option on a contender. He'll definitely get into some all-star games though.

Right now he's killing it in a limited/complimentary role, which is a credit to him. Could definitely see him end up as good as a guy like Paul Pierce.
User avatar
Mik317
RealGM
Posts: 41,284
And1: 19,915
Joined: May 31, 2005
Location: In Spain...without the S
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1157 » by Mik317 » Sun Dec 31, 2017 3:29 am

Paul Pierce is probably a HOF and was a primary scoring option on a contender.
#NeverGonnaBeGood
CelticsWin5
Senior
Posts: 579
And1: 377
Joined: Nov 16, 2017

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1158 » by CelticsWin5 » Sun Dec 31, 2017 4:08 am

Arsenal wrote:Yeah Tatum is great, but I'm not sure he will ever be a primary scoring option on a contender. He'll definitely get into some all-star games though.

Right now he's killing it in a limited/complimentary role, which is a credit to him. Could definitely see him end up as good as a guy like Paul Pierce.

I could see it too, but I have to ask- did you think Pierce wasn’t a primary scoring option? Pierce is #15 on the all time scoring leaders list, ranked near names like Hakeem, Duncan, and Havlicek. Hard to call that complimentary...But I do agree with the rest of your comment that he will contend for all star games


About fultz - why haven’t the 76ers formally made statement or update about fultz? Might be wrong but I thought the 3 weeks evaluation period ended already? Been a little quiet on that end apart from that video of him stretching which isn’t much. a timetable of when he will return would be nice especially since they said his pain was gone a while ago...team is kind of treating fans poorly.
User avatar
JojoSlimbiid
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,317
And1: 2,239
Joined: Dec 03, 2016
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1159 » by JojoSlimbiid » Sun Dec 31, 2017 4:28 am

CelticsWin5 wrote:
Arsenal wrote:

About fultz - why haven’t the 76ers formally made statement or update about fultz? Might be wrong but I thought the 3 weeks evaluation period ended already? Been a little quiet on that end apart from that video of him stretching which isn’t much. a timetable of when he will return would be nice especially since they said his pain was gone a while ago...team is kind of treating fans poorly.


Why do you care how poorly the fans get treated or about Fultz's condition at all?

If you want an update check twitter or follow the beat writers. What exactly is the purpose of coming in here at all?
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 17,070
And1: 11,964
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: Now with more warnings than games played 

Post#1160 » by Arsenal » Sun Dec 31, 2017 4:31 am

CelticsWin5 wrote:
Arsenal wrote:Yeah Tatum is great, but I'm not sure he will ever be a primary scoring option on a contender. He'll definitely get into some all-star games though.

Right now he's killing it in a limited/complimentary role, which is a credit to him. Could definitely see him end up as good as a guy like Paul Pierce.

I could see it too, but I have to ask- did you think Pierce wasn’t a primary scoring option? Pierce is #15 on the all time scoring leaders list, ranked near names like Hakeem, Duncan, and Havlicek. Hard to call that complimentary...But I do agree with the rest of your comment that he will contend for all star games


About fultz - why haven’t the 76ers formally made statement or update about fultz? Might be wrong but I thought the 3 weeks evaluation period ended already? Been a little quiet on that end apart from that video of him stretching which isn’t much. a timetable of when he will return would be nice especially since they said his pain was gone a while ago...team is kind of treating fans poorly.


To me Paul Pierce is a borderline #1 guy for a contender. Even if you say he is (which I won't argue against much), I'm not sure Tatum tops out as good as Pierce. Obviously if he does that's fantastic for the Celtics.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers